Toxicity of two effluents from agricultural activity: Comparing the genotoxicity of sugar cane and orange vinasse

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Garcia, Camila Fernandes H. [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Souza, Raphael B. de [UNESP], de Souza, Cleiton Pereira [UNESP], Christofoletti, Cintya Ap., Fontanetti, Carmem S. [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.03.053
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/178798
Resumo: Vinasse, produced by several countries as a by-product of agricultural activity, has different alternatives for its reuse, mainly fertirrigation. Several monocultures, such as sugar cane and orange crops, produce this effluent. Sugar cane vinasse is already widely used in fertirrigation and orange vinasse has potential for this intention. However, its use as a fertilizer has caused great concern. Thus, ecotoxicological evaluation is extremely important in order to assess the possible effects on the environment. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the potential toxicity of vinasse of two different crops: sugar cane and orange. For this purpose, bioassays with Allium cepa as a test organism were performed with two vinasse dilutions (2.5% and 5%) to detect chromosomal aberrations and micronucleus induction. The results showed that both types of vinasse are able to induce chromosomal aberrations in meristematic cells, mainly nuclear and anaphasic bridges, suggesting genotoxic potential. The induction of micronuclei in cells of the F1 region suggests that the two residues have mutagenic potential. Thus, caution is advised when applying these effluents in the environment.
id UNSP_75276b1de819b962293eabf3d1a08b17
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/178798
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Toxicity of two effluents from agricultural activity: Comparing the genotoxicity of sugar cane and orange vinasseCitrus stillageFertirrigationMicronucleusMutagenicitySugar cane stillageVinasse, produced by several countries as a by-product of agricultural activity, has different alternatives for its reuse, mainly fertirrigation. Several monocultures, such as sugar cane and orange crops, produce this effluent. Sugar cane vinasse is already widely used in fertirrigation and orange vinasse has potential for this intention. However, its use as a fertilizer has caused great concern. Thus, ecotoxicological evaluation is extremely important in order to assess the possible effects on the environment. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the potential toxicity of vinasse of two different crops: sugar cane and orange. For this purpose, bioassays with Allium cepa as a test organism were performed with two vinasse dilutions (2.5% and 5%) to detect chromosomal aberrations and micronucleus induction. The results showed that both types of vinasse are able to induce chromosomal aberrations in meristematic cells, mainly nuclear and anaphasic bridges, suggesting genotoxic potential. The induction of micronuclei in cells of the F1 region suggests that the two residues have mutagenic potential. Thus, caution is advised when applying these effluents in the environment.Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) Instituto de Biociências, Rio Claro – Avenida 24A, 1515, Bela VistaUNIARARAS – Centro Universitário Hermínio Ometto, Araras - Avenida Dr. Maximiliano Baruto, 500, Jardim UniversitarioUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) Instituto de Biociências, Rio Claro – Avenida 24A, 1515, Bela VistaFAPESP: 2012/50197-2FAPESP: 2014/17998-7Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)UNIARARAS – Centro Universitário Hermínio OmettoGarcia, Camila Fernandes H. [UNESP]Souza, Raphael B. de [UNESP]de Souza, Cleiton Pereira [UNESP]Christofoletti, Cintya Ap.Fontanetti, Carmem S. [UNESP]2018-12-11T17:32:07Z2018-12-11T17:32:07Z2017-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article216-221application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.03.053Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, v. 142, p. 216-221.1090-24140147-6513http://hdl.handle.net/11449/17879810.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.03.0532-s2.0-850174485312-s2.0-85017448531.pdfScopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengEcotoxicology and Environmental Safety1,2011,201info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-01-15T06:17:49Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/178798Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-01-15T06:17:49Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Toxicity of two effluents from agricultural activity: Comparing the genotoxicity of sugar cane and orange vinasse
title Toxicity of two effluents from agricultural activity: Comparing the genotoxicity of sugar cane and orange vinasse
spellingShingle Toxicity of two effluents from agricultural activity: Comparing the genotoxicity of sugar cane and orange vinasse
Garcia, Camila Fernandes H. [UNESP]
Citrus stillage
Fertirrigation
Micronucleus
Mutagenicity
Sugar cane stillage
title_short Toxicity of two effluents from agricultural activity: Comparing the genotoxicity of sugar cane and orange vinasse
title_full Toxicity of two effluents from agricultural activity: Comparing the genotoxicity of sugar cane and orange vinasse
title_fullStr Toxicity of two effluents from agricultural activity: Comparing the genotoxicity of sugar cane and orange vinasse
title_full_unstemmed Toxicity of two effluents from agricultural activity: Comparing the genotoxicity of sugar cane and orange vinasse
title_sort Toxicity of two effluents from agricultural activity: Comparing the genotoxicity of sugar cane and orange vinasse
author Garcia, Camila Fernandes H. [UNESP]
author_facet Garcia, Camila Fernandes H. [UNESP]
Souza, Raphael B. de [UNESP]
de Souza, Cleiton Pereira [UNESP]
Christofoletti, Cintya Ap.
Fontanetti, Carmem S. [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Souza, Raphael B. de [UNESP]
de Souza, Cleiton Pereira [UNESP]
Christofoletti, Cintya Ap.
Fontanetti, Carmem S. [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
UNIARARAS – Centro Universitário Hermínio Ometto
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Garcia, Camila Fernandes H. [UNESP]
Souza, Raphael B. de [UNESP]
de Souza, Cleiton Pereira [UNESP]
Christofoletti, Cintya Ap.
Fontanetti, Carmem S. [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Citrus stillage
Fertirrigation
Micronucleus
Mutagenicity
Sugar cane stillage
topic Citrus stillage
Fertirrigation
Micronucleus
Mutagenicity
Sugar cane stillage
description Vinasse, produced by several countries as a by-product of agricultural activity, has different alternatives for its reuse, mainly fertirrigation. Several monocultures, such as sugar cane and orange crops, produce this effluent. Sugar cane vinasse is already widely used in fertirrigation and orange vinasse has potential for this intention. However, its use as a fertilizer has caused great concern. Thus, ecotoxicological evaluation is extremely important in order to assess the possible effects on the environment. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the potential toxicity of vinasse of two different crops: sugar cane and orange. For this purpose, bioassays with Allium cepa as a test organism were performed with two vinasse dilutions (2.5% and 5%) to detect chromosomal aberrations and micronucleus induction. The results showed that both types of vinasse are able to induce chromosomal aberrations in meristematic cells, mainly nuclear and anaphasic bridges, suggesting genotoxic potential. The induction of micronuclei in cells of the F1 region suggests that the two residues have mutagenic potential. Thus, caution is advised when applying these effluents in the environment.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-08-01
2018-12-11T17:32:07Z
2018-12-11T17:32:07Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.03.053
Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, v. 142, p. 216-221.
1090-2414
0147-6513
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/178798
10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.03.053
2-s2.0-85017448531
2-s2.0-85017448531.pdf
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.03.053
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/178798
identifier_str_mv Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, v. 142, p. 216-221.
1090-2414
0147-6513
10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.03.053
2-s2.0-85017448531
2-s2.0-85017448531.pdf
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety
1,201
1,201
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 216-221
application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799965619869712384