The effect of polymerization mode on monomer conversion, free radical entrapment, and interaction with hydroxyapatite of commercial self-adhesive cements
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.02.019 |
Texto Completo: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751616115000624 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/129427 |
Resumo: | Objectives: This study evaluated the degree of conversion, the free radical entrapment, and the chemical interaction of self-adhesive resin cements mixed with pure hydroxyapatite, as a function of the polymerization activation mode among a variety of commercial self-adhesive cements.Materials and methods: Four cements (Embrace WetBond, MaxCem Elite, Bifix SE, and RelyX U200) were mixed, combined with hydroxyapatite, dispensed into molds, and distributed into three groups, according to polymerization protocols: IP (photoactivation for 40 s); DP (delayed photoactivation, 10 min self-curing plus 40 s light-activated); and CA (chemical activation, no light exposure). Infrared (IR) spectra were obtained and monomer conversion (%) was calculated by comparing the aliphatic-to-aromatic IR absorption peak ratio before and after polymerization (n=10). The free radical entrapment values of the resin cements were characterized using Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR) and the concentration of spins (number of spins/mass) calculated (n=3). Values were compared using two-way ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc test (alpha=5%). X-ray diffraction (XRD) characterized the crystallinity of hydroxyapatite as a function of the chemical interactions with the resin cements.Results: The tested parameters varied as a function of resin cement and polymerization protocol. Embrace WetBond and RelyX U200 demonstrated dependence on photoactivation (immediate or delayed), whereas MaxCem Elite exhibited dependence on the chemical activation mode. Bifix SE presented the best balance based on the parameters analyzed, irrespective of the activation protocol.Conclusions: Choice of polymerization protocol affects the degree of conversion, free radical entrapment, and the chemical interaction between hydroxyapatite and self-adhesive resin cement mixtures. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. |
id |
UNSP_79d7bee7555b284f56bdec5fd6197309 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/129427 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
The effect of polymerization mode on monomer conversion, free radical entrapment, and interaction with hydroxyapatite of commercial self-adhesive cementsSelf-adhesive resin cementHydroxyapatiteChemical interactionFT-IREPRX-ray diffractionObjectives: This study evaluated the degree of conversion, the free radical entrapment, and the chemical interaction of self-adhesive resin cements mixed with pure hydroxyapatite, as a function of the polymerization activation mode among a variety of commercial self-adhesive cements.Materials and methods: Four cements (Embrace WetBond, MaxCem Elite, Bifix SE, and RelyX U200) were mixed, combined with hydroxyapatite, dispensed into molds, and distributed into three groups, according to polymerization protocols: IP (photoactivation for 40 s); DP (delayed photoactivation, 10 min self-curing plus 40 s light-activated); and CA (chemical activation, no light exposure). Infrared (IR) spectra were obtained and monomer conversion (%) was calculated by comparing the aliphatic-to-aromatic IR absorption peak ratio before and after polymerization (n=10). The free radical entrapment values of the resin cements were characterized using Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR) and the concentration of spins (number of spins/mass) calculated (n=3). Values were compared using two-way ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc test (alpha=5%). X-ray diffraction (XRD) characterized the crystallinity of hydroxyapatite as a function of the chemical interactions with the resin cements.Results: The tested parameters varied as a function of resin cement and polymerization protocol. Embrace WetBond and RelyX U200 demonstrated dependence on photoactivation (immediate or delayed), whereas MaxCem Elite exhibited dependence on the chemical activation mode. Bifix SE presented the best balance based on the parameters analyzed, irrespective of the activation protocol.Conclusions: Choice of polymerization protocol affects the degree of conversion, free radical entrapment, and the chemical interaction between hydroxyapatite and self-adhesive resin cement mixtures. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Universidade Anhanguera de São Paulo (UNIAN), Sch Dent, Biomat Res Grp, Sao Paulo, SP, BrazilUniv Estadual Paulista, UNESP, POSMAT Programa Posgrad Ciencia &Tecnol Mat, DF FC, Bauru, SP, BrazilUniv Estadual Paulista, UNESP, POSMAT Programa Posgrad Ciencia &Tecnol Mat, Departamento de Física, DF FC, Bauru, SP, BrazilCNPq: 479744/2010-6CNPq: 163102/2011-2Elsevier B.V.Universidade Anhanguera de São Paulo (UNIAN)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)D'Alpinoa, Paulo Henrique PerlattiSilva, Marilia SantosVismara, Marcus Vinicius Goncalves[UNESP]Di Hipolito, ViniciusMiranda Gonzalez, Alejandra HortenciaGraeff, Carlos Frederico de Oliveira [UNESP]2015-10-21T21:04:34Z2015-10-21T21:04:34Z2015-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article83-92http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751616115000624Journal Of The Mechanical Behavior Of Biomedical Materials, v. 46, p. 83-92, 2015.1751-6161http://hdl.handle.net/11449/12942710.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.02.019WOS:0003537521000090000-0003-0162-8273Web of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal Of The Mechanical Behavior Of Biomedical Materials3.2390,958info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-04-25T17:39:51Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/129427Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T17:33:44.425911Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The effect of polymerization mode on monomer conversion, free radical entrapment, and interaction with hydroxyapatite of commercial self-adhesive cements |
title |
