Open flap debridement compared to repeated applications of photodynamic therapy in the treatment of residual pockets: A randomized clinical trial
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/JPER.22-0059 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/240180 |
Resumo: | Background: The aim of the present study was to compare repeated applications of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) to open flap debridement (OFD) in the treatment of residual periodontal pockets in non-furcation sites. Methods: Forty-six subjects with a diagnosis of Stage III or IV Grade C periodontitis, that had been previously treated, participated in the study. Residual pockets were divided between two groups: (1) aPDT group: received ultrasonic periodontal debridement followed by immediate application of aPDT, and repeated on1st, 2nd, 7th, and 14th days; and (2) OFD group: treated by modified papilla preservation technique, where granulation tissue and visible calculus were removed with hand curettes and an ultrasonic device. Clinical, immunological, and microbiological parameters were evaluated before and after treatment. Results: Both treatments were effective reducing clinical parameters of disease. OFD resulted in a greater mean probing pocket depths (PPD) reduction in deep pockets (p = 0.001). However, aPDT resulted in a lower occurrence of gingival recession (GR), dentin hypersensitivity (DH) and analgesic intake. Reduction in Porphyromonas gingivalis was observed in both groups. Only the OFD group had a significant reduction in Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans. aPDT group had greater increase in interleukin 10 (IL-10) levels and a greater reduction of interleukin 1 beta (IL-1β) at 14 days when compared to the OFD group (p < 0.05). Conclusion: OFD was superior in reducing PPD in deep pockets compared to the aPDT. However, OFD resulted in greater GR. Both treatments lowered P. gingivalis levels but only OFD reduced levels of A. actinomycemtemcomitans. |
id |
UNSP_5a7752f6518e7a6014294d2d64d5828d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/240180 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Open flap debridement compared to repeated applications of photodynamic therapy in the treatment of residual pockets: A randomized clinical trialantiinfective agentsgingival recessionperiodontal debridementperiodontal pocketperiodontitisphotodynamic therapysurgical procedureultrasonicBackground: The aim of the present study was to compare repeated applications of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) to open flap debridement (OFD) in the treatment of residual periodontal pockets in non-furcation sites. Methods: Forty-six subjects with a diagnosis of Stage III or IV Grade C periodontitis, that had been previously treated, participated in the study. Residual pockets were divided between two groups: (1) aPDT group: received ultrasonic periodontal debridement followed by immediate application of aPDT, and repeated on1st, 2nd, 7th, and 14th days; and (2) OFD group: treated by modified papilla preservation technique, where granulation tissue and visible calculus were removed with hand curettes and an ultrasonic device. Clinical, immunological, and microbiological parameters were evaluated before and after treatment. Results: Both treatments were effective reducing clinical parameters of disease. OFD resulted in a greater mean probing pocket depths (PPD) reduction in deep pockets (p = 0.001). However, aPDT resulted in a lower occurrence of gingival recession (GR), dentin hypersensitivity (DH) and analgesic intake. Reduction in Porphyromonas gingivalis was observed in both groups. Only the OFD group had a significant reduction in Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans. aPDT group had greater increase in interleukin 10 (IL-10) levels and a greater reduction of interleukin 1 beta (IL-1β) at 14 days when compared to the OFD group (p < 0.05). Conclusion: OFD was superior in reducing PPD in deep pockets compared to the aPDT. However, OFD resulted in greater GR. Both treatments lowered P. gingivalis levels but only OFD reduced levels of A. actinomycemtemcomitans.Division of Periodontics Institute of Science and Technology São Paulo State University (Unesp), São PauloDental Research Division Guarulhos University (UNG), São PauloDivision of Periodontics Piracicaba Dental School University of Campinas (Unicamp), São PauloDivision of Periodontology College of Dentistry University of KentuckyDivision of Periodontics Institute of Science and Technology São Paulo State University (Unesp), São PauloUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Guarulhos University (UNG)Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)University of KentuckyAndere, Naira M. R. B. [UNESP]Santos, Nídia C. Castro dos [UNESP]Araújo, Cássia F. [UNESP]Paz, Hélvis E. S.Shaddox, Luciana M.Casarin, Renato C. V.Santamaria, Mauro P. [UNESP]2023-03-01T20:05:03Z2023-03-01T20:05:03Z2022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/JPER.22-0059Journal of Periodontology.0022-3492http://hdl.handle.net/11449/24018010.1002/JPER.22-00592-s2.0-85131294257Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal of Periodontologyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-03-01T20:05:03Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/240180Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T23:18:14.592525Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Open flap debridement compared to repeated applications of photodynamic therapy in the treatment of residual pockets: A randomized clinical trial |
