Discriminant analysis in the selection of groups of peach cultivars

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Melo, G. W.
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Rozane, D. E. [UNESP], Brunetto, G., Lattuada, D. S.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2018.1217.42
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/221221
Resumo: Brazil ranks 14th in the world in terms of peach and nectarine production. Of the nearly 211,000 tons total output, the state of Rio Grande do Sul produces 60% of the national production, while southern Brazil accounts for 75%. This indicates that adequate parameters are required to manage the nutritional status of all fruit trees, of which the peach tree is an important component, as well as the performance of long-term experiments under field conditions in several, but often restricted, numbers of cultivars. The nutritional parameters that have been established as adequate can be applied to other cultivars which reveal similar nutritional contents and equivalent demands. Besides productivity, 12 elements (N, P, K, Ca, Mg, S, Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn, Al and Na) were analyzed in leaf tissue samples in 144 commercially cultivated peach orchards in South Rio Grande do Sul, specifically the cultivars of Chimarrita, Chiripá, Delanona, Eragil, Fascínio, Kampai, Pialo, PS10711, PS-Tardia and São Barbosa. Group analysis employing the Wilks’ Lambda test (F=9.29; p<0.01) revealed differences among the groups. Nutrients like Cu, Zn, K, Mg, Ca and N were found to most significantly influence growth and formed the three main axes for distinguishing among the groups, whereas nutrients like S, P and Mn, showed the least contribution. The nutritional profiles of the peach cultivars can be categorized in homogeneous groups to benefit from the fertilizer trials. Cluster analysis can be instrumental in the diagnosis and nutrient management of peach trees.
id UNSP_647b4f78c5435ac00da91492b593f563
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/221221
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Discriminant analysis in the selection of groups of peach cultivarsCompositional nutrientFruitNutritionPrunus persicaBrazil ranks 14th in the world in terms of peach and nectarine production. Of the nearly 211,000 tons total output, the state of Rio Grande do Sul produces 60% of the national production, while southern Brazil accounts for 75%. This indicates that adequate parameters are required to manage the nutritional status of all fruit trees, of which the peach tree is an important component, as well as the performance of long-term experiments under field conditions in several, but often restricted, numbers of cultivars. The nutritional parameters that have been established as adequate can be applied to other cultivars which reveal similar nutritional contents and equivalent demands. Besides productivity, 12 elements (N, P, K, Ca, Mg, S, Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn, Al and Na) were analyzed in leaf tissue samples in 144 commercially cultivated peach orchards in South Rio Grande do Sul, specifically the cultivars of Chimarrita, Chiripá, Delanona, Eragil, Fascínio, Kampai, Pialo, PS10711, PS-Tardia and São Barbosa. Group analysis employing the Wilks’ Lambda test (F=9.29; p<0.01) revealed differences among the groups. Nutrients like Cu, Zn, K, Mg, Ca and N were found to most significantly influence growth and formed the three main axes for distinguishing among the groups, whereas nutrients like S, P and Mn, showed the least contribution. The nutritional profiles of the peach cultivars can be categorized in homogeneous groups to benefit from the fertilizer trials. Cluster analysis can be instrumental in the diagnosis and nutrient management of peach trees.Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa AgropecuáriaUniversidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”Federal University of Santa MariaResearch Center Celeste GobbatoUniversidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (EMBRAPA)Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Federal University of Santa MariaResearch Center Celeste GobbatoMelo, G. W.Rozane, D. E. [UNESP]Brunetto, G.Lattuada, D. S.2022-04-28T19:26:53Z2022-04-28T19:26:53Z2018-10-31info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article335-342http://dx.doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2018.1217.42Acta Horticulturae, v. 1217, p. 335-342.2406-61680567-7572http://hdl.handle.net/11449/22122110.17660/ActaHortic.2018.1217.422-s2.0-85057775082Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengActa Horticulturaeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-04-28T19:26:53Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/221221Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462022-04-28T19:26:53Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Discriminant analysis in the selection of groups of peach cultivars
title Discriminant analysis in the selection of groups of peach cultivars
spellingShingle Discriminant analysis in the selection of groups of peach cultivars
Melo, G. W.
Compositional nutrient
Fruit
Nutrition
Prunus persica
title_short Discriminant analysis in the selection of groups of peach cultivars
title_full Discriminant analysis in the selection of groups of peach cultivars
title_fullStr Discriminant analysis in the selection of groups of peach cultivars
title_full_unstemmed Discriminant analysis in the selection of groups of peach cultivars
title_sort Discriminant analysis in the selection of groups of peach cultivars
author Melo, G. W.
author_facet Melo, G. W.
Rozane, D. E. [UNESP]
Brunetto, G.
Lattuada, D. S.
author_role author
author2 Rozane, D. E. [UNESP]
Brunetto, G.
Lattuada, D. S.
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (EMBRAPA)
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
Federal University of Santa Maria
Research Center Celeste Gobbato
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Melo, G. W.
Rozane, D. E. [UNESP]
Brunetto, G.
Lattuada, D. S.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Compositional nutrient
Fruit
Nutrition
Prunus persica
topic Compositional nutrient
Fruit
Nutrition
Prunus persica
description Brazil ranks 14th in the world in terms of peach and nectarine production. Of the nearly 211,000 tons total output, the state of Rio Grande do Sul produces 60% of the national production, while southern Brazil accounts for 75%. This indicates that adequate parameters are required to manage the nutritional status of all fruit trees, of which the peach tree is an important component, as well as the performance of long-term experiments under field conditions in several, but often restricted, numbers of cultivars. The nutritional parameters that have been established as adequate can be applied to other cultivars which reveal similar nutritional contents and equivalent demands. Besides productivity, 12 elements (N, P, K, Ca, Mg, S, Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn, Al and Na) were analyzed in leaf tissue samples in 144 commercially cultivated peach orchards in South Rio Grande do Sul, specifically the cultivars of Chimarrita, Chiripá, Delanona, Eragil, Fascínio, Kampai, Pialo, PS10711, PS-Tardia and São Barbosa. Group analysis employing the Wilks’ Lambda test (F=9.29; p<0.01) revealed differences among the groups. Nutrients like Cu, Zn, K, Mg, Ca and N were found to most significantly influence growth and formed the three main axes for distinguishing among the groups, whereas nutrients like S, P and Mn, showed the least contribution. The nutritional profiles of the peach cultivars can be categorized in homogeneous groups to benefit from the fertilizer trials. Cluster analysis can be instrumental in the diagnosis and nutrient management of peach trees.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-10-31
2022-04-28T19:26:53Z
2022-04-28T19:26:53Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2018.1217.42
Acta Horticulturae, v. 1217, p. 335-342.
2406-6168
0567-7572
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/221221
10.17660/ActaHortic.2018.1217.42
2-s2.0-85057775082
url http://dx.doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2018.1217.42
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/221221
identifier_str_mv Acta Horticulturae, v. 1217, p. 335-342.
2406-6168
0567-7572
10.17660/ActaHortic.2018.1217.42
2-s2.0-85057775082
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Acta Horticulturae
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 335-342
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799965419848597504