Oxidative stress biomarkers in newborn calves: Comparison among artificial insemination, in vitro fertilization and cloning
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2020.106538 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/200707 |
Resumo: | Oxidative stress occurs when there is greater than optimal production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) or an antioxidant system failure. Calves produced using in vitro fertilization (IVF) or cloning (CA) have greater mortality rates, with greater incidence of respiratory diseases, which could be explained by the deleterious outcomes from oxidative stress. Calves were studied that were produced using: artificial insemination (AI; n = 20), in vitro fertilization (IVF; n = 15) or cloning (CA; n = 15). Blood samples were collected at 6, 12, 24 and 48 h subsequent to the time of birth. The cloned calves had greater ROS production from lipid peroxidation, with greater thiobarbituric acid reactive substances. This factor was associated with a lesser amount of superoxide dismutase in the CA. Calves produced using IVF had a greater activity of catalase and glutathione peroxidase, either due to greater production of hydrogen peroxide or greater efficiency of enzymatic response of these neonates. Calves produced using AI had greater concentrations of reduced thiol groups. These associated factors may indicate there is greater oxidative stress in calves produced by IVF and cloning than with use of AI, however in these calves there was an effective response to these oxidative stressors within 48 h subsequent to birth. Hence, calves produced using IVF and by cloning have greater ROS production when compared to calves produced using AI. The calves produced using IVF, however, had a greater enzymatic activity or were more efficient in adapting to ROS when compared to calves produced by cloning. |
id |
UNSP_678b2649a2dfafa98574cd17644001e5 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/200707 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Oxidative stress biomarkers in newborn calves: Comparison among artificial insemination, in vitro fertilization and cloningAntioxidant enzymesCattleLipid peroxidationNeonatologyReactive oxygen speciesOxidative stress occurs when there is greater than optimal production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) or an antioxidant system failure. Calves produced using in vitro fertilization (IVF) or cloning (CA) have greater mortality rates, with greater incidence of respiratory diseases, which could be explained by the deleterious outcomes from oxidative stress. Calves were studied that were produced using: artificial insemination (AI; n = 20), in vitro fertilization (IVF; n = 15) or cloning (CA; n = 15). Blood samples were collected at 6, 12, 24 and 48 h subsequent to the time of birth. The cloned calves had greater ROS production from lipid peroxidation, with greater thiobarbituric acid reactive substances. This factor was associated with a lesser amount of superoxide dismutase in the CA. Calves produced using IVF had a greater activity of catalase and glutathione peroxidase, either due to greater production of hydrogen peroxide or greater efficiency of enzymatic response of these neonates. Calves produced using AI had greater concentrations of reduced thiol groups. These associated factors may indicate there is greater oxidative stress in calves produced by IVF and cloning than with use of AI, however in these calves there was an effective response to these oxidative stressors within 48 h subsequent to birth. Hence, calves produced using IVF and by cloning have greater ROS production when compared to calves produced using AI. The calves produced using IVF, however, had a greater enzymatic activity or were more efficient in adapting to ROS when compared to calves produced by cloning.Department of Veterinary Clinic School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science (FMVZ) São Paulo State University (UNESP)Department of Veterinary Clinics Agricultural Sciences Center Londrina State University (UEL)Department of Basic Sciences School of Animal Science and Food Engineering (FZEA) University of São Paulo (USP), Pirassununga CampusIn Vitro Clonagem Animal S/A. Mogi MirimLaboratory of Experimental Research on Gynecology and Obstetrics Botucatu Medical School São Paulo State University (UNESP)Department of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery Federal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ)Departament of Medical Clinic (VCM) School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science (FMVZ) São Paulo University (USP)Department of Veterinary Clinic School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science (FMVZ) São Paulo State University (UNESP)Laboratory of Experimental Research on Gynecology and Obstetrics Botucatu Medical School São Paulo State University (UNESP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)Universidade de São Paulo (USP)In Vitro Clonagem Animal S/A. Mogi MirimFederal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ)Dantas, Gabriela N. [UNESP]Santarosa, Bianca P. [UNESP]Santos, Vitor H.Hooper, Henrique B.Micai, Ricardo A.Sinzato, Yuri K. [UNESP]Damasceno, Débora C. [UNESP]da Silva, Andreza A.Benesi, Fernando J.Gonçalves, Roberto C. [UNESP]2020-12-12T02:13:52Z2020-12-12T02:13:52Z2020-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2020.106538Animal Reproduction Science, v. 219.0378-4320http://hdl.handle.net/11449/20070710.1016/j.anireprosci.2020.1065382-s2.0-85087475722Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengAnimal Reproduction Scienceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-09-05T18:44:34Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/200707Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462024-09-05T18:44:34Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Oxidative stress biomarkers in newborn calves: Comparison among artificial insemination, in vitro fertilization and cloning |
