The key role of protection status in safeguarding the ecological functions of some Neotropical mammals

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Nagy-Reis, Mariana B.
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Ribeiro, Milton Cezar [UNESP], Setz, Eleonore Z. F., Chiarello, Adriano G.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10531-019-01783-y
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/190376
Resumo: Protected areas can mediate negative effects of habitat loss and human-related pressures on key ecological groups. However, different protected area categories can vary substantially in their degree of enforcement, which may ensure different levels of effectiveness for biodiversity protection. Because little attempt has been made to quantify this, we investigated the protection effectiveness of different levels of protection (low, intermediate, and high) in maintaining the ecological functions of mammalian species. We assessed this on a selection of five species with varying ecological functions: nine-banded armadillo (insectivore), paca (seed disperser), tayra (omnivore), ocelot (carnivore), and collared peccary (seed predator). Their occupancy probability and the integrity of their ecological functions were estimated and spatialized across landscapes at all protection levels (low, intermediate, and high). In addition, we estimated how many of these species were maintained in each protection status using a minimum of 35% occupancy threshold for each. Our results indicated that higher protection statuses can hold more ecological functions of these mammalian species than areas with lower protection levels. Ocelot and paca heavily relied on areas with higher protection, which can impact the overall ecosystem functioning and ecological services of less protected areas, since these are species performing unique roles in our landscape (mixed-sized prey carnivory and large-sized seed dispersal, respectively). Our study suggests that the degrees of protection can influence the area effectiveness in maintaining certain mammalian species and their ecological functions and ecosystem services. Therefore, management strategies and degree of enforcement should be carefully planned when assigning areas for conservation to ensure the conservation of more sensitive species and preserve more ecological functions.
id UNSP_69816d29bfb1f8aba2a795b82ebeec84
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/190376
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling The key role of protection status in safeguarding the ecological functions of some Neotropical mammalsCarnivoryEcosystem servicesMammal conservationProtected areasSeed dispersalProtected areas can mediate negative effects of habitat loss and human-related pressures on key ecological groups. However, different protected area categories can vary substantially in their degree of enforcement, which may ensure different levels of effectiveness for biodiversity protection. Because little attempt has been made to quantify this, we investigated the protection effectiveness of different levels of protection (low, intermediate, and high) in maintaining the ecological functions of mammalian species. We assessed this on a selection of five species with varying ecological functions: nine-banded armadillo (insectivore), paca (seed disperser), tayra (omnivore), ocelot (carnivore), and collared peccary (seed predator). Their occupancy probability and the integrity of their ecological functions were estimated and spatialized across landscapes at all protection levels (low, intermediate, and high). In addition, we estimated how many of these species were maintained in each protection status using a minimum of 35% occupancy threshold for each. Our results indicated that higher protection statuses can hold more ecological functions of these mammalian species than areas with lower protection levels. Ocelot and paca heavily relied on areas with higher protection, which can impact the overall ecosystem functioning and ecological services of less protected areas, since these are species performing unique roles in our landscape (mixed-sized prey carnivory and large-sized seed dispersal, respectively). Our study suggests that the degrees of protection can influence the area effectiveness in maintaining certain mammalian species and their ecological functions and ecosystem services. Therefore, management strategies and degree of enforcement should be carefully planned when assigning areas for conservation to ensure the conservation of more sensitive species and preserve more ecological functions.Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Idea WildDepartment of Animal Biology Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Bertrand Russel, 1505, mailbox: 6109Department of Ecology Spatial Ecology and Conservation Lab (LEEC) Institute of Bioscience UNESP - Univ Estadual PaulistaDepartment of Biology Universidade de São Paulo, Av. Bandeirante, 3900Department of Biological Sciences University of Alberta, 116 St. and 85 AveDepartment of Ecology Spatial Ecology and Conservation Lab (LEEC) Institute of Bioscience UNESP - Univ Estadual PaulistaFAPESP: 2013/07162-6FAPESP: 2013/50421-2CNPq: 303101/2017-2CNPq: 312045/2013-1CNPq: 312292/2016-3Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Universidade de São Paulo (USP)University of AlbertaNagy-Reis, Mariana B.Ribeiro, Milton Cezar [UNESP]Setz, Eleonore Z. F.Chiarello, Adriano G.2019-10-06T17:11:09Z2019-10-06T17:11:09Z2019-08-15info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article2599-2613http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10531-019-01783-yBiodiversity and Conservation, v. 28, n. 10, p. 2599-2613, 2019.1572-97100960-3115http://hdl.handle.net/11449/19037610.1007/s10531-019-01783-y2-s2.0-850668543634158685235743119Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengBiodiversity and Conservationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-10-23T10:18:33Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/190376Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T22:00:54.040026Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The key role of protection status in safeguarding the ecological functions of some Neotropical mammals
title The key role of protection status in safeguarding the ecological functions of some Neotropical mammals
spellingShingle The key role of protection status in safeguarding the ecological functions of some Neotropical mammals
Nagy-Reis, Mariana B.
