Open flap debridement compared to repeated applications of photodynamic therapy in the treatment of residual pockets: A randomized clinical trial

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Andere, Naira M. R. B. [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Santos, Nídia C. Castro dos [UNESP], Araújo, Cássia F. [UNESP], Paz, Hélvis E. S., Shaddox, Luciana M., Casarin, Renato C. V., Santamaria, Mauro P. [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/JPER.22-0059
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/240180
Resumo: Background: The aim of the present study was to compare repeated applications of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) to open flap debridement (OFD) in the treatment of residual periodontal pockets in non-furcation sites. Methods: Forty-six subjects with a diagnosis of Stage III or IV Grade C periodontitis, that had been previously treated, participated in the study. Residual pockets were divided between two groups: (1) aPDT group: received ultrasonic periodontal debridement followed by immediate application of aPDT, and repeated on1st, 2nd, 7th, and 14th days; and (2) OFD group: treated by modified papilla preservation technique, where granulation tissue and visible calculus were removed with hand curettes and an ultrasonic device. Clinical, immunological, and microbiological parameters were evaluated before and after treatment. Results: Both treatments were effective reducing clinical parameters of disease. OFD resulted in a greater mean probing pocket depths (PPD) reduction in deep pockets (p = 0.001). However, aPDT resulted in a lower occurrence of gingival recession (GR), dentin hypersensitivity (DH) and analgesic intake. Reduction in Porphyromonas gingivalis was observed in both groups. Only the OFD group had a significant reduction in Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans. aPDT group had greater increase in interleukin 10 (IL-10) levels and a greater reduction of interleukin 1 beta (IL-1β) at 14 days when compared to the OFD group (p < 0.05). Conclusion: OFD was superior in reducing PPD in deep pockets compared to the aPDT. However, OFD resulted in greater GR. Both treatments lowered P. gingivalis levels but only OFD reduced levels of A. actinomycemtemcomitans.
id UNSP_5a7752f6518e7a6014294d2d64d5828d
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/240180
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Open flap debridement compared to repeated applications of photodynamic therapy in the treatment of residual pockets: A randomized clinical trialantiinfective agentsgingival recessionperiodontal debridementperiodontal pocketperiodontitisphotodynamic therapysurgical procedureultrasonicBackground: The aim of the present study was to compare repeated applications of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) to open flap debridement (OFD) in the treatment of residual periodontal pockets in non-furcation sites. Methods: Forty-six subjects with a diagnosis of Stage III or IV Grade C periodontitis, that had been previously treated, participated in the study. Residual pockets were divided between two groups: (1) aPDT group: received ultrasonic periodontal debridement followed by immediate application of aPDT, and repeated on1st, 2nd, 7th, and 14th days; and (2) OFD group: treated by modified papilla preservation technique, where granulation tissue and visible calculus were removed with hand curettes and an ultrasonic device. Clinical, immunological, and microbiological parameters were evaluated before and after treatment. Results: Both treatments were effective reducing clinical parameters of disease. OFD resulted in a greater mean probing pocket depths (PPD) reduction in deep pockets (p = 0.001). However, aPDT resulted in a lower occurrence of gingival recession (GR), dentin hypersensitivity (DH) and analgesic intake. Reduction in Porphyromonas gingivalis was observed in both groups. Only the OFD group had a significant reduction in Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans. aPDT group had greater increase in interleukin 10 (IL-10) levels and a greater reduction of interleukin 1 beta (IL-1β) at 14 days when compared to the OFD group (p < 0.05). Conclusion: OFD was superior in reducing PPD in deep pockets compared to the aPDT. However, OFD resulted in greater GR. Both treatments lowered P. gingivalis levels but only OFD reduced levels of A. actinomycemtemcomitans.Division of Periodontics Institute of Science and Technology São Paulo State University (Unesp), São PauloDental Research Division Guarulhos University (UNG), São PauloDivision of Periodontics Piracicaba Dental School University of Campinas (Unicamp), São PauloDivision of Periodontology College of Dentistry University of KentuckyDivision of Periodontics Institute of Science and Technology São Paulo State University (Unesp), São PauloUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Guarulhos University (UNG)Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)University of KentuckyAndere, Naira M. R. B. [UNESP]Santos, Nídia C. Castro dos [UNESP]Araújo, Cássia F. [UNESP]Paz, Hélvis E. S.Shaddox, Luciana M.Casarin, Renato C. V.Santamaria, Mauro P. [UNESP]2023-03-01T20:05:03Z2023-03-01T20:05:03Z2022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/JPER.22-0059Journal of Periodontology.0022-3492http://hdl.handle.net/11449/24018010.1002/JPER.22-00592-s2.0-85131294257Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal of Periodontologyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-03-01T20:05:03Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/240180Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T23:18:14.592525Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Open flap debridement compared to repeated applications of photodynamic therapy in the treatment of residual pockets: A randomized clinical trial
