Laying hen manure in anaerobic Co-Digestion with glycerin containing different glycerol and impurity levels

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Schwingel, Alice Watte
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Amorim Orrico, Ana Carolina, Lucas Junior, Jorge de [UNESP], Previdelli Orrico Junior, Marco Antonio, Aspilcueta Borquis, Rusbel Raul, Fava, Aldo Felipe
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.125
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/186649
Resumo: Biodiesel has arisen as a promising option of renewable fuel to minimize the impacts caused by fossil fuels. However, its production process generates high amounts of crude glycerin as a residue, which is considered low-quality commercially due to its low glycerol content. In order to add value to this byproduct, some production plants employ a purification process. Nonetheless, aiming to cut down costs with this purification step, many researches have been seeking treatments that use glycerin with lower purity, such as anaerobic co-digestion with another residue of complementary composition so as to balance the digestion medium and increase energy yield. During recycling, glycerin goes from an environmental liability to a sustainable financial asset by being transformed into cleaner energy, i.e., biogas. This research was carried out to assess the influence of glycerol content in glycerin containing the same impurities at three proportions (40% (G40), 60% (G60), and 80% (G80)), and to add them to the process at different glycerol levels (0, 1, 2, 3, and 4%) in the total solids (TS) of the affluents prepared with laying hen manure. No interaction was found between glycerin type and glycerol content regarding biogas and methane productions as well as reductions in TS and volatile solids (VS). Adding 2.5% glycerol led to the highest specific biogas production (1654.1 L kg(-1) VS added) while adding 2.6% yielded the maximum specific production of methane (1058.9 L kg(-1) VS added), i.e., glycerol increased methane generation by over 36% when compared with the treatment with no glycerin. Consequently, greater reductions in TS (60.97%) and VS (73.6%) were observed with ideal addition levels of 2.2 and 2.4% glycerol. Adding 2.1% glycerol using G40 resulted in the greatest reduction (55.4%) in chemical oxygen demand (COD) whereas such reduction was by 50.4 and 50.5% for G60 and G80 when 2.6% glycerol were added. With that in mind, and in face of the high costs of purification, G40 can be recommended with addition of 2.6% glycerol to TS to improve co-digestion with laying hen manure and generate energy that returns to poultry and biodiesel production systems. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
id UNSP_61d40041c277154fe9d81ca0e15fa6d6
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/186649
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Laying hen manure in anaerobic Co-Digestion with glycerin containing different glycerol and impurity levelsBatch digestionBiodiesel wasteGlycerin purity levelMethane productionBiodiesel has arisen as a promising option of renewable fuel to minimize the impacts caused by fossil fuels. However, its production process generates high amounts of crude glycerin as a residue, which is considered low-quality commercially due to its low glycerol content. In order to add value to this byproduct, some production plants employ a purification process. Nonetheless, aiming to cut down costs with this purification step, many researches have been seeking treatments that use glycerin with lower purity, such as anaerobic co-digestion with another residue of complementary composition so as to balance the digestion medium and increase energy yield. During recycling, glycerin goes from an environmental liability to a sustainable financial asset by being transformed into cleaner energy, i.e., biogas. This research was carried out to assess the influence of glycerol content in glycerin containing the same impurities at three proportions (40% (G40), 60% (G60), and 80% (G80)), and to add them to the process at different glycerol levels (0, 1, 2, 3, and 4%) in the total solids (TS) of the affluents prepared with laying hen manure. No interaction was found between glycerin type and glycerol content regarding biogas and methane productions as well as reductions in TS and volatile solids (VS). Adding 2.5% glycerol led to the highest specific biogas production (1654.1 L kg(-1) VS added) while adding 2.6% yielded the maximum specific production of methane (1058.9 L kg(-1) VS added), i.e., glycerol increased methane generation by over 36% when compared with the treatment with no glycerin. Consequently, greater reductions in TS (60.97%) and VS (73.6%) were observed with ideal addition levels of 2.2 and 2.4% glycerol. Adding 2.1% glycerol using G40 resulted in the greatest reduction (55.4%) in chemical oxygen demand (COD) whereas such reduction was by 50.4 and 50.5% for G60 and G80 when 2.6% glycerol were added. With that in mind, and in face of the high costs of purification, G40 can be recommended with addition of 2.6% glycerol to TS to improve co-digestion with laying hen manure and generate energy that returns to poultry and biodiesel production systems. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.Sao Paulo State University Julio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP)Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)Fed Univ Great Dourados, Sch Agr Sci, POB 364, BR-79804970 Dourados, MS, BrazilState Univ Sao Paulo Julio de Mesquita Filho, Sch Vet Med & Anim Sci, BR-14884900 Jaboticabal, SP, BrazilWest Parana State Univ, Ctr Engn & Exact Sci, BR-85819110 Toledo, PR, BrazilState Univ Sao Paulo Julio de Mesquita Filho, Sch Vet Med & Anim Sci, BR-14884900 Jaboticabal, SP, BrazilElsevier B.V.Fed Univ Great DouradosUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)West Parana State UnivSchwingel, Alice WatteAmorim Orrico, Ana CarolinaLucas Junior, Jorge de [UNESP]Previdelli Orrico Junior, Marco AntonioAspilcueta Borquis, Rusbel RaulFava, Aldo Felipe2019-10-05T14:08:27Z2019-10-05T14:08:27Z2019-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article1437-1444http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.125Journal Of Cleaner Production. Oxford: Elsevier Sci Ltd, v. 215, p. 1437-1444, 2019.0959-6526http://hdl.handle.net/11449/18664910.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.125WOS:000459358300120Web of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal Of Cleaner Productioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-06-06T15:18:29Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/186649Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T18:01:50.731615Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Laying hen manure in anaerobic Co-Digestion with glycerin containing different glycerol and impurity levels
