Comparison of Transpulmonary Thermodilution and Calibrated Pulse Contour Analysis with Pulmonary Artery Thermodilution Cardiac Output Measurements in Anesthetized Dogs

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Garofalo, N. A.
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Teixeira-Neto, F. J., Rodrigues, J. C., Cerejo, S. A., Aguiar, A J A, Becerra-Velásquez, D. R.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jvim.13984
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/170061
Resumo: BACKGROUND: Transpulmonary thermodilution (TPTDCO ) and calibrated pulse contour analysis (PCACO ) are alternatives to pulmonary artery thermodilution cardiac output (PATDCO ) measurement. HYPOTHESIS: Ten mL of ice-cold thermal indicator (TI10 ) would improve the agreement and trending ability between TPTDCO and PATDCO compared to 5 mL of indicator (TI5 ) (Phase-1). The agreement and TA between PCACO and PATDCO would be poor during changes in systemic vascular resistance (SVR) (Phase-2). ANIMALS: Eight clinically normal dogs (20.8-31.5 kg). METHODS: Prospective, experimental study. Simultaneous TPTDCO and PATDCO (averaged from 3 repetitions) using TI5 and TI10 were obtained during isoflurane anesthesia combined or not with remifentanil or dobutamine (Phase-1). Triplicate PCACO and PATDCO measurements were recorded during phenylephrine-induced vasoconstriction and nitroprusside-induced vasodilation (Phase-2). RESULTS: Mean bias (limits of agreement: LOA) (L/min), percentage bias (PB), and percentage error (PE) were 0.62 (-0.11 to 1.35), 16%, and 19% for TI5 ; and 0.33 (-0.25 to 0.91), 9%, and 16% for TI10 . Mean bias (LOA), PB, and PE were 0.22 (-0.63 to 1.07), 6%, and 23% during phenylephrine; and 2.12 (0.70-3.55), 43%, and 29% during nitroprusside. Mean angular bias (radial LOA) values were 2° (-10° to 14°) and -1° (-9° to 6°) for TI5 and TI10 , respectively (Phase-1), and 38° (5°-71°) (Phase-2). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Although TI10 slightly improves the agreement and trending ability between TPTDCO and PATDCO in comparison to TI5 , both volumes can be used for TPTDCO in replacement of PATDCO . Vasodilation worsens the agreement between PCACO and PATDCO . Because of PCACO 's poor agreement and trending ability with PATDCO during SVR changes, this method has limited clinical application.
id UNSP_580802957d0da1aec2e86309a6985f0b
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/170061
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Comparison of Transpulmonary Thermodilution and Calibrated Pulse Contour Analysis with Pulmonary Artery Thermodilution Cardiac Output Measurements in Anesthetized DogsIndicator dilution cardiac outputMonitoringPulse contour analysisBACKGROUND: Transpulmonary thermodilution (TPTDCO ) and calibrated pulse contour analysis (PCACO ) are alternatives to pulmonary artery thermodilution cardiac output (PATDCO ) measurement. HYPOTHESIS: Ten mL of ice-cold thermal indicator (TI10 ) would improve the agreement and trending ability between TPTDCO and PATDCO compared to 5 mL of indicator (TI5 ) (Phase-1). The agreement and TA between PCACO and PATDCO would be poor during changes in systemic vascular resistance (SVR) (Phase-2). ANIMALS: Eight clinically normal dogs (20.8-31.5 kg). METHODS: Prospective, experimental study. Simultaneous TPTDCO and PATDCO (averaged from 3 repetitions) using TI5 and TI10 were obtained during isoflurane anesthesia combined or not with remifentanil or dobutamine (Phase-1). Triplicate PCACO and PATDCO measurements were recorded during phenylephrine-induced vasoconstriction and nitroprusside-induced vasodilation (Phase-2). RESULTS: Mean bias (limits of agreement: LOA) (L/min), percentage bias (PB), and percentage error (PE) were 0.62 (-0.11 to 1.35), 16%, and 19% for TI5 ; and 0.33 (-0.25 to 0.91), 9%, and 16% for TI10 . Mean bias (LOA), PB, and PE were 0.22 (-0.63 to 1.07), 6%, and 23% during phenylephrine; and 2.12 (0.70-3.55), 43%, and 29% during nitroprusside. Mean angular bias (radial LOA) values were 2° (-10° to 14°) and -1° (-9° to 6°) for TI5 and TI10 , respectively (Phase-1), and 38° (5°-71°) (Phase-2). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Although TI10 slightly improves the agreement and trending ability between TPTDCO and PATDCO in comparison to TI5 , both volumes can be used for TPTDCO in replacement of PATDCO . Vasodilation worsens the agreement between PCACO and PATDCO . Because of PCACO 's poor agreement and trending ability with PATDCO during SVR changes, this method has limited clinical application.Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Botucatu, São Paulo, BrazilFaculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade Estadual Paulista, UNESP, Botucatu, São Paulo, BrazilUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Garofalo, N. A.Teixeira-Neto, F. J.Rodrigues, J. C.Cerejo, S. A.Aguiar, A J ABecerra-Velásquez, D. R.2018-12-11T16:48:58Z2018-12-11T16:48:58Z2016-07-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article941-950application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jvim.13984Journal of veterinary internal medicine, v. 30, n. 4, p. 941-950, 2016.1939-1676http://hdl.handle.net/11449/17006110.1111/jvim.139842-s2.0-850282817422-s2.0-85028281742.pdfScopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal of veterinary internal medicineinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-10-28T06:09:47Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/170061Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462023-10-28T06:09:47Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison of Transpulmonary Thermodilution and Calibrated Pulse Contour Analysis with Pulmonary Artery Thermodilution Cardiac Output Measurements in Anesthetized Dogs
title Comparison of Transpulmonary Thermodilution and Calibrated Pulse Contour Analysis with Pulmonary Artery Thermodilution Cardiac Output Measurements in Anesthetized Dogs
spellingShingle Comparison of Transpulmonary Thermodilution and Calibrated Pulse Contour Analysis with Pulmonary Artery Thermodilution Cardiac Output Measurements in Anesthetized Dogs
Garofalo, N. A.
