One-year prospective clinical study comparing patient satisfaction and masticatory performance of mandibular overdentures supported by one versus two implants

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Paleari, Andre Gustavo
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Oliveira Junior, Norberto Martins de [UNESP], Mendoza Marin, Danny Omar [UNESP], Rodriguez, Larissa Santana [UNESP], Arioli Filho, Joao Neudenir [UNESP], Pero, Ana Carolina [UNESP], Compagnoni, Marco Antonio [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2016-0628
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/184930
Resumo: There is a lack of clinical evidence on mandibular overdentures (MOD) supported by a single implant. Objective: To compare patient satisfaction and masticatory performance in MOD supported by one versus two implants in a two-group parallel randomized clinical trial. Material and Methods: Twenty-one patients wearing new maxillary and mandibular complete dentures (CDs) were randomly divided to receive one (GI, n=11) or two (GII, n=10) implants in the mandibular arch. Four months after implant placement, o-ring abutments were installed in the implants, and matrix attachments were placed in the lower complete dentures. Patient satisfaction with their dentures and masticatory performance were compared at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months after the procedure. Data on patient satisfaction were analyzed using the Friedman test and the Mann-Whitney U test. Data on masticatory performance were analyzed using one-way repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Student's t test (alpha=0.05). Results: Both groups exhibited a significant increase in overall patient satisfaction in all periods evaluated (p<0.05), except for GI after 12 months, which had values similar to baseline (p=0.74). Satisfaction levels of GI and GII were similar at baseline, 3 and 6 months, but GII showed higher satisfaction levels (p=0.01) than GI at 12 months. GI and GII exhibited a significant increase (p<0.05) in masticatory performance for all periods relative to baseline. However, GII had higher masticatory performance with dentures than GI, regardless of the period (p<0.05). Conclusion: MOD supported by two implants demonstrated better patient satisfaction in the follow-up at 12 months and better masticatory performance than MOD supported by one implant.
id UNSP_78f4ba08a1ec3400bd7db3003ba2d498
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/184930
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling One-year prospective clinical study comparing patient satisfaction and masticatory performance of mandibular overdentures supported by one versus two implantsDental implantsDenturesPatient satisfactionThere is a lack of clinical evidence on mandibular overdentures (MOD) supported by a single implant. Objective: To compare patient satisfaction and masticatory performance in MOD supported by one versus two implants in a two-group parallel randomized clinical trial. Material and Methods: Twenty-one patients wearing new maxillary and mandibular complete dentures (CDs) were randomly divided to receive one (GI, n=11) or two (GII, n=10) implants in the mandibular arch. Four months after implant placement, o-ring abutments were installed in the implants, and matrix attachments were placed in the lower complete dentures. Patient satisfaction with their dentures and masticatory performance were compared at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months after the procedure. Data on patient satisfaction were analyzed using the Friedman test and the Mann-Whitney U test. Data on masticatory performance were analyzed using one-way repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Student's t test (alpha=0.05). Results: Both groups exhibited a significant increase in overall patient satisfaction in all periods evaluated (p<0.05), except for GI after 12 months, which had values similar to baseline (p=0.74). Satisfaction levels of GI and GII were similar at baseline, 3 and 6 months, but GII showed higher satisfaction levels (p=0.01) than GI at 12 months. GI and GII exhibited a significant increase (p<0.05) in masticatory performance for all periods relative to baseline. However, GII had higher masticatory performance with dentures than GI, regardless of the period (p<0.05). Conclusion: MOD supported by two implants demonstrated better patient satisfaction in the follow-up at 12 months and better masticatory performance than MOD supported by one implant.Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)Univ Fed Alfenas, Fac Odontol, Dept Odontol Restauradora, Alfenas, MG, BrazilUniv Estadual Paulista, Fac Odontol Araraquara, Dept Mat Odontol & Protese, Araraquara, SP, BrazilUniv Estadual Paulista, Fac Odontol Araraquara, Dept Mat Odontol & Protese, Araraquara, SP, BrazilFAPESP: 2012/08856-9FAPESP: 2012/03809-2Univ Sao Paulo Fac Odontologia BauruUniv Fed AlfenasUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Paleari, Andre GustavoOliveira Junior, Norberto Martins de [UNESP]Mendoza Marin, Danny Omar [UNESP]Rodriguez, Larissa Santana [UNESP]Arioli Filho, Joao Neudenir [UNESP]Pero, Ana Carolina [UNESP]Compagnoni, Marco Antonio [UNESP]2019-10-04T12:31:19Z2019-10-04T12:31:19Z2018-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article11application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2016-0628Journal Of Applied Oral Science. Bauru-sp: Univ Sao Paulo Fac Odontologia Bauru, v. 26, 11 p., 2018.1678-7757http://hdl.handle.net/11449/18493010.1590/1678-7757-2016-0628S1678-77572018000100493WOS:000446937900001S1678-77572018000100493.pdf8921196002764597Web of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal Of Applied Oral Scienceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-09-27T14:57:26Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/184930Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462024-09-27T14:57:26Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv One-year prospective clinical study comparing patient satisfaction and masticatory performance of mandibular overdentures supported by one versus two implants
