Effects of vaccination against foot-and-mouth disease virus on reproductive performance of Bos indicus beef cows
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/jas2015-9537 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/158709 |
Resumo: | This study compared reproductive performance of Bos indicus cows vaccinated against the foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) virus before timed AI or during early pregnancy (Exp. 1), as well as rectal temperature (RT) and plasma concentrations of the acute-phase protein haptoglobin in cattle vaccinated or not against the FMD virus (Exp. 2). Cattle utilized in Exp. 1 and 2 originated from herds with no historical occurrences of FMD and that received vaccination against the FMD virus biannually. In Exp. 1, 604 lactating, multiparous, nonpregnant Nelore cows were randomly assigned on d -31 of the experiment to receive 1) vaccination against the FMD virus on d >= 31 (VACPRE; n = 291) and 2) vaccination against FMD virus on d 30 (VACGEST; n = 313). From d -11 to 0, all cows were assigned to an estrus synchronization + timed AI (d 0) protocol. Pregnancy status to AI was verified on d 30 and 90 via transrectal ultrasonography. A treatment x day interaction was detected (P < 0.01) for pregnancy rates to AI, which were similar (P = 0.17) between VACPRE and VACGEST on d 30 (61.8% vs. 56.2%, respectively; SEM = 2.8) but greater (P < 0.01) for VACPRE on d 90 (59.4% vs. 46.9%, respectively; SEM = 2.8). Pregnancy loss from d 30 to 90 was greater (P < 0.01) in VACGEST compared with VACPRE (16.5% vs. 3.9%, respectively; SEM = 2.2). In Exp. 2, 40 pregnant Nelore females (20 nulliparous and 20 multiparous cows; BCS = 4.73 +/- 0.12) were ranked by parity and assigned to receive (VAC; n = 20) or not receive (NOVAC; n = 20) vaccination against the FMD virus. Blood samples were collected and RT was recorded before (h 0) and 24, 72, 120, and 168 h after treatment administration. Treatment x day interactions were detected (P < 0.01) for RT and plasma haptoglobin. The RT was greater (P < 0.01) in VAC compared with NOVAC at 24 h after treatment administration and was similar (P = 0.31) between treatments at all other sampling hours. Plasma haptoglobin concentration was similar (P = 0.98) between VAC and NOVAC before treatment administration (P = 0.48) and greater (P < 0.01) in VAC at 24, 72, 120, and 168 h after treatment administration. In summary, vaccinating B. indicus beef cows against the FMD virus resulted in a 4-fold increase in pregnancy loss when the vaccine was administered 30 d after timed AI compared with 31 d before timed AI. These outcomes can be associated with inflammatory and acute-phase reactions elicited by the FMD vaccine, which are known to impair pregnancy maintenance in cattle. |
id |
UNSP_748e91f1c70d7b6456c71a094ac31f5d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/158709 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Effects of vaccination against foot-and-mouth disease virus on reproductive performance of Bos indicus beef cowsacute-phase responsebeef cattlefoot-and-mouth diseaseinflammationpregnancy lossThis study compared reproductive performance of Bos indicus cows vaccinated against the foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) virus before timed AI or during early pregnancy (Exp. 1), as well as rectal temperature (RT) and plasma concentrations of the acute-phase protein haptoglobin in cattle vaccinated or not against the FMD virus (Exp. 2). Cattle utilized in Exp. 1 and 2 originated from herds with no historical occurrences of FMD and that received vaccination against the FMD virus biannually. In Exp. 1, 604 lactating, multiparous, nonpregnant Nelore cows were randomly assigned on d -31 of the experiment to receive 1) vaccination against the FMD virus on d >= 31 (VACPRE; n = 291) and 2) vaccination against FMD virus on d 30 (VACGEST; n = 313). From d -11 to 0, all cows were assigned to an estrus synchronization + timed AI (d 0) protocol. Pregnancy status to AI was verified on d 30 and 90 via transrectal ultrasonography. A treatment x day interaction was detected (P < 0.01) for pregnancy rates to AI, which were similar (P = 0.17) between VACPRE and VACGEST on d 30 (61.8% vs. 56.2%, respectively; SEM = 2.8) but greater (P < 0.01) for VACPRE on d 90 (59.4% vs. 46.9%, respectively; SEM = 2.8). Pregnancy