Application of multi-criteria decision-making methods: certification mechanisms for organic produce in Brazil

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Esguícero, Fábio José [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Rotoli, Liliane Ubeda Morandi [UNESP], Battistelle, Rosane Aparecida Gomes [UNESP], Deus, Rafael Mattos [UNESP], Siqueira, Regiane Máximo [UNESP], Bezerra, Barbara Stolte [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207233.2019.1594216
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/190268
Resumo: A rural producer who wishes to market organic products must obtain the Brazilian Organic Conformity Assessment System seal and consider a series of criteria for certification. The objective of this article is to identify which criteria should take priority and which organic conformity assessment mechanism (certification by Audit or by the Participatory Guarantee System—SPG) is the most appropriate option for a rural producer who wishes to obtain the seal of organic certification. After a bibliometric analysis, the researchers used the Analytic Hierarchy Process multicriteria method. A sensitivity analysis was also carried out to investigate variations in the priorities of the criteria and certification alternatives. The results indicated the following order of priority of the criteria: cost, market access, and producer availability. SPG was the most relevant assessment mechanism.
id UNSP_651608e815722fb3432bbb4eb0f2c7b8
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/190268
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Application of multi-criteria decision-making methods: certification mechanisms for organic produce in BrazilagricultureAHPcertificationdecisionOrganicsmallholderA rural producer who wishes to market organic products must obtain the Brazilian Organic Conformity Assessment System seal and consider a series of criteria for certification. The objective of this article is to identify which criteria should take priority and which organic conformity assessment mechanism (certification by Audit or by the Participatory Guarantee System—SPG) is the most appropriate option for a rural producer who wishes to obtain the seal of organic certification. After a bibliometric analysis, the researchers used the Analytic Hierarchy Process multicriteria method. A sensitivity analysis was also carried out to investigate variations in the priorities of the criteria and certification alternatives. The results indicated the following order of priority of the criteria: cost, market access, and producer availability. SPG was the most relevant assessment mechanism.School of Engineering São Paulo State University (UNESP)School of Sciences and Languages of Assis São Paulo State University (UNESP)School of Engineering São Paulo State University (UNESP)School of Sciences and Languages of Assis São Paulo State University (UNESP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Esguícero, Fábio José [UNESP]Rotoli, Liliane Ubeda Morandi [UNESP]Battistelle, Rosane Aparecida Gomes [UNESP]Deus, Rafael Mattos [UNESP]Siqueira, Regiane Máximo [UNESP]Bezerra, Barbara Stolte [UNESP]2019-10-06T17:07:41Z2019-10-06T17:07:41Z2019-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207233.2019.1594216International Journal of Environmental Studies.1029-04000020-7233http://hdl.handle.net/11449/19026810.1080/00207233.2019.15942162-s2.0-8506450640654443935098830720000-0002-4695-2678Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengInternational Journal of Environmental Studiesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-06-28T12:56:33Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/190268Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-06-28T12:56:33Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Application of multi-criteria decision-making methods: certification mechanisms for organic produce in Brazil
title Application of multi-criteria decision-making methods: certification mechanisms for organic produce in Brazil
spellingShingle Application of multi-criteria decision-making methods: certification mechanisms for organic produce in Brazil
Esguícero, Fábio José [UNESP]
agriculture
AHP
certification
decision
Organic
smallholder
title_short Application of multi-criteria decision-making methods: certification mechanisms for organic produce in Brazil
title_full Application of multi-criteria decision-making methods: certification mechanisms for organic produce in Brazil
title_fullStr Application of multi-criteria decision-making methods: certification mechanisms for organic produce in Brazil
title_full_unstemmed Application of multi-criteria decision-making methods: certification mechanisms for organic produce in Brazil
title_sort Application of multi-criteria decision-making methods: certification mechanisms for organic produce in Brazil
author Esguícero, Fábio José [UNESP]
author_facet Esguícero, Fábio José [UNESP]
Rotoli, Liliane Ubeda Morandi [UNESP]
Battistelle, Rosane Aparecida Gomes [UNESP]
Deus, Rafael Mattos [UNESP]
Siqueira, Regiane Máximo [UNESP]
Bezerra, Barbara Stolte [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Rotoli, Liliane Ubeda Morandi [UNESP]
Battistelle, Rosane Aparecida Gomes [UNESP]
Deus, Rafael Mattos [UNESP]
Siqueira, Regiane Máximo [UNESP]
Bezerra, Barbara Stolte [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Esguícero, Fábio José [UNESP]
Rotoli, Liliane Ubeda Morandi [UNESP]
Battistelle, Rosane Aparecida Gomes [UNESP]
Deus, Rafael Mattos [UNESP]
Siqueira, Regiane Máximo [UNESP]
Bezerra, Barbara Stolte [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv agriculture
AHP
certification
decision
Organic
smallholder
topic agriculture
AHP
certification
decision
Organic
smallholder
description A rural producer who wishes to market organic products must obtain the Brazilian Organic Conformity Assessment System seal and consider a series of criteria for certification. The objective of this article is to identify which criteria should take priority and which organic conformity assessment mechanism (certification by Audit or by the Participatory Guarantee System—SPG) is the most appropriate option for a rural producer who wishes to obtain the seal of organic certification. After a bibliometric analysis, the researchers used the Analytic Hierarchy Process multicriteria method. A sensitivity analysis was also carried out to investigate variations in the priorities of the criteria and certification alternatives. The results indicated the following order of priority of the criteria: cost, market access, and producer availability. SPG was the most relevant assessment mechanism.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-10-06T17:07:41Z
2019-10-06T17:07:41Z
2019-01-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207233.2019.1594216
International Journal of Environmental Studies.
1029-0400
0020-7233
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/190268
10.1080/00207233.2019.1594216
2-s2.0-85064506406
5444393509883072
0000-0002-4695-2678
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207233.2019.1594216
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/190268
identifier_str_mv International Journal of Environmental Studies.
1029-0400
0020-7233
10.1080/00207233.2019.1594216
2-s2.0-85064506406
5444393509883072
0000-0002-4695-2678
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv International Journal of Environmental Studies
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1803649739652071424