The effect of polymerization mode on monomer conversion, free radical entrapment, and interaction with hydroxyapatite of commercial self-adhesive cements

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: D'Alpinoa, Paulo Henrique Perlatti
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Silva, Marilia Santos, Vismara, Marcus Vinicius Goncalves[UNESP], Di Hipolito, Vinicius, Miranda Gonzalez, Alejandra Hortencia, Graeff, Carlos Frederico de Oliveira [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.02.019
Texto Completo: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751616115000624
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/129427
Resumo: Objectives: This study evaluated the degree of conversion, the free radical entrapment, and the chemical interaction of self-adhesive resin cements mixed with pure hydroxyapatite, as a function of the polymerization activation mode among a variety of commercial self-adhesive cements.Materials and methods: Four cements (Embrace WetBond, MaxCem Elite, Bifix SE, and RelyX U200) were mixed, combined with hydroxyapatite, dispensed into molds, and distributed into three groups, according to polymerization protocols: IP (photoactivation for 40 s); DP (delayed photoactivation, 10 min self-curing plus 40 s light-activated); and CA (chemical activation, no light exposure). Infrared (IR) spectra were obtained and monomer conversion (%) was calculated by comparing the aliphatic-to-aromatic IR absorption peak ratio before and after polymerization (n=10). The free radical entrapment values of the resin cements were characterized using Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR) and the concentration of spins (number of spins/mass) calculated (n=3). Values were compared using two-way ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc test (alpha=5%). X-ray diffraction (XRD) characterized the crystallinity of hydroxyapatite as a function of the chemical interactions with the resin cements.Results: The tested parameters varied as a function of resin cement and polymerization protocol. Embrace WetBond and RelyX U200 demonstrated dependence on photoactivation (immediate or delayed), whereas MaxCem Elite exhibited dependence on the chemical activation mode. Bifix SE presented the best balance based on the parameters analyzed, irrespective of the activation protocol.Conclusions: Choice of polymerization protocol affects the degree of conversion, free radical entrapment, and the chemical interaction between hydroxyapatite and self-adhesive resin cement mixtures. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
id UNSP_79d7bee7555b284f56bdec5fd6197309
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/129427
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling The effect of polymerization mode on monomer conversion, free radical entrapment, and interaction with hydroxyapatite of commercial self-adhesive cementsSelf-adhesive resin cementHydroxyapatiteChemical interactionFT-IREPRX-ray diffractionObjectives: This study evaluated the degree of conversion, the free radical entrapment, and the chemical interaction of self-adhesive resin cements mixed with pure hydroxyapatite, as a function of the polymerization activation mode among a variety of commercial self-adhesive cements.Materials and methods: Four cements (Embrace WetBond, MaxCem Elite, Bifix SE, and RelyX U200) were mixed, combined with hydroxyapatite, dispensed into molds, and distributed into three groups, according to polymerization protocols: IP (photoactivation for 40 s); DP (delayed photoactivation, 10 min self-curing plus 40 s light-activated); and CA (chemical activation, no light exposure). Infrared (IR) spectra were obtained and monomer conversion (%) was calculated by comparing the aliphatic-to-aromatic IR absorption peak ratio before and after polymerization (n=10). The free radical entrapment values of the resin cements were characterized using Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR) and the concentration of spins (number of spins/mass) calculated (n=3). Values were compared using two-way ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc test (alpha=5%). X-ray diffraction (XRD) characterized the crystallinity of hydroxyapatite as a function of the chemical interactions with the resin cements.Results: The tested parameters varied as a function of resin cement and polymerization protocol. Embrace WetBond and RelyX U200 demonstrated dependence on photoactivation (immediate or delayed), whereas MaxCem Elite exhibited dependence on the chemical activation mode. Bifix SE presented the best balance based on the parameters analyzed, irrespective of the activation protocol.Conclusions: Choice of polymerization protocol affects the degree of conversion, free radical entrapment, and the chemical interaction between hydroxyapatite and self-adhesive resin cement mixtures. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Universidade Anhanguera de São Paulo (UNIAN), Sch Dent, Biomat Res Grp, Sao Paulo, SP, BrazilUniv Estadual Paulista, UNESP, POSMAT Programa Posgrad Ciencia &Tecnol Mat, DF FC, Bauru, SP, BrazilUniv Estadual Paulista, UNESP, POSMAT Programa Posgrad Ciencia &Tecnol Mat, Departamento de Física, DF FC, Bauru, SP, BrazilCNPq: 479744/2010-6CNPq: 163102/2011-2Elsevier B.V.Universidade Anhanguera de São Paulo (UNIAN)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)D'Alpinoa, Paulo Henrique PerlattiSilva, Marilia SantosVismara, Marcus Vinicius Goncalves[UNESP]Di Hipolito, ViniciusMiranda Gonzalez, Alejandra HortenciaGraeff, Carlos Frederico de Oliveira [UNESP]2015-10-21T21:04:34Z2015-10-21T21:04:34Z2015-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article83-92http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751616115000624Journal Of The Mechanical Behavior Of Biomedical Materials, v. 46, p. 83-92, 2015.1751-6161http://hdl.handle.net/11449/12942710.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.02.019WOS:0003537521000090000-0003-0162-8273Web of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal Of The Mechanical Behavior Of Biomedical Materials3.2390,958info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-04-25T17:39:51Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/129427Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T17:33:44.425911Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The effect of polymerization mode on monomer conversion, free radical entrapment, and interaction with hydroxyapatite of commercial self-adhesive cements