title |
Oxidative stress biomarkers in newborn calves: Comparison among artificial insemination, in vitro fertilization and cloning |
spellingShingle |
Oxidative stress biomarkers in newborn calves: Comparison among artificial insemination, in vitro fertilization and cloning Dantas, Gabriela N. [UNESP] Antioxidant enzymes Cattle Lipid peroxidation Neonatology Reactive oxygen species |
title_short |
Oxidative stress biomarkers in newborn calves: Comparison among artificial insemination, in vitro fertilization and cloning |
title_full |
Oxidative stress biomarkers in newborn calves: Comparison among artificial insemination, in vitro fertilization and cloning |
title_fullStr |
Oxidative stress biomarkers in newborn calves: Comparison among artificial insemination, in vitro fertilization and cloning |
title_full_unstemmed |
Oxidative stress biomarkers in newborn calves: Comparison among artificial insemination, in vitro fertilization and cloning |
title_sort |
Oxidative stress biomarkers in newborn calves: Comparison among artificial insemination, in vitro fertilization and cloning |
author |
Dantas, Gabriela N. [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Dantas, Gabriela N. [UNESP] Santarosa, Bianca P. [UNESP] Santos, Vitor H. Hooper, Henrique B. Micai, Ricardo A. Sinzato, Yuri K. [UNESP] Damasceno, Débora C. [UNESP] da Silva, Andreza A. Benesi, Fernando J. Gonçalves, Roberto C. [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Santarosa, Bianca P. [UNESP] Santos, Vitor H. Hooper, Henrique B. Micai, Ricardo A. Sinzato, Yuri K. [UNESP] Damasceno, Débora C. [UNESP] da Silva, Andreza A. Benesi, Fernando J. Gonçalves, Roberto C. [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) Universidade de São Paulo (USP) In Vitro Clonagem Animal S/A. Mogi Mirim Federal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Dantas, Gabriela N. [UNESP] Santarosa, Bianca P. [UNESP] Santos, Vitor H. Hooper, Henrique B. Micai, Ricardo A. Sinzato, Yuri K. [UNESP] Damasceno, Débora C. [UNESP] da Silva, Andreza A. Benesi, Fernando J. Gonçalves, Roberto C. [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Antioxidant enzymes Cattle Lipid peroxidation Neonatology Reactive oxygen species |
topic |
Antioxidant enzymes Cattle Lipid peroxidation Neonatology Reactive oxygen species |
description |
Oxidative stress occurs when there is greater than optimal production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) or an antioxidant system failure. Calves produced using in vitro fertilization (IVF) or cloning (CA) have greater mortality rates, with greater incidence of respiratory diseases, which could be explained by the deleterious outcomes from oxidative stress. Calves were studied that were produced using: artificial insemination (AI; n = 20), in vitro fertilization (IVF; n = 15) or cloning (CA; n = 15). Blood samples were collected at 6, 12, 24 and 48 h subsequent to the time of birth. The cloned calves had greater ROS production from lipid peroxidation, with greater thiobarbituric acid reactive substances. This factor was associated with a lesser amount of superoxide dismutase in the CA. Calves produced using IVF had a greater activity of catalase and glutathione peroxidase, either due to greater production of hydrogen peroxide or greater efficiency of enzymatic response of these neonates. Calves produced using AI had greater concentrations of reduced thiol groups. These associated factors may indicate there is greater oxidative stress in calves produced by IVF and cloning than with use of AI, however in these calves there was an effective response to these oxidative stressors within 48 h subsequent to birth. Hence, calves produced using IVF and by cloning have greater ROS production when compared to calves produced using AI. The calves produced using IVF, however, had a greater enzymatic activity or were more efficient in adapting to ROS when compared to calves produced by cloning. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-12-12T02:13:52Z 2020-12-12T02:13:52Z 2020-08-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2020.106538 Animal Reproduction Science, v. 219. 0378-4320 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/200707 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2020.106538 2-s2.0-85087475722 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2020.106538 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/200707 |
identifier_str_mv |
Animal Reproduction Science, v. 219. 0378-4320 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2020.106538 2-s2.0-85087475722 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Animal Reproduction Science |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositoriounesp@unesp.br |
_version_ |
1826303695139110912 |