title Open flap debridement compared to repeated applications of photodynamic therapy in the treatment of residual pockets: A randomized clinical trial
spellingShingle Open flap debridement compared to repeated applications of photodynamic therapy in the treatment of residual pockets: A randomized clinical trial
Andere, Naira M. R. B. [UNESP]
antiinfective agents
gingival recession
periodontal debridement
periodontal pocket
periodontitis
photodynamic therapy
surgical procedure
ultrasonic
title_short Open flap debridement compared to repeated applications of photodynamic therapy in the treatment of residual pockets: A randomized clinical trial
title_full Open flap debridement compared to repeated applications of photodynamic therapy in the treatment of residual pockets: A randomized clinical trial
title_fullStr Open flap debridement compared to repeated applications of photodynamic therapy in the treatment of residual pockets: A randomized clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Open flap debridement compared to repeated applications of photodynamic therapy in the treatment of residual pockets: A randomized clinical trial
title_sort Open flap debridement compared to repeated applications of photodynamic therapy in the treatment of residual pockets: A randomized clinical trial
author Andere, Naira M. R. B. [UNESP]
author_facet Andere, Naira M. R. B. [UNESP]
Santos, Nídia C. Castro dos [UNESP]
Araújo, Cássia F. [UNESP]
Paz, Hélvis E. S.
Shaddox, Luciana M.
Casarin, Renato C. V.
Santamaria, Mauro P. [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Santos, Nídia C. Castro dos [UNESP]
Araújo, Cássia F. [UNESP]
Paz, Hélvis E. S.
Shaddox, Luciana M.
Casarin, Renato C. V.
Santamaria, Mauro P. [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
Guarulhos University (UNG)
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
University of Kentucky
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Andere, Naira M. R. B. [UNESP]
Santos, Nídia C. Castro dos [UNESP]
Araújo, Cássia F. [UNESP]
Paz, Hélvis E. S.
Shaddox, Luciana M.
Casarin, Renato C. V.
Santamaria, Mauro P. [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv antiinfective agents
gingival recession
periodontal debridement
periodontal pocket
periodontitis
photodynamic therapy
surgical procedure
ultrasonic
topic antiinfective agents
gingival recession
periodontal debridement
periodontal pocket
periodontitis
photodynamic therapy
surgical procedure
ultrasonic
description Background: The aim of the present study was to compare repeated applications of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) to open flap debridement (OFD) in the treatment of residual periodontal pockets in non-furcation sites. Methods: Forty-six subjects with a diagnosis of Stage III or IV Grade C periodontitis, that had been previously treated, participated in the study. Residual pockets were divided between two groups: (1) aPDT group: received ultrasonic periodontal debridement followed by immediate application of aPDT, and repeated on1st, 2nd, 7th, and 14th days; and (2) OFD group: treated by modified papilla preservation technique, where granulation tissue and visible calculus were removed with hand curettes and an ultrasonic device. Clinical, immunological, and microbiological parameters were evaluated before and after treatment. Results: Both treatments were effective reducing clinical parameters of disease. OFD resulted in a greater mean probing pocket depths (PPD) reduction in deep pockets (p = 0.001). However, aPDT resulted in a lower occurrence of gingival recession (GR), dentin hypersensitivity (DH) and analgesic intake. Reduction in Porphyromonas gingivalis was observed in both groups. Only the OFD group had a significant reduction in Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans. aPDT group had greater increase in interleukin 10 (IL-10) levels and a greater reduction of interleukin 1 beta (IL-1β) at 14 days when compared to the OFD group (p < 0.05). Conclusion: OFD was superior in reducing PPD in deep pockets compared to the aPDT. However, OFD resulted in greater GR. Both treatments lowered P. gingivalis levels but only OFD reduced levels of A. actinomycemtemcomitans.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-01-01
2023-03-01T20:05:03Z
2023-03-01T20:05:03Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/JPER.22-0059
Journal of Periodontology.
0022-3492
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/240180
10.1002/JPER.22-0059
2-s2.0-85131294257
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/JPER.22-0059
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/240180
identifier_str_mv Journal of Periodontology.
0022-3492
10.1002/JPER.22-0059
2-s2.0-85131294257
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Periodontology
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808129505377648640