title |
Open flap debridement compared to repeated applications of photodynamic therapy in the treatment of residual pockets: A randomized clinical trial |
spellingShingle |
Open flap debridement compared to repeated applications of photodynamic therapy in the treatment of residual pockets: A randomized clinical trial Andere, Naira M. R. B. [UNESP] antiinfective agents gingival recession periodontal debridement periodontal pocket periodontitis photodynamic therapy surgical procedure ultrasonic |
title_short |
Open flap debridement compared to repeated applications of photodynamic therapy in the treatment of residual pockets: A randomized clinical trial |
title_full |
Open flap debridement compared to repeated applications of photodynamic therapy in the treatment of residual pockets: A randomized clinical trial |
title_fullStr |
Open flap debridement compared to repeated applications of photodynamic therapy in the treatment of residual pockets: A randomized clinical trial |
title_full_unstemmed |
Open flap debridement compared to repeated applications of photodynamic therapy in the treatment of residual pockets: A randomized clinical trial |
title_sort |
Open flap debridement compared to repeated applications of photodynamic therapy in the treatment of residual pockets: A randomized clinical trial |
author |
Andere, Naira M. R. B. [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Andere, Naira M. R. B. [UNESP] Santos, Nídia C. Castro dos [UNESP] Araújo, Cássia F. [UNESP] Paz, Hélvis E. S. Shaddox, Luciana M. Casarin, Renato C. V. Santamaria, Mauro P. [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Santos, Nídia C. Castro dos [UNESP] Araújo, Cássia F. [UNESP] Paz, Hélvis E. S. Shaddox, Luciana M. Casarin, Renato C. V. Santamaria, Mauro P. [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) Guarulhos University (UNG) Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) University of Kentucky |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Andere, Naira M. R. B. [UNESP] Santos, Nídia C. Castro dos [UNESP] Araújo, Cássia F. [UNESP] Paz, Hélvis E. S. Shaddox, Luciana M. Casarin, Renato C. V. Santamaria, Mauro P. [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
antiinfective agents gingival recession periodontal debridement periodontal pocket periodontitis photodynamic therapy surgical procedure ultrasonic |
topic |
antiinfective agents gingival recession periodontal debridement periodontal pocket periodontitis photodynamic therapy surgical procedure ultrasonic |
description |
Background: The aim of the present study was to compare repeated applications of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) to open flap debridement (OFD) in the treatment of residual periodontal pockets in non-furcation sites. Methods: Forty-six subjects with a diagnosis of Stage III or IV Grade C periodontitis, that had been previously treated, participated in the study. Residual pockets were divided between two groups: (1) aPDT group: received ultrasonic periodontal debridement followed by immediate application of aPDT, and repeated on1st, 2nd, 7th, and 14th days; and (2) OFD group: treated by modified papilla preservation technique, where granulation tissue and visible calculus were removed with hand curettes and an ultrasonic device. Clinical, immunological, and microbiological parameters were evaluated before and after treatment. Results: Both treatments were effective reducing clinical parameters of disease. OFD resulted in a greater mean probing pocket depths (PPD) reduction in deep pockets (p = 0.001). However, aPDT resulted in a lower occurrence of gingival recession (GR), dentin hypersensitivity (DH) and analgesic intake. Reduction in Porphyromonas gingivalis was observed in both groups. Only the OFD group had a significant reduction in Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans. aPDT group had greater increase in interleukin 10 (IL-10) levels and a greater reduction of interleukin 1 beta (IL-1β) at 14 days when compared to the OFD group (p < 0.05). Conclusion: OFD was superior in reducing PPD in deep pockets compared to the aPDT. However, OFD resulted in greater GR. Both treatments lowered P. gingivalis levels but only OFD reduced levels of A. actinomycemtemcomitans. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-01-01 2023-03-01T20:05:03Z 2023-03-01T20:05:03Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/JPER.22-0059 Journal of Periodontology. 0022-3492 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/240180 10.1002/JPER.22-0059 2-s2.0-85131294257 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/JPER.22-0059 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/240180 |
identifier_str_mv |
Journal of Periodontology. 0022-3492 10.1002/JPER.22-0059 2-s2.0-85131294257 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Periodontology |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808129505377648640 |