Efficacy of prebiotics, probiotics, and synbiotics on laying hens and broilers challenged with salmonella enteritidis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Murate, Leticia S.
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Paiao, Fernanda G., Almeida, Adriana M. de [UNESP], Berchieri, Angelo [UNESP], Shimokomaki, Massami
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jpsa/52/1/52_0130211/_article
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/129134
Resumo: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of dietary prebiotic, probiotic, and symbiotic products for controlling infection in laying hens and broiler chickens challenged with Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis (SE). These products could replace the use of antibiotics, which would avoid the problem of hastening antimicrobial resistance for both types of birds. Salmonella-free 1-day-old (1-d-old) layers chicks and broilers chicks were inoculated with SE resistant to nalidixic acid and spectinomycin (SE Nai(r) Spec(r)) and divided into four groups: 1) control (without feed additives); 2) probiotic (Bacillus subtilis, Lactobacillus acidophilus, L. casei, Enterococcus faecium, Bifidobacterium longum); 3) prebiotic (inulin, fructooligosaccharide, mannanoligosaccharide, and oligosaccharide); and 4) synbiotic (85% of the probiotic + 15% of the prebiotic additives). The presence of SE Nal(r) Spec(r) in cloacal swabs was analyzed at 7, 14, and 21 days post-infection (dpi) in laying hens and broilers. The number of SE Nai(r) Spec(r). per gram of cecal contents was determined at 7, 14, and 21 dpi in laying hens and at 2, 5, 7, 14, and 21 dpi in broilers. The results showed that the prebiotic additive reduced the occurrence of SE in cloacal swabs from laying hens but not from broilers. In the groups of laying hens and broilers that received prebiotics, the isolation and counts of SE Nair Specr were lower during the first week post-infection but not throughout the experiment. The probiotic and synbiotic additives did not influence the SE infection in laying hens and broilers; in contrast prebiotics had a protective effect during the first week post-infection.
id UNSP_78c75c70e9a45c5dc6906474f7456c61
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/129134
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Efficacy of prebiotics, probiotics, and synbiotics on laying hens and broilers challenged with salmonella enteritidisAdditivesChickenPathogenic bacteriaSalmonella-freeThis study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of dietary prebiotic, probiotic, and symbiotic products for controlling infection in laying hens and broiler chickens challenged with Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis (SE). These products could replace the use of antibiotics, which would avoid the problem of hastening antimicrobial resistance for both types of birds. Salmonella-free 1-day-old (1-d-old) layers chicks and broilers chicks were inoculated with SE resistant to nalidixic acid and spectinomycin (SE Nai(r) Spec(r)) and divided into four groups: 1) control (without feed additives); 2) probiotic (Bacillus subtilis, Lactobacillus acidophilus, L. casei, Enterococcus faecium, Bifidobacterium longum); 3) prebiotic (inulin, fructooligosaccharide, mannanoligosaccharide, and oligosaccharide); and 4) synbiotic (85% of the probiotic + 15% of the prebiotic additives). The presence of SE Nal(r) Spec(r) in cloacal swabs was analyzed at 7, 14, and 21 days post-infection (dpi) in laying hens and broilers. The number of SE Nai(r) Spec(r). per gram of cecal contents was determined at 7, 14, and 21 dpi in laying hens and at 2, 5, 7, 14, and 21 dpi in broilers. The results showed that the prebiotic additive reduced the occurrence of SE in cloacal swabs from laying hens but not from broilers. In the groups of laying hens and broilers that received prebiotics, the isolation and counts of SE Nair Specr were lower during the first week post-infection but not throughout the experiment. The probiotic and synbiotic additives did not influence the SE infection in laying hens and broilers; in contrast prebiotics had a protective effect during the first week post-infection.Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Departamento de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva, Londrina, PR, BrasilUniversidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (UTFPR), Londrina, PR, BrasilUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Departamento de Patologia Veterinária, Jaboticabal, SP, BrasilUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Departamento de Patologia Veterinária, Jaboticabal, SP, BrasilCNPq: 475503/2009-0CAPES: 23038007638201119Japan Poultry Science AssocUniversidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (UTFPR)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Murate, Leticia S.Paiao, Fernanda G.Almeida, Adriana M. de [UNESP]Berchieri, Angelo [UNESP]Shimokomaki, Massami2015-10-21T20:26:07Z2015-10-21T20:26:07Z2015-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article52-56application/pdfhttps://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jpsa/52/1/52_0130211/_articleJournal Of Poultry Science. Tsukuba: Japan Poultry Science Assoc, v. 52, n. 1, p. 52-56, 2015.1346-7395http://hdl.handle.net/11449/12913410.2141/jpsa.0130211WOS:000348554800009WOS000348554800009.pdfWeb of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal Of Poultry Science0.8600,370info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-06-07T13:03:18Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/129134Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T23:49:04.262175Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Efficacy of prebiotics, probiotics, and synbiotics on laying hens and broilers challenged with salmonella enteritidis
title Efficacy of prebiotics, probiotics, and synbiotics on laying hens and broilers challenged with salmonella enteritidis
spellingShingle Efficacy of prebiotics, probiotics, and synbiotics on laying hens and broilers challenged with salmonella enteritidis
Murate, Leticia S.
