Effects of marine protected areas under different management regimes in a hot spot of biodiversity and cumulative impacts from SW Atlantic

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Motta, Fabio S.
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Moura, Rodrigo L., Neves, Leonardo M., Souza, Gabriel R.S. [UNESP], Gibran, Fernando Z., Francini, Carlo L., Shintate, Gustavo I., Rolim, Fernanda A., Marconi, Marina, Giglio, Vinicius J., Pereira-Filho, Guilherme H.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rsma.2021.101951
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/229278
Resumo: Marine protected areas (MPAs) represent a useful tool for resource management, as well as to conserve and/or restore biological communities. The level of protection is key factor influencing the marine biodiversity, where a more enforced protection is expected to drive positive outcomes. In 2008, a large MPAs network (∼11,380 km 2) was established in one of off the most populated and industrialized areas in the world (i.e., São Paulo State coast, southeast Brazil). Given many goods and services provided by marine ecosystems, this MPA network represents the most challenging marine conservation initiative in Brazil. Harboring​ areas with different socio-ecological contexts and management regimes, this MPA network provides a unique opportunity to investigate the effects of cumulative impacts. We contrasted the biomass and size structure of reef fish in three subtropical islands under different levels of enforcement. We analyzed the influence of variables as island size, benthic cover, depth, topographic complexity, wave exposure, and protection level on the biomass of reef fish assemblages. Protection level was the main attribute responsible to explain the high biomass of fish target species and small territorial herbivores. In sites sheltered from the waves, the biomass of groupers was ∼1600% higher within enforced area than that from open-access area. Beyond the idea of positive effects of enforcement on reef fish biomass and size, we add evidences that even under multiple stressors, the area-based management is still a strong tool to marine conservation.
id UNSP_6c91b8f165d47c91304a5eacabac50f8
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/229278
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Effects of marine protected areas under different management regimes in a hot spot of biodiversity and cumulative impacts from SW AtlanticConservationEffectivenessFishing effectsMPA networkReef fishesUnderwater visual censusMarine protected areas (MPAs) represent a useful tool for resource management, as well as to conserve and/or restore biological communities. The level of protection is key factor influencing the marine biodiversity, where a more enforced protection is expected to drive positive outcomes. In 2008, a large MPAs network (∼11,380 km 2) was established in one of off the most populated and industrialized areas in the world (i.e., São Paulo State coast, southeast Brazil). Given many goods and services provided by marine ecosystems, this MPA network represents the most challenging marine conservation initiative in Brazil. Harboring​ areas with different socio-ecological contexts and management regimes, this MPA network provides a unique opportunity to investigate the effects of cumulative impacts. We contrasted the biomass and size structure of reef fish in three subtropical islands under different levels of enforcement. We analyzed the influence of variables as island size, benthic cover, depth, topographic complexity, wave exposure, and protection level on the biomass of reef fish assemblages. Protection level was the main attribute responsible to explain the high biomass of fish target species and small territorial herbivores. In sites sheltered from the waves, the biomass of groupers was ∼1600% higher within enforced area than that from open-access area. Beyond the idea of positive effects of enforcement on reef fish biomass and size, we add evidences that even under multiple stressors, the area-based management is still a strong tool to marine conservation.Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)Laboratório de Ecologia e Conservação Marinha (LABECMar) Instituto do Mar Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Rua Dr. Carvalho de Mendonça, 144Instituto de Biologia and SAGE/COPPE Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro CT-2, Rua Moniz de Aragão 360, bl.2 Ilha do Fundão, Cidade UniversitáriaDepartamento de Ciências do Meio Ambiente Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Av. Pref. Alberto da Silva Lavinas, 1847Instituto de Biociências Universidade Estadual Paulista, Praça Infante Dom Henrique, s/n, Parque Bitarú, São VicenteCentro de Ciências Naturais e Humanas Universidade Federal do ABC Rua Arcturus, 03, Jardim Antares, São Bernardo do CampoInstituto Laje Viva São Paulo SPInstituto de Biociências Universidade Estadual Paulista, Praça Infante Dom Henrique, s/n, Parque Bitarú, São VicenteFAPESP: #2017/22273-0FAPESP: #2019/19423-5Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de JaneiroUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Universidade Federal do ABC (UFABC)SPMotta, Fabio S.Moura, Rodrigo L.Neves, Leonardo M.Souza, Gabriel R.S. [UNESP]Gibran, Fernando Z.Francini, Carlo L.Shintate, Gustavo I.Rolim, Fernanda A.Marconi, MarinaGiglio, Vinicius J.Pereira-Filho, Guilherme H.2022-04-29T08:31:32Z2022-04-29T08:31:32Z2021-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rsma.2021.101951Regional Studies in Marine Science, v. 47.2352-4855http://hdl.handle.net/11449/22927810.1016/j.rsma.2021.1019512-s2.0-85111938547Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengRegional Studies in Marine Scienceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-04-29T08:31:32Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/229278Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T15:06:23.267839Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Effects of marine protected areas under different management regimes in a hot spot of biodiversity and cumulative impacts from SW Atlantic
title Effects of marine protected areas under different management regimes in a hot spot of biodiversity and cumulative impacts from SW Atlantic
spellingShingle Effects of marine protected areas under different management regimes in a hot spot of biodiversity and cumulative impacts from SW Atlantic
Motta, Fabio S.