title One-year prospective clinical study comparing patient satisfaction and masticatory performance of mandibular overdentures supported by one versus two implants
spellingShingle One-year prospective clinical study comparing patient satisfaction and masticatory performance of mandibular overdentures supported by one versus two implants
Paleari, Andre Gustavo
Dental implants
Dentures
Patient satisfaction
title_short One-year prospective clinical study comparing patient satisfaction and masticatory performance of mandibular overdentures supported by one versus two implants
title_full One-year prospective clinical study comparing patient satisfaction and masticatory performance of mandibular overdentures supported by one versus two implants
title_fullStr One-year prospective clinical study comparing patient satisfaction and masticatory performance of mandibular overdentures supported by one versus two implants
title_full_unstemmed One-year prospective clinical study comparing patient satisfaction and masticatory performance of mandibular overdentures supported by one versus two implants
title_sort One-year prospective clinical study comparing patient satisfaction and masticatory performance of mandibular overdentures supported by one versus two implants
author Paleari, Andre Gustavo
author_facet Paleari, Andre Gustavo
Oliveira Junior, Norberto Martins de [UNESP]
Mendoza Marin, Danny Omar [UNESP]
Rodriguez, Larissa Santana [UNESP]
Arioli Filho, Joao Neudenir [UNESP]
Pero, Ana Carolina [UNESP]
Compagnoni, Marco Antonio [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Oliveira Junior, Norberto Martins de [UNESP]
Mendoza Marin, Danny Omar [UNESP]
Rodriguez, Larissa Santana [UNESP]
Arioli Filho, Joao Neudenir [UNESP]
Pero, Ana Carolina [UNESP]
Compagnoni, Marco Antonio [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Univ Fed Alfenas
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Paleari, Andre Gustavo
Oliveira Junior, Norberto Martins de [UNESP]
Mendoza Marin, Danny Omar [UNESP]
Rodriguez, Larissa Santana [UNESP]
Arioli Filho, Joao Neudenir [UNESP]
Pero, Ana Carolina [UNESP]
Compagnoni, Marco Antonio [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Dental implants
Dentures
Patient satisfaction
topic Dental implants
Dentures
Patient satisfaction
description There is a lack of clinical evidence on mandibular overdentures (MOD) supported by a single implant. Objective: To compare patient satisfaction and masticatory performance in MOD supported by one versus two implants in a two-group parallel randomized clinical trial. Material and Methods: Twenty-one patients wearing new maxillary and mandibular complete dentures (CDs) were randomly divided to receive one (GI, n=11) or two (GII, n=10) implants in the mandibular arch. Four months after implant placement, o-ring abutments were installed in the implants, and matrix attachments were placed in the lower complete dentures. Patient satisfaction with their dentures and masticatory performance were compared at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months after the procedure. Data on patient satisfaction were analyzed using the Friedman test and the Mann-Whitney U test. Data on masticatory performance were analyzed using one-way repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Student's t test (alpha=0.05). Results: Both groups exhibited a significant increase in overall patient satisfaction in all periods evaluated (p<0.05), except for GI after 12 months, which had values similar to baseline (p=0.74). Satisfaction levels of GI and GII were similar at baseline, 3 and 6 months, but GII showed higher satisfaction levels (p=0.01) than GI at 12 months. GI and GII exhibited a significant increase (p<0.05) in masticatory performance for all periods relative to baseline. However, GII had higher masticatory performance with dentures than GI, regardless of the period (p<0.05). Conclusion: MOD supported by two implants demonstrated better patient satisfaction in the follow-up at 12 months and better masticatory performance than MOD supported by one implant.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-01-01
2019-10-04T12:31:19Z
2019-10-04T12:31:19Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2016-0628
Journal Of Applied Oral Science. Bauru-sp: Univ Sao Paulo Fac Odontologia Bauru, v. 26, 11 p., 2018.
1678-7757
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/184930
10.1590/1678-7757-2016-0628
S1678-77572018000100493
WOS:000446937900001
S1678-77572018000100493.pdf
8921196002764597
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2016-0628
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/184930
identifier_str_mv Journal Of Applied Oral Science. Bauru-sp: Univ Sao Paulo Fac Odontologia Bauru, v. 26, 11 p., 2018.
1678-7757
10.1590/1678-7757-2016-0628
S1678-77572018000100493
WOS:000446937900001
S1678-77572018000100493.pdf
8921196002764597
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Journal Of Applied Oral Science
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 11
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Univ Sao Paulo Fac Odontologia Bauru
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Univ Sao Paulo Fac Odontologia Bauru
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Web of Science
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositoriounesp@unesp.br
_version_ 1813546517405892608