BPM for change management: Two process diagnosis techniques

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: de Pádua, Silvia Inês Dallavalle
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: da Costa, Janaina Mascarenhas Hornos [UNESP], Segatto, Mayara, Júnior, Melchior Aparecido de Souza, Jabbour, Charbel José Chiappetta [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-03-2013-0039
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/177201
Resumo: Purpose: This paper focuses on organizational change through the business process management approach. While business process modeling permits understanding process activities and their activities with other participants, current reality tree (CRT) technique promotes the identification of process constraints. The purpose of this study is to compare the results from applying both diagnostic techniques, process modeling, using the business process modeling notation, and root cause analysis, using the CRT. Design/methodology/approach: The comparison is made using a pre-experiment in which two teams conducted diagnoses concomitantly in the information technology management (ITM) process of one unit of the biggest and prestigious higher education institution (HEI) in Brazil. Findings: The modeling technique and the CRT should be considered complementary techniques, since applying one does not diminish or exclude the importance of using the other. Results were compared analyzing which dimensions of the process each technique highlighted: strategy, organization, activity/information and resources. Research limitations/implications: A possible limitation of this research is that the experiment was conducted in a single process and the result cannot be generalized to other processes. Practical implications: It may be noted that the main contribution of this study is the presentation of the steps of two techniques for process diagnosis. It is expected that with the reports on diagnoses outcomes, team's assessment and the perception of the managers presented here other improvement teams may use the results of this research as an inspiration to perform process diagnosis, and as basis for decision making to define which technique to use according to the specific needs of process improvement. Originality/value: The paper stands out the comparison of the technique application's outcomes. This study offers valuable insights to the organizations that are interested in restructuring their processes. It delineates many important benefits of such a diagnosis techniques. It also identifies possible pitfalls and recommends guidelines for the successful conduction of process diagnoses initiatives. © Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
id UNSP_639c953e08c0b005b7477cbe7b185813
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/177201
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling BPM for change management: Two process diagnosis techniquesBusiness analysisChange managementComparative methodModelingOrganizational changeOrganizational processesPurpose: This paper focuses on organizational change through the business process management approach. While business process modeling permits understanding process activities and their activities with other participants, current reality tree (CRT) technique promotes the identification of process constraints. The purpose of this study is to compare the results from applying both diagnostic techniques, process modeling, using the business process modeling notation, and root cause analysis, using the CRT. Design/methodology/approach: The comparison is made using a pre-experiment in which two teams conducted diagnoses concomitantly in the information technology management (ITM) process of one unit of the biggest and prestigious higher education institution (HEI) in Brazil. Findings: The modeling technique and the CRT should be considered complementary techniques, since applying one does not diminish or exclude the importance of using the other. Results were compared analyzing which dimensions of the process each technique highlighted: strategy, organization, activity/information and resources. Research limitations/implications: A possible limitation of this research is that the experiment was conducted in a single process and the result cannot be generalized to other processes. Practical implications: It may be noted that the main contribution of this study is the presentation of the steps of two techniques for process diagnosis. It is expected that with the reports on diagnoses outcomes, team's assessment and the perception of the managers presented here other improvement teams may use the results of this research as an inspiration to perform process diagnosis, and as basis for decision making to define which technique to use according to the specific needs of process improvement. Originality/value: The paper stands out the comparison of the technique application's outcomes. This study offers valuable insights to the organizations that are interested in restructuring their processes. It delineates many important benefits of such a diagnosis techniques. It also identifies possible pitfalls and recommends guidelines for the successful conduction of process diagnoses initiatives. © Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Business Administration Department, University of Sao Paulo (USP), Ribeirã o PretoIndustrial Engineering and Management, The Sao Paulo State University (UNESP), BauruSociotechnical Systems Research Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MAIndustrial Engineering and Management, The Sao Paulo State University (UNESP), BauruUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Sociotechnical Systems