Dynamics and efficacy of sulfentrazone, flumioxazin, and isoxaflutole herbicides applied on eucalyptus harvest residues

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Carbonari, Caio Antonio [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Gomes, Giovanna Larissa Gimenes Cotrick [UNESP], Krenchinski, Fábio Henrique [UNESP], Simões, Plinio Saulo [UNESP], Batista de Castro, Edicarlos [UNESP], Velini, Edivaldo Domingues [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11056-019-09756-3
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/201305
Resumo: Eucalyptus harvests generate residues that remain on the soil and affect the efficacy of preemergent herbicides in the following planting cycle. The objective of this work was to evaluate the dynamics of flumioxazin, sulfentrazone, and isoxaflutole herbicides applied on different amounts and compositions of eucalyptus harvest residues subjected to different rainfall depths; and evaluate the weed control effectiveness of these herbicides when applied under these conditions. A LC–MS/MS system was used for the evaluations and the results showed that a cumulative rainfall of 50 mm was sufficient for the maximum removal of herbicides from the eucalyptus residues, regardless of the residue composition. The amount of the flumioxazin, sulfentrazone, and isoxaflutole herbicides that reached the soil was lower in the treatment with the highest amount of eucalyptus harvest residue used (40 Mg ha−1). The greatest amount of herbicide reaching the soil was found with the use of 15 Mg ha−1 of residues without presence of bark. The highest amount of residue used (40 Mg ha−1) reduced the control of Brachiaria decumbens by sulfentrazone and isoxaflutole. The control of Commelina benghalensis was inefficient (> 80%) in the treatment with 15 Mg ha−1 of residues without barks, regardless of the herbicide. Sulfentrazone controlled Ipomoea grandifolia (> 90%) under the evaluated residue conditions. Spermacoce latifolia and Sida rhombifolia were controlled by all herbicides in the evaluated residue conditions. Isoxaflutole controlled Panicum maximum in all residue conditions. The choice between the herbicides depends on the residue condition, rainfall regime, and weed species to be controlled.
id UNSP_627f04f11182ae49cae140aefd2e1592
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/201305
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Dynamics and efficacy of sulfentrazone, flumioxazin, and isoxaflutole herbicides applied on eucalyptus harvest residuesBrachiaria decumbensHerbicide dynamicsIpomoea grandifoliaPanicum maximumPreemergent herbicidesSoil coverEucalyptus harvests generate residues that remain on the soil and affect the efficacy of preemergent herbicides in the following planting cycle. The objective of this work was to evaluate the dynamics of flumioxazin, sulfentrazone, and isoxaflutole herbicides applied on different amounts and compositions of eucalyptus harvest residues subjected to different rainfall depths; and evaluate the weed control effectiveness of these herbicides when applied under these conditions. A LC–MS/MS system was used for the evaluations and the results showed that a cumulative rainfall of 50 mm was sufficient for the maximum removal of herbicides from the eucalyptus residues, regardless of the residue composition. The amount of the flumioxazin, sulfentrazone, and isoxaflutole herbicides that reached the soil was lower in the treatment with the highest amount of eucalyptus harvest residue used (40 Mg ha−1). The greatest amount of herbicide reaching the soil was found with the use of 15 Mg ha−1 of residues without presence of bark. The highest amount of residue used (40 Mg ha−1) reduced the control of Brachiaria decumbens by sulfentrazone and isoxaflutole. The control of Commelina benghalensis was inefficient (> 80%) in the treatment with 15 Mg ha−1 of residues without barks, regardless of the herbicide. Sulfentrazone controlled Ipomoea grandifolia (> 90%) under the evaluated residue conditions. Spermacoce latifolia and Sida rhombifolia were controlled by all herbicides in the evaluated residue conditions. Isoxaflutole controlled Panicum maximum in all residue conditions. The choice between the herbicides depends on the residue condition, rainfall regime, and weed species to be controlled.School of Agriculture of the São Paulo State University (Unesp), Av. Universitária, 3780 - Altos do Paraíso, Fazenda Experimental LageadoSchool of Agriculture of the São Paulo State University (Unesp), Av. Universitária, 3780 - Altos do Paraíso, Fazenda Experimental LageadoUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Carbonari, Caio Antonio [UNESP]Gomes, Giovanna Larissa Gimenes Cotrick [UNESP]Krenchinski, Fábio Henrique [UNESP]Simões, Plinio Saulo [UNESP]Batista de Castro, Edicarlos [UNESP]Velini, Edivaldo Domingues [UNESP]2020-12-12T02:29:14Z2020-12-12T02:29:14Z2020-07-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article723-737http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11056-019-09756-3New Forests, v. 51, n. 4, p. 723-737, 2020.1573-50950169-4286http://hdl.handle.net/11449/20130510.1007/s11056-019-09756-32-s2.0-85074643976Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengNew Forestsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-04-30T15:58:21Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/201305Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T21:33:50.629366Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Dynamics and efficacy of sulfentrazone, flumioxazin, and isoxaflutole herbicides applied on eucalyptus harvest residues