Conservation
Effectiveness
Fishing effects
MPA network
Reef fishes
Underwater visual census
title_short Effects of marine protected areas under different management regimes in a hot spot of biodiversity and cumulative impacts from SW Atlantic
title_full Effects of marine protected areas under different management regimes in a hot spot of biodiversity and cumulative impacts from SW Atlantic
title_fullStr Effects of marine protected areas under different management regimes in a hot spot of biodiversity and cumulative impacts from SW Atlantic
title_full_unstemmed Effects of marine protected areas under different management regimes in a hot spot of biodiversity and cumulative impacts from SW Atlantic
title_sort Effects of marine protected areas under different management regimes in a hot spot of biodiversity and cumulative impacts from SW Atlantic
author Motta, Fabio S.
author_facet Motta, Fabio S.
Moura, Rodrigo L.
Neves, Leonardo M.
Souza, Gabriel R.S. [UNESP]
Gibran, Fernando Z.
Francini, Carlo L.
Shintate, Gustavo I.
Rolim, Fernanda A.
Marconi, Marina
Giglio, Vinicius J.
Pereira-Filho, Guilherme H.
author_role author
author2 Moura, Rodrigo L.
Neves, Leonardo M.
Souza, Gabriel R.S. [UNESP]
Gibran, Fernando Z.
Francini, Carlo L.
Shintate, Gustavo I.
Rolim, Fernanda A.
Marconi, Marina
Giglio, Vinicius J.
Pereira-Filho, Guilherme H.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)
Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
Universidade Federal do ABC (UFABC)
SP
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Motta, Fabio S.
Moura, Rodrigo L.
Neves, Leonardo M.
Souza, Gabriel R.S. [UNESP]
Gibran, Fernando Z.
Francini, Carlo L.
Shintate, Gustavo I.
Rolim, Fernanda A.
Marconi, Marina
Giglio, Vinicius J.
Pereira-Filho, Guilherme H.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Conservation
Effectiveness
Fishing effects
MPA network
Reef fishes
Underwater visual census
topic Conservation
Effectiveness
Fishing effects
MPA network
Reef fishes
Underwater visual census
description Marine protected areas (MPAs) represent a useful tool for resource management, as well as to conserve and/or restore biological communities. The level of protection is key factor influencing the marine biodiversity, where a more enforced protection is expected to drive positive outcomes. In 2008, a large MPAs network (∼11,380 km 2) was established in one of off the most populated and industrialized areas in the world (i.e., São Paulo State coast, southeast Brazil). Given many goods and services provided by marine ecosystems, this MPA network represents the most challenging marine conservation initiative in Brazil. Harboring​ areas with different socio-ecological contexts and management regimes, this MPA network provides a unique opportunity to investigate the effects of cumulative impacts. We contrasted the biomass and size structure of reef fish in three subtropical islands under different levels of enforcement. We analyzed the influence of variables as island size, benthic cover, depth, topographic complexity, wave exposure, and protection level on the biomass of reef fish assemblages. Protection level was the main attribute responsible to explain the high biomass of fish target species and small territorial herbivores. In sites sheltered from the waves, the biomass of groupers was ∼1600% higher within enforced area than that from open-access area. Beyond the idea of positive effects of enforcement on reef fish biomass and size, we add evidences that even under multiple stressors, the area-based management is still a strong tool to marine conservation.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-09-01
2022-04-29T08:31:32Z
2022-04-29T08:31:32Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rsma.2021.101951
Regional Studies in Marine Science, v. 47.
2352-4855
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/229278
10.1016/j.rsma.2021.101951
2-s2.0-85111938547
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rsma.2021.101951
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/229278
identifier_str_mv Regional Studies in Marine Science, v. 47.
2352-4855
10.1016/j.rsma.2021.101951
2-s2.0-85111938547
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Regional Studies in Marine Science
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808128461610418176