The presence of invasive grasses affects the soil seed bank composition and dynamics of both invaded and non-invaded areas of open savannas
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111291 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/205244 |
Resumo: | One of the major threats to tropical savannas globally is the invasion by alien grasses. In systems frequently disturbed, individuals can be recruited from the seed bank, and areas under natural regeneration can be more easily invaded when exotic newcomers are in the system, including the presence of invasive propagules in the soil seed bank. This study analyzed the dynamics of the soil seed bank in invaded and non-invaded areas of open savannas elucidating the potential of grass regeneration from the seed bank. Soil samples were collected in areas with different invasive grasses: Urochloa brizantha (Hochst. ex A. Rich.) R.D.Webster – synonym Brachiaria brizantha (Hochst. ex A. Rich.) Stapf, Melinis minutiflora Beauv. and areas with native vegetation. Soil seed bank was assessed using two techniques: seed counting and seedling emergence. Dominant species in each area influenced the seed bank composition, showing the highest densities from April to September. In invaded areas, the seed bank was composed mainly of invasive grasses that contributed to 98% (670 ± 382 seeds.m−2) of total seeds. In non-invaded areas, the soil seed bank presented the highest density (65%, 135 ± 38 seeds.m−2) of native species. However, the presence of invasive grasses was significant, with 35% of the total seeds belonging to U. brizantha. Although non-invaded areas have a higher potential for regeneration by native grasses, the presence of invasive grasses in the seed bank is an indication that the invasive species is already in the system and changes in the aboveground cover could accelerate the invasion process. Early management efforts towards establishing and/or established invasive species before seed dispersal could help reduce the soil seed bank load and should be carried out to control and avoid the establishment of African grasses, since they can dominate the seed bank in non-invaded areas if they are present in neighboring areas, affecting the dynamics of plant communities. |
id |
UNSP_7166654c1a26f4798596ec99c4cd40f6 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/205244 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
The presence of invasive grasses affects the soil seed bank composition and dynamics of both invaded and non-invaded areas of open savannasAfrican invasive speciesGerminationGrassesNatural regenerationRegeneration nicheOne of the major threats to tropical savannas globally is the invasion by alien grasses. In systems frequently disturbed, individuals can be recruited from the seed bank, and areas under natural regeneration can be more easily invaded when exotic newcomers are in the system, including the presence of invasive propagules in the soil seed bank. This study analyzed the dynamics of the soil seed bank in invaded and non-invaded areas of open savannas elucidating the potential of grass regeneration from the seed bank. Soil samples were collected in areas with different invasive grasses: Urochloa brizantha (Hochst. ex A. Rich.) R.D.Webster – synonym Brachiaria brizantha (Hochst. ex A. Rich.) Stapf, Melinis minutiflora Beauv. and areas with native vegetation. Soil seed bank was assessed using two techniques: seed counting and seedling emergence. Dominant species in each area influenced the seed bank composition, showing the highest densities from April to September. In invaded areas, the seed bank was composed mainly of invasive grasses that contributed to 98% (670 ± 382 seeds.m−2) of total seeds. In non-invaded areas, the soil seed bank presented the highest density (65%, 135 ± 38 seeds.m−2) of native species. However, the presence of invasive grasses was significant, with 35% of the total seeds belonging to U. brizantha. Although non-invaded areas have a higher potential for regeneration by native grasses, the presence of invasive grasses in the seed bank is an indication that the invasive species is already in the system and changes in the aboveground cover could accelerate the invasion process. Early management efforts towards establishing and/or established invasive species before seed dispersal could help reduce the soil seed bank load and should be carried out to control and avoid the establishment of African grasses, since they can dominate the seed bank in non-invaded areas if they are present in neighboring areas, affecting the dynamics of plant communities.Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) Instituto de Biociências Lab of Vegetation Ecology, Avenida 24A, 1515Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) Instituto de Biociências Lab of Vegetation Ecology, Avenida 24A, 1515Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Dairel, Mariana [UNESP]Fidelis, Alessandra [UNESP]2021-06-25T10:12:10Z2021-06-25T10:12:10Z2020-12-15info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111291Journal of Environmental Management, v. 276.1095-86300301-4797http://hdl.handle.net/11449/20524410.1016/j.jenvman.2020.1112912-s2.0-85091895370Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal of Environmental Managementinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-10-23T12:19:12Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/205244Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T15:10:31.161934Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The presence of invasive grasses affects the soil seed bank composition and dynamics of both invaded and non-invaded areas of open savannas |