title Dynamics and efficacy of sulfentrazone, flumioxazin, and isoxaflutole herbicides applied on eucalyptus harvest residues
spellingShingle Dynamics and efficacy of sulfentrazone, flumioxazin, and isoxaflutole herbicides applied on eucalyptus harvest residues
Carbonari, Caio Antonio [UNESP]
Brachiaria decumbens
Herbicide dynamics
Ipomoea grandifolia
Panicum maximum
Preemergent herbicides
Soil cover
title_short Dynamics and efficacy of sulfentrazone, flumioxazin, and isoxaflutole herbicides applied on eucalyptus harvest residues
title_full Dynamics and efficacy of sulfentrazone, flumioxazin, and isoxaflutole herbicides applied on eucalyptus harvest residues
title_fullStr Dynamics and efficacy of sulfentrazone, flumioxazin, and isoxaflutole herbicides applied on eucalyptus harvest residues
title_full_unstemmed Dynamics and efficacy of sulfentrazone, flumioxazin, and isoxaflutole herbicides applied on eucalyptus harvest residues
title_sort Dynamics and efficacy of sulfentrazone, flumioxazin, and isoxaflutole herbicides applied on eucalyptus harvest residues
author Carbonari, Caio Antonio [UNESP]
author_facet Carbonari, Caio Antonio [UNESP]
Gomes, Giovanna Larissa Gimenes Cotrick [UNESP]
Krenchinski, Fábio Henrique [UNESP]
Simões, Plinio Saulo [UNESP]
Batista de Castro, Edicarlos [UNESP]
Velini, Edivaldo Domingues [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Gomes, Giovanna Larissa Gimenes Cotrick [UNESP]
Krenchinski, Fábio Henrique [UNESP]
Simões, Plinio Saulo [UNESP]
Batista de Castro, Edicarlos [UNESP]
Velini, Edivaldo Domingues [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Carbonari, Caio Antonio [UNESP]
Gomes, Giovanna Larissa Gimenes Cotrick [UNESP]
Krenchinski, Fábio Henrique [UNESP]
Simões, Plinio Saulo [UNESP]
Batista de Castro, Edicarlos [UNESP]
Velini, Edivaldo Domingues [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Brachiaria decumbens
Herbicide dynamics
Ipomoea grandifolia
Panicum maximum
Preemergent herbicides
Soil cover
topic Brachiaria decumbens
Herbicide dynamics
Ipomoea grandifolia
Panicum maximum
Preemergent herbicides
Soil cover
description Eucalyptus harvests generate residues that remain on the soil and affect the efficacy of preemergent herbicides in the following planting cycle. The objective of this work was to evaluate the dynamics of flumioxazin, sulfentrazone, and isoxaflutole herbicides applied on different amounts and compositions of eucalyptus harvest residues subjected to different rainfall depths; and evaluate the weed control effectiveness of these herbicides when applied under these conditions. A LC–MS/MS system was used for the evaluations and the results showed that a cumulative rainfall of 50 mm was sufficient for the maximum removal of herbicides from the eucalyptus residues, regardless of the residue composition. The amount of the flumioxazin, sulfentrazone, and isoxaflutole herbicides that reached the soil was lower in the treatment with the highest amount of eucalyptus harvest residue used (40 Mg ha−1). The greatest amount of herbicide reaching the soil was found with the use of 15 Mg ha−1 of residues without presence of bark. The highest amount of residue used (40 Mg ha−1) reduced the control of Brachiaria decumbens by sulfentrazone and isoxaflutole. The control of Commelina benghalensis was inefficient (> 80%) in the treatment with 15 Mg ha−1 of residues without barks, regardless of the herbicide. Sulfentrazone controlled Ipomoea grandifolia (> 90%) under the evaluated residue conditions. Spermacoce latifolia and Sida rhombifolia were controlled by all herbicides in the evaluated residue conditions. Isoxaflutole controlled Panicum maximum in all residue conditions. The choice between the herbicides depends on the residue condition, rainfall regime, and weed species to be controlled.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-12-12T02:29:14Z
2020-12-12T02:29:14Z
2020-07-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11056-019-09756-3
New Forests, v. 51, n. 4, p. 723-737, 2020.
1573-5095
0169-4286
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/201305
10.1007/s11056-019-09756-3
2-s2.0-85074643976
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11056-019-09756-3
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/201305
identifier_str_mv New Forests, v. 51, n. 4, p. 723-737, 2020.
1573-5095
0169-4286
10.1007/s11056-019-09756-3
2-s2.0-85074643976
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv New Forests
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 723-737
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808129336302108672