Escherichia coli used as a biomarker of antimicrobial resistance in pig farms of Southern Brazil

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Brisola, Maiara Cristiane
Publication Date: 2019
Other Authors: Crecencio, Regiane Boaretto, Bitner, Dinael Simão, Frigo, Angélica, Rampazzo, Luana, Stefani, Lenita Moura, Faria, Gláucia Amorim [UNESP]
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Download full: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.438
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/186875
Summary: The objective of this study was to verify the presence of antimicrobial resistant strains of Escherichia coli in pig farms and to use it as a biomarker to evaluate phenotypic and genotypic profiles of antimicrobial susceptibility, as well as the presence of Extended Spectrum Beta-lactamases (ESBLs) and fluoroquinolone resistance genes. Several samples (n = 306) collected from swine farms (n = 100) of Southern Brazil were used for E. coli isolation: 103 of swine feces, 105 of water, and 98 of soil. E. coli isolates were submitted to the disk-diffusion test to verify their antimicrobial susceptibility, to disk-approximation test to detect ESBL-producers, and to PCR analysis to search for ESBLs genes (blaCTY-M2, blaSHV-1, blaTEM-1, blaCTX-M2, blaOXA-1, blaPSE-1) and quinolone resistance genes (qnrA, qnrB and qnrS). The percentage of E. coli isolates found in feces, water and soil samples was 66.02%, 30.48% and 35.71%, respectively. The highest percentages of resistance were obtained for sulfamethoxazole associated with trimethoprim (63.70%), colistin (45.19%) and enrofloxacin (39.26%). Regarding the levels of multidrug resistance, 37.04% of the isolates were resistant to three or more classes of antimicrobials. The most common profile (16%) of multirresistance was GEM-SUT-ENO-COL. The index of multiple resistance to antimicrobials (IRMA) was above 0.2 in 78% of the multiresistant isolates. Out of 135 E. coli isolates, 7.41% was ESBL-producers, of which 50% showed the blaCMY-M2 gene, 40% the blaTEM-1 and 70% the qnrS gene. Of non-ESBL-producing strains resistant to enrofloxacin, 13.04% were positives for qnrS gene. These results demonstrated the presence of fecal contamination in the environment, in addition to high resistance indexes for several antimicrobials, including beta-lactams and fluoroquinolones, which was confirmed by the genetic detection of ESBLs and qnr genes.
id UNSP_775f743aec96533a376ef9929e6f4dd9
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/186875
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Escherichia coli used as a biomarker of antimicrobial resistance in pig farms of Southern BrazilESBLsEscherichia coliFecal contaminationFluoroquinolonesResistanceThe objective of this study was to verify the presence of antimicrobial resistant strains of Escherichia coli in pig farms and to use it as a biomarker to evaluate phenotypic and genotypic profiles of antimicrobial susceptibility, as well as the presence of Extended Spectrum Beta-lactamases (ESBLs) and fluoroquinolone resistance genes. Several samples (n = 306) collected from swine farms (n = 100) of Southern Brazil were used for E. coli isolation: 103 of swine feces, 105 of water, and 98 of soil. E. coli isolates were submitted to the disk-diffusion test to verify their antimicrobial susceptibility, to disk-approximation test to detect ESBL-producers, and to PCR analysis to search for ESBLs genes (blaCTY-M2, blaSHV-1, blaTEM-1, blaCTX-M2, blaOXA-1, blaPSE-1) and quinolone resistance genes (qnrA, qnrB and qnrS). The percentage of E. coli isolates found in feces, water and soil samples was 66.02%, 30.48% and 35.71%, respectively. The highest percentages of resistance were obtained for sulfamethoxazole associated with trimethoprim (63.70%), colistin (45.19%) and enrofloxacin (39.26%). Regarding the levels of multidrug resistance, 37.04% of the isolates were resistant to three or more classes of antimicrobials. The most common profile (16%) of multirresistance was GEM-SUT-ENO-COL. The index of multiple resistance to antimicrobials (IRMA) was above 0.2 in 78% of the multiresistant isolates. Out of 135 E. coli isolates, 7.41% was ESBL-producers, of which 50% showed the blaCMY-M2 gene, 40% the blaTEM-1 and 70% the qnrS gene. Of non-ESBL-producing strains resistant to enrofloxacin, 13.04% were positives for qnrS gene. These results demonstrated the presence of fecal contamination in the environment, in addition to high resistance indexes for several antimicrobials, including beta-lactams and fluoroquinolones, which was confirmed by the genetic detection of ESBLs and qnr genes.Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Post Graduation Program in Animal Science State University of Santa Catarina (UDESC) Western Center of EducationGraduate in Animal Science State University of Santa Catarina (UDESC) Western Center of EducationDepartment of Animal Science State University of Santa Catarina (UDESC) Western Center of EducationDepartment of Mathematics Paulista State University Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP)Department of Mathematics Paulista State University Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP)Western Center of EducationUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Brisola, Maiara CristianeCrecencio, Regiane BoarettoBitner, Dinael SimãoFrigo, AngélicaRampazzo, LuanaStefani, Lenita MouraFaria, Gláucia Amorim [UNESP]2019-10-06T15:18:27Z2019-10-06T15:18:27Z2019-01-10info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article362-368http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.438Science of the Total Environment, v. 647, p. 362-368.1879-10260048-9697http://hdl.handle.net/11449/18687510.