Does bathing affect tick and flea burdens and ectoparasiticide effectiveness of a spot-on formulation (fipronil plus (S)-methoprene) for dogs?

• Autor(a) principal: Cruz, Breno Cayeiro [UNESP]
• Data de Publicação: 2020
• Outros Autores: Pires Teixeira, Weslen Fabricio [UNESP], Costa Gomes, Lucas Vinicius [UNESP], Maciel, Willian Giquelin [UNESP], Felippelli, Gustavo [UNESP], Buzzulini, Carolina [UNESP], Ferreira, Lorena Lopes, Santos, Thais Rabelo dos, Soares, Vando Edesio, Massamitsu Sakamoto, Claudio Alessandro, Oliveira Monteiro, Caio Marcio de, Zanetti Lopes, Welber Daniel, Costa, Alvimar Jose da [UNESP]
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: eng
• Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
• Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2020.109192; http://hdl.handle.net/11449/197910
• topic: Ctenocephalides felis; efficacy; experimental infestation; phenylpyrazole; spot-on; Rhipicephalus sanguineus; water

This work evaluated tick and flea burdens and the efficacy of a single topical application of 10% fipronil + 9% (S)-methoprene spot-on against experimental infestations of Rhipicephalus sanguineus sensu lato and Ctenocephalides felis felis on dogs that were submitted to regular baths for 56-days post-treatment. Four treatments (n = 24) were evaluated: no chemical treatment and no bathing (T01); no chemical treatment + bathing (T02); chemical treatment and no bathing (T03) and chemical treatment + bathing (T04). Dogs were infested with adult ticks and fleas seven days pre-treatment (-7). The ectoparasites were then counted and removed on day -5, followed by a new infestation on day -2 and treatment on day 0. Ticks and fleas were then counted without removal on day 1 and counted with removal on day 2. The dogs were then repeatedly infested with both ectoparasites on days 5, 12, 19, 26, 33, 40, 47 and 54 post-treatment. Baths and ectoparasite counts with removal were performed every 48 h before and after experimental infestation, respectively. Animals of T04 had lower (P = 0.05) tick burden than animals from T01 and T02 from day 2 to day 28. For fleas, the counts varied among days of the study. Dogs from T03 presented lower (P <= 0.05) flea burden than dogs from T01 from day 1 until day 56. The same was true for T04 when compared to T01 from day 1 to day 42. Animals of T02 greater (P <= 0.05) flea burden than animals of T04 in all dates post treatment. In addition, dogs from T02 presented higher (P <= 0.05) flea burden than T01 from day 7 to day 28 and from day 49 to day 56. In sum, the efficacy of the spot-on formulation used declined over the time against both ectoparasites. The efficacy for ticks ranged from 0.0 to 96.5% and 0.0 to 98.52% for T03 and T04, respectively. While for fleas, the efficacy of the formulation ranged from 67.41 to 100% for T03 and 40.18 to 100% for T04. So, bathing dogs that were not treated increased C. f. felis burden but not R. sanguineus s. l. burden. The residual efficacy of the product had a shorter duration against these ectoparasites for dogs that received subsequent bathing.