The effect of polymerization mode on monomer conversion, free radical entrapment, and interaction with hydroxyapatite of commercial self-adhesive cements |
spellingShingle |
The effect of polymerization mode on monomer conversion, free radical entrapment, and interaction with hydroxyapatite of commercial self-adhesive cements The effect of polymerization mode on monomer conversion, free radical entrapment, and interaction with hydroxyapatite of commercial self-adhesive cements D'Alpinoa, Paulo Henrique Perlatti Self-adhesive resin cement Hydroxyapatite Chemical interaction FT-IR EPR X-ray diffraction D'Alpinoa, Paulo Henrique Perlatti Self-adhesive resin cement Hydroxyapatite Chemical interaction FT-IR EPR X-ray diffraction |
title_short |
The effect of polymerization mode on monomer conversion, free radical entrapment, and interaction with hydroxyapatite of commercial self-adhesive cements |
title_full |
The effect of polymerization mode on monomer conversion, free radical entrapment, and interaction with hydroxyapatite of commercial self-adhesive cements |
title_fullStr |
The effect of polymerization mode on monomer conversion, free radical entrapment, and interaction with hydroxyapatite of commercial self-adhesive cements The effect of polymerization mode on monomer conversion, free radical entrapment, and interaction with hydroxyapatite of commercial self-adhesive cements |
title_full_unstemmed |
The effect of polymerization mode on monomer conversion, free radical entrapment, and interaction with hydroxyapatite of commercial self-adhesive cements The effect of polymerization mode on monomer conversion, free radical entrapment, and interaction with hydroxyapatite of commercial self-adhesive cements |
title_sort |
The effect of polymerization mode on monomer conversion, free radical entrapment, and interaction with hydroxyapatite of commercial self-adhesive cements |
author |
D'Alpinoa, Paulo Henrique Perlatti |
author_facet |
D'Alpinoa, Paulo Henrique Perlatti D'Alpinoa, Paulo Henrique Perlatti Silva, Marilia Santos Vismara, Marcus Vinicius Goncalves[UNESP] Di Hipolito, Vinicius Miranda Gonzalez, Alejandra Hortencia Graeff, Carlos Frederico de Oliveira [UNESP] Silva, Marilia Santos Vismara, Marcus Vinicius Goncalves[UNESP] Di Hipolito, Vinicius Miranda Gonzalez, Alejandra Hortencia Graeff, Carlos Frederico de Oliveira [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Silva, Marilia Santos Vismara, Marcus Vinicius Goncalves[UNESP] Di Hipolito, Vinicius Miranda Gonzalez, Alejandra Hortencia Graeff, Carlos Frederico de Oliveira [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Anhanguera de São Paulo (UNIAN) Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
D'Alpinoa, Paulo Henrique Perlatti Silva, Marilia Santos Vismara, Marcus Vinicius Goncalves[UNESP] Di Hipolito, Vinicius Miranda Gonzalez, Alejandra Hortencia Graeff, Carlos Frederico de Oliveira [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Self-adhesive resin cement Hydroxyapatite Chemical interaction FT-IR EPR X-ray diffraction |
topic |
Self-adhesive resin cement Hydroxyapatite Chemical interaction FT-IR EPR X-ray diffraction |
description |
Objectives: This study evaluated the degree of conversion, the free radical entrapment, and the chemical interaction of self-adhesive resin cements mixed with pure hydroxyapatite, as a function of the polymerization activation mode among a variety of commercial self-adhesive cements.Materials and methods: Four cements (Embrace WetBond, MaxCem Elite, Bifix SE, and RelyX U200) were mixed, combined with hydroxyapatite, dispensed into molds, and distributed into three groups, according to polymerization protocols: IP (photoactivation for 40 s); DP (delayed photoactivation, 10 min self-curing plus 40 s light-activated); and CA (chemical activation, no light exposure). Infrared (IR) spectra were obtained and monomer conversion (%) was calculated by comparing the aliphatic-to-aromatic IR absorption peak ratio before and after polymerization (n=10). The free radical entrapment values of the resin cements were characterized using Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR) and the concentration of spins (number of spins/mass) calculated (n=3). Values were compared using two-way ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc test (alpha=5%). X-ray diffraction (XRD) characterized the crystallinity of hydroxyapatite as a function of the chemical interactions with the resin cements.Results: The tested parameters varied as a function of resin cement and polymerization protocol. Embrace WetBond and RelyX U200 demonstrated dependence on photoactivation (immediate or delayed), whereas MaxCem Elite exhibited dependence on the chemical activation mode. Bifix SE presented the best balance based on the parameters analyzed, irrespective of the activation protocol.Conclusions: Choice of polymerization protocol affects the degree of conversion, free radical entrapment, and the chemical interaction between hydroxyapatite and self-adhesive resin cement mixtures. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-10-21T21:04:34Z 2015-10-21T21:04:34Z 2015-06-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751616115000624 Journal Of The Mechanical Behavior Of Biomedical Materials, v. 46, p. 83-92, 2015. 1751-6161 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/129427 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.02.019 WOS:000353752100009 0000-0003-0162-8273 |
url |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751616115000624 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/129427 |
identifier_str_mv |
Journal Of The Mechanical Behavior Of Biomedical Materials, v. 46, p. 83-92, 2015. 1751-6161 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.02.019 WOS:000353752100009 0000-0003-0162-8273 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal Of The Mechanical Behavior Of Biomedical Materials 3.239 0,958 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
83-92 |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier B.V. |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier B.V. |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Web of Science reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1822230579970572288 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.02.019 |