title The effect of polymerization mode on monomer conversion, free radical entrapment, and interaction with hydroxyapatite of commercial self-adhesive cements
spellingShingle The effect of polymerization mode on monomer conversion, free radical entrapment, and interaction with hydroxyapatite of commercial self-adhesive cements
The effect of polymerization mode on monomer conversion, free radical entrapment, and interaction with hydroxyapatite of commercial self-adhesive cements
D'Alpinoa, Paulo Henrique Perlatti
Self-adhesive resin cement
Hydroxyapatite
Chemical interaction
FT-IR
EPR
X-ray diffraction
D'Alpinoa, Paulo Henrique Perlatti
Self-adhesive resin cement
Hydroxyapatite
Chemical interaction
FT-IR
EPR
X-ray diffraction
title_short The effect of polymerization mode on monomer conversion, free radical entrapment, and interaction with hydroxyapatite of commercial self-adhesive cements
title_full The effect of polymerization mode on monomer conversion, free radical entrapment, and interaction with hydroxyapatite of commercial self-adhesive cements
title_fullStr The effect of polymerization mode on monomer conversion, free radical entrapment, and interaction with hydroxyapatite of commercial self-adhesive cements
The effect of polymerization mode on monomer conversion, free radical entrapment, and interaction with hydroxyapatite of commercial self-adhesive cements
title_full_unstemmed The effect of polymerization mode on monomer conversion, free radical entrapment, and interaction with hydroxyapatite of commercial self-adhesive cements
The effect of polymerization mode on monomer conversion, free radical entrapment, and interaction with hydroxyapatite of commercial self-adhesive cements
title_sort The effect of polymerization mode on monomer conversion, free radical entrapment, and interaction with hydroxyapatite of commercial self-adhesive cements
author D'Alpinoa, Paulo Henrique Perlatti
author_facet D'Alpinoa, Paulo Henrique Perlatti
D'Alpinoa, Paulo Henrique Perlatti
Silva, Marilia Santos
Vismara, Marcus Vinicius Goncalves[UNESP]
Di Hipolito, Vinicius
Miranda Gonzalez, Alejandra Hortencia
Graeff, Carlos Frederico de Oliveira [UNESP]
Silva, Marilia Santos
Vismara, Marcus Vinicius Goncalves[UNESP]
Di Hipolito, Vinicius
Miranda Gonzalez, Alejandra Hortencia
Graeff, Carlos Frederico de Oliveira [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Silva, Marilia Santos
Vismara, Marcus Vinicius Goncalves[UNESP]
Di Hipolito, Vinicius
Miranda Gonzalez, Alejandra Hortencia
Graeff, Carlos Frederico de Oliveira [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Anhanguera de São Paulo (UNIAN)
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv D'Alpinoa, Paulo Henrique Perlatti
Silva, Marilia Santos
Vismara, Marcus Vinicius Goncalves[UNESP]
Di Hipolito, Vinicius
Miranda Gonzalez, Alejandra Hortencia
Graeff, Carlos Frederico de Oliveira [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Self-adhesive resin cement
Hydroxyapatite
Chemical interaction
FT-IR
EPR
X-ray diffraction
topic Self-adhesive resin cement
Hydroxyapatite
Chemical interaction
FT-IR
EPR
X-ray diffraction
description Objectives: This study evaluated the degree of conversion, the free radical entrapment, and the chemical interaction of self-adhesive resin cements mixed with pure hydroxyapatite, as a function of the polymerization activation mode among a variety of commercial self-adhesive cements.Materials and methods: Four cements (Embrace WetBond, MaxCem Elite, Bifix SE, and RelyX U200) were mixed, combined with hydroxyapatite, dispensed into molds, and distributed into three groups, according to polymerization protocols: IP (photoactivation for 40 s); DP (delayed photoactivation, 10 min self-curing plus 40 s light-activated); and CA (chemical activation, no light exposure). Infrared (IR) spectra were obtained and monomer conversion (%) was calculated by comparing the aliphatic-to-aromatic IR absorption peak ratio before and after polymerization (n=10). The free radical entrapment values of the resin cements were characterized using Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR) and the concentration of spins (number of spins/mass) calculated (n=3). Values were compared using two-way ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc test (alpha=5%). X-ray diffraction (XRD) characterized the crystallinity of hydroxyapatite as a function of the chemical interactions with the resin cements.Results: The tested parameters varied as a function of resin cement and polymerization protocol. Embrace WetBond and RelyX U200 demonstrated dependence on photoactivation (immediate or delayed), whereas MaxCem Elite exhibited dependence on the chemical activation mode. Bifix SE presented the best balance based on the parameters analyzed, irrespective of the activation protocol.Conclusions: Choice of polymerization protocol affects the degree of conversion, free radical entrapment, and the chemical interaction between hydroxyapatite and self-adhesive resin cement mixtures. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-10-21T21:04:34Z
2015-10-21T21:04:34Z
2015-06-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751616115000624
Journal Of The Mechanical Behavior Of Biomedical Materials, v. 46, p. 83-92, 2015.
1751-6161
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/129427
10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.02.019
WOS:000353752100009
0000-0003-0162-8273
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751616115000624
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/129427
identifier_str_mv Journal Of The Mechanical Behavior Of Biomedical Materials, v. 46, p. 83-92, 2015.
1751-6161
10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.02.019
WOS:000353752100009
0000-0003-0162-8273
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Journal Of The Mechanical Behavior Of Biomedical Materials
3.239
0,958
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 83-92
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier B.V.
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier B.V.
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Web of Science
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1822230579970572288
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.02.019