Quantitative real-time RT-PCR and chromogenic in situ hybridization: precise methods to detect HER-2 status in breast carcinoma

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rosa, Fabiola E. [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2009
Outros Autores: Silveira, Sara M. [UNESP], Silveira, Cassia G. T. [UNESP], Bergamo, Nadia A. [UNESP], Moraes Neto, Francisco A., Domingues, Maria Aparecida Custódio [UNESP], Soares, Fernando A., Caldeira, Jose R. F. [UNESP], Rogatto, Silvia Regina [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-9-90
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/12920
Resumo: Background: HER-2 gene testing has become an integral part of breast cancer patient diagnosis. The most commonly used assay in the clinical setting for evaluating HER-2 status is immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). These procedures permit correlation between HER-2 expression and morphological features. However, FISH signals are labile and fade over time, making post-revision of the tumor difficult. CISH (chromogenic in situ hybridization) is an alternative procedure, with certain advantages, although still limited as a diagnostic tool in breast carcinomas.Methods: To elucidate the molecular profile of HER-2 status, mRNA and protein expression in 75 invasive breast carcinomas were analyzed by real time quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) and IHC, respectively. Amplifications were evaluated in 43 of these cases by CISH and in 11 by FISH.Results: The concordance rate between IHC and qRT-PCR results was 78.9%, and 94.6% for qRT-PCR and CISH. Intratumoral heterogeneity of HER-2 status was identified in three cases by CISH. The results of the three procedures were compared and showed a concordance rate of 83.8%; higher discordances were observed in 0 or 1+immunostaining cases, which showed high-level amplification (15.4%) and HER-2 transcript overexpression (20%). Moreover, 2+ immunostaining cases presented nonamplified status (50%) by CISH and HER-2 downexpression (38.5%) by qRT-PCR. In general, concordance occurred between qRT-PCR and CISH results. A high concordance was observed between CISH/qRT-PCR and FISH. Comparisons with clinicopathological data revealed a significant association between HER-2 downexpression and the involvement of less than four lymph nodes (P = 0.0350).Conclusion: Based on these findings, qRT-PCR was more precise and reproducible than IHC. Furthermore, CISH was revealed as an alternative and useful procedure for investigating amplifications involving the HER-2 gene.
id UNSP_753bab43cb9062e489c74edcf11c3a33
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/12920
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Quantitative real-time RT-PCR and chromogenic in situ hybridization: precise methods to detect HER-2 status in breast carcinomaBackground: HER-2 gene testing has become an integral part of breast cancer patient diagnosis. The most commonly used assay in the clinical setting for evaluating HER-2 status is immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). These procedures permit correlation between HER-2 expression and morphological features. However, FISH signals are labile and fade over time, making post-revision of the tumor difficult. CISH (chromogenic in situ hybridization) is an alternative procedure, with certain advantages, although still limited as a diagnostic tool in breast carcinomas.Methods: To elucidate the molecular profile of HER-2 status, mRNA and protein expression in 75 invasive breast carcinomas were analyzed by real time quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) and IHC, respectively. Amplifications were evaluated in 43 of these cases by CISH and in 11 by FISH.Results: The concordance rate between IHC and qRT-PCR results was 78.9%, and 94.6% for qRT-PCR and CISH. Intratumoral heterogeneity of HER-2 status was identified in three cases by CISH. The results of the three procedures were compared and showed a concordance rate of 83.8%; higher discordances were observed in 0 or 1+immunostaining cases, which showed high-level amplification (15.4%) and HER-2 transcript overexpression (20%). Moreover, 2+ immunostaining cases presented nonamplified status (50%) by CISH and HER-2 downexpression (38.5%) by qRT-PCR. In general, concordance occurred between qRT-PCR and CISH results. A high concordance was observed between CISH/qRT-PCR and FISH. Comparisons with clinicopathological data revealed a significant association between HER-2 downexpression and the involvement of less than four lymph nodes (P = 0.0350).Conclusion: Based on these findings, qRT-PCR was more precise and reproducible than IHC. Furthermore, CISH was revealed as an alternative and useful procedure for investigating amplifications involving the HER-2 gene.Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)UNESP São Paulo State Univ, Fac Med, Dept Urol, Botucatu, SP, BrazilUNESP São Paulo State Univ, Inst Biosci, Dept Genet, Botucatu, SP, BrazilAmaral Carvalho Hosp, Dept Pathol, São Paulo, BrazilUNESP São Paulo State Univ, Fac Med, Dept Pathol, Botucatu, SP, BrazilHosp AC Camargo Fund Antonio Prudente, Fundação Antonio Prudente, Dept Pathol, São Paulo, BrazilAmaral Carvalho Hosp, Dept Senol, São Paulo, BrazilHosp AC Camargo Liberdade São Paulo, Fundação Antonio Prudente 211, NeoGene Lab, São Paulo, BrazilUNESP São Paulo State Univ, Fac Med, Dept Urol, Botucatu, SP, BrazilUNESP São Paulo State Univ, Inst Biosci, Dept Genet, Botucatu, SP, BrazilUNESP São Paulo State Univ, Fac Med, Dept Pathol, Botucatu, SP, BrazilBiomed Central Ltd.Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Amaral Carvalho HospHosp AC Camargo Fund Antonio PrudenteHosp AC Camargo Liberdade São PauloRosa, Fabiola E. [UNESP]Silveira, Sara M. [UNESP]Silveira, Cassia G. T. [UNESP]Bergamo, Nadia A. [UNESP]Moraes Neto, Francisco A.Domingues, Maria Aparecida Custódio [UNESP]Soares, Fernando A.Caldeira, Jose R. F. [UNESP]Rogatto, Silvia Regina [UNESP]2014-05-20T13:37:22Z2014-05-20T13:37:22Z2009-03-23info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article12application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-9-90Bmc Cancer. London: Biomed Central Ltd., v. 9, p. 12, 2009.1471-2407http://hdl.handle.net/11449/1292010.1186/1471-2407-9-90WOS:000265611700001WOS000265611700001.pdf2259986546265579Web of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengBMC Cancer3.2881,464info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-11-05T06:10:52Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/12920Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462023-11-05T06:10:52Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Quantitative real-time RT-PCR and chromogenic in situ hybridization: precise methods to detect HER-2 status in breast carcinoma