title Laying hen manure in anaerobic Co-Digestion with glycerin containing different glycerol and impurity levels
spellingShingle Laying hen manure in anaerobic Co-Digestion with glycerin containing different glycerol and impurity levels
Schwingel, Alice Watte
Batch digestion
Biodiesel waste
Glycerin purity level
Methane production
title_short Laying hen manure in anaerobic Co-Digestion with glycerin containing different glycerol and impurity levels
title_full Laying hen manure in anaerobic Co-Digestion with glycerin containing different glycerol and impurity levels
title_fullStr Laying hen manure in anaerobic Co-Digestion with glycerin containing different glycerol and impurity levels
title_full_unstemmed Laying hen manure in anaerobic Co-Digestion with glycerin containing different glycerol and impurity levels
title_sort Laying hen manure in anaerobic Co-Digestion with glycerin containing different glycerol and impurity levels
author Schwingel, Alice Watte
author_facet Schwingel, Alice Watte
Amorim Orrico, Ana Carolina
Lucas Junior, Jorge de [UNESP]
Previdelli Orrico Junior, Marco Antonio
Aspilcueta Borquis, Rusbel Raul
Fava, Aldo Felipe
author_role author
author2 Amorim Orrico, Ana Carolina
Lucas Junior, Jorge de [UNESP]
Previdelli Orrico Junior, Marco Antonio
Aspilcueta Borquis, Rusbel Raul
Fava, Aldo Felipe
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Fed Univ Great Dourados
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
West Parana State Univ
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Schwingel, Alice Watte
Amorim Orrico, Ana Carolina
Lucas Junior, Jorge de [UNESP]
Previdelli Orrico Junior, Marco Antonio
Aspilcueta Borquis, Rusbel Raul
Fava, Aldo Felipe
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Batch digestion
Biodiesel waste
Glycerin purity level
Methane production
topic Batch digestion
Biodiesel waste
Glycerin purity level
Methane production
description Biodiesel has arisen as a promising option of renewable fuel to minimize the impacts caused by fossil fuels. However, its production process generates high amounts of crude glycerin as a residue, which is considered low-quality commercially due to its low glycerol content. In order to add value to this byproduct, some production plants employ a purification process. Nonetheless, aiming to cut down costs with this purification step, many researches have been seeking treatments that use glycerin with lower purity, such as anaerobic co-digestion with another residue of complementary composition so as to balance the digestion medium and increase energy yield. During recycling, glycerin goes from an environmental liability to a sustainable financial asset by being transformed into cleaner energy, i.e., biogas. This research was carried out to assess the influence of glycerol content in glycerin containing the same impurities at three proportions (40% (G40), 60% (G60), and 80% (G80)), and to add them to the process at different glycerol levels (0, 1, 2, 3, and 4%) in the total solids (TS) of the affluents prepared with laying hen manure. No interaction was found between glycerin type and glycerol content regarding biogas and methane productions as well as reductions in TS and volatile solids (VS). Adding 2.5% glycerol led to the highest specific biogas production (1654.1 L kg(-1) VS added) while adding 2.6% yielded the maximum specific production of methane (1058.9 L kg(-1) VS added), i.e., glycerol increased methane generation by over 36% when compared with the treatment with no glycerin. Consequently, greater reductions in TS (60.97%) and VS (73.6%) were observed with ideal addition levels of 2.2 and 2.4% glycerol. Adding 2.1% glycerol using G40 resulted in the greatest reduction (55.4%) in chemical oxygen demand (COD) whereas such reduction was by 50.4 and 50.5% for G60 and G80 when 2.6% glycerol were added. With that in mind, and in face of the high costs of purification, G40 can be recommended with addition of 2.6% glycerol to TS to improve co-digestion with laying hen manure and generate energy that returns to poultry and biodiesel production systems. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-10-05T14:08:27Z
2019-10-05T14:08:27Z
2019-04-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.125
Journal Of Cleaner Production. Oxford: Elsevier Sci Ltd, v. 215, p. 1437-1444, 2019.
0959-6526
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/186649
10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.125
WOS:000459358300120
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.125
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/186649
identifier_str_mv Journal Of Cleaner Production. Oxford: Elsevier Sci Ltd, v. 215, p. 1437-1444, 2019.
0959-6526
10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.125
WOS:000459358300120
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Journal Of Cleaner Production
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 1437-1444
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier B.V.
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier B.V.
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Web of Science
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808128886907600896