One-year prospective clinical study comparing patient satisfaction and masticatory performance of mandibular overdentures supported by one versus two implants
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2016-0628 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/184930 |
Resumo: | There is a lack of clinical evidence on mandibular overdentures (MOD) supported by a single implant. Objective: To compare patient satisfaction and masticatory performance in MOD supported by one versus two implants in a two-group parallel randomized clinical trial. Material and Methods: Twenty-one patients wearing new maxillary and mandibular complete dentures (CDs) were randomly divided to receive one (GI, n=11) or two (GII, n=10) implants in the mandibular arch. Four months after implant placement, o-ring abutments were installed in the implants, and matrix attachments were placed in the lower complete dentures. Patient satisfaction with their dentures and masticatory performance were compared at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months after the procedure. Data on patient satisfaction were analyzed using the Friedman test and the Mann-Whitney U test. Data on masticatory performance were analyzed using one-way repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Student's t test (alpha=0.05). Results: Both groups exhibited a significant increase in overall patient satisfaction in all periods evaluated (p<0.05), except for GI after 12 months, which had values similar to baseline (p=0.74). Satisfaction levels of GI and GII were similar at baseline, 3 and 6 months, but GII showed higher satisfaction levels (p=0.01) than GI at 12 months. GI and GII exhibited a significant increase (p<0.05) in masticatory performance for all periods relative to baseline. However, GII had higher masticatory performance with dentures than GI, regardless of the period (p<0.05). Conclusion: MOD supported by two implants demonstrated better patient satisfaction in the follow-up at 12 months and better masticatory performance than MOD supported by one implant. |
id |
UNSP_78f4ba08a1ec3400bd7db3003ba2d498 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/184930 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
One-year prospective clinical study comparing patient satisfaction and masticatory performance of mandibular overdentures supported by one versus two implantsDental implantsDenturesPatient satisfactionThere is a lack of clinical evidence on mandibular overdentures (MOD) supported by a single implant. Objective: To compare patient satisfaction and masticatory performance in MOD supported by one versus two implants in a two-group parallel randomized clinical trial. Material and Methods: Twenty-one patients wearing new maxillary and mandibular complete dentures (CDs) were randomly divided to receive one (GI, n=11) or two (GII, n=10) implants in the mandibular arch. Four months after implant placement, o-ring abutments were installed in the implants, and matrix attachments were placed in the lower complete dentures. Patient satisfaction with their dentures and masticatory performance were compared at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months after the procedure. Data on patient satisfaction were analyzed using the Friedman test and the Mann-Whitney U test. Data on masticatory performance were analyzed using one-way repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Student's t test (alpha=0.05). Results: Both groups exhibited a significant increase in overall patient satisfaction in all periods evaluated (p<0.05), except for GI after 12 months, which had values similar to baseline (p=0.74). Satisfaction levels of GI and GII were similar at baseline, 3 and 6 months, but GII showed higher satisfaction levels (p=0.01) than GI at 12 months. GI and GII exhibited a significant increase (p<0.05) in masticatory performance for all periods relative to baseline. However, GII had higher masticatory performance with dentures than GI, regardless of the period (p<0.05). Conclusion: MOD supported by two implants demonstrated better patient satisfaction in the follow-up at 12 months and better masticatory performance than MOD supported by one implant.Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)Univ Fed Alfenas, Fac Odontol, Dept Odontol Restauradora, Alfenas, MG, BrazilUniv Estadual Paulista, Fac Odontol Araraquara, Dept Mat Odontol & Protese, Araraquara, SP, BrazilUniv Estadual Paulista, Fac Odontol Araraquara, Dept Mat Odontol & Protese, Araraquara, SP, BrazilFAPESP: 2012/08856-9FAPESP: 2012/03809-2Univ Sao Paulo Fac Odontologia BauruUniv Fed AlfenasUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Paleari, Andre GustavoOliveira Junior, Norberto Martins de [UNESP]Mendoza Marin, Danny Omar [UNESP]Rodriguez, Larissa Santana [UNESP]Arioli Filho, Joao Neudenir [UNESP]Pero, Ana Carolina [UNESP]Compagnoni, Marco Antonio [UNESP]2019-10-04T12:31:19Z2019-10-04T12:31:19Z2018-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article11application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2016-0628Journal Of Applied Oral Science. Bauru-sp: Univ Sao Paulo Fac Odontologia Bauru, v. 26, 11 p., 2018.1678-7757http://hdl.handle.net/11449/18493010.1590/1678-7757-2016-0628S1678-77572018000100493WOS:000446937900001S1678-77572018000100493.pdf8921196002764597Web of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal Of Applied Oral Scienceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-09-27T14:57:26Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/184930Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462024-09-27T14:57:26Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