title Quantitative real-time RT-PCR and chromogenic in situ hybridization: precise methods to detect HER-2 status in breast carcinoma
spellingShingle Quantitative real-time RT-PCR and chromogenic in situ hybridization: precise methods to detect HER-2 status in breast carcinoma
Rosa, Fabiola E. [UNESP]
title_short Quantitative real-time RT-PCR and chromogenic in situ hybridization: precise methods to detect HER-2 status in breast carcinoma
title_full Quantitative real-time RT-PCR and chromogenic in situ hybridization: precise methods to detect HER-2 status in breast carcinoma
title_fullStr Quantitative real-time RT-PCR and chromogenic in situ hybridization: precise methods to detect HER-2 status in breast carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative real-time RT-PCR and chromogenic in situ hybridization: precise methods to detect HER-2 status in breast carcinoma
title_sort Quantitative real-time RT-PCR and chromogenic in situ hybridization: precise methods to detect HER-2 status in breast carcinoma
author Rosa, Fabiola E. [UNESP]
author_facet Rosa, Fabiola E. [UNESP]
Silveira, Sara M. [UNESP]
Silveira, Cassia G. T. [UNESP]
Bergamo, Nadia A. [UNESP]
Moraes Neto, Francisco A.
Domingues, Maria Aparecida Custódio [UNESP]
Soares, Fernando A.
Caldeira, Jose R. F. [UNESP]
Rogatto, Silvia Regina [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Silveira, Sara M. [UNESP]
Silveira, Cassia G. T. [UNESP]
Bergamo, Nadia A. [UNESP]
Moraes Neto, Francisco A.
Domingues, Maria Aparecida Custódio [UNESP]
Soares, Fernando A.
Caldeira, Jose R. F. [UNESP]
Rogatto, Silvia Regina [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Amaral Carvalho Hosp
Hosp AC Camargo Fund Antonio Prudente
Hosp AC Camargo Liberdade São Paulo
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rosa, Fabiola E. [UNESP]
Silveira, Sara M. [UNESP]
Silveira, Cassia G. T. [UNESP]
Bergamo, Nadia A. [UNESP]
Moraes Neto, Francisco A.
Domingues, Maria Aparecida Custódio [UNESP]
Soares, Fernando A.
Caldeira, Jose R. F. [UNESP]
Rogatto, Silvia Regina [UNESP]
description Background: HER-2 gene testing has become an integral part of breast cancer patient diagnosis. The most commonly used assay in the clinical setting for evaluating HER-2 status is immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). These procedures permit correlation between HER-2 expression and morphological features. However, FISH signals are labile and fade over time, making post-revision of the tumor difficult. CISH (chromogenic in situ hybridization) is an alternative procedure, with certain advantages, although still limited as a diagnostic tool in breast carcinomas.Methods: To elucidate the molecular profile of HER-2 status, mRNA and protein expression in 75 invasive breast carcinomas were analyzed by real time quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) and IHC, respectively. Amplifications were evaluated in 43 of these cases by CISH and in 11 by FISH.Results: The concordance rate between IHC and qRT-PCR results was 78.9%, and 94.6% for qRT-PCR and CISH. Intratumoral heterogeneity of HER-2 status was identified in three cases by CISH. The results of the three procedures were compared and showed a concordance rate of 83.8%; higher discordances were observed in 0 or 1+immunostaining cases, which showed high-level amplification (15.4%) and HER-2 transcript overexpression (20%). Moreover, 2+ immunostaining cases presented nonamplified status (50%) by CISH and HER-2 downexpression (38.5%) by qRT-PCR. In general, concordance occurred between qRT-PCR and CISH results. A high concordance was observed between CISH/qRT-PCR and FISH. Comparisons with clinicopathological data revealed a significant association between HER-2 downexpression and the involvement of less than four lymph nodes (P = 0.0350).Conclusion: Based on these findings, qRT-PCR was more precise and reproducible than IHC. Furthermore, CISH was revealed as an alternative and useful procedure for investigating amplifications involving the HER-2 gene.
publishDate 2009
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2009-03-23
2014-05-20T13:37:22Z
2014-05-20T13:37:22Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-9-90
Bmc Cancer. London: Biomed Central Ltd., v. 9, p. 12, 2009.
1471-2407
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/12920
10.1186/1471-2407-9-90
WOS:000265611700001
WOS000265611700001.pdf
2259986546265579
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-9-90
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/12920
identifier_str_mv Bmc Cancer. London: Biomed Central Ltd., v. 9, p. 12, 2009.
1471-2407
10.1186/1471-2407-9-90
WOS:000265611700001
WOS000265611700001.pdf
2259986546265579
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv BMC Cancer
3.288
1,464
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 12
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Biomed Central Ltd.
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Biomed Central Ltd.
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Web of Science
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1803046334109843456