Performance and cost of applied nucleation versus high-diversity plantations for tropical forest restoration
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119088 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/210308 |
Resumo: | How to best restore highly diverse tropical forests to deliver an affordable and effective legacy of biodiversity remains an ecological dilemma. We investigated both vegetation recovery and financial outcomes of forest restoration in applied nucleation and high-diversity plantation plots in the Atlantic forest of Brazil. We used a randomized block design with four replicates (40 ? 54 m plots) for each of the two restoration treatments and a control (natural regeneration). After six years, we sampled 50% of the restored area and calculated all labor and input costs associated with both restoration establishment and maintenance. Overstory basal area, species richness and species diversity were highest in plantation and lowest in control plots. Understory density was also higher in plantation plots but density of shrubs and vines was higher in nucleation and control plots. There were no differences in understory species diversity or richness across treatments. When considering only recruited individuals, overstory density and basal area, and species richness in both over and understory was highest in nucleation plots. In comparison to plantation plots, the overstory composition of nucleation plots was more similar to control plots and there was greater variability across plots. The total cost of restoration was up to 34% cheaper in nucleation (US$ 4654.09 ha-1) than in the high-diversity plantations (US$ 7038.05 ha-1). While high-diversity plantation restoration is currently the most widespread and prevalent approach, applied nucleation appears to offer an intermediate level of recovery speed and cost, and can be a valuable strategy that can strike a balance between passive and active restoration. |
id |
UNSP_77eff377f7d9c00db427fb969ad8f556 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/210308 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Performance and cost of applied nucleation versus high-diversity plantations for tropical forest restorationSubtropical forestRecoverySuccessionNatural regenerationBrazilAtlantic forestHow to best restore highly diverse tropical forests to deliver an affordable and effective legacy of biodiversity remains an ecological dilemma. We investigated both vegetation recovery and financial outcomes of forest restoration in applied nucleation and high-diversity plantation plots in the Atlantic forest of Brazil. We used a randomized block design with four replicates (40 ? 54 m plots) for each of the two restoration treatments and a control (natural regeneration). After six years, we sampled 50% of the restored area and calculated all labor and input costs associated with both restoration establishment and maintenance. Overstory basal area, species richness and species diversity were highest in plantation and lowest in control plots. Understory density was also higher in plantation plots but density of shrubs and vines was higher in nucleation and control plots. There were no differences in understory species diversity or richness across treatments. When considering only recruited individuals, overstory density and basal area, and species richness in both over and understory was highest in nucleation plots. In comparison to plantation plots, the overstory composition of nucleation plots was more similar to control plots and there was greater variability across plots. The total cost of restoration was up to 34% cheaper in nucleation (US$ 4654.09 ha-1) than in the high-diversity plantations (US$ 7038.05 ha-1). While high-diversity plantation restoration is currently the most widespread and prevalent approach, applied nucleation appears to offer an intermediate level of recovery speed and cost, and can be a valuable strategy that can strike a balance between passive and active restoration.Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)Univ Tecnol Fed Parana, Forest Ecol & Taxon Lab, Estr P Boa Esperanca Km 04, BR-85660000 Dois Vizinhos, PR, BrazilUniv Hawaii Manoa, Sch Life Sci, Honolulu, HI 96822 USASao Paulo State Univ, Dept Forest Soil & Environm Sci, Botucatu, SP, BrazilSao Paulo State Univ, Dept Forest Soil & Environm Sci, Botucatu, SP, BrazilCNPq: 575081CNPq: 2008-2Elsevier B.V.Univ Tecnol Fed ParanaUniv Hawaii ManoaUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Bechara, Fernando CampanhaTrentin, Bruna Elisa [UNESP]Engel, Vera Lex [UNESP]Estevan, Daniela AparecidaTicktin, Tamara2021-06-25T15:04:28Z2021-06-25T15:04:28Z2021-07-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article10http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119088Forest Ecology And Management. Amsterdam: Elsevier, v. 491, 10 p., 2021.0378-1127http://hdl.handle.net/11449/21030810.1016/j.foreco.2021.119088WOS:000647735500006Web of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengForest Ecology And Managementinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-04-30T13:11:01Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/210308Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T17:33:50.373711Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Performance and cost of applied nucleation versus high-diversity plantations for tropical forest restoration |
