HDR brachytherapy as monotherapy for prostate cancer: A systematic review with meta-analysis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Viani, Gustavo Arruda
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Arruda, Caio Viani [UNESP], Assis Pellizzon, Antonio Cassio, De Fendi, Ligia Issa
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2020.10.009
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/205752
Resumo: Purpose: The effectiveness and safety of high dose brachytherapy as monotherapy (HDR-BRT-M) in prostate cancer is limited to retrospective studies. We performed a meta-analysis to summarize existing data and identify trends in biochemical recurrence-free survival (bRFS) and toxicity after HDR-BRT-M in patients with prostate cancer. Methods and Materials: Retrospective, prospective, or randomized clinical trials were identified on electronical databases through June 2020. We followed the PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines. A meta-regression analysis was performed to assess if there is a relationship between moderator variables and bRFS. A p-value < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: Fourteen studies with a total of 3534 patients treated were included. The cumulative size of the bRFS at 5 years was 0.92 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.48–0.61). The five-year bRFS for low, intermediate, and high risk was 97.5% (95% CI 96–98%), 93.5% (95% CI 91–96%), and 91% (95% CI 88–93%), respectively. The total biological effective dose (BED) (p = 0.02), the BED per fraction (p = 0.001), androgen deprivation therapy usage (p = 0.04), and the number of fractions of HDR-BRT-M (p = 0.024) were significantly associated with bRFS rate. The rate of late Grade 2/3 or > genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicity was 22.4% (95% CI 9–35,2%)/1.4% (95% CI 0.8–2.1%) and 2.7% (95% CI 0–6.8%) and 0.2% (95% CI 0.1%–0.4%), respectively. Conclusions: HDR-BRT-M is safe with excellent rates of bRFS for all risk groups. The total BED, the BED per fraction, and number of fractions were the key factors associated with the biochemical control. These data can be useful to choose the size and number of BRT fractionation.
id UNSP_6bd9a0c0d53ac9ff6723da19d173e7b5
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/205752
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling HDR brachytherapy as monotherapy for prostate cancer: A systematic review with meta-analysisBiochemical controlBrachytherapyMeta-analysisProstate cancerPurpose: The effectiveness and safety of high dose brachytherapy as monotherapy (HDR-BRT-M) in prostate cancer is limited to retrospective studies. We performed a meta-analysis to summarize existing data and identify trends in biochemical recurrence-free survival (bRFS) and toxicity after HDR-BRT-M in patients with prostate cancer. Methods and Materials: Retrospective, prospective, or randomized clinical trials were identified on electronical databases through June 2020. We followed the PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines. A meta-regression analysis was performed to assess if there is a relationship between moderator variables and bRFS. A p-value < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: Fourteen studies with a total of 3534 patients treated were included. The cumulative size of the bRFS at 5 years was 0.92 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.48–0.61). The five-year bRFS for low, intermediate, and high risk was 97.5% (95% CI 96–98%), 93.5% (95% CI 91–96%), and 91% (95% CI 88–93%), respectively. The total biological effective dose (BED) (p = 0.02), the BED per fraction (p = 0.001), androgen deprivation therapy usage (p = 0.04), and the number of fractions of HDR-BRT-M (p = 0.024) were significantly associated with bRFS rate. The rate of late Grade 2/3 or > genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicity was 22.4% (95% CI 9–35,2%)/1.4% (95% CI 0.8–2.1%) and 2.7% (95% CI 0–6.8%) and 0.2% (95% CI 0.1%–0.4%), respectively. Conclusions: HDR-BRT-M is safe with excellent rates of bRFS for all risk groups. The total BED, the BED per fraction, and number of fractions were the key factors associated with the biochemical control. These data can be useful to choose the size and number of BRT fractionation.Ribeirão Medical School University of São PauloBioscience Institute of University of State from Sao Paulo (UNESP)Radiation Oncology Department AC Camargo Cancer CenterBioscience Institute of University of State from Sao Paulo (UNESP)Universidade de São Paulo (USP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)AC Camargo Cancer CenterViani, Gustavo ArrudaArruda, Caio Viani [UNESP]Assis Pellizzon, Antonio CassioDe Fendi, Ligia Issa2021-06-25T10:20:38Z2021-06-25T10:20:38Z2021-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article307-314http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2020.10.009Brachytherapy, v. 20, n. 2, p. 307-314, 2021.1873-14491538-4721http://hdl.handle.net/11449/20575210.1016/j.brachy.2020.10.0092-s2.0-85099551312Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengBrachytherapyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-10-22T17:02:10Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/205752Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T15:22:06.088413Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv HDR brachytherapy as monotherapy for prostate cancer: A systematic review with meta-analysis
