Efficacy of prebiotics, probiotics, and synbiotics on laying hens and broilers challenged with salmonella enteritidis
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jpsa/52/1/52_0130211/_article http://hdl.handle.net/11449/129134 |
Resumo: | This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of dietary prebiotic, probiotic, and symbiotic products for controlling infection in laying hens and broiler chickens challenged with Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis (SE). These products could replace the use of antibiotics, which would avoid the problem of hastening antimicrobial resistance for both types of birds. Salmonella-free 1-day-old (1-d-old) layers chicks and broilers chicks were inoculated with SE resistant to nalidixic acid and spectinomycin (SE Nai(r) Spec(r)) and divided into four groups: 1) control (without feed additives); 2) probiotic (Bacillus subtilis, Lactobacillus acidophilus, L. casei, Enterococcus faecium, Bifidobacterium longum); 3) prebiotic (inulin, fructooligosaccharide, mannanoligosaccharide, and oligosaccharide); and 4) synbiotic (85% of the probiotic + 15% of the prebiotic additives). The presence of SE Nal(r) Spec(r) in cloacal swabs was analyzed at 7, 14, and 21 days post-infection (dpi) in laying hens and broilers. The number of SE Nai(r) Spec(r). per gram of cecal contents was determined at 7, 14, and 21 dpi in laying hens and at 2, 5, 7, 14, and 21 dpi in broilers. The results showed that the prebiotic additive reduced the occurrence of SE in cloacal swabs from laying hens but not from broilers. In the groups of laying hens and broilers that received prebiotics, the isolation and counts of SE Nair Specr were lower during the first week post-infection but not throughout the experiment. The probiotic and synbiotic additives did not influence the SE infection in laying hens and broilers; in contrast prebiotics had a protective effect during the first week post-infection. |
id |
UNSP_78c75c70e9a45c5dc6906474f7456c61 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/129134 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Efficacy of prebiotics, probiotics, and synbiotics on laying hens and broilers challenged with salmonella enteritidisAdditivesChickenPathogenic bacteriaSalmonella-freeThis study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of dietary prebiotic, probiotic, and symbiotic products for controlling infection in laying hens and broiler chickens challenged with Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis (SE). These products could replace the use of antibiotics, which would avoid the problem of hastening antimicrobial resistance for both types of birds. Salmonella-free 1-day-old (1-d-old) layers chicks and broilers chicks were inoculated with SE resistant to nalidixic acid and spectinomycin (SE Nai(r) Spec(r)) and divided into four groups: 1) control (without feed additives); 2) probiotic (Bacillus subtilis, Lactobacillus acidophilus, L. casei, Enterococcus faecium, Bifidobacterium longum); 3) prebiotic (inulin, fructooligosaccharide, mannanoligosaccharide, and oligosaccharide); and 4) synbiotic (85% of the probiotic + 15% of the prebiotic additives). The presence of SE Nal(r) Spec(r) in cloacal swabs was analyzed at 7, 14, and 21 days post-infection (dpi) in laying hens and broilers. The number of SE Nai(r) Spec(r). per gram of cecal contents was determined at 7, 14, and 21 dpi in laying hens and at 2, 5, 7, 14, and 21 dpi in broilers. The results showed that the prebiotic additive reduced the occurrence of SE in cloacal swabs from laying hens but not from broilers. In the groups of laying hens and broilers that received prebiotics, the isolation and counts of SE Nair Specr were lower during the first week post-infection but not throughout the experiment. The probiotic and synbiotic additives did not influence the SE infection in laying hens and broilers; in contrast prebiotics had a protective effect during the first week post-infection.Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Departamento de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva, Londrina, PR, BrasilUniversidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (UTFPR), Londrina, PR, BrasilUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Departamento de Patologia Veterinária, Jaboticabal, SP, BrasilUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Departamento de Patologia Veterinária, Jaboticabal, SP, BrasilCNPq: 475503/2009-0CAPES: 23038007638201119Japan Poultry Science AssocUniversidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (UTFPR)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Murate, Leticia S.Paiao, Fernanda G.Almeida, Adriana M. de [UNESP]Berchieri, Angelo [UNESP]Shimokomaki, Massami2015-10-21T20:26:07Z2015-10-21T20:26:07Z2015-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article52-56application/pdfhttps://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jpsa/52/1/52_0130211/_articleJournal Of Poultry Science. Tsukuba: Japan Poultry Science Assoc, v. 52, n. 1, p. 52-56, 2015.1346-7395http://hdl.handle.net/11449/12913410.2141/jpsa.0130211WOS:000348554800009WOS000348554800009.pdfWeb of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal Of Poultry Science0.8600,370info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-06-07T13:03:18Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/129134Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T23:49:04.262175Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Efficacy of prebiotics, probiotics, and synbiotics on laying hens and broilers challenged with salmonella enteritidis |
