How many cattle can be infected by Trypanosoma vivax by reusing the same needle and syringe, and what is the viability time of this protozoan in injectable veterinary products?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: De Melo, Rubens Dias
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Bastos, Thiago Souza Azeredo, Heller, Luciana Maffini, Couto, Luiz Fellipe Monteiro, Zapa, Dina María Beltrán, Cavalcante, Alliny Souza De Assis, Cruvinel, Leonardo Bueno, Nicaretta, João Eduardo, Iuasse, Haryie Victória, Ferreira, Lorena Lopes, Soares, Vando Edésio, De Souza, Guilherme Rocha Lino, Cadioli, Fabiano Antônio [UNESP], Lopes, Welber Daniel Zanetti
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S003118202100175X
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/233822
Resumo: It was investigated how many cattle become infected with Trypanosoma vivax by subcutaneous (SC), intramuscular (IM) and intravenous (IV) routes, using the same syringe and needle from an animal with acute T. vivax infection. Besides, the T. vivax viability in 109 injectable veterinary drugs (antibiotics, antiparasitics, reproductive hormones, vitamin complex and derivatives, vaccines, anaesthetics, anti-inflammatory/antipyretics, antitoxics). In the field assay, four groups were performed: T01, T02 and T03 animals that received saline solution with the same syringe and needle contaminated with T. vivax via SC, IM and IV routes, respectively, and T04 control animals that received only saline solution with the same syringe and needle IV. In the laboratory, drugs had their pH measured and T. vivax viability verified. The number of cattle infected with T. vivax via SC (3/20) was lower (P ≤ 0.05) compared to via IM (9/20), which was lower (P ≤ 0.05) compared to IV (15/20). The solution pH did not influence T. vivax viability. In 44% (48/109) of the products, T. vivax remained viable regardless of time, stooding out that in 100% of oxytocins the protozoan was verified, at some evaluation times. The mean of T. vivax quantified in foot-and-mouth and brucellosis vaccines and in doramectin-based products were higher (P ≤ 0.05) than found in blood + saline solution.
id UNSP_5f6e4faa67d4abb65b5d589966e96254
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/233822
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling How many cattle can be infected by Trypanosoma vivax by reusing the same needle and syringe, and what is the viability time of this protozoan in injectable veterinary products?Dairy cattle dairy cattleiatrogenic transmissiontrypanosomosisIt was investigated how many cattle become infected with Trypanosoma vivax by subcutaneous (SC), intramuscular (IM) and intravenous (IV) routes, using the same syringe and needle from an animal with acute T. vivax infection. Besides, the T. vivax viability in 109 injectable veterinary drugs (antibiotics, antiparasitics, reproductive hormones, vitamin complex and derivatives, vaccines, anaesthetics, anti-inflammatory/antipyretics, antitoxics). In the field assay, four groups were performed: T01, T02 and T03 animals that received saline solution with the same syringe and needle contaminated with T. vivax via SC, IM and IV routes, respectively, and T04 control animals that received only saline solution with the same syringe and needle IV. In the laboratory, drugs had their pH measured and T. vivax viability verified. The number of cattle infected with T. vivax via SC (3/20) was lower (P ≤ 0.05) compared to via IM (9/20), which was lower (P ≤ 0.05) compared to IV (15/20). The solution pH did not influence T. vivax viability. In 44% (48/109) of the products, T. vivax remained viable regardless of time, stooding out that in 100% of oxytocins the protozoan was verified, at some evaluation times. The mean of T. vivax quantified in foot-and-mouth and brucellosis vaccines and in doramectin-based products were higher (P ≤ 0.05) than found in blood + saline solution.Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de GoiásConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Escola de Veterinária e Zootecnia Universidade Federal de Goiás, GoiásDepartamento de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva Escola de Veterinária Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Minas GeraisUniversidade Brasil, São PauloInstituto de Ciências Biológicas Universidade Federal de Goiás, GoiásDepartamento de Clínica Cirurgia e Reprodução Animal Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária Universidade Estadual Paulista - UnespDepartamento de Biociências e Tecnologia Instituto de Patologia Tropical e Saúde Pública Universidade Federal de Goiás, GoiásDepartamento de Clínica Cirurgia e Reprodução Animal Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária Universidade Estadual Paulista - UnespCAPES: 001Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Goiás: 201810267001189CNPq: 5882670080665232Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)Universidade BrasilUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)De Melo, Rubens DiasBastos, Thiago Souza AzeredoHeller, Luciana MaffiniCouto, Luiz Fellipe MonteiroZapa, Dina María BeltránCavalcante, Alliny Souza De AssisCruvinel, Leonardo BuenoNicaretta, João EduardoIuasse, Haryie VictóriaFerreira, Lorena LopesSoares, Vando EdésioDe Souza, Guilherme Rocha LinoCadioli, Fabiano Antônio [UNESP]Lopes, Welber Daniel Zanetti2022-05-01T10:35:03Z2022-05-01T10:35:03Z2022-02-09info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article270-282http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S003118202100175XParasitology, v. 149, n. 2, p. 270-282, 2022.1469-81610031-1820http://hdl.handle.net/11449/23382210.1017/S003118202100175X2-s2.0-85119521999Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengParasitologyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-09-04T18:04:10Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/233822Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462024-09-04T18:04:10Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv How many cattle can be infected by Trypanosoma vivax by reusing the same needle and syringe, and what is the viability time of this protozoan in injectable veterinary products?
title How many cattle can be infected by Trypanosoma vivax by reusing the same needle and syringe, and what is the viability time of this protozoan in injectable veterinary products?
spellingShingle How many cattle can be infected by Trypanosoma vivax by reusing the same needle and syringe, and what is the viability time of this protozoan in injectable veterinary products?