title HDR brachytherapy as monotherapy for prostate cancer: A systematic review with meta-analysis
spellingShingle HDR brachytherapy as monotherapy for prostate cancer: A systematic review with meta-analysis
Viani, Gustavo Arruda
Biochemical control
Brachytherapy
Meta-analysis
Prostate cancer
title_short HDR brachytherapy as monotherapy for prostate cancer: A systematic review with meta-analysis
title_full HDR brachytherapy as monotherapy for prostate cancer: A systematic review with meta-analysis
title_fullStr HDR brachytherapy as monotherapy for prostate cancer: A systematic review with meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed HDR brachytherapy as monotherapy for prostate cancer: A systematic review with meta-analysis
title_sort HDR brachytherapy as monotherapy for prostate cancer: A systematic review with meta-analysis
author Viani, Gustavo Arruda
author_facet Viani, Gustavo Arruda
Arruda, Caio Viani [UNESP]
Assis Pellizzon, Antonio Cassio
De Fendi, Ligia Issa
author_role author
author2 Arruda, Caio Viani [UNESP]
Assis Pellizzon, Antonio Cassio
De Fendi, Ligia Issa
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
AC Camargo Cancer Center
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Viani, Gustavo Arruda
Arruda, Caio Viani [UNESP]
Assis Pellizzon, Antonio Cassio
De Fendi, Ligia Issa
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Biochemical control
Brachytherapy
Meta-analysis
Prostate cancer
topic Biochemical control
Brachytherapy
Meta-analysis
Prostate cancer
description Purpose: The effectiveness and safety of high dose brachytherapy as monotherapy (HDR-BRT-M) in prostate cancer is limited to retrospective studies. We performed a meta-analysis to summarize existing data and identify trends in biochemical recurrence-free survival (bRFS) and toxicity after HDR-BRT-M in patients with prostate cancer. Methods and Materials: Retrospective, prospective, or randomized clinical trials were identified on electronical databases through June 2020. We followed the PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines. A meta-regression analysis was performed to assess if there is a relationship between moderator variables and bRFS. A p-value < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: Fourteen studies with a total of 3534 patients treated were included. The cumulative size of the bRFS at 5 years was 0.92 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.48–0.61). The five-year bRFS for low, intermediate, and high risk was 97.5% (95% CI 96–98%), 93.5% (95% CI 91–96%), and 91% (95% CI 88–93%), respectively. The total biological effective dose (BED) (p = 0.02), the BED per fraction (p = 0.001), androgen deprivation therapy usage (p = 0.04), and the number of fractions of HDR-BRT-M (p = 0.024) were significantly associated with bRFS rate. The rate of late Grade 2/3 or > genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicity was 22.4% (95% CI 9–35,2%)/1.4% (95% CI 0.8–2.1%) and 2.7% (95% CI 0–6.8%) and 0.2% (95% CI 0.1%–0.4%), respectively. Conclusions: HDR-BRT-M is safe with excellent rates of bRFS for all risk groups. The total BED, the BED per fraction, and number of fractions were the key factors associated with the biochemical control. These data can be useful to choose the size and number of BRT fractionation.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-06-25T10:20:38Z
2021-06-25T10:20:38Z
2021-03-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2020.10.009
Brachytherapy, v. 20, n. 2, p. 307-314, 2021.
1873-1449
1538-4721
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/205752
10.1016/j.brachy.2020.10.009
2-s2.0-85099551312
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2020.10.009
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/205752
identifier_str_mv Brachytherapy, v. 20, n. 2, p. 307-314, 2021.
1873-1449
1538-4721
10.1016/j.brachy.2020.10.009
2-s2.0-85099551312
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Brachytherapy
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 307-314
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808128502869786624