Stocking densities and feeding strategies in shrimp and tilapia polyculture in tanks

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Simão, Bruno Rodrigo
Data de Publicação: 2013
Outros Autores: Brito, Luis Otavio, Maia, Alex Sandro Campos [UNESP], Miranda, Laizy Cabral, Azevedo, Celicina Maria Da Silveira Borges
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2013000800039
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/109442
Resumo: The objective of this work was to evaluate the performance of Pacific marine shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) and tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus), in a polyculture in tanks subjected to different stocking densities and feeding strategies, in comparison with monoculture. Two experiments were performed, at the same time, in a completely randomized design with three treatments and four replicates each. Treatments for experiment I were: monoculture with 10 shrimp per m² (10S:0T); polyculture with 10 shrimp and 0.5 tilapia per m² (10S:0.5T); and polyculture with 10 shrimp and 1 tilapia per m² (10S:1T). Shrimp was the main crop, and feed was provided based on shrimp biomass. Treatments for experiment II were: monoculture with 2 tilapia per m² (2T:0S); polyculture with 2 tilapia and 2.5 shrimp per m² (2T:2.5S); and polyculture with 2 tilapia and 5 shrimp per m² (2T:5S). Tilapia was the main crop, and feed was provided based on fish requirements. In the experiment I, tilapia introduction to shrimp culture resulted in lower shrimp growth and poor feed conversion rate. In experiment II, shrimp introduction to tilapia culture did not interfere with fish performance. Polyculture is more efficient with the combination of 2 tilapia and 2.5 or 5 shrimp per m² and feed based on fish requirements.
id UNSP_5a599cca096a1bc789477a7fee060688
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/109442
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Stocking densities and feeding strategies in shrimp and tilapia polyculture in tanksDensidades de estocagem e estratégias de alimentação em policultivo de camarão e tilápia em tanquesLitopenaeus vannameiOreochromis niloticuseficiência aquícolaestratégia de alimentaçãoLitopenaeus vannameiOreochromis niloticusaquaculture efficiencyfeeding strategieThe objective of this work was to evaluate the performance of Pacific marine shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) and tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus), in a polyculture in tanks subjected to different stocking densities and feeding strategies, in comparison with monoculture. Two experiments were performed, at the same time, in a completely randomized design with three treatments and four replicates each. Treatments for experiment I were: monoculture with 10 shrimp per m² (10S:0T); polyculture with 10 shrimp and 0.5 tilapia per m² (10S:0.5T); and polyculture with 10 shrimp and 1 tilapia per m² (10S:1T). Shrimp was the main crop, and feed was provided based on shrimp biomass. Treatments for experiment II were: monoculture with 2 tilapia per m² (2T:0S); polyculture with 2 tilapia and 2.5 shrimp per m² (2T:2.5S); and polyculture with 2 tilapia and 5 shrimp per m² (2T:5S). Tilapia was the main crop, and feed was provided based on fish requirements. In the experiment I, tilapia introduction to shrimp culture resulted in lower shrimp growth and poor feed conversion rate. In experiment II, shrimp introduction to tilapia culture did not interfere with fish performance. Polyculture is more efficient with the combination of 2 tilapia and 2.5 or 5 shrimp per m² and feed based on fish requirements.O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar o desempenho de camarão marinho (Litopenaeus vannamei) e tilápia (Oreochromis niloticus) em policultivo, em tanques de cimento, submetido a diferentes densidades de estocagem e estratégias de alimentação, em comparação ao monocultivo. Dois experimentos foram conduzidos, ao mesmo tempo, em delineamento inteiramente casualizado, com três tratamentos e quatro repetições cada um. Os tratamentos do experimento I foram: monocultivo com 10 camarões por m² (10S:0T); policultivo com 10 camarões e 0,5 tilápia por m² (10S:0.5T); e policultivo com 10 camarões e 1 tilápia por m² (10S:1T). O camarão foi a principal cultura, e a alimentação fornecida foi baseada na biomassa de camarão. Os tratamentos do experimento II foram: monocultivo com 2 tilápias por m² (2T:0S); policultivo com 2 tilápias e 2,5 camarões por m² (2T:2.5S); e policultivo com 2 tilápias e 5 camarões por m² (2T:5S). A tilápia foi a principal cultura, e a alimentação fornecida foi baseada na necessidade dos peixes. No experimento I, a introdução da tilápia no cultivo de camarão resultou em baixo crescimento do camarão e baixa taxa de conversão alimentar. No experimento II, a introdução de camarão no cultivo de tilápia não interferiu no desempenho dos peixes. O policultivo é mais eficiente com a combinação de 2 tilápias e 2,5 ou 5 camarões por m² e alimentação baseada na necessidade dos peixes.Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido Departamento de Ciências AmbientaisInstituto Agronômico de PernambucoUniversidade Estadual Paulista Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias Departamento de ZootecniaUfersa Departamento de Ciências AnimaisUniversidade Estadual Paulista Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias Departamento de ZootecniaEmpresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (EMBRAPA)Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)Instituto Agronômico de PernambucoUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Simão, Bruno RodrigoBrito, Luis OtavioMaia, Alex Sandro Campos [UNESP]Miranda, Laizy CabralAzevedo, Celicina Maria Da Silveira Borges2014-09-30T18:18:20Z2014-09-30T18:18:20Z2013-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article1088-1095application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2013000800039Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira. Embrapa Informação TecnológicaPesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, v. 48, n. 8, p. 1088-1095, 2013.0100-204Xhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/10944210.1590/S0100-204X2013000800039S0100-204X2013000800042WOS:000327752300042S0100-204X2013000800042.pdfSciELOreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengPesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira0.546info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-06-07T18:43:05Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/109442Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T20:03:24.465370Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Stocking densities and feeding strategies in shrimp and tilapia polyculture in tanks
Densidades de estocagem e estratégias de alimentação em policultivo de camarão e tilápia em tanques
title Stocking densities and feeding strategies in shrimp and tilapia polyculture in tanks
spellingShingle Stocking densities and feeding strategies in shrimp and tilapia polyculture in tanks
Simão, Bruno Rodrigo
Litopenaeus vannamei
Oreochromis niloticus
eficiência aquícola
estratégia de alimentação
Litopenaeus vannamei
Oreochromis niloticus
aquaculture efficiency
feeding strategie
title_short Stocking densities and feeding strategies in shrimp and tilapia polyculture in tanks
title_full Stocking densities and feeding strategies in shrimp and tilapia polyculture in tanks
title_fullStr Stocking densities and feeding strategies in shrimp and tilapia polyculture in tanks
title_full_unstemmed Stocking densities and feeding strategies in shrimp and tilapia polyculture in tanks
title_sort Stocking densities and feeding strategies in shrimp and tilapia polyculture in tanks
author Simão, Bruno Rodrigo
author_facet Simão, Bruno Rodrigo
Brito, Luis Otavio
Maia, Alex Sandro Campos [UNESP]
Miranda, Laizy Cabral
Azevedo, Celicina Maria Da Silveira Borges
author_role author
author2 Brito, Luis Otavio
Maia, Alex Sandro Campos [UNESP]
Miranda, Laizy Cabral
Azevedo, Celicina Maria Da Silveira Borges
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
Instituto Agronômico de Pernambuco
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Simão, Bruno Rodrigo
Brito, Luis Otavio
Maia, Alex Sandro Campos [UNESP]
Miranda, Laizy Cabral
Azevedo, Celicina Maria Da Silveira Borges
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Litopenaeus vannamei
Oreochromis niloticus
eficiência aquícola
estratégia de alimentação
Litopenaeus vannamei
Oreochromis niloticus
aquaculture efficiency
feeding strategie
topic Litopenaeus vannamei
Oreochromis niloticus
eficiência aquícola
estratégia de alimentação
Litopenaeus vannamei
Oreochromis niloticus
aquaculture efficiency
feeding strategie
description The objective of this work was to evaluate the performance of Pacific marine shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) and tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus), in a polyculture in tanks subjected to different stocking densities and feeding strategies, in comparison with monoculture. Two experiments were performed, at the same time, in a completely randomized design with three treatments and four replicates each. Treatments for experiment I were: monoculture with 10 shrimp per m² (10S:0T); polyculture with 10 shrimp and 0.5 tilapia per m² (10S:0.5T); and polyculture with 10 shrimp and 1 tilapia per m² (10S:1T). Shrimp was the main crop, and feed was provided based on shrimp biomass. Treatments for experiment II were: monoculture with 2 tilapia per m² (2T:0S); polyculture with 2 tilapia and 2.5 shrimp per m² (2T:2.5S); and polyculture with 2 tilapia and 5 shrimp per m² (2T:5S). Tilapia was the main crop, and feed was provided based on fish requirements. In the experiment I, tilapia introduction to shrimp culture resulted in lower shrimp growth and poor feed conversion rate. In experiment II, shrimp introduction to tilapia culture did not interfere with fish performance. Polyculture is more efficient with the combination of 2 tilapia and 2.5 or 5 shrimp per m² and feed based on fish requirements.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-08-01
2014-09-30T18:18:20Z
2014-09-30T18:18:20Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2013000800039
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira. Embrapa Informação TecnológicaPesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, v. 48, n. 8, p. 1088-1095, 2013.
0100-204X
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/109442
10.1590/S0100-204X2013000800039
S0100-204X2013000800042
WOS:000327752300042
S0100-204X2013000800042.pdf
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2013000800039
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/109442
identifier_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira. Embrapa Informação TecnológicaPesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, v. 48, n. 8, p. 1088-1095, 2013.
0100-204X
10.1590/S0100-204X2013000800039
S0100-204X2013000800042
WOS:000327752300042
S0100-204X2013000800042.pdf
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira
0.546
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 1088-1095
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (EMBRAPA)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (EMBRAPA)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv SciELO
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808129155407020032

Registros relacionados