Effect of Spray Tips and Mix Deposition on Common Water Hyacinth Growing with Varied Population Arrangements of Salvinia and Water Lettuce

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: De Marchi, Sidnei Roberto
Data de Publicação: 2009
Outros Autores: Martins, D. [UNESP], Da Costa, N. V. [UNESP], Domingues, V. D. [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://www.apms.org/japm/JAPM_2009.html
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/5516
Resumo: Water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) and other free floating plants continue to cause significant management problems in Brazilian reservoirs constructed for power generation. Herbicide management for control of these free-floating plants is currently under evaluation. In this study we evaluated two types of spray tips (ConeJet TXVK-8 and TeeJet DG 11002 VS) and the amount of spray mix deposited onto water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) plants organized in different population arrangements with eared watermoss (Salvinia auriculata) and water lettuce (Pistia stratiotes) plants. In addition to a 100% water hyacinth arrangement, we tested arrangements with either eared watermoss or water lettuce at 75:25%, 50:50%, and 25:75%, plus a triple density with the three species placed equally at a 33% proportion. Dye solutions of FDC Yellow No. 5 at 3500 ppm and FDC Blue No. 1 at 1000 ppm were used as spraying tracers for TXVK-8 and DG 11002 VS nozzles, respectively. Both solutions were sprayed on the same plot at 30-min intervals through a CO(2) pressured backpack knapsack calibrated to deliver a spray volume around 200 L/ha. The TXVK-8 tip provided greater spray mix deposition when compared to the DG 11002VS tip, regardless of the plant proportions. For both spray tips, higher proportions of eared watermoss and the triple association among the plants provided the highest spray mix deposition on water hyacinth plants. The increase of spray mix deposition is likely related to the increase of eared watermoss or water lettuce as well as the decrease of water hyacinth plants in the association and consequent decreases of self covering among water hyacinth leaves. Lake managers should consider that improved herbicide uptake is possible through the choice of nozzle as well as applying herbicides to hyacinth before it forms dense monocultures or dense mixtures with other free-floating plants.
id UNSP_59bb7b1c4448b51f76fa3d74cefbab23
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/5516
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Effect of Spray Tips and Mix Deposition on Common Water Hyacinth Growing with Varied Population Arrangements of Salvinia and Water LettuceEichhornia crassipesnozzlePistia stratiotesSalvinia auriculataspray technologyWater hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) and other free floating plants continue to cause significant management problems in Brazilian reservoirs constructed for power generation. Herbicide management for control of these free-floating plants is currently under evaluation. In this study we evaluated two types of spray tips (ConeJet TXVK-8 and TeeJet DG 11002 VS) and the amount of spray mix deposited onto water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) plants organized in different population arrangements with eared watermoss (Salvinia auriculata) and water lettuce (Pistia stratiotes) plants. In addition to a 100% water hyacinth arrangement, we tested arrangements with either eared watermoss or water lettuce at 75:25%, 50:50%, and 25:75%, plus a triple density with the three species placed equally at a 33% proportion. Dye solutions of FDC Yellow No. 5 at 3500 ppm and FDC Blue No. 1 at 1000 ppm were used as spraying tracers for TXVK-8 and DG 11002 VS nozzles, respectively. Both solutions were sprayed on the same plot at 30-min intervals through a CO(2) pressured backpack knapsack calibrated to deliver a spray volume around 200 L/ha. The TXVK-8 tip provided greater spray mix deposition when compared to the DG 11002VS tip, regardless of the plant proportions. For both spray tips, higher proportions of eared watermoss and the triple association among the plants provided the highest spray mix deposition on water hyacinth plants. The increase of spray mix deposition is likely related to the increase of eared watermoss or water lettuce as well as the decrease of water hyacinth plants in the association and consequent decreases of self covering among water hyacinth leaves. Lake managers should consider that improved herbicide uptake is possible through the choice of nozzle as well as applying herbicides to hyacinth before it forms dense monocultures or dense mixtures with other free-floating plants.Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)UFMT, BR-78550000 Sinop, MT, BrazilUNESP, Fac Ciencias Agron, Dept Prod Vegetal Agr Fazenda Expt Lageado, BR-18610307 Botucatu, SP, BrazilUNESP, Fac Ciencias Agron, Dept Prod Vegetal Agr Fazenda Expt Lageado, BR-18610307 Botucatu, SP, BrazilAquatic Plant Management Soc, IncUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso (UFMT)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)De Marchi, Sidnei RobertoMartins, D. [UNESP]Da Costa, N. V. [UNESP]Domingues, V. D. [UNESP]2014-05-20T13:20:08Z2014-05-20T13:20:08Z2009-07-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article110-115http://www.apms.org/japm/JAPM_2009.htmlJournal of Aquatic Plant Management. Lehigh Acres: Aquatic Plant Management Soc, Inc, v. 47, p. 110-115, 2009.0146-6623http://hdl.handle.net/11449/5516WOS:0002722049000042340617938554636Web of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal of Aquatic Plant Management0.2750,300info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-04-30T19:28:29Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/5516Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-04-30T19:28:29Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Effect of Spray Tips and Mix Deposition on Common Water Hyacinth Growing with Varied Population Arrangements of Salvinia and Water Lettuce
