Influence of Surfactants and Fluoride against Enamel Erosion

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Zanatta, Rayssa Ferreira
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Ávila, Daniele Mara Da Silva, Miyamoto, Karen Mayumi, Torres, Carlos Rocha Gomes, Borges, Alessandra Bühler
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000488207
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/177147
Resumo: This study investigated the effect of surfactants associated with sodium fluoride (NaF) on enamel erosion prevention, using an erosion-remineralization in vitro model. Sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS), polysorbate 20 (P20), and cocoamidopropyl betaine (CAPB) were tested, at concentrations of 1.0 and 1.5%, and associated or not with NaF (275 ppm). The control groups were distilled water and the NaF solution. Bovine enamel samples (n = 12) were prepared and submitted to a 5-day cycling model: acid challenge (0.3% citric acid, pH 2.6, 4×/day), human saliva (2 h, 4×/day), and the treatment solutions (2 min, 2×/day). The protective potential of the agents against initial erosion was assessed by microhardness and the surface loss by profilometry. Enamel surface wettability was determined by goniometry, protein adsorption was measured by spectroscopy (FTIR), and the KOH-soluble fluoride was quantified. Goniometry showed that SLS and CAPB increased enamel wettability. No differences were found among the surfactants regarding protein adsorption. Microhardness showed that SLS reduced NaF protection. P20 (1 and 1.5%) and CAPB 1.5% presented a protective effect, but lower than the NaF solution. Profilometry showed that CAPB protected enamel, but no agent associated with NaF promoted a higher protection than the NaF solution alone. KOH-soluble fluoride analysis showed that all surfactants reduced the fluoride adsorption on the enamel surface. Therefore, the surfactants tested (except for P20) changed the enamel surface energy. The SLS decreased the protective potential of NaF on initial erosion, but no tested agent interfered with the protective effect of NaF on enamel erosive wear.
id UNSP_7c73a5c18b6ad57fc999e3d8a0119e1a
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/177147
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Influence of Surfactants and Fluoride against Enamel ErosionFluoridepH cyclingProfilometrySalivary pellicleSurfactantThis study investigated the effect of surfactants associated with sodium fluoride (NaF) on enamel erosion prevention, using an erosion-remineralization in vitro model. Sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS), polysorbate 20 (P20), and cocoamidopropyl betaine (CAPB) were tested, at concentrations of 1.0 and 1.5%, and associated or not with NaF (275 ppm). The control groups were distilled water and the NaF solution. Bovine enamel samples (n = 12) were prepared and submitted to a 5-day cycling model: acid challenge (0.3% citric acid, pH 2.6, 4×/day), human saliva (2 h, 4×/day), and the treatment solutions (2 min, 2×/day). The protective potential of the agents against initial erosion was assessed by microhardness and the surface loss by profilometry. Enamel surface wettability was determined by goniometry, protein adsorption was measured by spectroscopy (FTIR), and the KOH-soluble fluoride was quantified. Goniometry showed that SLS and CAPB increased enamel wettability. No differences were found among the surfactants regarding protein adsorption. Microhardness showed that SLS reduced NaF protection. P20 (1 and 1.5%) and CAPB 1.5% presented a protective effect, but lower than the NaF solution. Profilometry showed that CAPB protected enamel, but no agent associated with NaF promoted a higher protection than the NaF solution alone. KOH-soluble fluoride analysis showed that all surfactants reduced the fluoride adsorption on the enamel surface. Therefore, the surfactants tested (except for P20) changed the enamel surface energy. The SLS decreased the protective potential of NaF on initial erosion, but no tested agent interfered with the protective effect of NaF on enamel erosive wear.aDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Institute of Science and Technology, São Paulo State University – UNESP, São José dos Campos, BrazilbDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Dental School, University of Taubaté, Taubaté, BrazilUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Zanatta, Rayssa FerreiraÁvila, Daniele Mara Da SilvaMiyamoto, Karen MayumiTorres, Carlos Rocha