One-year prospective clinical study comparing patient satisfaction and masticatory performance of mandibular overdentures supported by one versus two implants |
title |
One-year prospective clinical study comparing patient satisfaction and masticatory performance of mandibular overdentures supported by one versus two implants |
spellingShingle |
One-year prospective clinical study comparing patient satisfaction and masticatory performance of mandibular overdentures supported by one versus two implants Paleari, Andre Gustavo Dental implants Dentures Patient satisfaction |
title_short |
One-year prospective clinical study comparing patient satisfaction and masticatory performance of mandibular overdentures supported by one versus two implants |
title_full |
One-year prospective clinical study comparing patient satisfaction and masticatory performance of mandibular overdentures supported by one versus two implants |
title_fullStr |
One-year prospective clinical study comparing patient satisfaction and masticatory performance of mandibular overdentures supported by one versus two implants |
title_full_unstemmed |
One-year prospective clinical study comparing patient satisfaction and masticatory performance of mandibular overdentures supported by one versus two implants |
title_sort |
One-year prospective clinical study comparing patient satisfaction and masticatory performance of mandibular overdentures supported by one versus two implants |
author |
Paleari, Andre Gustavo |
author_facet |
Paleari, Andre Gustavo Oliveira Junior, Norberto Martins de [UNESP] Mendoza Marin, Danny Omar [UNESP] Rodriguez, Larissa Santana [UNESP] Arioli Filho, Joao Neudenir [UNESP] Pero, Ana Carolina [UNESP] Compagnoni, Marco Antonio [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Oliveira Junior, Norberto Martins de [UNESP] Mendoza Marin, Danny Omar [UNESP] Rodriguez, Larissa Santana [UNESP] Arioli Filho, Joao Neudenir [UNESP] Pero, Ana Carolina [UNESP] Compagnoni, Marco Antonio [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Univ Fed Alfenas Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Paleari, Andre Gustavo Oliveira Junior, Norberto Martins de [UNESP] Mendoza Marin, Danny Omar [UNESP] Rodriguez, Larissa Santana [UNESP] Arioli Filho, Joao Neudenir [UNESP] Pero, Ana Carolina [UNESP] Compagnoni, Marco Antonio [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Dental implants Dentures Patient satisfaction |
topic |
Dental implants Dentures Patient satisfaction |
description |
There is a lack of clinical evidence on mandibular overdentures (MOD) supported by a single implant. Objective: To compare patient satisfaction and masticatory performance in MOD supported by one versus two implants in a two-group parallel randomized clinical trial. Material and Methods: Twenty-one patients wearing new maxillary and mandibular complete dentures (CDs) were randomly divided to receive one (GI, n=11) or two (GII, n=10) implants in the mandibular arch. Four months after implant placement, o-ring abutments were installed in the implants, and matrix attachments were placed in the lower complete dentures. Patient satisfaction with their dentures and masticatory performance were compared at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months after the procedure. Data on patient satisfaction were analyzed using the Friedman test and the Mann-Whitney U test. Data on masticatory performance were analyzed using one-way repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Student's t test (alpha=0.05). Results: Both groups exhibited a significant increase in overall patient satisfaction in all periods evaluated (p<0.05), except for GI after 12 months, which had values similar to baseline (p=0.74). Satisfaction levels of GI and GII were similar at baseline, 3 and 6 months, but GII showed higher satisfaction levels (p=0.01) than GI at 12 months. GI and GII exhibited a significant increase (p<0.05) in masticatory performance for all periods relative to baseline. However, GII had higher masticatory performance with dentures than GI, regardless of the period (p<0.05). Conclusion: MOD supported by two implants demonstrated better patient satisfaction in the follow-up at 12 months and better masticatory performance than MOD supported by one implant. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-01-01 2019-10-04T12:31:19Z 2019-10-04T12:31:19Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2016-0628 Journal Of Applied Oral Science. Bauru-sp: Univ Sao Paulo Fac Odontologia Bauru, v. 26, 11 p., 2018. 1678-7757 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/184930 10.1590/1678-7757-2016-0628 S1678-77572018000100493 WOS:000446937900001 S1678-77572018000100493.pdf 8921196002764597 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2016-0628 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/184930 |
identifier_str_mv |
Journal Of Applied Oral Science. Bauru-sp: Univ Sao Paulo Fac Odontologia Bauru, v. 26, 11 p., 2018. 1678-7757 10.1590/1678-7757-2016-0628 S1678-77572018000100493 WOS:000446937900001 S1678-77572018000100493.pdf 8921196002764597 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal Of Applied Oral Science |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
11 application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Univ Sao Paulo Fac Odontologia Bauru |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Univ Sao Paulo Fac Odontologia Bauru |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Web of Science reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositoriounesp@unesp.br |
_version_ |
1813546517405892608 |