Carnivory
Ecosystem services
Mammal conservation
Protected areas
Seed dispersal
title_short The key role of protection status in safeguarding the ecological functions of some Neotropical mammals
title_full The key role of protection status in safeguarding the ecological functions of some Neotropical mammals
title_fullStr The key role of protection status in safeguarding the ecological functions of some Neotropical mammals
title_full_unstemmed The key role of protection status in safeguarding the ecological functions of some Neotropical mammals
title_sort The key role of protection status in safeguarding the ecological functions of some Neotropical mammals
author Nagy-Reis, Mariana B.
author_facet Nagy-Reis, Mariana B.
Ribeiro, Milton Cezar [UNESP]
Setz, Eleonore Z. F.
Chiarello, Adriano G.
author_role author
author2 Ribeiro, Milton Cezar [UNESP]
Setz, Eleonore Z. F.
Chiarello, Adriano G.
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
University of Alberta
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Nagy-Reis, Mariana B.
Ribeiro, Milton Cezar [UNESP]
Setz, Eleonore Z. F.
Chiarello, Adriano G.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Carnivory
Ecosystem services
Mammal conservation
Protected areas
Seed dispersal
topic Carnivory
Ecosystem services
Mammal conservation
Protected areas
Seed dispersal
description Protected areas can mediate negative effects of habitat loss and human-related pressures on key ecological groups. However, different protected area categories can vary substantially in their degree of enforcement, which may ensure different levels of effectiveness for biodiversity protection. Because little attempt has been made to quantify this, we investigated the protection effectiveness of different levels of protection (low, intermediate, and high) in maintaining the ecological functions of mammalian species. We assessed this on a selection of five species with varying ecological functions: nine-banded armadillo (insectivore), paca (seed disperser), tayra (omnivore), ocelot (carnivore), and collared peccary (seed predator). Their occupancy probability and the integrity of their ecological functions were estimated and spatialized across landscapes at all protection levels (low, intermediate, and high). In addition, we estimated how many of these species were maintained in each protection status using a minimum of 35% occupancy threshold for each. Our results indicated that higher protection statuses can hold more ecological functions of these mammalian species than areas with lower protection levels. Ocelot and paca heavily relied on areas with higher protection, which can impact the overall ecosystem functioning and ecological services of less protected areas, since these are species performing unique roles in our landscape (mixed-sized prey carnivory and large-sized seed dispersal, respectively). Our study suggests that the degrees of protection can influence the area effectiveness in maintaining certain mammalian species and their ecological functions and ecosystem services. Therefore, management strategies and degree of enforcement should be carefully planned when assigning areas for conservation to ensure the conservation of more sensitive species and preserve more ecological functions.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-10-06T17:11:09Z
2019-10-06T17:11:09Z
2019-08-15
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10531-019-01783-y
Biodiversity and Conservation, v. 28, n. 10, p. 2599-2613, 2019.
1572-9710
0960-3115
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/190376
10.1007/s10531-019-01783-y
2-s2.0-85066854363
4158685235743119
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10531-019-01783-y
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/190376
identifier_str_mv Biodiversity and Conservation, v. 28, n. 10, p. 2599-2613, 2019.
1572-9710
0960-3115
10.1007/s10531-019-01783-y
2-s2.0-85066854363
4158685235743119
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Biodiversity and Conservation
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 2599-2613
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808129384011268096