Alternative methods for detecting soybean seeds genetically modified for resistance to herbicide glyphosate
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2013 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S2317-15372013000300016 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/109747 |
Resumo: | The objective of this study was to verify application of two methodologies: substrate moistened with herbicide solution (SM) and immersion of seeds in herbicide solution (IH) for detecting soybean seeds genetically modified. For this, non-transgenic and transgenic soybean seeds, harvested in the 2008/2009 crop seasons were used. The treatments with substrate moistened were: SM1) 0.03% herbicide solution, at 25 ºC, with evaluation in the sixth day (hs -0.03% -25 ºC, 6th d); SM2) HS -0.03% -35 ºC, 5th d; SM3) HS -0.03% - 40 ºC, 5th d; and SM4) hs -0.06% -5 ºC, 5th d. In the methodology of immersion of seeds the following treatments were performed: IH1) seed immersion in a 0.6% herbicide solution, at 25 ºC, for 1 h, (si -0.06% -25 ºC, 1 h; IH2) si -0.06% - 35 ºC, 30 min.; IH3) si -0.06% -40 ºC, 30 min.; IH4) si -0.12% -35 ºC, 30 min.; and IH5) si -0.12% -40 ºC, 30 min. Bioassays allow detecting soybean seeds tolerant to glyphosate herbicide within five days. The seeds of non-genetically modified and genetically modified soybean cultivars may be easily distinguished through the treatments SM2 and SM4 of the moistened substrate methodology; and treatments IH3, IH4, and IH5 of seed immersion methodology. Both methodologies are easily feasible, practical, and applicable in seed analysis laboratories, once do not require special equipments. |
id |
UNSP_61ee5462f6d4624c8b9ad898681a6f86 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/109747 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Alternative methods for detecting soybean seeds genetically modified for resistance to herbicide glyphosateMétodos alternativos para a detecção de sementes de soja geneticamente modificadas para resistência ao herbicida glifosatoGlycine maxpureza varietalmistura de sementesGlycine maxvarietal purityseed mixturesThe objective of this study was to verify application of two methodologies: substrate moistened with herbicide solution (SM) and immersion of seeds in herbicide solution (IH) for detecting soybean seeds genetically modified. For this, non-transgenic and transgenic soybean seeds, harvested in the 2008/2009 crop seasons were used. The treatments with substrate moistened were: SM1) 0.03% herbicide solution, at 25 ºC, with evaluation in the sixth day (hs -0.03% -25 ºC, 6th d); SM2) HS -0.03% -35 ºC, 5th d; SM3) HS -0.03% - 40 ºC, 5th d; and SM4) hs -0.06% -5 ºC, 5th d. In the methodology of immersion of seeds the following treatments were performed: IH1) seed immersion in a 0.6% herbicide solution, at 25 ºC, for 1 h, (si -0.06% -25 ºC, 1 h; IH2) si -0.06% - 35 ºC, 30 min.; IH3) si -0.06% -40 ºC, 30 min.; IH4) si -0.12% -35 ºC, 30 min.; and IH5) si -0.12% -40 ºC, 30 min. Bioassays allow detecting soybean seeds tolerant to glyphosate herbicide within five days. The seeds of non-genetically modified and genetically modified soybean cultivars may be easily distinguished through the treatments SM2 and SM4 of the moistened substrate methodology; and treatments IH3, IH4, and IH5 of seed immersion methodology. Both methodologies are easily feasible, practical, and applicable in seed analysis laboratories, once do not require special equipments.Esta pesquisa teve por objetivos verificar o efeito da aplicação de duas metodologias: substrato umedecido com solução herbicida (SU) e imersão das sementes em solução herbicida (IS), na detecção de sementes de soja geneticamente modificadas. Para isso, foram utilizadas sementes de soja convencional e transgênicas, colhidas na safra de 2008/2009. Os tratamentos com substrato umedecido foram: SU1) solução herbicida a 0,03%, a 25 ºC, com avaliação no sexto dia (SH-0,03% -25 ºC, 6º d); SU2) SH -0,03% -35 ºC, 5º d; SU3) SH -0,03% -40 ºC, 5º d; e SU4) SH -0,06% -35 ºC, 5º d. Na metodologia de imersão das sementes foram realizados os seguintes tratamentos: IS1) solução herbicida a 0,06% por 1 hora a 25 ºC (SH -0,03% -1 h -25 ºC; IS2) SH -0,06% -30 min. -35 ºC; IS3) SH -0,06% -30 min. -40 ºC; IS4) SH -0,12% -30 min. -35 ºC; e IS5) SH -0,12% -30 min. -40 ºC. Os bioensaios permitem detectar sementes de soja tolerante ao glifosato, dentro de cinco dias. As sementes das cultivares convencionais e das geneticamente modificadas podem ser separadas pelos tratamentos SU2 e SU4 da metodologia substrato umedecido com solução herbicida; e IS3, IS4 e IS5 da metodologia imersão. As duas metodologias pesquisadas são de fácil montagem, são práticas e aplicáveis em laboratórios de analise sementes, uma vez que não exigem equipamentos especiais.UNESP Departamento de Fitotecnia, Tecnologia de Alimentos e Sócio-EconomiaUniversidade de BrasíliaUNESP Departamento de Fitotecnia, Tecnologia de Alimentos e Sócio-EconomiaAssociação Brasileira de Tecnologia de Sementes (ABRATES)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Universidade de Brasília (UnB)Melo, Lilian Faria De [UNESP]Fagioli, MarceloSá, Marco Eustáquio De [UNESP]2014-10-01T13:08:30Z2014-10-01T13:08:30Z2013info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article381-386application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S2317-15372013000300016Journal of Seed Science. ABRATES - Associação Brasileira de Tecnologia de Sementes, v. 35, n. 3, p. 381-386, 2013.2317-1537http://hdl.handle.net/11449/10974710.1590/S2317-15372013000300016S2317-15372013000300016S2317-15372013000300016.pdf0756504113273662SciELOreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal of Seed Science0,367info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-07-05T19:08:32Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/109747Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T18:23:06.348307Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Alternative methods for detecting soybean seeds genetically modified for resistance to herbicide glyphosate Métodos alternativos para a detecção de sementes de soja geneticamente modificadas para resistência ao herbicida glifosato |
title |
Alternative methods for detecting soybean seeds genetically modified for resistance to herbicide glyphosate |
spellingShingle |
Alternative methods for detecting soybean seeds genetically modified for resistance to herbicide glyphosate Melo, Lilian Faria De [UNESP] Glycine max pureza varietal mistura de sementes Glycine max varietal purity seed mixtures |
title_short |
Alternative methods for detecting soybean seeds genetically modified for resistance to herbicide glyphosate |
title_full |
Alternative methods for detecting soybean seeds genetically modified for resistance to herbicide glyphosate |
title_fullStr |
Alternative methods for detecting soybean seeds genetically modified for resistance to herbicide glyphosate |
title_full_unstemmed |
Alternative methods for detecting soybean seeds genetically modified for resistance to herbicide glyphosate |
title_sort |
Alternative methods for detecting soybean seeds genetically modified for resistance to herbicide glyphosate |
author |
Melo, Lilian Faria De [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Melo, Lilian Faria De [UNESP] Fagioli, Marcelo Sá, Marco Eustáquio De [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Fagioli, Marcelo Sá, Marco Eustáquio De [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) Universidade de Brasília (UnB) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Melo, Lilian Faria De [UNESP] Fagioli, Marcelo Sá, Marco Eustáquio De [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Glycine max pureza varietal mistura de sementes Glycine max varietal purity seed mixtures |
topic |
Glycine max pureza varietal mistura de sementes Glycine max varietal purity seed mixtures |
description |
The objective of this study was to verify application of two methodologies: substrate moistened with herbicide solution (SM) and immersion of seeds in herbicide solution (IH) for detecting soybean seeds genetically modified. For this, non-transgenic and transgenic soybean seeds, harvested in the 2008/2009 crop seasons were used. The treatments with substrate moistened were: SM1) 0.03% herbicide solution, at 25 ºC, with evaluation in the sixth day (hs -0.03% -25 ºC, 6th d); SM2) HS -0.03% -35 ºC, 5th d; SM3) HS -0.03% - 40 ºC, 5th d; and SM4) hs -0.06% -5 ºC, 5th d. In the methodology of immersion of seeds the following treatments were performed: IH1) seed immersion in a 0.6% herbicide solution, at 25 ºC, for 1 h, (si -0.06% -25 ºC, 1 h; IH2) si -0.06% - 35 ºC, 30 min.; IH3) si -0.06% -40 ºC, 30 min.; IH4) si -0.12% -35 ºC, 30 min.; and IH5) si -0.12% -40 ºC, 30 min. Bioassays allow detecting soybean seeds tolerant to glyphosate herbicide within five days. The seeds of non-genetically modified and genetically modified soybean cultivars may be easily distinguished through the treatments SM2 and SM4 of the moistened substrate methodology; and treatments IH3, IH4, and IH5 of seed immersion methodology. Both methodologies are easily feasible, practical, and applicable in seed analysis laboratories, once do not require special equipments. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013 2014-10-01T13:08:30Z 2014-10-01T13:08:30Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S2317-15372013000300016 Journal of Seed Science. ABRATES - Associação Brasileira de Tecnologia de Sementes, v. 35, n. 3, p. 381-386, 2013. 2317-1537 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/109747 10.1590/S2317-15372013000300016 S2317-15372013000300016 S2317-15372013000300016.pdf 0756504113273662 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S2317-15372013000300016 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/109747 |
identifier_str_mv |
Journal of Seed Science. ABRATES - Associação Brasileira de Tecnologia de Sementes, v. 35, n. 3, p. 381-386, 2013. 2317-1537 10.1590/S2317-15372013000300016 S2317-15372013000300016 S2317-15372013000300016.pdf 0756504113273662 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Seed Science 0,367 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
381-386 application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Tecnologia de Sementes (ABRATES) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Tecnologia de Sementes (ABRATES) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
SciELO reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808128925385097216 |