Comparison of methods for selection of castor beans lineages

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Sartori, Maria Márcia Pereira [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Da Silva, Jackson [UNESP], Zanotto, Mauricio Dutra [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.14295/cs.v9i4.2970
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/232928
Resumo: The choice of the most appropriate method is determined by the precision desired by the researcher, by the ease of the analysis, as well as by the way of obtaining the data. In order to select lineages of low size and high productivity this study aimed to evaluate different methods of cluster analysis in the representation of genetic divergence, compared to univariate methods. The analyzed variables were grain yield, plant size and oil yield of 24 lineages of castor beans cultivated in the years 2014 and 2015. The Single and Average methods presented similar results in the formation of groups and different from the Complete. Evaluating the purpose of this research the Complete method and principal components analysis, together with the discriminant analysis, were considered the most appropriate methods to evaluate the genetic divergence of the castor bean crop. Lineages 18, 19 and 20 showed average grain yields above 1555 kg.ha-1, high oil content (above 46.9%), and low size plants (below 116 cm).
id UNSP_57fba598495bb530dc9895e59699d461
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/232928
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Comparison of methods for selection of castor beans lineagesGenetic divergenceGenotypesMultivariate statisticsPlant breedingRicinus communis L.The choice of the most appropriate method is determined by the precision desired by the researcher, by the ease of the analysis, as well as by the way of obtaining the data. In order to select lineages of low size and high productivity this study aimed to evaluate different methods of cluster analysis in the representation of genetic divergence, compared to univariate methods. The analyzed variables were grain yield, plant size and oil yield of 24 lineages of castor beans cultivated in the years 2014 and 2015. The Single and Average methods presented similar results in the formation of groups and different from the Complete. Evaluating the purpose of this research the Complete method and principal components analysis, together with the discriminant analysis, were considered the most appropriate methods to evaluate the genetic divergence of the castor bean crop. Lineages 18, 19 and 20 showed average grain yields above 1555 kg.ha-1, high oil content (above 46.9%), and low size plants (below 116 cm).São Paulo State UniversitySão Paulo State UniversityUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Sartori, Maria Márcia Pereira [UNESP]Da Silva, Jackson [UNESP]Zanotto, Mauricio Dutra [UNESP]2022-04-30T20:25:12Z2022-04-30T20:25:12Z2018-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article687-694http://dx.doi.org/10.14295/cs.v9i4.2970Comunicata Scientiae, v. 9, n. 4, p. 687-694, 2018.2176-9079http://hdl.handle.net/11449/23292810.14295/cs.v9i4.29702-s2.0-85074173883Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengComunicata Scientiaeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-04-30T15:56:54Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/232928Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-04-30T15:56:54Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison of methods for selection of castor beans lineages
title Comparison of methods for selection of castor beans lineages
spellingShingle Comparison of methods for selection of castor beans lineages
Sartori, Maria Márcia Pereira [UNESP]
Genetic divergence
Genotypes
Multivariate statistics
Plant breeding
Ricinus communis L.
title_short Comparison of methods for selection of castor beans lineages
title_full Comparison of methods for selection of castor beans lineages
title_fullStr Comparison of methods for selection of castor beans lineages
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of methods for selection of castor beans lineages
title_sort Comparison of methods for selection of castor beans lineages
author Sartori, Maria Márcia Pereira [UNESP]
author_facet Sartori, Maria Márcia Pereira [UNESP]
Da Silva, Jackson [UNESP]
Zanotto, Mauricio Dutra [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Da Silva, Jackson [UNESP]
Zanotto, Mauricio Dutra [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Sartori, Maria Márcia Pereira [UNESP]
Da Silva, Jackson [UNESP]
Zanotto, Mauricio Dutra [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Genetic divergence
Genotypes
Multivariate statistics
Plant breeding
Ricinus communis L.
topic Genetic divergence
Genotypes
Multivariate statistics
Plant breeding
Ricinus communis L.
description The choice of the most appropriate method is determined by the precision desired by the researcher, by the ease of the analysis, as well as by the way of obtaining the data. In order to select lineages of low size and high productivity this study aimed to evaluate different methods of cluster analysis in the representation of genetic divergence, compared to univariate methods. The analyzed variables were grain yield, plant size and oil yield of 24 lineages of castor beans cultivated in the years 2014 and 2015. The Single and Average methods presented similar results in the formation of groups and different from the Complete. Evaluating the purpose of this research the Complete method and principal components analysis, together with the discriminant analysis, were considered the most appropriate methods to evaluate the genetic divergence of the castor bean crop. Lineages 18, 19 and 20 showed average grain yields above 1555 kg.ha-1, high oil content (above 46.9%), and low size plants (below 116 cm).
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-01-01
2022-04-30T20:25:12Z
2022-04-30T20:25:12Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.14295/cs.v9i4.2970
Comunicata Scientiae, v. 9, n. 4, p. 687-694, 2018.
2176-9079
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/232928
10.14295/cs.v9i4.2970
2-s2.0-85074173883
url http://dx.doi.org/10.14295/cs.v9i4.2970
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/232928
identifier_str_mv Comunicata Scientiae, v. 9, n. 4, p. 687-694, 2018.
2176-9079
10.14295/cs.v9i4.2970
2-s2.0-85074173883
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Comunicata Scientiae
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 687-694
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799965071078588416