De Melo, Rubens Dias
Dairy cattle dairy cattle
iatrogenic transmission
trypanosomosis
title_short How many cattle can be infected by Trypanosoma vivax by reusing the same needle and syringe, and what is the viability time of this protozoan in injectable veterinary products?
title_full How many cattle can be infected by Trypanosoma vivax by reusing the same needle and syringe, and what is the viability time of this protozoan in injectable veterinary products?
title_fullStr How many cattle can be infected by Trypanosoma vivax by reusing the same needle and syringe, and what is the viability time of this protozoan in injectable veterinary products?
title_full_unstemmed How many cattle can be infected by Trypanosoma vivax by reusing the same needle and syringe, and what is the viability time of this protozoan in injectable veterinary products?
title_sort How many cattle can be infected by Trypanosoma vivax by reusing the same needle and syringe, and what is the viability time of this protozoan in injectable veterinary products?
author De Melo, Rubens Dias
author_facet De Melo, Rubens Dias
Bastos, Thiago Souza Azeredo
Heller, Luciana Maffini
Couto, Luiz Fellipe Monteiro
Zapa, Dina María Beltrán
Cavalcante, Alliny Souza De Assis
Cruvinel, Leonardo Bueno
Nicaretta, João Eduardo
Iuasse, Haryie Victória
Ferreira, Lorena Lopes
Soares, Vando Edésio
De Souza, Guilherme Rocha Lino
Cadioli, Fabiano Antônio [UNESP]
Lopes, Welber Daniel Zanetti
author_role author
author2 Bastos, Thiago Souza Azeredo
Heller, Luciana Maffini
Couto, Luiz Fellipe Monteiro
Zapa, Dina María Beltrán
Cavalcante, Alliny Souza De Assis
Cruvinel, Leonardo Bueno
Nicaretta, João Eduardo
Iuasse, Haryie Victória
Ferreira, Lorena Lopes
Soares, Vando Edésio
De Souza, Guilherme Rocha Lino
Cadioli, Fabiano Antônio [UNESP]
Lopes, Welber Daniel Zanetti
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
Universidade Brasil
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv De Melo, Rubens Dias
Bastos, Thiago Souza Azeredo
Heller, Luciana Maffini
Couto, Luiz Fellipe Monteiro
Zapa, Dina María Beltrán
Cavalcante, Alliny Souza De Assis
Cruvinel, Leonardo Bueno
Nicaretta, João Eduardo
Iuasse, Haryie Victória
Ferreira, Lorena Lopes
Soares, Vando Edésio
De Souza, Guilherme Rocha Lino
Cadioli, Fabiano Antônio [UNESP]
Lopes, Welber Daniel Zanetti
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Dairy cattle dairy cattle
iatrogenic transmission
trypanosomosis
topic Dairy cattle dairy cattle
iatrogenic transmission
trypanosomosis
description It was investigated how many cattle become infected with Trypanosoma vivax by subcutaneous (SC), intramuscular (IM) and intravenous (IV) routes, using the same syringe and needle from an animal with acute T. vivax infection. Besides, the T. vivax viability in 109 injectable veterinary drugs (antibiotics, antiparasitics, reproductive hormones, vitamin complex and derivatives, vaccines, anaesthetics, anti-inflammatory/antipyretics, antitoxics). In the field assay, four groups were performed: T01, T02 and T03 animals that received saline solution with the same syringe and needle contaminated with T. vivax via SC, IM and IV routes, respectively, and T04 control animals that received only saline solution with the same syringe and needle IV. In the laboratory, drugs had their pH measured and T. vivax viability verified. The number of cattle infected with T. vivax via SC (3/20) was lower (P ≤ 0.05) compared to via IM (9/20), which was lower (P ≤ 0.05) compared to IV (15/20). The solution pH did not influence T. vivax viability. In 44% (48/109) of the products, T. vivax remained viable regardless of time, stooding out that in 100% of oxytocins the protozoan was verified, at some evaluation times. The mean of T. vivax quantified in foot-and-mouth and brucellosis vaccines and in doramectin-based products were higher (P ≤ 0.05) than found in blood + saline solution.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-05-01T10:35:03Z
2022-05-01T10:35:03Z
2022-02-09
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S003118202100175X
Parasitology, v. 149, n. 2, p. 270-282, 2022.
1469-8161
0031-1820
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/233822
10.1017/S003118202100175X
2-s2.0-85119521999
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S003118202100175X
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/233822
identifier_str_mv Parasitology, v. 149, n. 2, p. 270-282, 2022.
1469-8161
0031-1820
10.1017/S003118202100175X
2-s2.0-85119521999
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Parasitology
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 270-282
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositoriounesp@unesp.br
_version_ 1810021403984920576