loss from d 30 to 90 was greater (P < 0.01) in VACGEST compared with VACPRE (16.5% vs. 3.9%, respectively; SEM = 2.2). In Exp. 2, 40 pregnant Nelore females (20 nulliparous and 20 multiparous cows; BCS = 4.73 +/- 0.12) were ranked by parity and assigned to receive (VAC; n = 20) or not receive (NOVAC; n = 20) vaccination against the FMD virus. Blood samples were collected and RT was recorded before (h 0) and 24, 72, 120, and 168 h after treatment administration. Treatment x day interactions were detected (P < 0.01) for RT and plasma haptoglobin. The RT was greater (P < 0.01) in VAC compared with NOVAC at 24 h after treatment administration and was similar (P = 0.31) between treatments at all other sampling hours. Plasma haptoglobin concentration was similar (P = 0.98) between VAC and NOVAC before treatment administration (P = 0.48) and greater (P < 0.01) in VAC at 24, 72, 120, and 168 h after treatment administration. In summary, vaccinating B. indicus beef cows against the FMD virus resulted in a 4-fold increase in pregnancy loss when the vaccine was administered 30 d after timed AI compared with 31 d before timed AI. These outcomes can be associated with inflammatory and acute-phase reactions elicited by the FMD vaccine, which are known to impair pregnancy maintenance in cattle.Univ Fed Mato Grosso do Sul, Fac Med Vet & Zootecnia, BR-79074460 Campo Grande, BrazilOregon State Univ, Eastern Oregon Agr Res Ctr, Burns, OR 97720 USAUniv Estadual Paulista, Programa Posgrad Zootecnia, Fac Med Vet & Zootecnia, BR-18618970 Botucatu, SP, BrazilUniv Estadual Mato Grosso do Sul, Unidade Univ Aquidauana, BR-79200000 Aquidauana, BrazilUniv Fed Mato Grosso do Sul, Ctr Ciencias Biol & Saude, BR-79074460 Campo Grande, BrazilLab Zoetis Ltda, BR-79074460 Campo Grande, BrazilUniv Estadual Paulista, Programa Posgrad Zootecnia, Fac Med Vet & Zootecnia, BR-18618970 Botucatu, SP, BrazilAmer Soc Animal ScienceUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS)Oregon State UnivUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Universidade Estadual de Mato Grosso do Sul (UEMS)Lab Zoetis LtdaFerreira, L. C. L.Cooke, R. F. [UNESP]Marques, R. S.Fernandes, H. J.Fernandes, C. E.Stelato, R.Franco, G. L.Lemos, R. A. A.2018-11-26T15:28:44Z2018-11-26T15:28:44Z2016-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article401-405application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.2527/jas2015-9537Journal Of Animal Science. Champaign: Amer Soc Animal Science, v. 94, n. 1, p. 401-405, 2016.0021-8812http://hdl.handle.net/11449/15870910.2527/jas2015-9537WOS:000370375600040WOS000370375600040.pdfWeb of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal Of Animal Science0,848info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-12-26T06:19:59Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/158709Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T21:22:17.122262Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Effects of vaccination against foot-and-mouth disease virus on reproductive performance of Bos indicus beef cows |
title |
Effects of vaccination against foot-and-mouth disease virus on reproductive performance of Bos indicus beef cows |
spellingShingle |
Effects of vaccination against foot-and-mouth disease virus on reproductive performance of Bos indicus beef cows Ferreira, L. C. L. acute-phase response beef cattle foot-and-mouth disease inflammation pregnancy loss |
title_short |
Effects of vaccination against foot-and-mouth disease virus on reproductive performance of Bos indicus beef cows |
title_full |
Effects of vaccination against foot-and-mouth disease virus on reproductive performance of Bos indicus beef cows |
title_fullStr |
Effects of vaccination against foot-and-mouth disease virus on reproductive performance of Bos indicus beef cows |
title_full_unstemmed |
Effects of vaccination against foot-and-mouth disease virus on reproductive performance of Bos indicus beef cows |
title_sort |
Effects of vaccination against foot-and-mouth disease virus on reproductive performance of Bos indicus beef cows |
author |
Ferreira, L. C. L. |
author_facet |
