The consent in sex trafficking under the hammer of the Judiciary: judicial practices and discourses

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Garbellini Filho, Luiz Henrique
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Borges, Paulo Cesar Correa [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2179-8966/2021/55088
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/245803
Resumo: This paper aims to analyze the judicial response on consent to sex trafficking. The qualitative analysis falls on the judicial practices and discourses of the Court's judges in seven (07) judgments of the Tribunal Regional Federal da 3 Regiao as elements for problematizing the relation between punitive power and gender from the theoretical -methodological arsenal of Feminist Criminology and Critical Discourse Analysis. We sustain that, in decisions after 2016, the judges have (i) broked with the categorization, standardized portraits and moral panics about sex trafficking, as well as (ii) modified the understanding about consent, which became relevant for a configuration of crime. We argue that the judges can create new standards of anti-discriminatory and non -generalizing judicial understandings, however, they fail to develop an effective feminist legal project.
id UNSP_661ad85569358062e64d09b31ab0e514
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/245803
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling The consent in sex trafficking under the hammer of the Judiciary: judicial practices and discoursesLawGenderConsentThis paper aims to analyze the judicial response on consent to sex trafficking. The qualitative analysis falls on the judicial practices and discourses of the Court's judges in seven (07) judgments of the Tribunal Regional Federal da 3 Regiao as elements for problematizing the relation between punitive power and gender from the theoretical -methodological arsenal of Feminist Criminology and Critical Discourse Analysis. We sustain that, in decisions after 2016, the judges have (i) broked with the categorization, standardized portraits and moral panics about sex trafficking, as well as (ii) modified the understanding about consent, which became relevant for a configuration of crime. We argue that the judges can create new standards of anti-discriminatory and non -generalizing judicial understandings, however, they fail to develop an effective feminist legal project.Univ Sevilha, Direito, Seville, Andaluzia, SpainUniv Estadual Paulista, Franca, SP, BrazilUniv Estadual Paulista, Franca, SP, BrazilUniv Estado Rio De Janeiro, Fac DireitoUniv SevilhaUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Garbellini Filho, Luiz HenriqueBorges, Paulo Cesar Correa [UNESP]2023-07-29T12:14:26Z2023-07-29T12:14:26Z2022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article2374-2403http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2179-8966/2021/55088Direito e Praxis. Rio de Janeiro: Univ Estado Rio de Janeiro, Fac Direito, v. 13, n. 4, p. 2374-2403, 2022.2179-8966http://hdl.handle.net/11449/24580310.1590/2179-8966/2021/55088WOS:000936988400011Web of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengDireito E Praxisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-06-25T18:34:47Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/245803Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T17:40:22.383797Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The consent in sex trafficking under the hammer of the Judiciary: judicial practices and discourses
title The consent in sex trafficking under the hammer of the Judiciary: judicial practices and discourses
spellingShingle The consent in sex trafficking under the hammer of the Judiciary: judicial practices and discourses
Garbellini Filho, Luiz Henrique
Law
Gender
Consent
title_short The consent in sex trafficking under the hammer of the Judiciary: judicial practices and discourses
title_full The consent in sex trafficking under the hammer of the Judiciary: judicial practices and discourses
title_fullStr The consent in sex trafficking under the hammer of the Judiciary: judicial practices and discourses
title_full_unstemmed The consent in sex trafficking under the hammer of the Judiciary: judicial practices and discourses
title_sort The consent in sex trafficking under the hammer of the Judiciary: judicial practices and discourses
author Garbellini Filho, Luiz Henrique
author_facet Garbellini Filho, Luiz Henrique
Borges, Paulo Cesar Correa [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Borges, Paulo Cesar Correa [UNESP]
author2_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Univ Sevilha
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Garbellini Filho, Luiz Henrique
Borges, Paulo Cesar Correa [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Law
Gender
Consent
topic Law
Gender
Consent
description This paper aims to analyze the judicial response on consent to sex trafficking. The qualitative analysis falls on the judicial practices and discourses of the Court's judges in seven (07) judgments of the Tribunal Regional Federal da 3 Regiao as elements for problematizing the relation between punitive power and gender from the theoretical -methodological arsenal of Feminist Criminology and Critical Discourse Analysis. We sustain that, in decisions after 2016, the judges have (i) broked with the categorization, standardized portraits and moral panics about sex trafficking, as well as (ii) modified the understanding about consent, which became relevant for a configuration of crime. We argue that the judges can create new standards of anti-discriminatory and non -generalizing judicial understandings, however, they fail to develop an effective feminist legal project.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-01-01
2023-07-29T12:14:26Z
2023-07-29T12:14:26Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2179-8966/2021/55088
Direito e Praxis. Rio de Janeiro: Univ Estado Rio de Janeiro, Fac Direito, v. 13, n. 4, p. 2374-2403, 2022.
2179-8966
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/245803
10.1590/2179-8966/2021/55088
WOS:000936988400011
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2179-8966/2021/55088
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/245803
identifier_str_mv Direito e Praxis. Rio de Janeiro: Univ Estado Rio de Janeiro, Fac Direito, v. 13, n. 4, p. 2374-2403, 2022.
2179-8966
10.1590/2179-8966/2021/55088
WOS:000936988400011
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Direito E Praxis
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 2374-2403
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Univ Estado Rio De Janeiro, Fac Direito
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Univ Estado Rio De Janeiro, Fac Direito
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Web of Science
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808128841654206464

Registros relacionados