The presence of invasive grasses affects the soil seed bank composition and dynamics of both invaded and non-invaded areas of open savannas

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Dairel, Mariana [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Fidelis, Alessandra [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111291
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/205244
Resumo: One of the major threats to tropical savannas globally is the invasion by alien grasses. In systems frequently disturbed, individuals can be recruited from the seed bank, and areas under natural regeneration can be more easily invaded when exotic newcomers are in the system, including the presence of invasive propagules in the soil seed bank. This study analyzed the dynamics of the soil seed bank in invaded and non-invaded areas of open savannas elucidating the potential of grass regeneration from the seed bank. Soil samples were collected in areas with different invasive grasses: Urochloa brizantha (Hochst. ex A. Rich.) R.D.Webster – synonym Brachiaria brizantha (Hochst. ex A. Rich.) Stapf, Melinis minutiflora Beauv. and areas with native vegetation. Soil seed bank was assessed using two techniques: seed counting and seedling emergence. Dominant species in each area influenced the seed bank composition, showing the highest densities from April to September. In invaded areas, the seed bank was composed mainly of invasive grasses that contributed to 98% (670 ± 382 seeds.m−2) of total seeds. In non-invaded areas, the soil seed bank presented the highest density (65%, 135 ± 38 seeds.m−2) of native species. However, the presence of invasive grasses was significant, with 35% of the total seeds belonging to U. brizantha. Although non-invaded areas have a higher potential for regeneration by native grasses, the presence of invasive grasses in the seed bank is an indication that the invasive species is already in the system and changes in the aboveground cover could accelerate the invasion process. Early management efforts towards establishing and/or established invasive species before seed dispersal could help reduce the soil seed bank load and should be carried out to control and avoid the establishment of African grasses, since they can dominate the seed bank in non-invaded areas if they are present in neighboring areas, affecting the dynamics of plant communities.
id UNSP_7166654c1a26f4798596ec99c4cd40f6
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/205244
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling The presence of invasive grasses affects the soil seed bank composition and dynamics of both invaded and non-invaded areas of open savannasAfrican invasive speciesGerminationGrassesNatural regenerationRegeneration nicheOne of the major threats to tropical savannas globally is the invasion by alien grasses. In systems frequently disturbed, individuals can be recruited from the seed bank, and areas under natural regeneration can be more easily invaded when exotic newcomers are in the system, including the presence of invasive propagules in the soil seed bank. This study analyzed the dynamics of the soil seed bank in invaded and non-invaded areas of open savannas elucidating the potential of grass regeneration from the seed bank. Soil samples were collected in areas with different invasive grasses: Urochloa brizantha (Hochst. ex A. Rich.) R.D.Webster – synonym Brachiaria brizantha (Hochst. ex A. Rich.) Stapf, Melinis minutiflora Beauv. and areas with native vegetation. Soil seed bank was assessed using two techniques: seed counting and seedling emergence. Dominant species in each area influenced the seed bank composition, showing the highest densities from April to September. In invaded areas, the seed bank was composed mainly of invasive grasses that contributed to 98% (670 ± 382 seeds.m−2) of total seeds. In non-invaded areas, the soil seed bank presented the highest density (65%, 135 ± 38 seeds.m−2) of native species. However, the presence of invasive grasses was significant, with 35% of the total seeds belonging to U. brizantha. Although non-invaded areas have a higher potential for regeneration by native grasses, the presence of invasive grasses in the seed bank is an indication that the invasive species is already in the system and changes in the aboveground cover could accelerate the invasion process. Early management efforts towards establishing and/or established invasive species before seed dispersal could help reduce the soil seed bank load and should be carried out to control and avoid the establishment of African grasses, since they can dominate the seed bank in non-invaded areas if they are present in neighboring areas, affecting the dynamics of plant communities.Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) Instituto de Biociências Lab of Vegetation Ecology, Avenida 24A, 1515Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) Instituto de Biociências Lab of Vegetation Ecology, Avenida 24A, 1515Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Dairel, Mariana [UNESP]Fidelis, Alessandra [UNESP]2021-06-25T10:12:10Z2021-06-25T10:12:10Z2020-12-15info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111291Journal of Environmental Management, v. 276.1095-86300301-4797http://hdl.handle.net/11449/20524410.1016/j.jenvman.2020.1112912-s2.0-85091895370Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal of Environmental Managementinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-10-23T12:19:12Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/205244Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T15:10:31.161934Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The presence of invasive grasses affects the soil seed bank composition and dynamics of both invaded and non-invaded areas of open savannas
