Rewilding South America: Ten key questions
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pecon.2017.09.007 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/163651 |
Resumo: | There are various approaches to rewilding, corresponding to different socio-ecological and policy contexts. Most South American ecosystems have experienced Pleistocene and historical defaunation and the functional persistence of many areas will depend on restoration and rewilding. Rewilding is not seen as a priority or as a tool for restoration in South America, but we argue that several concepts could potentially be adapted to their contexts to respond flexibly to developing socio-ecological conditions. Here, we consider 10 questions that rewilding projects should consider, and we provide examples of how these questions are relevant to South America and how they have been answered already, in some cases. The 10 questions include: What role should humans play in rewilding projects? How can society deal with monsters? Is there a rationale for non-analogue rewilding? How do we justify baselines? Is it possible to do rewilding with small species? What is the right scale for a rewilding project? Should rewilding projects worry about sample size and pseudo-replication? When should we rewild carnivores? Do we need to distinguish rewilding from safari parks and zoos? What should be included in integrated monitoring and assessment? The questions we raise here do not have general answers optimal for all situations, but should be answered with reference to the socio-ecological conditions and transformational possibilities in different areas of South America. (C) 2017 Associacao Brasileira de Ciencia Ecologica e Conservacao. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. |
id |
UNSP_66eb56e0489e3549cc67e38c191cb82f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/163651 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Rewilding South America: Ten key questionsRewildingSouth AmericaSocio-ecological systemBrazilChileBaselinesScaleCerradoThere are various approaches to rewilding, corresponding to different socio-ecological and policy contexts. Most South American ecosystems have experienced Pleistocene and historical defaunation and the functional persistence of many areas will depend on restoration and rewilding. Rewilding is not seen as a priority or as a tool for restoration in South America, but we argue that several concepts could potentially be adapted to their contexts to respond flexibly to developing socio-ecological conditions. Here, we consider 10 questions that rewilding projects should consider, and we provide examples of how these questions are relevant to South America and how they have been answered already, in some cases. The 10 questions include: What role should humans play in rewilding projects? How can society deal with monsters? Is there a rationale for non-analogue rewilding? How do we justify baselines? Is it possible to do rewilding with small species? What is the right scale for a rewilding project? Should rewilding projects worry about sample size and pseudo-replication? When should we rewild carnivores? Do we need to distinguish rewilding from safari parks and zoos? What should be included in integrated monitoring and assessment? The questions we raise here do not have general answers optimal for all situations, but should be answered with reference to the socio-ecological conditions and transformational possibilities in different areas of South America. (C) 2017 Associacao Brasileira de Ciencia Ecologica e Conservacao. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda.FONDECYTAarhus University Research on the Anthropocene (AURA)Danish National Research Foundation Niels Bohr professorship projectMarie Curie FP7 COFUND Agreenskills FellowshipConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)Univ Oxford, Sch Geog & Environm, Dyson Perrins Bldg,South Pk Rd, Oxford OX1 3QY, EnglandAarhus Univ, Dept Biosci, Aarhus, DenmarkINRA, UMR SAD APT, Grignon, FranceUniv Estadual Paulista, Inst Biociencias, Dept Ecol, CP 199, BR-13506900 Rio Claro, SP, BrazilUniv Fed Alagoas, Inst Biol & Hlth Sci, Av Lourival Melo Mota S-N, BR-57072900 Maceio, AL, BrazilUniv Estadual Paulista, Inst Biociencias, Dept Ecol, CP 199, BR-13506900 Rio Claro, SP, BrazilFONDECYT: 3130336CNPq: 311412/2011-4Elsevier B.V.Univ OxfordAarhus UnivINRAUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Univ Fed AlagoasRoot-Bernstein, MeredithGaletti, Mauro [UNESP]Ladle, Richard J.2018-11-26T17:44:25Z2018-11-26T17:44:25Z2017-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article271-281application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pecon.2017.09.007Perspectives In Ecology And Conservation. Oxford: Elsevier Sci Ltd, v. 15, n. 4, p. 271-281, 2017.2530-0644http://hdl.handle.net/11449/16365110.1016/j.pecon.2017.09.007WOS:000418497600005WOS000418497600005.pdfWeb of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengPerspectives In Ecology And Conservation0,877info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-10-14T06:06:58Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/163651Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T14:53:31.771514Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Rewilding South America: Ten key questions |
title |
Rewilding South America: Ten key questions |
spellingShingle |
Rewilding South America: Ten key questions Root-Bernstein, Meredith Rewilding South America Socio-ecological system Brazil Chile Baselines Scale Cerrado |
title_short |
Rewilding South America: Ten key questions |
title_full |
Rewilding South America: Ten key questions |
title_fullStr |
Rewilding South America: Ten key questions |
title_full_unstemmed |
Rewilding South America: Ten key questions |
title_sort |
Rewilding South America: Ten key questions |
author |
Root-Bernstein, Meredith |
author_facet |
Root-Bernstein, Meredith Galetti, Mauro [UNESP] Ladle, Richard J. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Galetti, Mauro [UNESP] Ladle, Richard J. |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Univ Oxford Aarhus Univ INRA Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) Univ Fed Alagoas |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Root-Bernstein, Meredith Galetti, Mauro [UNESP] Ladle, Richard J. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Rewilding South America Socio-ecological system Brazil Chile Baselines Scale Cerrado |
topic |
Rewilding South America Socio-ecological system Brazil Chile Baselines Scale Cerrado |
description |
There are various approaches to rewilding, corresponding to different socio-ecological and policy contexts. Most South American ecosystems have experienced Pleistocene and historical defaunation and the functional persistence of many areas will depend on restoration and rewilding. Rewilding is not seen as a priority or as a tool for restoration in South America, but we argue that several concepts could potentially be adapted to their contexts to respond flexibly to developing socio-ecological conditions. Here, we consider 10 questions that rewilding projects should consider, and we provide examples of how these questions are relevant to South America and how they have been answered already, in some cases. The 10 questions include: What role should humans play in rewilding projects? How can society deal with monsters? Is there a rationale for non-analogue rewilding? How do we justify baselines? Is it possible to do rewilding with small species? What is the right scale for a rewilding project? Should rewilding projects worry about sample size and pseudo-replication? When should we rewild carnivores? Do we need to distinguish rewilding from safari parks and zoos? What should be included in integrated monitoring and assessment? The questions we raise here do not have general answers optimal for all situations, but should be answered with reference to the socio-ecological conditions and transformational possibilities in different areas of South America. (C) 2017 Associacao Brasileira de Ciencia Ecologica e Conservacao. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-10-01 2018-11-26T17:44:25Z 2018-11-26T17:44:25Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pecon.2017.09.007 Perspectives In Ecology And Conservation. Oxford: Elsevier Sci Ltd, v. 15, n. 4, p. 271-281, 2017. 2530-0644 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/163651 10.1016/j.pecon.2017.09.007 WOS:000418497600005 WOS000418497600005.pdf |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pecon.2017.09.007 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/163651 |
identifier_str_mv |
Perspectives In Ecology And Conservation. Oxford: Elsevier Sci Ltd, v. 15, n. 4, p. 271-281, 2017. 2530-0644 10.1016/j.pecon.2017.09.007 WOS:000418497600005 WOS000418497600005.pdf |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Perspectives In Ecology And Conservation 0,877 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
271-281 application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier B.V. |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier B.V. |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Web of Science reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808128432245047296 |