Ferreira, L. C. L. Cooke, R. F. [UNESP] Marques, R. S. Fernandes, H. J. Fernandes, C. E. Stelato, R. Franco, G. L. Lemos, R. A. A. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Cooke, R. F. [UNESP] Marques, R. S. Fernandes, H. J. Fernandes, C. E. Stelato, R. Franco, G. L. Lemos, R. A. A. |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS) Oregon State Univ Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) Universidade Estadual de Mato Grosso do Sul (UEMS) Lab Zoetis Ltda |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ferreira, L. C. L. Cooke, R. F. [UNESP] Marques, R. S. Fernandes, H. J. Fernandes, C. E. Stelato, R. Franco, G. L. Lemos, R. A. A. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
acute-phase response beef cattle foot-and-mouth disease inflammation pregnancy loss |
topic |
acute-phase response beef cattle foot-and-mouth disease inflammation pregnancy loss |
description |
This study compared reproductive performance of Bos indicus cows vaccinated against the foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) virus before timed AI or during early pregnancy (Exp. 1), as well as rectal temperature (RT) and plasma concentrations of the acute-phase protein haptoglobin in cattle vaccinated or not against the FMD virus (Exp. 2). Cattle utilized in Exp. 1 and 2 originated from herds with no historical occurrences of FMD and that received vaccination against the FMD virus biannually. In Exp. 1, 604 lactating, multiparous, nonpregnant Nelore cows were randomly assigned on d -31 of the experiment to receive 1) vaccination against the FMD virus on d >= 31 (VACPRE; n = 291) and 2) vaccination against FMD virus on d 30 (VACGEST; n = 313). From d -11 to 0, all cows were assigned to an estrus synchronization + timed AI (d 0) protocol. Pregnancy status to AI was verified on d 30 and 90 via transrectal ultrasonography. A treatment x day interaction was detected (P < 0.01) for pregnancy rates to AI, which were similar (P = 0.17) between VACPRE and VACGEST on d 30 (61.8% vs. 56.2%, respectively; SEM = 2.8) but greater (P < 0.01) for VACPRE on d 90 (59.4% vs. 46.9%, respectively; SEM = 2.8). Pregnancy loss from d 30 to 90 was greater (P < 0.01) in VACGEST compared with VACPRE (16.5% vs. 3.9%, respectively; SEM = 2.2). In Exp. 2, 40 pregnant Nelore females (20 nulliparous and 20 multiparous cows; BCS = 4.73 +/- 0.12) were ranked by parity and assigned to receive (VAC; n = 20) or not receive (NOVAC; n = 20) vaccination against the FMD virus. Blood samples were collected and RT was recorded before (h 0) and 24, 72, 120, and 168 h after treatment administration. Treatment x day interactions were detected (P < 0.01) for RT and plasma haptoglobin. The RT was greater (P < 0.01) in VAC compared with NOVAC at 24 h after treatment administration and was similar (P = 0.31) between treatments at all other sampling hours. Plasma haptoglobin concentration was similar (P = 0.98) between VAC and NOVAC before treatment administration (P = 0.48) and greater (P < 0.01) in VAC at 24, 72, 120, and 168 h after treatment administration. In summary, vaccinating B. indicus beef cows against the FMD virus resulted in a 4-fold increase in pregnancy loss when the vaccine was administered 30 d after timed AI compared with 31 d before timed AI. These outcomes can be associated with inflammatory and acute-phase reactions elicited by the FMD vaccine, which are known to impair pregnancy maintenance in cattle. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-01-01 2018-11-26T15:28:44Z 2018-11-26T15:28:44Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/jas2015-9537 Journal Of Animal Science. Champaign: Amer Soc Animal Science, v. 94, n. 1, p. 401-405, 2016. 0021-8812 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/158709 10.2527/jas2015-9537 WOS:000370375600040 WOS000370375600040.pdf |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/jas2015-9537 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/158709 |
identifier_str_mv |
Journal Of Animal Science. Champaign: Amer Soc Animal Science, v. 94, n. 1, p. 401-405, 2016. 0021-8812 10.2527/jas2015-9537 WOS:000370375600040 WOS000370375600040.pdf |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal Of Animal Science 0,848 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
401-405 application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Amer Soc Animal Science |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Amer Soc Animal Science |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Web of Science reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808129313563738112 |