title The presence of invasive grasses affects the soil seed bank composition and dynamics of both invaded and non-invaded areas of open savannas
spellingShingle The presence of invasive grasses affects the soil seed bank composition and dynamics of both invaded and non-invaded areas of open savannas
Dairel, Mariana [UNESP]
African invasive species
Germination
Grasses
Natural regeneration
Regeneration niche
title_short The presence of invasive grasses affects the soil seed bank composition and dynamics of both invaded and non-invaded areas of open savannas
title_full The presence of invasive grasses affects the soil seed bank composition and dynamics of both invaded and non-invaded areas of open savannas
title_fullStr The presence of invasive grasses affects the soil seed bank composition and dynamics of both invaded and non-invaded areas of open savannas
title_full_unstemmed The presence of invasive grasses affects the soil seed bank composition and dynamics of both invaded and non-invaded areas of open savannas
title_sort The presence of invasive grasses affects the soil seed bank composition and dynamics of both invaded and non-invaded areas of open savannas
author Dairel, Mariana [UNESP]
author_facet Dairel, Mariana [UNESP]
Fidelis, Alessandra [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Fidelis, Alessandra [UNESP]
author2_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Dairel, Mariana [UNESP]
Fidelis, Alessandra [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv African invasive species
Germination
Grasses
Natural regeneration
Regeneration niche
topic African invasive species
Germination
Grasses
Natural regeneration
Regeneration niche
description One of the major threats to tropical savannas globally is the invasion by alien grasses. In systems frequently disturbed, individuals can be recruited from the seed bank, and areas under natural regeneration can be more easily invaded when exotic newcomers are in the system, including the presence of invasive propagules in the soil seed bank. This study analyzed the dynamics of the soil seed bank in invaded and non-invaded areas of open savannas elucidating the potential of grass regeneration from the seed bank. Soil samples were collected in areas with different invasive grasses: Urochloa brizantha (Hochst. ex A. Rich.) R.D.Webster – synonym Brachiaria brizantha (Hochst. ex A. Rich.) Stapf, Melinis minutiflora Beauv. and areas with native vegetation. Soil seed bank was assessed using two techniques: seed counting and seedling emergence. Dominant species in each area influenced the seed bank composition, showing the highest densities from April to September. In invaded areas, the seed bank was composed mainly of invasive grasses that contributed to 98% (670 ± 382 seeds.m−2) of total seeds. In non-invaded areas, the soil seed bank presented the highest density (65%, 135 ± 38 seeds.m−2) of native species. However, the presence of invasive grasses was significant, with 35% of the total seeds belonging to U. brizantha. Although non-invaded areas have a higher potential for regeneration by native grasses, the presence of invasive grasses in the seed bank is an indication that the invasive species is already in the system and changes in the aboveground cover could accelerate the invasion process. Early management efforts towards establishing and/or established invasive species before seed dispersal could help reduce the soil seed bank load and should be carried out to control and avoid the establishment of African grasses, since they can dominate the seed bank in non-invaded areas if they are present in neighboring areas, affecting the dynamics of plant communities.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-12-15
2021-06-25T10:12:10Z
2021-06-25T10:12:10Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111291
Journal of Environmental Management, v. 276.
1095-8630
0301-4797
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/205244
10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111291
2-s2.0-85091895370
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111291
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/205244
identifier_str_mv Journal of Environmental Management, v. 276.
1095-8630
0301-4797
10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111291
2-s2.0-85091895370
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Environmental Management
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808128473648070656