Participative democracy in the Constitutional Cational Assembly and the Constitution of 1988
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.9732.2020.V121.846 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/209105 |
Resumo: | This article discusses the forms and results related to the instruments of participatory democracy in the National Constitutional Assembly and in the 1988 Constitution. For this purpose, the main documents that report this participation are examined. It is a qualitative approach, formalized in two strategies: (i) selective review of the material available in the Brazilian literature and in the Congress database (ii) case study of bills resulting from popular initiative presented since the creation of the Institution in 1988 and 2013 with the verification of how many proposed bills were converted into law and how this process occurs. The main results reveal a very insignificant application of the instruments of right judgment, with a total of 07 bills presented where only 05 were converted into law. As a main conclusion, the instruments of popular initiative to amend the Constitution, the plebiscite and the referendum are participatory instruments almost unknown to Brazilian voters, whose practice would strengthen our young democracy. We point lege ferenda to the need for a constitutional reform that removes the obstacles that currently hinder the exercise of participatory democracy. Legal and Political Science. |
id |
UNSP_6c999a9d0c629ff5a44dd5f5a8ad373b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/209105 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Participative democracy in the Constitutional Cational Assembly and the Constitution of 1988Constitutional National AssemblyConstitution of 1988Participative DemocracyPopular SovereigntyThis article discusses the forms and results related to the instruments of participatory democracy in the National Constitutional Assembly and in the 1988 Constitution. For this purpose, the main documents that report this participation are examined. It is a qualitative approach, formalized in two strategies: (i) selective review of the material available in the Brazilian literature and in the Congress database (ii) case study of bills resulting from popular initiative presented since the creation of the Institution in 1988 and 2013 with the verification of how many proposed bills were converted into law and how this process occurs. The main results reveal a very insignificant application of the instruments of right judgment, with a total of 07 bills presented where only 05 were converted into law. As a main conclusion, the instruments of popular initiative to amend the Constitution, the plebiscite and the referendum are participatory instruments almost unknown to Brazilian voters, whose practice would strengthen our young democracy. We point lege ferenda to the need for a constitutional reform that removes the obstacles that currently hinder the exercise of participatory democracy. Legal and Political Science.Univ Toronto, Fac Appl Sci & Engn, Toronto, ON, CanadaUNESP, Programa Mestrado Direito, Disciplina Implicacoes Eticas & Jurid Influencias, Campus Franca, Franca, SP, BrazilUNESP, Direito Adm & Direito Constituc, Curso Adm Publ, Campus Araraquara, Araraquara, SP, BrazilUniv Estadual Paulista, Direito Constituc Direitos Fundamentais, Sao Paulo, BrazilUniv Estadual Paulista, Sao Paulo, BrazilGrp Pesquisa CNPq, Desenvolvimento Polit Publ & Implementacao Direit, Brasilia, DF, BrazilUNESP, Programa Mestrado Direito, Disciplina Implicacoes Eticas & Jurid Influencias, Campus Franca, Franca, SP, BrazilUNESP, Direito Adm & Direito Constituc, Curso Adm Publ, Campus Araraquara, Araraquara, SP, BrazilUniv Estadual Paulista, Direito Constituc Direitos Fundamentais, Sao Paulo, BrazilUniv Estadual Paulista, Sao Paulo, BrazilRevista Brasileira Estudos PoliticosUniv TorontoUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Grp Pesquisa CNPqBarrientos-Parra, Jorge David [UNESP]Gasparetto Lunardi, Soraya Regina [UNESP]2021-06-25T11:48:43Z2021-06-25T11:48:43Z2020-07-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article421-454http://dx.doi.org/10.9732.2020.V121.846Revista Brasileira De Estudos Politicos. Belo Horizonte: Revista Brasileira Estudos Politicos, v. 121, p. 421-454, 2020.0034-7191http://hdl.handle.net/11449/20910510.9732.2020.V121.846WOS:000607562900012Web of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPporRevista Brasileira De Estudos Politicosinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-10-23T19:23:33Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/209105Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T18:11:11.800400Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Participative democracy in the Constitutional Cational Assembly and the Constitution of 1988 |
title |
Participative democracy in the Constitutional Cational Assembly and the Constitution of 1988 |
spellingShingle |
Participative democracy in the Constitutional Cational Assembly and the Constitution of 1988 Barrientos-Parra, Jorge David [UNESP] Constitutional National Assembly Constitution of 1988 Participative Democracy Popular Sovereignty |
title_short |
Participative democracy in the Constitutional Cational Assembly and the Constitution of 1988 |
title_full |
Participative democracy in the Constitutional Cational Assembly and the Constitution of 1988 |
title_fullStr |
Participative democracy in the Constitutional Cational Assembly and the Constitution of 1988 |
title_full_unstemmed |
Participative democracy in the Constitutional Cational Assembly and the Constitution of 1988 |
title_sort |
Participative democracy in the Constitutional Cational Assembly and the Constitution of 1988 |
author |
Barrientos-Parra, Jorge David [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Barrientos-Parra, Jorge David [UNESP] Gasparetto Lunardi, Soraya Regina [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Gasparetto Lunardi, Soraya Regina [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Univ Toronto Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) Grp Pesquisa CNPq |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Barrientos-Parra, Jorge David [UNESP] Gasparetto Lunardi, Soraya Regina [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Constitutional National Assembly Constitution of 1988 Participative Democracy Popular Sovereignty |
topic |
Constitutional National Assembly Constitution of 1988 Participative Democracy Popular Sovereignty |
description |
This article discusses the forms and results related to the instruments of participatory democracy in the National Constitutional Assembly and in the 1988 Constitution. For this purpose, the main documents that report this participation are examined. It is a qualitative approach, formalized in two strategies: (i) selective review of the material available in the Brazilian literature and in the Congress database (ii) case study of bills resulting from popular initiative presented since the creation of the Institution in 1988 and 2013 with the verification of how many proposed bills were converted into law and how this process occurs. The main results reveal a very insignificant application of the instruments of right judgment, with a total of 07 bills presented where only 05 were converted into law. As a main conclusion, the instruments of popular initiative to amend the Constitution, the plebiscite and the referendum are participatory instruments almost unknown to Brazilian voters, whose practice would strengthen our young democracy. We point lege ferenda to the need for a constitutional reform that removes the obstacles that currently hinder the exercise of participatory democracy. Legal and Political Science. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-07-01 2021-06-25T11:48:43Z 2021-06-25T11:48:43Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.9732.2020.V121.846 Revista Brasileira De Estudos Politicos. Belo Horizonte: Revista Brasileira Estudos Politicos, v. 121, p. 421-454, 2020. 0034-7191 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/209105 10.9732.2020.V121.846 WOS:000607562900012 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.9732.2020.V121.846 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/209105 |
identifier_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira De Estudos Politicos. Belo Horizonte: Revista Brasileira Estudos Politicos, v. 121, p. 421-454, 2020. 0034-7191 10.9732.2020.V121.846 WOS:000607562900012 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira De Estudos Politicos |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
421-454 |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira Estudos Politicos |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira Estudos Politicos |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Web of Science reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808128906087104512 |