Efficacy of anesthetic agents to delay pain onset after periodontal surgery.
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2011 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.2344/0003-3006-58.2.57 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/219717 |
Resumo: | The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of 2 anesthetic agents on patients' postoperative pain perception after periodontal surgery. For this parallel-group, double-blinded, randomized clinical trial, 36 open flap debridement surgeries were performed on patients who presented with periodontal disease with clinical signs of inflammation after nonsurgical treatment on at least 1 quadrant. Patients were allocated to 1 of the following groups: group 1, 2% lidocaine with 1100,000 epinephrine; group 2, 2% mepivacaine with 1100,000 norepinephrine. Pain intensity was assessed using the visual analog scale during the first 8 hours after surgery. All patients received 750-mg acetaminophen tablets, which they were instructed to take as a rescue medication if necessary. The results demonstrated that postoperative pain intensity was statistically lower in group 2 than in group 1 at the 1-, 2-, and 3-hour periods after surgery, although the pain intensity for all groups could be considered mild. In conclusion, patients in both groups reported similar mild pain after periodontal surgery. |
id |
UNSP_59973478448a42accb5fca4f70da5a94 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/219717 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Efficacy of anesthetic agents to delay pain onset after periodontal surgery.The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of 2 anesthetic agents on patients' postoperative pain perception after periodontal surgery. For this parallel-group, double-blinded, randomized clinical trial, 36 open flap debridement surgeries were performed on patients who presented with periodontal disease with clinical signs of inflammation after nonsurgical treatment on at least 1 quadrant. Patients were allocated to 1 of the following groups: group 1, 2% lidocaine with 1100,000 epinephrine; group 2, 2% mepivacaine with 1100,000 norepinephrine. Pain intensity was assessed using the visual analog scale during the first 8 hours after surgery. All patients received 750-mg acetaminophen tablets, which they were instructed to take as a rescue medication if necessary. The results demonstrated that postoperative pain intensity was statistically lower in group 2 than in group 1 at the 1-, 2-, and 3-hour periods after surgery, although the pain intensity for all groups could be considered mild. In conclusion, patients in both groups reported similar mild pain after periodontal surgery.University of São Paulo State, Araraquara, Brazil.Universidade de São Paulo (USP)Steffens, Joao PauloPochapski, Márcia ThaísSantos, Fábio AndréPilatti, Gibson Luiz2022-04-28T18:57:11Z2022-04-28T18:57:11Z2011-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article57-60http://dx.doi.org/10.2344/0003-3006-58.2.57Anesthesia progress, v. 58, n. 2, p. 57-60, 2011.0003-3006http://hdl.handle.net/11449/21971710.2344/0003-3006-58.2.572-s2.0-80052954479Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengAnesthesia progressinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-04-28T18:57:11Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/219717Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T19:08:37.349995Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Efficacy of anesthetic agents to delay pain onset after periodontal surgery. |
title |
Efficacy of anesthetic agents to delay pain onset after periodontal surgery. |
spellingShingle |
Efficacy of anesthetic agents to delay pain onset after periodontal surgery. Steffens, Joao Paulo |
title_short |
Efficacy of anesthetic agents to delay pain onset after periodontal surgery. |
title_full |
Efficacy of anesthetic agents to delay pain onset after periodontal surgery. |
title_fullStr |
Efficacy of anesthetic agents to delay pain onset after periodontal surgery. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Efficacy of anesthetic agents to delay pain onset after periodontal surgery. |
title_sort |
Efficacy of anesthetic agents to delay pain onset after periodontal surgery. |
author |
Steffens, Joao Paulo |
author_facet |
Steffens, Joao Paulo Pochapski, Márcia Thaís Santos, Fábio André Pilatti, Gibson Luiz |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Pochapski, Márcia Thaís Santos, Fábio André Pilatti, Gibson Luiz |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Steffens, Joao Paulo Pochapski, Márcia Thaís Santos, Fábio André Pilatti, Gibson Luiz |
description |
The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of 2 anesthetic agents on patients' postoperative pain perception after periodontal surgery. For this parallel-group, double-blinded, randomized clinical trial, 36 open flap debridement surgeries were performed on patients who presented with periodontal disease with clinical signs of inflammation after nonsurgical treatment on at least 1 quadrant. Patients were allocated to 1 of the following groups: group 1, 2% lidocaine with 1100,000 epinephrine; group 2, 2% mepivacaine with 1100,000 norepinephrine. Pain intensity was assessed using the visual analog scale during the first 8 hours after surgery. All patients received 750-mg acetaminophen tablets, which they were instructed to take as a rescue medication if necessary. The results demonstrated that postoperative pain intensity was statistically lower in group 2 than in group 1 at the 1-, 2-, and 3-hour periods after surgery, although the pain intensity for all groups could be considered mild. In conclusion, patients in both groups reported similar mild pain after periodontal surgery. |
publishDate |
2011 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2011-06-01 2022-04-28T18:57:11Z 2022-04-28T18:57:11Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.2344/0003-3006-58.2.57 Anesthesia progress, v. 58, n. 2, p. 57-60, 2011. 0003-3006 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/219717 10.2344/0003-3006-58.2.57 2-s2.0-80052954479 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.2344/0003-3006-58.2.57 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/219717 |
identifier_str_mv |
Anesthesia progress, v. 58, n. 2, p. 57-60, 2011. 0003-3006 10.2344/0003-3006-58.2.57 2-s2.0-80052954479 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Anesthesia progress |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
57-60 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808129024942145536 |