title Effect of Spray Tips and Mix Deposition on Common Water Hyacinth Growing with Varied Population Arrangements of Salvinia and Water Lettuce
spellingShingle Effect of Spray Tips and Mix Deposition on Common Water Hyacinth Growing with Varied Population Arrangements of Salvinia and Water Lettuce
De Marchi, Sidnei Roberto
Eichhornia crassipes
nozzle
Pistia stratiotes
Salvinia auriculata
spray technology
title_short Effect of Spray Tips and Mix Deposition on Common Water Hyacinth Growing with Varied Population Arrangements of Salvinia and Water Lettuce
title_full Effect of Spray Tips and Mix Deposition on Common Water Hyacinth Growing with Varied Population Arrangements of Salvinia and Water Lettuce
title_fullStr Effect of Spray Tips and Mix Deposition on Common Water Hyacinth Growing with Varied Population Arrangements of Salvinia and Water Lettuce
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Spray Tips and Mix Deposition on Common Water Hyacinth Growing with Varied Population Arrangements of Salvinia and Water Lettuce
title_sort Effect of Spray Tips and Mix Deposition on Common Water Hyacinth Growing with Varied Population Arrangements of Salvinia and Water Lettuce
author De Marchi, Sidnei Roberto
author_facet De Marchi, Sidnei Roberto
Martins, D. [UNESP]
Da Costa, N. V. [UNESP]
Domingues, V. D. [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Martins, D. [UNESP]
Da Costa, N. V. [UNESP]
Domingues, V. D. [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso (UFMT)
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv De Marchi, Sidnei Roberto
Martins, D. [UNESP]
Da Costa, N. V. [UNESP]
Domingues, V. D. [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Eichhornia crassipes
nozzle
Pistia stratiotes
Salvinia auriculata
spray technology
topic Eichhornia crassipes
nozzle
Pistia stratiotes
Salvinia auriculata
spray technology
description Water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) and other free floating plants continue to cause significant management problems in Brazilian reservoirs constructed for power generation. Herbicide management for control of these free-floating plants is currently under evaluation. In this study we evaluated two types of spray tips (ConeJet TXVK-8 and TeeJet DG 11002 VS) and the amount of spray mix deposited onto water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) plants organized in different population arrangements with eared watermoss (Salvinia auriculata) and water lettuce (Pistia stratiotes) plants. In addition to a 100% water hyacinth arrangement, we tested arrangements with either eared watermoss or water lettuce at 75:25%, 50:50%, and 25:75%, plus a triple density with the three species placed equally at a 33% proportion. Dye solutions of FDC Yellow No. 5 at 3500 ppm and FDC Blue No. 1 at 1000 ppm were used as spraying tracers for TXVK-8 and DG 11002 VS nozzles, respectively. Both solutions were sprayed on the same plot at 30-min intervals through a CO(2) pressured backpack knapsack calibrated to deliver a spray volume around 200 L/ha. The TXVK-8 tip provided greater spray mix deposition when compared to the DG 11002VS tip, regardless of the plant proportions. For both spray tips, higher proportions of eared watermoss and the triple association among the plants provided the highest spray mix deposition on water hyacinth plants. The increase of spray mix deposition is likely related to the increase of eared watermoss or water lettuce as well as the decrease of water hyacinth plants in the association and consequent decreases of self covering among water hyacinth leaves. Lake managers should consider that improved herbicide uptake is possible through the choice of nozzle as well as applying herbicides to hyacinth before it forms dense monocultures or dense mixtures with other free-floating plants.
publishDate 2009
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2009-07-01
2014-05-20T13:20:08Z
2014-05-20T13:20:08Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www.apms.org/japm/JAPM_2009.html
Journal of Aquatic Plant Management. Lehigh Acres: Aquatic Plant Management Soc, Inc, v. 47, p. 110-115, 2009.
0146-6623
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/5516
WOS:000272204900004
2340617938554636
url http://www.apms.org/japm/JAPM_2009.html
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/5516
identifier_str_mv Journal of Aquatic Plant Management. Lehigh Acres: Aquatic Plant Management Soc, Inc, v. 47, p. 110-115, 2009.
0146-6623
WOS:000272204900004
2340617938554636
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Aquatic Plant Management
0.275
0,300
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 110-115
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Aquatic Plant Management Soc, Inc
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Aquatic Plant Management Soc, Inc
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Web of Science
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1803046358965288960