The key role of protection status in safeguarding the ecological functions of some Neotropical mammals
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10531-019-01783-y http://hdl.handle.net/11449/190376 |
Resumo: | Protected areas can mediate negative effects of habitat loss and human-related pressures on key ecological groups. However, different protected area categories can vary substantially in their degree of enforcement, which may ensure different levels of effectiveness for biodiversity protection. Because little attempt has been made to quantify this, we investigated the protection effectiveness of different levels of protection (low, intermediate, and high) in maintaining the ecological functions of mammalian species. We assessed this on a selection of five species with varying ecological functions: nine-banded armadillo (insectivore), paca (seed disperser), tayra (omnivore), ocelot (carnivore), and collared peccary (seed predator). Their occupancy probability and the integrity of their ecological functions were estimated and spatialized across landscapes at all protection levels (low, intermediate, and high). In addition, we estimated how many of these species were maintained in each protection status using a minimum of 35% occupancy threshold for each. Our results indicated that higher protection statuses can hold more ecological functions of these mammalian species than areas with lower protection levels. Ocelot and paca heavily relied on areas with higher protection, which can impact the overall ecosystem functioning and ecological services of less protected areas, since these are species performing unique roles in our landscape (mixed-sized prey carnivory and large-sized seed dispersal, respectively). Our study suggests that the degrees of protection can influence the area effectiveness in maintaining certain mammalian species and their ecological functions and ecosystem services. Therefore, management strategies and degree of enforcement should be carefully planned when assigning areas for conservation to ensure the conservation of more sensitive species and preserve more ecological functions. |
id |
UNSP_69816d29bfb1f8aba2a795b82ebeec84 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/190376 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
The key role of protection status in safeguarding the ecological functions of some Neotropical mammalsCarnivoryEcosystem servicesMammal conservationProtected areasSeed dispersalProtected areas can mediate negative effects of habitat loss and human-related pressures on key ecological groups. However, different protected area categories can vary substantially in their degree of enforcement, which may ensure different levels of effectiveness for biodiversity protection. Because little attempt has been made to quantify this, we investigated the protection effectiveness of different levels of protection (low, intermediate, and high) in maintaining the ecological functions of mammalian species. We assessed this on a selection of five species with varying ecological functions: nine-banded armadillo (insectivore), paca (seed disperser), tayra (omnivore), ocelot (carnivore), and collared peccary (seed predator). Their occupancy probability and the integrity of their ecological functions were estimated and spatialized across landscapes at all protection levels (low, intermediate, and high). In addition, we estimated how many of these species were maintained in each protection status using a minimum of 35% occupancy threshold for each. Our results indicated that higher protection statuses can hold more ecological functions of these mammalian species than areas with lower protection levels. Ocelot and paca heavily relied on areas with higher protection, which can impact the overall ecosystem functioning and ecological services of less protected areas, since these are species performing unique roles in our landscape (mixed-sized prey carnivory and large-sized seed dispersal, respectively). Our study suggests that the degrees of protection can influence the area effectiveness in maintaining certain mammalian species and their ecological functions and ecosystem services. Therefore, management strategies and degree of enforcement should be carefully planned when assigning areas for conservation to ensure the conservation of more sensitive species and preserve more ecological functions.Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Idea WildDepartment of Animal Biology Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Bertrand Russel, 1505, mailbox: 6109Department of Ecology Spatial Ecology and Conservation Lab (LEEC) Institute of Bioscience UNESP - Univ Estadual PaulistaDepartment of Biology Universidade de São Paulo, Av. Bandeirante, 3900Department of Biological Sciences University of Alberta, 116 St. and 85 AveDepartment of Ecology Spatial Ecology and Conservation Lab (LEEC) Institute of Bioscience UNESP - Univ Estadual PaulistaFAPESP: 2013/07162-6FAPESP: 2013/50421-2CNPq: 303101/2017-2CNPq: 312045/2013-1CNPq: 312292/2016-3Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Universidade de São Paulo (USP)University of AlbertaNagy-Reis, Mariana B.Ribeiro, Milton Cezar [UNESP]Setz, Eleonore Z. F.Chiarello, Adriano G.2019-10-06T17:11:09Z2019-10-06T17:11:09Z2019-08-15info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article2599-2613http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10531-019-01783-yBiodiversity and Conservation, v. 28, n. 10, p. 2599-2613, 2019.1572-97100960-3115http://hdl.handle.net/11449/19037610.1007/s10531-019-01783-y2-s2.0-850668543634158685235743119Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengBiodiversity and Conservationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-10-23T10:18:33Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/190376Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T22:00:54.040026Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The key role of protection status in safeguarding the ecological functions of some Neotropical mammals |
