Errors measurement of interpolation methods for geoid models: Study case in the Brazilian region

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Arana, Daniel [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Prol, Fabricio dos Santos [UNESP], Camargo, Paulo de Oliveira [UNESP], Guimarães, Gabriel do Nascimento
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1982-21702018000100004
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/176159
Resumo: The geoid is an equipotential surface regarded as the altimetric reference for geodetic surveys and it therefore, has several practical applications for engineers. In recent decades the geodetic community has concentrated efforts on the development of highly accurate geoid models through modern techniques. These models are supplied through regular grids which users need to make interpolations. Yet, little information can be obtained regarding the most appropriate interpolation method to extract information from the regular grid of geoidal models. The use of an interpolator that does not represent the geoid surface appropriately can impair the quality of geoid undulations and consequently the height transformation. This work aims to quantify the magnitude of error that comes from a regular mesh of geoid models. The analysis consisted of performing a comparison between the interpolation of the MAPGEO2015 program and three interpolation methods: bilinear, cubic spline and neural networks Radial Basis Function. As a result of the experiments, it was concluded that 2.5 cm of the 18 cm error of the MAPGEO2015 validation is caused by the use of interpolations in the 5'x5' grid.
id UNSP_7166f4ffffa9d79f3b76a6b3df516a5f
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/176159
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Errors measurement of interpolation methods for geoid models: Study case in the Brazilian regionMensuração do erro de métodos de interpolação para modelos geoidais: Estudo de caso na região BrasileiraBilinearMAPGEO2015RBFSplineThe geoid is an equipotential surface regarded as the altimetric reference for geodetic surveys and it therefore, has several practical applications for engineers. In recent decades the geodetic community has concentrated efforts on the development of highly accurate geoid models through modern techniques. These models are supplied through regular grids which users need to make interpolations. Yet, little information can be obtained regarding the most appropriate interpolation method to extract information from the regular grid of geoidal models. The use of an interpolator that does not represent the geoid surface appropriately can impair the quality of geoid undulations and consequently the height transformation. This work aims to quantify the magnitude of error that comes from a regular mesh of geoid models. The analysis consisted of performing a comparison between the interpolation of the MAPGEO2015 program and three interpolation methods: bilinear, cubic spline and neural networks Radial Basis Function. As a result of the experiments, it was concluded that 2.5 cm of the 18 cm error of the MAPGEO2015 validation is caused by the use of interpolations in the 5'x5' grid.Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)Universidade Estadual Paulista - UNESP Faculdade de Ciência e TecnologiaUniversidade Estadual Paulista - UNESP Faculdade de Ciência e Tecnologia Departamento de CartografiaUniversidade Federal de Uberlândia – UFU Instituto de Geografia, Campus Monte CarmeloUniversidade Estadual Paulista - UNESP Faculdade de Ciência e TecnologiaUniversidade Estadual Paulista - UNESP Faculdade de Ciência e Tecnologia Departamento de CartografiaUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)Arana, Daniel [UNESP]Prol, Fabricio dos Santos [UNESP]Camargo, Paulo de Oliveira [UNESP]Guimarães, Gabriel do Nascimento2018-12-11T17:19:19Z2018-12-11T17:19:19Z2018-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article44-57application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1982-21702018000100004Boletim de Ciencias Geodesicas, v. 24, n. 1, p. 44-57, 2018.1982-21701413-4853http://hdl.handle.net/11449/17615910.1590/S1982-21702018000100004S1982-217020180001000442-s2.0-85045145303S1982-21702018000100044.pdf67907082475988130000-0001-7648-1291Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengBoletim de Ciencias Geodesicas0,188info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-06-18T15:01:03Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/176159Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T14:11:14.778789Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Errors measurement of interpolation methods for geoid models: Study case in the Brazilian region
Mensuração do erro de métodos de interpolação para modelos geoidais: Estudo de caso na região Brasileira
title Errors measurement of interpolation methods for geoid models: Study case in the Brazilian region
spellingShingle Errors measurement of interpolation methods for geoid models: Study case in the Brazilian region
Arana, Daniel [UNESP]
Bilinear
MAPGEO2015
RBF
Spline
title_short Errors measurement of interpolation methods for geoid models: Study case in the Brazilian region
title_full Errors measurement of interpolation methods for geoid models: Study case in the Brazilian region
title_fullStr Errors measurement of interpolation methods for geoid models: Study case in the Brazilian region
title_full_unstemmed Errors measurement of interpolation methods for geoid models: Study case in the Brazilian region
title_sort Errors measurement of interpolation methods for geoid models: Study case in the Brazilian region
author Arana, Daniel [UNESP]
author_facet Arana, Daniel [UNESP]
Prol, Fabricio dos Santos [UNESP]
Camargo, Paulo de Oliveira [UNESP]
Guimarães, Gabriel do Nascimento
author_role author
author2 Prol, Fabricio dos Santos [UNESP]
Camargo, Paulo de Oliveira [UNESP]
Guimarães, Gabriel do Nascimento
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Arana, Daniel [UNESP]
Prol, Fabricio dos Santos [UNESP]
Camargo, Paulo de Oliveira [UNESP]
Guimarães, Gabriel do Nascimento
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Bilinear
MAPGEO2015
RBF
Spline
topic Bilinear
MAPGEO2015
RBF
Spline
description The geoid is an equipotential surface regarded as the altimetric reference for geodetic surveys and it therefore, has several practical applications for engineers. In recent decades the geodetic community has concentrated efforts on the development of highly accurate geoid models through modern techniques. These models are supplied through regular grids which users need to make interpolations. Yet, little information can be obtained regarding the most appropriate interpolation method to extract information from the regular grid of geoidal models. The use of an interpolator that does not represent the geoid surface appropriately can impair the quality of geoid undulations and consequently the height transformation. This work aims to quantify the magnitude of error that comes from a regular mesh of geoid models. The analysis consisted of performing a comparison between the interpolation of the MAPGEO2015 program and three interpolation methods: bilinear, cubic spline and neural networks Radial Basis Function. As a result of the experiments, it was concluded that 2.5 cm of the 18 cm error of the MAPGEO2015 validation is caused by the use of interpolations in the 5'x5' grid.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-12-11T17:19:19Z
2018-12-11T17:19:19Z
2018-01-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1982-21702018000100004
Boletim de Ciencias Geodesicas, v. 24, n. 1, p. 44-57, 2018.
1982-2170
1413-4853
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/176159
10.1590/S1982-21702018000100004
S1982-21702018000100044
2-s2.0-85045145303
S1982-21702018000100044.pdf
6790708247598813
0000-0001-7648-1291
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1982-21702018000100004
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/176159
identifier_str_mv Boletim de Ciencias Geodesicas, v. 24, n. 1, p. 44-57, 2018.
1982-2170
1413-4853
10.1590/S1982-21702018000100004
S1982-21702018000100044
2-s2.0-85045145303
S1982-21702018000100044.pdf
6790708247598813
0000-0001-7648-1291
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Boletim de Ciencias Geodesicas
0,188
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 44-57
application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808128328942485504