Application of multi-criteria decision-making methods: certification mechanisms for organic produce in Brazil
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207233.2019.1594216 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/190268 |
Resumo: | A rural producer who wishes to market organic products must obtain the Brazilian Organic Conformity Assessment System seal and consider a series of criteria for certification. The objective of this article is to identify which criteria should take priority and which organic conformity assessment mechanism (certification by Audit or by the Participatory Guarantee System—SPG) is the most appropriate option for a rural producer who wishes to obtain the seal of organic certification. After a bibliometric analysis, the researchers used the Analytic Hierarchy Process multicriteria method. A sensitivity analysis was also carried out to investigate variations in the priorities of the criteria and certification alternatives. The results indicated the following order of priority of the criteria: cost, market access, and producer availability. SPG was the most relevant assessment mechanism. |
id |
UNSP_651608e815722fb3432bbb4eb0f2c7b8 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/190268 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Application of multi-criteria decision-making methods: certification mechanisms for organic produce in BrazilagricultureAHPcertificationdecisionOrganicsmallholderA rural producer who wishes to market organic products must obtain the Brazilian Organic Conformity Assessment System seal and consider a series of criteria for certification. The objective of this article is to identify which criteria should take priority and which organic conformity assessment mechanism (certification by Audit or by the Participatory Guarantee System—SPG) is the most appropriate option for a rural producer who wishes to obtain the seal of organic certification. After a bibliometric analysis, the researchers used the Analytic Hierarchy Process multicriteria method. A sensitivity analysis was also carried out to investigate variations in the priorities of the criteria and certification alternatives. The results indicated the following order of priority of the criteria: cost, market access, and producer availability. SPG was the most relevant assessment mechanism.School of Engineering São Paulo State University (UNESP)School of Sciences and Languages of Assis São Paulo State University (UNESP)School of Engineering São Paulo State University (UNESP)School of Sciences and Languages of Assis São Paulo State University (UNESP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Esguícero, Fábio José [UNESP]Rotoli, Liliane Ubeda Morandi [UNESP]Battistelle, Rosane Aparecida Gomes [UNESP]Deus, Rafael Mattos [UNESP]Siqueira, Regiane Máximo [UNESP]Bezerra, Barbara Stolte [UNESP]2019-10-06T17:07:41Z2019-10-06T17:07:41Z2019-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207233.2019.1594216International Journal of Environmental Studies.1029-04000020-7233http://hdl.handle.net/11449/19026810.1080/00207233.2019.15942162-s2.0-8506450640654443935098830720000-0002-4695-2678Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengInternational Journal of Environmental Studiesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-06-28T12:56:33Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/190268Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-06-28T12:56:33Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Application of multi-criteria decision-making methods: certification mechanisms for organic produce in Brazil |
title |
Application of multi-criteria decision-making methods: certification mechanisms for organic produce in Brazil |
spellingShingle |
Application of multi-criteria decision-making methods: certification mechanisms for organic produce in Brazil Esguícero, Fábio José [UNESP] agriculture AHP certification decision Organic smallholder |
title_short |
Application of multi-criteria decision-making methods: certification mechanisms for organic produce in Brazil |
title_full |
Application of multi-criteria decision-making methods: certification mechanisms for organic produce in Brazil |
title_fullStr |
Application of multi-criteria decision-making methods: certification mechanisms for organic produce in Brazil |
title_full_unstemmed |
Application of multi-criteria decision-making methods: certification mechanisms for organic produce in Brazil |
title_sort |
Application of multi-criteria decision-making methods: certification mechanisms for organic produce in Brazil |
author |
Esguícero, Fábio José [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Esguícero, Fábio José [UNESP] Rotoli, Liliane Ubeda Morandi [UNESP] Battistelle, Rosane Aparecida Gomes [UNESP] Deus, Rafael Mattos [UNESP] Siqueira, Regiane Máximo [UNESP] Bezerra, Barbara Stolte [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Rotoli, Liliane Ubeda Morandi [UNESP] Battistelle, Rosane Aparecida Gomes [UNESP] Deus, Rafael Mattos [UNESP] Siqueira, Regiane Máximo [UNESP] Bezerra, Barbara Stolte [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Esguícero, Fábio José [UNESP] Rotoli, Liliane Ubeda Morandi [UNESP] Battistelle, Rosane Aparecida Gomes [UNESP] Deus, Rafael Mattos [UNESP] Siqueira, Regiane Máximo [UNESP] Bezerra, Barbara Stolte [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
agriculture AHP certification decision Organic smallholder |
topic |
agriculture AHP certification decision Organic smallholder |
description |
A rural producer who wishes to market organic products must obtain the Brazilian Organic Conformity Assessment System seal and consider a series of criteria for certification. The objective of this article is to identify which criteria should take priority and which organic conformity assessment mechanism (certification by Audit or by the Participatory Guarantee System—SPG) is the most appropriate option for a rural producer who wishes to obtain the seal of organic certification. After a bibliometric analysis, the researchers used the Analytic Hierarchy Process multicriteria method. A sensitivity analysis was also carried out to investigate variations in the priorities of the criteria and certification alternatives. The results indicated the following order of priority of the criteria: cost, market access, and producer availability. SPG was the most relevant assessment mechanism. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-10-06T17:07:41Z 2019-10-06T17:07:41Z 2019-01-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207233.2019.1594216 International Journal of Environmental Studies. 1029-0400 0020-7233 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/190268 10.1080/00207233.2019.1594216 2-s2.0-85064506406 5444393509883072 0000-0002-4695-2678 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207233.2019.1594216 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/190268 |
identifier_str_mv |
International Journal of Environmental Studies. 1029-0400 0020-7233 10.1080/00207233.2019.1594216 2-s2.0-85064506406 5444393509883072 0000-0002-4695-2678 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
International Journal of Environmental Studies |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1803649739652071424 |