title |
The key role of protection status in safeguarding the ecological functions of some Neotropical mammals |
spellingShingle |
The key role of protection status in safeguarding the ecological functions of some Neotropical mammals Nagy-Reis, Mariana B. Carnivory Ecosystem services Mammal conservation Protected areas Seed dispersal |
title_short |
The key role of protection status in safeguarding the ecological functions of some Neotropical mammals |
title_full |
The key role of protection status in safeguarding the ecological functions of some Neotropical mammals |
title_fullStr |
The key role of protection status in safeguarding the ecological functions of some Neotropical mammals |
title_full_unstemmed |
The key role of protection status in safeguarding the ecological functions of some Neotropical mammals |
title_sort |
The key role of protection status in safeguarding the ecological functions of some Neotropical mammals |
author |
Nagy-Reis, Mariana B. |
author_facet |
Nagy-Reis, Mariana B. Ribeiro, Milton Cezar [UNESP] Setz, Eleonore Z. F. Chiarello, Adriano G. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ribeiro, Milton Cezar [UNESP] Setz, Eleonore Z. F. Chiarello, Adriano G. |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) Universidade de São Paulo (USP) University of Alberta |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Nagy-Reis, Mariana B. Ribeiro, Milton Cezar [UNESP] Setz, Eleonore Z. F. Chiarello, Adriano G. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Carnivory Ecosystem services Mammal conservation Protected areas Seed dispersal |
topic |
Carnivory Ecosystem services Mammal conservation Protected areas Seed dispersal |
description |
Protected areas can mediate negative effects of habitat loss and human-related pressures on key ecological groups. However, different protected area categories can vary substantially in their degree of enforcement, which may ensure different levels of effectiveness for biodiversity protection. Because little attempt has been made to quantify this, we investigated the protection effectiveness of different levels of protection (low, intermediate, and high) in maintaining the ecological functions of mammalian species. We assessed this on a selection of five species with varying ecological functions: nine-banded armadillo (insectivore), paca (seed disperser), tayra (omnivore), ocelot (carnivore), and collared peccary (seed predator). Their occupancy probability and the integrity of their ecological functions were estimated and spatialized across landscapes at all protection levels (low, intermediate, and high). In addition, we estimated how many of these species were maintained in each protection status using a minimum of 35% occupancy threshold for each. Our results indicated that higher protection statuses can hold more ecological functions of these mammalian species than areas with lower protection levels. Ocelot and paca heavily relied on areas with higher protection, which can impact the overall ecosystem functioning and ecological services of less protected areas, since these are species performing unique roles in our landscape (mixed-sized prey carnivory and large-sized seed dispersal, respectively). Our study suggests that the degrees of protection can influence the area effectiveness in maintaining certain mammalian species and their ecological functions and ecosystem services. Therefore, management strategies and degree of enforcement should be carefully planned when assigning areas for conservation to ensure the conservation of more sensitive species and preserve more ecological functions. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-10-06T17:11:09Z 2019-10-06T17:11:09Z 2019-08-15 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10531-019-01783-y Biodiversity and Conservation, v. 28, n. 10, p. 2599-2613, 2019. 1572-9710 0960-3115 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/190376 10.1007/s10531-019-01783-y 2-s2.0-85066854363 4158685235743119 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10531-019-01783-y http://hdl.handle.net/11449/190376 |
identifier_str_mv |
Biodiversity and Conservation, v. 28, n. 10, p. 2599-2613, 2019. 1572-9710 0960-3115 10.1007/s10531-019-01783-y 2-s2.0-85066854363 4158685235743119 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Biodiversity and Conservation |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
2599-2613 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808129384011268096 |