The α and β diversities in the fish assemblages of the promiss̃ao reservoir (SP-Brazil): Scales, complexities and ecotone heterogeneity

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Do Amaral, B. D. [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2001
Outros Autores: Petrere M., Jr [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: pol
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/11449/224210
Resumo: This paper characterizes the fish assemblage and its interaction with different ecotones within the reservoir. The transformation of a river basin into a cascade of reservoirs produces new ecotones which interact differentially with the spatial\temporal distribution of fish species, their diversity, trophic structures, etc. So the variations of the fish fauna are described to understand better the practices of conservation and management of these reservoirs. The concepts of α and β diversities are related to the concepts of scale, complexity and heterogeneity. Scale comprises the longitudinal, horizontal and vertical variation which are represented by the complexity and heterogeneity of the fish assemblage in the reservoir. Complexity exhibits the variations in ecological data interpretation according to environmental variability or type of data. Heterogeneity describes the variations in species assemblages related to different ecotones. The sampled ecotones were: forest, agricultural land, beaches and mouths of tributaries, each with three replications. Cluster analysis of the environmental factors revealed two distinct ecotonal groups: i) forest, agricultural land and beach; and ii) the tributary mouths. The ANOVAS indicated two possible patterns of diversity: 1 - heterogeneity within the fish assemblage represented by number of species, and differences between the ecotones; 2 - homogeneity within the fish assemblage described by the biomass of different species. The β diversities were congruent with environmental factors giving evidence of the horizontal scale within the reservoir. The forest ecotones revealed higher heterogeneity in the coexistence of fish species than did the with other ecotones. This fact is explained by the littoral areas close to the forest fragments with more refuge, increasing the environmental structural diversity. So it reinforces the importance of the forest as refuge enhancing fish dispersal. The fish assemblages related to agricultural land and beaches were more similar. Agricultural land and pasture ware the dominant ecotone on the reservoir margins.
id UNSP_7aeb5864cc75f5c2676851170a7a09ed
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/224210
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling The α and β diversities in the fish assemblages of the promiss̃ao reservoir (SP-Brazil): Scales, complexities and ecotone heterogeneityAssemblageDiversityEcotones and heterogeneityFishReservoirThis paper characterizes the fish assemblage and its interaction with different ecotones within the reservoir. The transformation of a river basin into a cascade of reservoirs produces new ecotones which interact differentially with the spatial\temporal distribution of fish species, their diversity, trophic structures, etc. So the variations of the fish fauna are described to understand better the practices of conservation and management of these reservoirs. The concepts of α and β diversities are related to the concepts of scale, complexity and heterogeneity. Scale comprises the longitudinal, horizontal and vertical variation which are represented by the complexity and heterogeneity of the fish assemblage in the reservoir. Complexity exhibits the variations in ecological data interpretation according to environmental variability or type of data. Heterogeneity describes the variations in species assemblages related to different ecotones. The sampled ecotones were: forest, agricultural land, beaches and mouths of tributaries, each with three replications. Cluster analysis of the environmental factors revealed two distinct ecotonal groups: i) forest, agricultural land and beach; and ii) the tributary mouths. The ANOVAS indicated two possible patterns of diversity: 1 - heterogeneity within the fish assemblage represented by number of species, and differences between the ecotones; 2 - homogeneity within the fish assemblage described by the biomass of different species. The β diversities were congruent with environmental factors giving evidence of the horizontal scale within the reservoir. The forest ecotones revealed higher heterogeneity in the coexistence of fish species than did the with other ecotones. This fact is explained by the littoral areas close to the forest fragments with more refuge, increasing the environmental structural diversity. So it reinforces the importance of the forest as refuge enhancing fish dispersal. The fish assemblages related to agricultural land and beaches were more similar. Agricultural land and pasture ware the dominant ecotone on the reservoir margins.Department of Ecology Institute of Bioscience UNESP-State University of Sao Paulo, Rio Claro SP 13-506Department of Ecology Institute of Bioscience UNESP-State University of Sao Paulo, Rio Claro SP 13-506Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Do Amaral, B. D. [UNESP]Petrere M., Jr [UNESP]2022-04-28T19:55:19Z2022-04-28T19:55:19Z2001-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article185-193Ecohydrology and Hydrobiology, v. 1, n. 1-2, p. 185-193, 2001.1642-3593http://hdl.handle.net/11449/2242102-s2.0-0035166599Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPpolEcohydrology and Hydrobiologyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-04-28T19:55:19Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/224210Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T22:04:36.955380Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The α and β diversities in the fish assemblages of the promiss̃ao reservoir (SP-Brazil): Scales, complexities and ecotone heterogeneity