GomesBorges, Alessandra Bühler2018-12-11T17:24:12Z2018-12-11T17:24:12Z2018-06-06info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article1-9application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000488207Caries Research, p. 1-9.1421-976X0008-6568http://hdl.handle.net/11449/17714710.1159/0004882072-s2.0-850481861712-s2.0-85048186171.pdfScopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengCaries Research1,108info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-12-02T06:15:14Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/177147Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462023-12-02T06:15:14Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Influence of Surfactants and Fluoride against Enamel Erosion
title Influence of Surfactants and Fluoride against Enamel Erosion
spellingShingle Influence of Surfactants and Fluoride against Enamel Erosion
Zanatta, Rayssa Ferreira
Fluoride
pH cycling
Profilometry
Salivary pellicle
Surfactant
title_short Influence of Surfactants and Fluoride against Enamel Erosion
title_full Influence of Surfactants and Fluoride against Enamel Erosion
title_fullStr Influence of Surfactants and Fluoride against Enamel Erosion
title_full_unstemmed Influence of Surfactants and Fluoride against Enamel Erosion
title_sort Influence of Surfactants and Fluoride against Enamel Erosion
author Zanatta, Rayssa Ferreira
author_facet Zanatta, Rayssa Ferreira
Ávila, Daniele Mara Da Silva
Miyamoto, Karen Mayumi
Torres, Carlos Rocha Gomes
Borges, Alessandra Bühler
author_role author
author2 Ávila, Daniele Mara Da Silva
Miyamoto, Karen Mayumi
Torres, Carlos Rocha Gomes
Borges, Alessandra Bühler
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Zanatta, Rayssa Ferreira
Ávila, Daniele Mara Da Silva
Miyamoto, Karen Mayumi
Torres, Carlos Rocha Gomes
Borges, Alessandra Bühler
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Fluoride
pH cycling
Profilometry
Salivary pellicle
Surfactant
topic Fluoride
pH cycling
Profilometry
Salivary pellicle
Surfactant
description This study investigated the effect of surfactants associated with sodium fluoride (NaF) on enamel erosion prevention, using an erosion-remineralization in vitro model. Sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS), polysorbate 20 (P20), and cocoamidopropyl betaine (CAPB) were tested, at concentrations of 1.0 and 1.5%, and associated or not with NaF (275 ppm). The control groups were distilled water and the NaF solution. Bovine enamel samples (n = 12) were prepared and submitted to a 5-day cycling model: acid challenge (0.3% citric acid, pH 2.6, 4×/day), human saliva (2 h, 4×/day), and the treatment solutions (2 min, 2×/day). The protective potential of the agents against initial erosion was assessed by microhardness and the surface loss by profilometry. Enamel surface wettability was determined by goniometry, protein adsorption was measured by spectroscopy (FTIR), and the KOH-soluble fluoride was quantified. Goniometry showed that SLS and CAPB increased enamel wettability. No differences were found among the surfactants regarding protein adsorption. Microhardness showed that SLS reduced NaF protection. P20 (1 and 1.5%) and CAPB 1.5% presented a protective effect, but lower than the NaF solution. Profilometry showed that CAPB protected enamel, but no agent associated with NaF promoted a higher protection than the NaF solution alone. KOH-soluble fluoride analysis showed that all surfactants reduced the fluoride adsorption on the enamel surface. Therefore, the surfactants tested (except for P20) changed the enamel surface energy. The SLS decreased the protective potential of NaF on initial erosion, but no tested agent interfered with the protective effect of NaF on enamel erosive wear.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-12-11T17:24:12Z
2018-12-11T17:24:12Z
2018-06-06
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000488207
Caries Research, p. 1-9.
1421-976X
0008-6568
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/177147
10.1159/000488207
2-s2.0-85048186171
2-s2.0-85048186171.pdf
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000488207
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/177147
identifier_str_mv Caries Research, p. 1-9.
1421-976X
0008-6568
10.1159/000488207
2-s2.0-85048186171
2-s2.0-85048186171.pdf
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Caries Research
1,108
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 1-9
application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799965146642120704