Do humans walk like robots when crossing an obstacle without visual information?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rossi, Luis Filipe
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Rodrigues, Sergio T. [UNESP], Forner-Cordero, A.
Tipo de documento: Artigo de conferência
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/11449/167729
Resumo: This work analyses the obstacle crossing during gait and compares the behavior of humans with a robot model. The aim of the study is to compare the obstacle crossing task between human subjects, performing the task both with vision and blindfolded, and ZMP biped robots. It was hypothesized that the trajectories of the hip joint and the foot of the blindfolded subjects would resemble those of the robot. Seven subjects walked on a flat surface with an obstacle of 0.26 m height and crossed the obstacle successfully 30 times under two conditions: blindfolded and with normal vision. The motion of the leading limb was recorded by video at 60 Hz. There were markers placed on the subject's hip, knee, ankle, rear foot, and forefoot. The following parameters were calculated: critical time, vertical foot position and average step velocity. A robot model with inertial parameters matched with the subjects and a controller based on the ZMP criterion was developed. The hip joint and foot trajectories of humans and robots were assessed and compared. Unavailability of visual information resulted in different strategies to cross the obstacle, like a higher toe clearance or lower step speed. Without vision, the crossing pattern seems to be more cautious and slower than with vision, thus resembling that of the robot with ZMP. The hip was kept behind until the foot has overtaken the obstacle as a possible mechanism to maintain a safe base of support if a trip occurs. This is also supported by the data showing that blindfolded behaved with an intermediate pattern between vision and robot in the hip antero-posterior trajectory. In this context, it is possible to extract some conclusions to improve the ZMP stability criterion of biped robots.
id UNSP_622e518874aac2941ddf4b4408f3de11
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/167729
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Do humans walk like robots when crossing an obstacle without visual information?This work analyses the obstacle crossing during gait and compares the behavior of humans with a robot model. The aim of the study is to compare the obstacle crossing task between human subjects, performing the task both with vision and blindfolded, and ZMP biped robots. It was hypothesized that the trajectories of the hip joint and the foot of the blindfolded subjects would resemble those of the robot. Seven subjects walked on a flat surface with an obstacle of 0.26 m height and crossed the obstacle successfully 30 times under two conditions: blindfolded and with normal vision. The motion of the leading limb was recorded by video at 60 Hz. There were markers placed on the subject's hip, knee, ankle, rear foot, and forefoot. The following parameters were calculated: critical time, vertical foot position and average step velocity. A robot model with inertial parameters matched with the subjects and a controller based on the ZMP criterion was developed. The hip joint and foot trajectories of humans and robots were assessed and compared. Unavailability of visual information resulted in different strategies to cross the obstacle, like a higher toe clearance or lower step speed. Without vision, the crossing pattern seems to be more cautious and slower than with vision, thus resembling that of the robot with ZMP. The hip was kept behind until the foot has overtaken the obstacle as a possible mechanism to maintain a safe base of support if a trip occurs. This is also supported by the data showing that blindfolded behaved with an intermediate pattern between vision and robot in the hip antero-posterior trajectory. In this context, it is possible to extract some conclusions to improve the ZMP stability criterion of biped robots.University of São PauloFaculty of Science, State University of São Paulo - UNESPFaculty of Science, State University of São Paulo - UNESPUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Rossi, Luis FilipeRodrigues, Sergio T. [UNESP]Forner-Cordero, A.2018-12-11T16:38:06Z2018-12-11T16:38:06Z2014-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject216-220Proceedings of the IEEE RAS and EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics, p. 216-220.2155-1774http://hdl.handle.net/11449/1677292-s2.0-84918556048Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengProceedings of the IEEE RAS and EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics0,259info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-10-23T21:44:24Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/167729Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462021-10-23T21:44:24Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Do humans walk like robots when crossing an obstacle without visual information?
title Do humans walk like robots when crossing an obstacle without visual information?
spellingShingle Do humans walk like robots when crossing an obstacle without visual information?
Rossi, Luis Filipe
title_short Do humans walk like robots when crossing an obstacle without visual information?
title_full Do humans walk like robots when crossing an obstacle without visual information?
title_fullStr Do humans walk like robots when crossing an obstacle without visual information?
title_full_unstemmed Do humans walk like robots when crossing an obstacle without visual information?
title_sort Do humans walk like robots when crossing an obstacle without visual information?
author Rossi, Luis Filipe
author_facet Rossi, Luis Filipe
Rodrigues, Sergio T. [UNESP]
Forner-Cordero, A.
author_role author
author2 Rodrigues, Sergio T. [UNESP]
Forner-Cordero, A.
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rossi, Luis Filipe
Rodrigues, Sergio T. [UNESP]
Forner-Cordero, A.
description This work analyses the obstacle crossing during gait and compares the behavior of humans with a robot model. The aim of the study is to compare the obstacle crossing task between human subjects, performing the task both with vision and blindfolded, and ZMP biped robots. It was hypothesized that the trajectories of the hip joint and the foot of the blindfolded subjects would resemble those of the robot. Seven subjects walked on a flat surface with an obstacle of 0.26 m height and crossed the obstacle successfully 30 times under two conditions: blindfolded and with normal vision. The motion of the leading limb was recorded by video at 60 Hz. There were markers placed on the subject's hip, knee, ankle, rear foot, and forefoot. The following parameters were calculated: critical time, vertical foot position and average step velocity. A robot model with inertial parameters matched with the subjects and a controller based on the ZMP criterion was developed. The hip joint and foot trajectories of humans and robots were assessed and compared. Unavailability of visual information resulted in different strategies to cross the obstacle, like a higher toe clearance or lower step speed. Without vision, the crossing pattern seems to be more cautious and slower than with vision, thus resembling that of the robot with ZMP. The hip was kept behind until the foot has overtaken the obstacle as a possible mechanism to maintain a safe base of support if a trip occurs. This is also supported by the data showing that blindfolded behaved with an intermediate pattern between vision and robot in the hip antero-posterior trajectory. In this context, it is possible to extract some conclusions to improve the ZMP stability criterion of biped robots.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-01-01
2018-12-11T16:38:06Z
2018-12-11T16:38:06Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
format conferenceObject
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv Proceedings of the IEEE RAS and EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics, p. 216-220.
2155-1774
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/167729
2-s2.0-84918556048
identifier_str_mv Proceedings of the IEEE RAS and EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics, p. 216-220.
2155-1774
2-s2.0-84918556048
url http://hdl.handle.net/11449/167729
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Proceedings of the IEEE RAS and EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics
0,259
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 216-220
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1803046579235454976