title |
Performance and cost of applied nucleation versus high-diversity plantations for tropical forest restoration |
spellingShingle |
Performance and cost of applied nucleation versus high-diversity plantations for tropical forest restoration Bechara, Fernando Campanha Subtropical forest Recovery Succession Natural regeneration Brazil Atlantic forest |
title_short |
Performance and cost of applied nucleation versus high-diversity plantations for tropical forest restoration |
title_full |
Performance and cost of applied nucleation versus high-diversity plantations for tropical forest restoration |
title_fullStr |
Performance and cost of applied nucleation versus high-diversity plantations for tropical forest restoration |
title_full_unstemmed |
Performance and cost of applied nucleation versus high-diversity plantations for tropical forest restoration |
title_sort |
Performance and cost of applied nucleation versus high-diversity plantations for tropical forest restoration |
author |
Bechara, Fernando Campanha |
author_facet |
Bechara, Fernando Campanha Trentin, Bruna Elisa [UNESP] Engel, Vera Lex [UNESP] Estevan, Daniela Aparecida Ticktin, Tamara |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Trentin, Bruna Elisa [UNESP] Engel, Vera Lex [UNESP] Estevan, Daniela Aparecida Ticktin, Tamara |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Univ Tecnol Fed Parana Univ Hawaii Manoa Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Bechara, Fernando Campanha Trentin, Bruna Elisa [UNESP] Engel, Vera Lex [UNESP] Estevan, Daniela Aparecida Ticktin, Tamara |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Subtropical forest Recovery Succession Natural regeneration Brazil Atlantic forest |
topic |
Subtropical forest Recovery Succession Natural regeneration Brazil Atlantic forest |
description |
How to best restore highly diverse tropical forests to deliver an affordable and effective legacy of biodiversity remains an ecological dilemma. We investigated both vegetation recovery and financial outcomes of forest restoration in applied nucleation and high-diversity plantation plots in the Atlantic forest of Brazil. We used a randomized block design with four replicates (40 ? 54 m plots) for each of the two restoration treatments and a control (natural regeneration). After six years, we sampled 50% of the restored area and calculated all labor and input costs associated with both restoration establishment and maintenance. Overstory basal area, species richness and species diversity were highest in plantation and lowest in control plots. Understory density was also higher in plantation plots but density of shrubs and vines was higher in nucleation and control plots. There were no differences in understory species diversity or richness across treatments. When considering only recruited individuals, overstory density and basal area, and species richness in both over and understory was highest in nucleation plots. In comparison to plantation plots, the overstory composition of nucleation plots was more similar to control plots and there was greater variability across plots. The total cost of restoration was up to 34% cheaper in nucleation (US$ 4654.09 ha-1) than in the high-diversity plantations (US$ 7038.05 ha-1). While high-diversity plantation restoration is currently the most widespread and prevalent approach, applied nucleation appears to offer an intermediate level of recovery speed and cost, and can be a valuable strategy that can strike a balance between passive and active restoration. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-06-25T15:04:28Z 2021-06-25T15:04:28Z 2021-07-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119088 Forest Ecology And Management. Amsterdam: Elsevier, v. 491, 10 p., 2021. 0378-1127 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/210308 10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119088 WOS:000647735500006 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119088 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/210308 |
identifier_str_mv |
Forest Ecology And Management. Amsterdam: Elsevier, v. 491, 10 p., 2021. 0378-1127 10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119088 WOS:000647735500006 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Forest Ecology And Management |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
10 |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier B.V. |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier B.V. |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Web of Science reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808128827063271424 |