Indicator dilution cardiac output
Monitoring
Pulse contour analysis
title_short Comparison of Transpulmonary Thermodilution and Calibrated Pulse Contour Analysis with Pulmonary Artery Thermodilution Cardiac Output Measurements in Anesthetized Dogs
title_full Comparison of Transpulmonary Thermodilution and Calibrated Pulse Contour Analysis with Pulmonary Artery Thermodilution Cardiac Output Measurements in Anesthetized Dogs
title_fullStr Comparison of Transpulmonary Thermodilution and Calibrated Pulse Contour Analysis with Pulmonary Artery Thermodilution Cardiac Output Measurements in Anesthetized Dogs
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Transpulmonary Thermodilution and Calibrated Pulse Contour Analysis with Pulmonary Artery Thermodilution Cardiac Output Measurements in Anesthetized Dogs
title_sort Comparison of Transpulmonary Thermodilution and Calibrated Pulse Contour Analysis with Pulmonary Artery Thermodilution Cardiac Output Measurements in Anesthetized Dogs
author Garofalo, N. A.
author_facet Garofalo, N. A.
Teixeira-Neto, F. J.
Rodrigues, J. C.
Cerejo, S. A.
Aguiar, A J A
Becerra-Velásquez, D. R.
author_role author
author2 Teixeira-Neto, F. J.
Rodrigues, J. C.
Cerejo, S. A.
Aguiar, A J A
Becerra-Velásquez, D. R.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Garofalo, N. A.
Teixeira-Neto, F. J.
Rodrigues, J. C.
Cerejo, S. A.
Aguiar, A J A
Becerra-Velásquez, D. R.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Indicator dilution cardiac output
Monitoring
Pulse contour analysis
topic Indicator dilution cardiac output
Monitoring
Pulse contour analysis
description BACKGROUND: Transpulmonary thermodilution (TPTDCO ) and calibrated pulse contour analysis (PCACO ) are alternatives to pulmonary artery thermodilution cardiac output (PATDCO ) measurement. HYPOTHESIS: Ten mL of ice-cold thermal indicator (TI10 ) would improve the agreement and trending ability between TPTDCO and PATDCO compared to 5 mL of indicator (TI5 ) (Phase-1). The agreement and TA between PCACO and PATDCO would be poor during changes in systemic vascular resistance (SVR) (Phase-2). ANIMALS: Eight clinically normal dogs (20.8-31.5 kg). METHODS: Prospective, experimental study. Simultaneous TPTDCO and PATDCO (averaged from 3 repetitions) using TI5 and TI10 were obtained during isoflurane anesthesia combined or not with remifentanil or dobutamine (Phase-1). Triplicate PCACO and PATDCO measurements were recorded during phenylephrine-induced vasoconstriction and nitroprusside-induced vasodilation (Phase-2). RESULTS: Mean bias (limits of agreement: LOA) (L/min), percentage bias (PB), and percentage error (PE) were 0.62 (-0.11 to 1.35), 16%, and 19% for TI5 ; and 0.33 (-0.25 to 0.91), 9%, and 16% for TI10 . Mean bias (LOA), PB, and PE were 0.22 (-0.63 to 1.07), 6%, and 23% during phenylephrine; and 2.12 (0.70-3.55), 43%, and 29% during nitroprusside. Mean angular bias (radial LOA) values were 2° (-10° to 14°) and -1° (-9° to 6°) for TI5 and TI10 , respectively (Phase-1), and 38° (5°-71°) (Phase-2). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Although TI10 slightly improves the agreement and trending ability between TPTDCO and PATDCO in comparison to TI5 , both volumes can be used for TPTDCO in replacement of PATDCO . Vasodilation worsens the agreement between PCACO and PATDCO . Because of PCACO 's poor agreement and trending ability with PATDCO during SVR changes, this method has limited clinical application.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-07-01
2018-12-11T16:48:58Z
2018-12-11T16:48:58Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jvim.13984
Journal of veterinary internal medicine, v. 30, n. 4, p. 941-950, 2016.
1939-1676
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/170061
10.1111/jvim.13984
2-s2.0-85028281742
2-s2.0-85028281742.pdf
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jvim.13984
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/170061
identifier_str_mv Journal of veterinary internal medicine, v. 30, n. 4, p. 941-950, 2016.
1939-1676
10.1111/jvim.13984
2-s2.0-85028281742
2-s2.0-85028281742.pdf
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Journal of veterinary internal medicine
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 941-950
application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1803649550740619264