title |
Efficacy of prebiotics, probiotics, and synbiotics on laying hens and broilers challenged with salmonella enteritidis |
spellingShingle |
Efficacy of prebiotics, probiotics, and synbiotics on laying hens and broilers challenged with salmonella enteritidis Murate, Leticia S. Additives Chicken Pathogenic bacteria Salmonella-free |
title_short |
Efficacy of prebiotics, probiotics, and synbiotics on laying hens and broilers challenged with salmonella enteritidis |
title_full |
Efficacy of prebiotics, probiotics, and synbiotics on laying hens and broilers challenged with salmonella enteritidis |
title_fullStr |
Efficacy of prebiotics, probiotics, and synbiotics on laying hens and broilers challenged with salmonella enteritidis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Efficacy of prebiotics, probiotics, and synbiotics on laying hens and broilers challenged with salmonella enteritidis |
title_sort |
Efficacy of prebiotics, probiotics, and synbiotics on laying hens and broilers challenged with salmonella enteritidis |
author |
Murate, Leticia S. |
author_facet |
Murate, Leticia S. Paiao, Fernanda G. Almeida, Adriana M. de [UNESP] Berchieri, Angelo [UNESP] Shimokomaki, Massami |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Paiao, Fernanda G. Almeida, Adriana M. de [UNESP] Berchieri, Angelo [UNESP] Shimokomaki, Massami |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (UTFPR) Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Murate, Leticia S. Paiao, Fernanda G. Almeida, Adriana M. de [UNESP] Berchieri, Angelo [UNESP] Shimokomaki, Massami |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Additives Chicken Pathogenic bacteria Salmonella-free |
topic |
Additives Chicken Pathogenic bacteria Salmonella-free |
description |
This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of dietary prebiotic, probiotic, and symbiotic products for controlling infection in laying hens and broiler chickens challenged with Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis (SE). These products could replace the use of antibiotics, which would avoid the problem of hastening antimicrobial resistance for both types of birds. Salmonella-free 1-day-old (1-d-old) layers chicks and broilers chicks were inoculated with SE resistant to nalidixic acid and spectinomycin (SE Nai(r) Spec(r)) and divided into four groups: 1) control (without feed additives); 2) probiotic (Bacillus subtilis, Lactobacillus acidophilus, L. casei, Enterococcus faecium, Bifidobacterium longum); 3) prebiotic (inulin, fructooligosaccharide, mannanoligosaccharide, and oligosaccharide); and 4) synbiotic (85% of the probiotic + 15% of the prebiotic additives). The presence of SE Nal(r) Spec(r) in cloacal swabs was analyzed at 7, 14, and 21 days post-infection (dpi) in laying hens and broilers. The number of SE Nai(r) Spec(r). per gram of cecal contents was determined at 7, 14, and 21 dpi in laying hens and at 2, 5, 7, 14, and 21 dpi in broilers. The results showed that the prebiotic additive reduced the occurrence of SE in cloacal swabs from laying hens but not from broilers. In the groups of laying hens and broilers that received prebiotics, the isolation and counts of SE Nair Specr were lower during the first week post-infection but not throughout the experiment. The probiotic and synbiotic additives did not influence the SE infection in laying hens and broilers; in contrast prebiotics had a protective effect during the first week post-infection. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-10-21T20:26:07Z 2015-10-21T20:26:07Z 2015-01-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jpsa/52/1/52_0130211/_article Journal Of Poultry Science. Tsukuba: Japan Poultry Science Assoc, v. 52, n. 1, p. 52-56, 2015. 1346-7395 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/129134 10.2141/jpsa.0130211 WOS:000348554800009 WOS000348554800009.pdf |
url |
https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jpsa/52/1/52_0130211/_article http://hdl.handle.net/11449/129134 |
identifier_str_mv |
Journal Of Poultry Science. Tsukuba: Japan Poultry Science Assoc, v. 52, n. 1, p. 52-56, 2015. 1346-7395 10.2141/jpsa.0130211 WOS:000348554800009 WOS000348554800009.pdf |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal Of Poultry Science 0.860 0,370 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
52-56 application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Japan Poultry Science Assoc |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Japan Poultry Science Assoc |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Web of Science reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808129555030867968 |