Research Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)de Pádua, Silvia Inês Dallavalleda Costa, Janaina Mascarenhas Hornos [UNESP]Segatto, MayaraJúnior, Melchior Aparecido de SouzaJabbour, Charbel José Chiappetta [UNESP]2018-12-11T17:24:26Z2018-12-11T17:24:26Z2014-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article247-271application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-03-2013-0039Business Process Management Journal, v. 20, n. 2, p. 247-271, 2014.1463-7154http://hdl.handle.net/11449/17720110.1108/BPMJ-03-2013-00392-s2.0-849004241692-s2.0-84900424169.pdfScopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengBusiness Process Management Journal0,465info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-12-05T06:16:45Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/177201Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462023-12-05T06:16:45Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv BPM for change management: Two process diagnosis techniques
title BPM for change management: Two process diagnosis techniques
spellingShingle BPM for change management: Two process diagnosis techniques
de Pádua, Silvia Inês Dallavalle
Business analysis
Change management
Comparative method
Modeling
Organizational change
Organizational processes
title_short BPM for change management: Two process diagnosis techniques
title_full BPM for change management: Two process diagnosis techniques
title_fullStr BPM for change management: Two process diagnosis techniques
title_full_unstemmed BPM for change management: Two process diagnosis techniques
title_sort BPM for change management: Two process diagnosis techniques
author de Pádua, Silvia Inês Dallavalle
author_facet de Pádua, Silvia Inês Dallavalle
da Costa, Janaina Mascarenhas Hornos [UNESP]
Segatto, Mayara
Júnior, Melchior Aparecido de Souza
Jabbour, Charbel José Chiappetta [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 da Costa, Janaina Mascarenhas Hornos [UNESP]
Segatto, Mayara
Júnior, Melchior Aparecido de Souza
Jabbour, Charbel José Chiappetta [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Sociotechnical Systems Research Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv de Pádua, Silvia Inês Dallavalle
da Costa, Janaina Mascarenhas Hornos [UNESP]
Segatto, Mayara
Júnior, Melchior Aparecido de Souza
Jabbour, Charbel José Chiappetta [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Business analysis
Change management
Comparative method
Modeling
Organizational change
Organizational processes
topic Business analysis
Change management
Comparative method
Modeling
Organizational change
Organizational processes
description Purpose: This paper focuses on organizational change through the business process management approach. While business process modeling permits understanding process activities and their activities with other participants, current reality tree (CRT) technique promotes the identification of process constraints. The purpose of this study is to compare the results from applying both diagnostic techniques, process modeling, using the business process modeling notation, and root cause analysis, using the CRT. Design/methodology/approach: The comparison is made using a pre-experiment in which two teams conducted diagnoses concomitantly in the information technology management (ITM) process of one unit of the biggest and prestigious higher education institution (HEI) in Brazil. Findings: The modeling technique and the CRT should be considered complementary techniques, since applying one does not diminish or exclude the importance of using the other. Results were compared analyzing which dimensions of the process each technique highlighted: strategy, organization, activity/information and resources. Research limitations/implications: A possible limitation of this research is that the experiment was conducted in a single process and the result cannot be generalized to other processes. Practical implications: It may be noted that the main contribution of this study is the presentation of the steps of two techniques for process diagnosis. It is expected that with the reports on diagnoses outcomes, team's assessment and the perception of the managers presented here other improvement teams may use the results of this research as an inspiration to perform process diagnosis, and as basis for decision making to define which technique to use according to the specific needs of process improvement. Originality/value: The paper stands out the comparison of the technique application's outcomes. This study offers valuable insights to the organizations that are interested in restructuring their processes. It delineates many important benefits of such a diagnosis techniques. It also identifies possible pitfalls and recommends guidelines for the successful conduction of process diagnoses initiatives. © Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-01-01
2018-12-11T17:24:26Z
2018-12-11T17:24:26Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-03-2013-0039
Business Process Management Journal, v. 20, n. 2, p. 247-271, 2014.
1463-7154
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/177201
10.1108/BPMJ-03-2013-0039
2-s2.0-84900424169
2-s2.0-84900424169.pdf
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-03-2013-0039
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/177201
identifier_str_mv Business Process Management Journal, v. 20, n. 2, p. 247-271, 2014.
1463-7154
10.1108/BPMJ-03-2013-0039
2-s2.0-84900424169
2-s2.0-84900424169.pdf
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Business Process Management Journal
0,465
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 247-271
application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799965177867665408