Toxicity of two effluents from agricultural activity: Comparing the genotoxicity of sugar cane and orange vinasse
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.03.053 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/178798 |
Resumo: | Vinasse, produced by several countries as a by-product of agricultural activity, has different alternatives for its reuse, mainly fertirrigation. Several monocultures, such as sugar cane and orange crops, produce this effluent. Sugar cane vinasse is already widely used in fertirrigation and orange vinasse has potential for this intention. However, its use as a fertilizer has caused great concern. Thus, ecotoxicological evaluation is extremely important in order to assess the possible effects on the environment. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the potential toxicity of vinasse of two different crops: sugar cane and orange. For this purpose, bioassays with Allium cepa as a test organism were performed with two vinasse dilutions (2.5% and 5%) to detect chromosomal aberrations and micronucleus induction. The results showed that both types of vinasse are able to induce chromosomal aberrations in meristematic cells, mainly nuclear and anaphasic bridges, suggesting genotoxic potential. The induction of micronuclei in cells of the F1 region suggests that the two residues have mutagenic potential. Thus, caution is advised when applying these effluents in the environment. |
id |
UNSP_75276b1de819b962293eabf3d1a08b17 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/178798 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Toxicity of two effluents from agricultural activity: Comparing the genotoxicity of sugar cane and orange vinasseCitrus stillageFertirrigationMicronucleusMutagenicitySugar cane stillageVinasse, produced by several countries as a by-product of agricultural activity, has different alternatives for its reuse, mainly fertirrigation. Several monocultures, such as sugar cane and orange crops, produce this effluent. Sugar cane vinasse is already widely used in fertirrigation and orange vinasse has potential for this intention. However, its use as a fertilizer has caused great concern. Thus, ecotoxicological evaluation is extremely important in order to assess the possible effects on the environment. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the potential toxicity of vinasse of two different crops: sugar cane and orange. For this purpose, bioassays with Allium cepa as a test organism were performed with two vinasse dilutions (2.5% and 5%) to detect chromosomal aberrations and micronucleus induction. The results showed that both types of vinasse are able to induce chromosomal aberrations in meristematic cells, mainly nuclear and anaphasic bridges, suggesting genotoxic potential. The induction of micronuclei in cells of the F1 region suggests that the two residues have mutagenic potential. Thus, caution is advised when applying these effluents in the environment.Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) Instituto de Biociências, Rio Claro – Avenida 24A, 1515, Bela VistaUNIARARAS – Centro Universitário Hermínio Ometto, Araras - Avenida Dr. Maximiliano Baruto, 500, Jardim UniversitarioUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) Instituto de Biociências, Rio Claro – Avenida 24A, 1515, Bela VistaFAPESP: 2012/50197-2FAPESP: 2014/17998-7Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)UNIARARAS – Centro Universitário Hermínio OmettoGarcia, Camila Fernandes H. [UNESP]Souza, Raphael B. de [UNESP]de Souza, Cleiton Pereira [UNESP]Christofoletti, Cintya Ap.Fontanetti, Carmem S. [UNESP]2018-12-11T17:32:07Z2018-12-11T17:32:07Z2017-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article216-221application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.03.053Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, v. 142, p. 216-221.1090-24140147-6513http://hdl.handle.net/11449/17879810.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.03.0532-s2.0-850174485312-s2.0-85017448531.pdfScopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengEcotoxicology and Environmental Safety1,2011,201info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-01-15T06:17:49Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/178798Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-01-15T06:17:49Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Toxicity of two effluents from agricultural activity: Comparing the genotoxicity of sugar cane and orange vinasse |
title |
Toxicity of two effluents from agricultural activity: Comparing the genotoxicity of sugar cane and orange vinasse |
spellingShingle |
Toxicity of two effluents from agricultural activity: Comparing the genotoxicity of sugar cane and orange vinasse Garcia, Camila Fernandes H. [UNESP] Citrus stillage Fertirrigation Micronucleus Mutagenicity Sugar cane stillage |
title_short |
Toxicity of two effluents from agricultural activity: Comparing the genotoxicity of sugar cane and orange vinasse |
title_full |
Toxicity of two effluents from agricultural activity: Comparing the genotoxicity of sugar cane and orange vinasse |
title_fullStr |
Toxicity of two effluents from agricultural activity: Comparing the genotoxicity of sugar cane and orange vinasse |
title_full_unstemmed |
Toxicity of two effluents from agricultural activity: Comparing the genotoxicity of sugar cane and orange vinasse |
title_sort |
Toxicity of two effluents from agricultural activity: Comparing the genotoxicity of sugar cane and orange vinasse |
author |
Garcia, Camila Fernandes H. [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Garcia, Camila Fernandes H. [UNESP] Souza, Raphael B. de [UNESP] de Souza, Cleiton Pereira [UNESP] Christofoletti, Cintya Ap. Fontanetti, Carmem S. [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Souza, Raphael B. de [UNESP] de Souza, Cleiton Pereira [UNESP] Christofoletti, Cintya Ap. Fontanetti, Carmem S. [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) UNIARARAS – Centro Universitário Hermínio Ometto |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Garcia, Camila Fernandes H. [UNESP] Souza, Raphael B. de [UNESP] de Souza, Cleiton Pereira [UNESP] Christofoletti, Cintya Ap. Fontanetti, Carmem S. [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Citrus stillage Fertirrigation Micronucleus Mutagenicity Sugar cane stillage |
topic |
Citrus stillage Fertirrigation Micronucleus Mutagenicity Sugar cane stillage |
description |
Vinasse, produced by several countries as a by-product of agricultural activity, has different alternatives for its reuse, mainly fertirrigation. Several monocultures, such as sugar cane and orange crops, produce this effluent. Sugar cane vinasse is already widely used in fertirrigation and orange vinasse has potential for this intention. However, its use as a fertilizer has caused great concern. Thus, ecotoxicological evaluation is extremely important in order to assess the possible effects on the environment. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the potential toxicity of vinasse of two different crops: sugar cane and orange. For this purpose, bioassays with Allium cepa as a test organism were performed with two vinasse dilutions (2.5% and 5%) to detect chromosomal aberrations and micronucleus induction. The results showed that both types of vinasse are able to induce chromosomal aberrations in meristematic cells, mainly nuclear and anaphasic bridges, suggesting genotoxic potential. The induction of micronuclei in cells of the F1 region suggests that the two residues have mutagenic potential. Thus, caution is advised when applying these effluents in the environment. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-08-01 2018-12-11T17:32:07Z 2018-12-11T17:32:07Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.03.053 Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, v. 142, p. 216-221. 1090-2414 0147-6513 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/178798 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.03.053 2-s2.0-85017448531 2-s2.0-85017448531.pdf |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.03.053 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/178798 |
identifier_str_mv |
Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, v. 142, p. 216-221. 1090-2414 0147-6513 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.03.053 2-s2.0-85017448531 2-s2.0-85017448531.pdf |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 1,201 1,201 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
216-221 application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799965619869712384 |