Errors measurement of interpolation methods for geoid models: Study case in the Brazilian region
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1982-21702018000100004 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/176159 |
Resumo: | The geoid is an equipotential surface regarded as the altimetric reference for geodetic surveys and it therefore, has several practical applications for engineers. In recent decades the geodetic community has concentrated efforts on the development of highly accurate geoid models through modern techniques. These models are supplied through regular grids which users need to make interpolations. Yet, little information can be obtained regarding the most appropriate interpolation method to extract information from the regular grid of geoidal models. The use of an interpolator that does not represent the geoid surface appropriately can impair the quality of geoid undulations and consequently the height transformation. This work aims to quantify the magnitude of error that comes from a regular mesh of geoid models. The analysis consisted of performing a comparison between the interpolation of the MAPGEO2015 program and three interpolation methods: bilinear, cubic spline and neural networks Radial Basis Function. As a result of the experiments, it was concluded that 2.5 cm of the 18 cm error of the MAPGEO2015 validation is caused by the use of interpolations in the 5'x5' grid. |
id |
UNSP_7166f4ffffa9d79f3b76a6b3df516a5f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/176159 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Errors measurement of interpolation methods for geoid models: Study case in the Brazilian regionMensuração do erro de métodos de interpolação para modelos geoidais: Estudo de caso na região BrasileiraBilinearMAPGEO2015RBFSplineThe geoid is an equipotential surface regarded as the altimetric reference for geodetic surveys and it therefore, has several practical applications for engineers. In recent decades the geodetic community has concentrated efforts on the development of highly accurate geoid models through modern techniques. These models are supplied through regular grids which users need to make interpolations. Yet, little information can be obtained regarding the most appropriate interpolation method to extract information from the regular grid of geoidal models. The use of an interpolator that does not represent the geoid surface appropriately can impair the quality of geoid undulations and consequently the height transformation. This work aims to quantify the magnitude of error that comes from a regular mesh of geoid models. The analysis consisted of performing a comparison between the interpolation of the MAPGEO2015 program and three interpolation methods: bilinear, cubic spline and neural networks Radial Basis Function. As a result of the experiments, it was concluded that 2.5 cm of the 18 cm error of the MAPGEO2015 validation is caused by the use of interpolations in the 5'x5' grid.Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)Universidade Estadual Paulista - UNESP Faculdade de Ciência e TecnologiaUniversidade Estadual Paulista - UNESP Faculdade de Ciência e Tecnologia Departamento de CartografiaUniversidade Federal de Uberlândia – UFU Instituto de Geografia, Campus Monte CarmeloUniversidade Estadual Paulista - UNESP Faculdade de Ciência e TecnologiaUniversidade Estadual Paulista - UNESP Faculdade de Ciência e Tecnologia Departamento de CartografiaUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)Arana, Daniel [UNESP]Prol, Fabricio dos Santos [UNESP]Camargo, Paulo de Oliveira [UNESP]Guimarães, Gabriel do Nascimento2018-12-11T17:19:19Z2018-12-11T17:19:19Z2018-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article44-57application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1982-21702018000100004Boletim de Ciencias Geodesicas, v. 24, n. 1, p. 44-57, 2018.1982-21701413-4853http://hdl.handle.net/11449/17615910.1590/S1982-21702018000100004S1982-217020180001000442-s2.0-85045145303S1982-21702018000100044.pdf67907082475988130000-0001-7648-1291Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengBoletim de Ciencias Geodesicas0,188info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-06-18T15:01:03Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/176159Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T14:11:14.778789Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Errors measurement of interpolation methods for geoid models: Study case in the Brazilian region Mensuração do erro de métodos de interpolação para modelos geoidais: Estudo de caso na região Brasileira |
title |
Errors measurement of interpolation methods for geoid models: Study case in the Brazilian region |
spellingShingle |
Errors measurement of interpolation methods for geoid models: Study case in the Brazilian region Arana, Daniel [UNESP] Bilinear MAPGEO2015 RBF Spline |
title_short |
Errors measurement of interpolation methods for geoid models: Study case in the Brazilian region |
title_full |
Errors measurement of interpolation methods for geoid models: Study case in the Brazilian region |
title_fullStr |
Errors measurement of interpolation methods for geoid models: Study case in the Brazilian region |
title_full_unstemmed |
Errors measurement of interpolation methods for geoid models: Study case in the Brazilian region |
title_sort |
Errors measurement of interpolation methods for geoid models: Study case in the Brazilian region |
author |
Arana, Daniel [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Arana, Daniel [UNESP] Prol, Fabricio dos Santos [UNESP] Camargo, Paulo de Oliveira [UNESP] Guimarães, Gabriel do Nascimento |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Prol, Fabricio dos Santos [UNESP] Camargo, Paulo de Oliveira [UNESP] Guimarães, Gabriel do Nascimento |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Arana, Daniel [UNESP] Prol, Fabricio dos Santos [UNESP] Camargo, Paulo de Oliveira [UNESP] Guimarães, Gabriel do Nascimento |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Bilinear MAPGEO2015 RBF Spline |
topic |
Bilinear MAPGEO2015 RBF Spline |
description |
The geoid is an equipotential surface regarded as the altimetric reference for geodetic surveys and it therefore, has several practical applications for engineers. In recent decades the geodetic community has concentrated efforts on the development of highly accurate geoid models through modern techniques. These models are supplied through regular grids which users need to make interpolations. Yet, little information can be obtained regarding the most appropriate interpolation method to extract information from the regular grid of geoidal models. The use of an interpolator that does not represent the geoid surface appropriately can impair the quality of geoid undulations and consequently the height transformation. This work aims to quantify the magnitude of error that comes from a regular mesh of geoid models. The analysis consisted of performing a comparison between the interpolation of the MAPGEO2015 program and three interpolation methods: bilinear, cubic spline and neural networks Radial Basis Function. As a result of the experiments, it was concluded that 2.5 cm of the 18 cm error of the MAPGEO2015 validation is caused by the use of interpolations in the 5'x5' grid. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-12-11T17:19:19Z 2018-12-11T17:19:19Z 2018-01-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1982-21702018000100004 Boletim de Ciencias Geodesicas, v. 24, n. 1, p. 44-57, 2018. 1982-2170 1413-4853 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/176159 10.1590/S1982-21702018000100004 S1982-21702018000100044 2-s2.0-85045145303 S1982-21702018000100044.pdf 6790708247598813 0000-0001-7648-1291 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1982-21702018000100004 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/176159 |
identifier_str_mv |
Boletim de Ciencias Geodesicas, v. 24, n. 1, p. 44-57, 2018. 1982-2170 1413-4853 10.1590/S1982-21702018000100004 S1982-21702018000100044 2-s2.0-85045145303 S1982-21702018000100044.pdf 6790708247598813 0000-0001-7648-1291 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Boletim de Ciencias Geodesicas 0,188 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
44-57 application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808128328942485504 |