Additives
Chicken
Pathogenic bacteria
Salmonella-free
title_short Efficacy of prebiotics, probiotics, and synbiotics on laying hens and broilers challenged with salmonella enteritidis
title_full Efficacy of prebiotics, probiotics, and synbiotics on laying hens and broilers challenged with salmonella enteritidis
title_fullStr Efficacy of prebiotics, probiotics, and synbiotics on laying hens and broilers challenged with salmonella enteritidis
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of prebiotics, probiotics, and synbiotics on laying hens and broilers challenged with salmonella enteritidis
title_sort Efficacy of prebiotics, probiotics, and synbiotics on laying hens and broilers challenged with salmonella enteritidis
author Murate, Leticia S.
author_facet Murate, Leticia S.
Paiao, Fernanda G.
Almeida, Adriana M. de [UNESP]
Berchieri, Angelo [UNESP]
Shimokomaki, Massami
author_role author
author2 Paiao, Fernanda G.
Almeida, Adriana M. de [UNESP]
Berchieri, Angelo [UNESP]
Shimokomaki, Massami
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (UTFPR)
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Murate, Leticia S.
Paiao, Fernanda G.
Almeida, Adriana M. de [UNESP]
Berchieri, Angelo [UNESP]
Shimokomaki, Massami
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Additives
Chicken
Pathogenic bacteria
Salmonella-free
topic Additives
Chicken
Pathogenic bacteria
Salmonella-free
description This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of dietary prebiotic, probiotic, and symbiotic products for controlling infection in laying hens and broiler chickens challenged with Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis (SE). These products could replace the use of antibiotics, which would avoid the problem of hastening antimicrobial resistance for both types of birds. Salmonella-free 1-day-old (1-d-old) layers chicks and broilers chicks were inoculated with SE resistant to nalidixic acid and spectinomycin (SE Nai(r) Spec(r)) and divided into four groups: 1) control (without feed additives); 2) probiotic (Bacillus subtilis, Lactobacillus acidophilus, L. casei, Enterococcus faecium, Bifidobacterium longum); 3) prebiotic (inulin, fructooligosaccharide, mannanoligosaccharide, and oligosaccharide); and 4) synbiotic (85% of the probiotic + 15% of the prebiotic additives). The presence of SE Nal(r) Spec(r) in cloacal swabs was analyzed at 7, 14, and 21 days post-infection (dpi) in laying hens and broilers. The number of SE Nai(r) Spec(r). per gram of cecal contents was determined at 7, 14, and 21 dpi in laying hens and at 2, 5, 7, 14, and 21 dpi in broilers. The results showed that the prebiotic additive reduced the occurrence of SE in cloacal swabs from laying hens but not from broilers. In the groups of laying hens and broilers that received prebiotics, the isolation and counts of SE Nair Specr were lower during the first week post-infection but not throughout the experiment. The probiotic and synbiotic additives did not influence the SE infection in laying hens and broilers; in contrast prebiotics had a protective effect during the first week post-infection.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-10-21T20:26:07Z
2015-10-21T20:26:07Z
2015-01-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jpsa/52/1/52_0130211/_article
Journal Of Poultry Science. Tsukuba: Japan Poultry Science Assoc, v. 52, n. 1, p. 52-56, 2015.
1346-7395
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/129134
10.2141/jpsa.0130211
WOS:000348554800009
WOS000348554800009.pdf
url https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jpsa/52/1/52_0130211/_article
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/129134
identifier_str_mv Journal Of Poultry Science. Tsukuba: Japan Poultry Science Assoc, v. 52, n. 1, p. 52-56, 2015.
1346-7395
10.2141/jpsa.0130211
WOS:000348554800009
WOS000348554800009.pdf
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Journal Of Poultry Science
0.860
0,370
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 52-56
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Japan Poultry Science Assoc
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Japan Poultry Science Assoc
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Web of Science
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808129555030867968