title The α and β diversities in the fish assemblages of the promiss̃ao reservoir (SP-Brazil): Scales, complexities and ecotone heterogeneity
spellingShingle The α and β diversities in the fish assemblages of the promiss̃ao reservoir (SP-Brazil): Scales, complexities and ecotone heterogeneity
Do Amaral, B. D. [UNESP]
Assemblage
Diversity
Ecotones and heterogeneity
Fish
Reservoir
title_short The α and β diversities in the fish assemblages of the promiss̃ao reservoir (SP-Brazil): Scales, complexities and ecotone heterogeneity
title_full The α and β diversities in the fish assemblages of the promiss̃ao reservoir (SP-Brazil): Scales, complexities and ecotone heterogeneity
title_fullStr The α and β diversities in the fish assemblages of the promiss̃ao reservoir (SP-Brazil): Scales, complexities and ecotone heterogeneity
title_full_unstemmed The α and β diversities in the fish assemblages of the promiss̃ao reservoir (SP-Brazil): Scales, complexities and ecotone heterogeneity
title_sort The α and β diversities in the fish assemblages of the promiss̃ao reservoir (SP-Brazil): Scales, complexities and ecotone heterogeneity
author Do Amaral, B. D. [UNESP]
author_facet Do Amaral, B. D. [UNESP]
Petrere M., Jr [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Petrere M., Jr [UNESP]
author2_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Do Amaral, B. D. [UNESP]
Petrere M., Jr [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Assemblage
Diversity
Ecotones and heterogeneity
Fish
Reservoir
topic Assemblage
Diversity
Ecotones and heterogeneity
Fish
Reservoir
description This paper characterizes the fish assemblage and its interaction with different ecotones within the reservoir. The transformation of a river basin into a cascade of reservoirs produces new ecotones which interact differentially with the spatial\temporal distribution of fish species, their diversity, trophic structures, etc. So the variations of the fish fauna are described to understand better the practices of conservation and management of these reservoirs. The concepts of α and β diversities are related to the concepts of scale, complexity and heterogeneity. Scale comprises the longitudinal, horizontal and vertical variation which are represented by the complexity and heterogeneity of the fish assemblage in the reservoir. Complexity exhibits the variations in ecological data interpretation according to environmental variability or type of data. Heterogeneity describes the variations in species assemblages related to different ecotones. The sampled ecotones were: forest, agricultural land, beaches and mouths of tributaries, each with three replications. Cluster analysis of the environmental factors revealed two distinct ecotonal groups: i) forest, agricultural land and beach; and ii) the tributary mouths. The ANOVAS indicated two possible patterns of diversity: 1 - heterogeneity within the fish assemblage represented by number of species, and differences between the ecotones; 2 - homogeneity within the fish assemblage described by the biomass of different species. The β diversities were congruent with environmental factors giving evidence of the horizontal scale within the reservoir. The forest ecotones revealed higher heterogeneity in the coexistence of fish species than did the with other ecotones. This fact is explained by the littoral areas close to the forest fragments with more refuge, increasing the environmental structural diversity. So it reinforces the importance of the forest as refuge enhancing fish dispersal. The fish assemblages related to agricultural land and beaches were more similar. Agricultural land and pasture ware the dominant ecotone on the reservoir margins.
publishDate 2001
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2001-01-01
2022-04-28T19:55:19Z
2022-04-28T19:55:19Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv Ecohydrology and Hydrobiology, v. 1, n. 1-2, p. 185-193, 2001.
1642-3593
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/224210
2-s2.0-0035166599
identifier_str_mv Ecohydrology and Hydrobiology, v. 1, n. 1-2, p. 185-193, 2001.
1642-3593
2-s2.0-0035166599
url http://hdl.handle.net/11449/224210
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv pol
language pol
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Ecohydrology and Hydrobiology
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 185-193
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808129389470154752