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.4382-s2.0-85050865067Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengScience of the Total Environmentinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-10-23T20:19:26Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/186875Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462021-10-23T20:19:26Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Escherichia coli used as a biomarker of antimicrobial resistance in pig farms of Southern Brazil
title Escherichia coli used as a biomarker of antimicrobial resistance in pig farms of Southern Brazil
spellingShingle Escherichia coli used as a biomarker of antimicrobial resistance in pig farms of Southern Brazil
Brisola, Maiara Cristiane
ESBLs
Escherichia coli
Fecal contamination
Fluoroquinolones
Resistance
title_short Escherichia coli used as a biomarker of antimicrobial resistance in pig farms of Southern Brazil
title_full Escherichia coli used as a biomarker of antimicrobial resistance in pig farms of Southern Brazil
title_fullStr Escherichia coli used as a biomarker of antimicrobial resistance in pig farms of Southern Brazil
title_full_unstemmed Escherichia coli used as a biomarker of antimicrobial resistance in pig farms of Southern Brazil
title_sort Escherichia coli used as a biomarker of antimicrobial resistance in pig farms of Southern Brazil
author Brisola, Maiara Cristiane
author_facet Brisola, Maiara Cristiane
Crecencio, Regiane Boaretto
Bitner, Dinael Simão
Frigo, Angélica
Rampazzo, Luana
Stefani, Lenita Moura
Faria, Gláucia Amorim [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Crecencio, Regiane Boaretto
Bitner, Dinael Simão
Frigo, Angélica
Rampazzo, Luana
Stefani, Lenita Moura
Faria, Gláucia Amorim [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Western Center of Education
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Brisola, Maiara Cristiane
Crecencio, Regiane Boaretto
Bitner, Dinael Simão
Frigo, Angélica
Rampazzo, Luana
Stefani, Lenita Moura
Faria, Gláucia Amorim [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv ESBLs
Escherichia coli
Fecal contamination
Fluoroquinolones
Resistance
topic ESBLs
Escherichia coli
Fecal contamination
Fluoroquinolones
Resistance
description The objective of this study was to verify the presence of antimicrobial resistant strains of Escherichia coli in pig farms and to use it as a biomarker to evaluate phenotypic and genotypic profiles of antimicrobial susceptibility, as well as the presence of Extended Spectrum Beta-lactamases (ESBLs) and fluoroquinolone resistance genes. Several samples (n = 306) collected from swine farms (n = 100) of Southern Brazil were used for E. coli isolation: 103 of swine feces, 105 of water, and 98 of soil. E. coli isolates were submitted to the disk-diffusion test to verify their antimicrobial susceptibility, to disk-approximation test to detect ESBL-producers, and to PCR analysis to search for ESBLs genes (blaCTY-M2, blaSHV-1, blaTEM-1, blaCTX-M2, blaOXA-1, blaPSE-1) and quinolone resistance genes (qnrA, qnrB and qnrS). The percentage of E. coli isolates found in feces, water and soil samples was 66.02%, 30.48% and 35.71%, respectively. The highest percentages of resistance were obtained for sulfamethoxazole associated with trimethoprim (63.70%), colistin (45.19%) and enrofloxacin (39.26%). Regarding the levels of multidrug resistance, 37.04% of the isolates were resistant to three or more classes of antimicrobials. The most common profile (16%) of multirresistance was GEM-SUT-ENO-COL. The index of multiple resistance to antimicrobials (IRMA) was above 0.2 in 78% of the multiresistant isolates. Out of 135 E. coli isolates, 7.41% was ESBL-producers, of which 50% showed the blaCMY-M2 gene, 40% the blaTEM-1 and 70% the qnrS gene. Of non-ESBL-producing strains resistant to enrofloxacin, 13.04% were positives for qnrS gene. These results demonstrated the presence of fecal contamination in the environment, in addition to high resistance indexes for several antimicrobials, including beta-lactams and fluoroquinolones, which was confirmed by the genetic detection of ESBLs and qnr genes.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-10-06T15:18:27Z
2019-10-06T15:18:27Z
2019-01-10
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.438
Science of the Total Environment, v. 647, p. 362-368.
1879-1026
0048-9697
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/186875
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.438
2-s2.0-85050865067
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.438
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/186875
identifier_str_mv Science of the Total Environment, v. 647, p. 362-368.
1879-1026
0048-9697
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.438
2-s2.0-85050865067
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Science of the Total Environment
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 362-368
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799965292833538048