title |
The presence of invasive grasses affects the soil seed bank composition and dynamics of both invaded and non-invaded areas of open savannas |
spellingShingle |
The presence of invasive grasses affects the soil seed bank composition and dynamics of both invaded and non-invaded areas of open savannas Dairel, Mariana [UNESP] African invasive species Germination Grasses Natural regeneration Regeneration niche |
title_short |
The presence of invasive grasses affects the soil seed bank composition and dynamics of both invaded and non-invaded areas of open savannas |
title_full |
The presence of invasive grasses affects the soil seed bank composition and dynamics of both invaded and non-invaded areas of open savannas |
title_fullStr |
The presence of invasive grasses affects the soil seed bank composition and dynamics of both invaded and non-invaded areas of open savannas |
title_full_unstemmed |
The presence of invasive grasses affects the soil seed bank composition and dynamics of both invaded and non-invaded areas of open savannas |
title_sort |
The presence of invasive grasses affects the soil seed bank composition and dynamics of both invaded and non-invaded areas of open savannas |
author |
Dairel, Mariana [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Dairel, Mariana [UNESP] Fidelis, Alessandra [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Fidelis, Alessandra [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Dairel, Mariana [UNESP] Fidelis, Alessandra [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
African invasive species Germination Grasses Natural regeneration Regeneration niche |
topic |
African invasive species Germination Grasses Natural regeneration Regeneration niche |
description |
One of the major threats to tropical savannas globally is the invasion by alien grasses. In systems frequently disturbed, individuals can be recruited from the seed bank, and areas under natural regeneration can be more easily invaded when exotic newcomers are in the system, including the presence of invasive propagules in the soil seed bank. This study analyzed the dynamics of the soil seed bank in invaded and non-invaded areas of open savannas elucidating the potential of grass regeneration from the seed bank. Soil samples were collected in areas with different invasive grasses: Urochloa brizantha (Hochst. ex A. Rich.) R.D.Webster – synonym Brachiaria brizantha (Hochst. ex A. Rich.) Stapf, Melinis minutiflora Beauv. and areas with native vegetation. Soil seed bank was assessed using two techniques: seed counting and seedling emergence. Dominant species in each area influenced the seed bank composition, showing the highest densities from April to September. In invaded areas, the seed bank was composed mainly of invasive grasses that contributed to 98% (670 ± 382 seeds.m−2) of total seeds. In non-invaded areas, the soil seed bank presented the highest density (65%, 135 ± 38 seeds.m−2) of native species. However, the presence of invasive grasses was significant, with 35% of the total seeds belonging to U. brizantha. Although non-invaded areas have a higher potential for regeneration by native grasses, the presence of invasive grasses in the seed bank is an indication that the invasive species is already in the system and changes in the aboveground cover could accelerate the invasion process. Early management efforts towards establishing and/or established invasive species before seed dispersal could help reduce the soil seed bank load and should be carried out to control and avoid the establishment of African grasses, since they can dominate the seed bank in non-invaded areas if they are present in neighboring areas, affecting the dynamics of plant communities. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-12-15 2021-06-25T10:12:10Z 2021-06-25T10:12:10Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111291 Journal of Environmental Management, v. 276. 1095-8630 0301-4797 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/205244 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111291 2-s2.0-85091895370 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111291 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/205244 |
identifier_str_mv |
Journal of Environmental Management, v. 276. 1095-8630 0301-4797 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111291 2-s2.0-85091895370 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Environmental Management |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808128473648070656 |