Effects of inspired oxygen fractions in rabbits anesthetized with isoflurane or sevoflurane, maintained on spontaneous ventilation
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4162-10472 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/184550 |
Resumo: | It is important to identify the best inspired fraction of oxygen in a variety of situations, including sevoflurane or isoflurane anesthesia, in spontaneously breathing rabbits. For this, 64 rabbits were assigned to eight groups: GI100 (FiO(2) = 1,0 + isoflurane), GS100 (FiO(2) = 1,0 + sevoflurane), GI80 (FiO(2) = 0,8 + isoflurane), GS80 (FiO(2) = 0,8 + sevoflurane), GI60 (FiO(2) = 0,6 + isoflurane), GS60 (FiO(2) = 0,6 + sevoflurane), GI21 (FiO(2) = 0,21 + isoflurane), GS21 (FiO(2) = 0,21 + sevoflurane). The induction was performed with (2.5MAC) of the anesthetic. The vaporizer was setted at 1.5 MAC and FiO(2) as attributed for each group. After the induction, the concentration was changed to 1 MAC. Measurements of parameters were performed 30 minutes after induction (TO), and then at 15 minute intervals (from T15 to T60). The arterial partial pressures of oxygen (PaO2), alveolar oxygen partial pressure (PAO2) and alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient [P(A-a)O-2] were higher with the use of high FiO(2). The GI80 showed higher levels of PaO2 FiO(2) ratio and respiratory index (RI). In conclusion, the FiO(2) of 0.21 is not indicated, because it causes hypoxemia. The isoflurane determines better ventilation when compared to sevoflurane, but isoflurane associated with 80% of oxygen promotes intrapulmonary shunt increase. |
id |
UNSP_7d11713701e33b9515c51b08ed0a51c1 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/184550 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Effects of inspired oxygen fractions in rabbits anesthetized with isoflurane or sevoflurane, maintained on spontaneous ventilationrabbitinhalatory anesthesiaventilationIt is important to identify the best inspired fraction of oxygen in a variety of situations, including sevoflurane or isoflurane anesthesia, in spontaneously breathing rabbits. For this, 64 rabbits were assigned to eight groups: GI100 (FiO(2) = 1,0 + isoflurane), GS100 (FiO(2) = 1,0 + sevoflurane), GI80 (FiO(2) = 0,8 + isoflurane), GS80 (FiO(2) = 0,8 + sevoflurane), GI60 (FiO(2) = 0,6 + isoflurane), GS60 (FiO(2) = 0,6 + sevoflurane), GI21 (FiO(2) = 0,21 + isoflurane), GS21 (FiO(2) = 0,21 + sevoflurane). The induction was performed with (2.5MAC) of the anesthetic. The vaporizer was setted at 1.5 MAC and FiO(2) as attributed for each group. After the induction, the concentration was changed to 1 MAC. Measurements of parameters were performed 30 minutes after induction (TO), and then at 15 minute intervals (from T15 to T60). The arterial partial pressures of oxygen (PaO2), alveolar oxygen partial pressure (PAO2) and alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient [P(A-a)O-2] were higher with the use of high FiO(2). The GI80 showed higher levels of PaO2 FiO(2) ratio and respiratory index (RI). In conclusion, the FiO(2) of 0.21 is not indicated, because it causes hypoxemia. The isoflurane determines better ventilation when compared to sevoflurane, but isoflurane associated with 80% of oxygen promotes intrapulmonary shunt increase.Univ Estadual Paulista, Jaboticabal, SP, BrazilUniv Estadual Paulista, Jaboticabal, SP, BrazilArquivo Brasileiro Medicina Veterinaria ZootecniaUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Horr, M. [UNESP]Nunes, N. [UNESP]Biteli, E. G. F. [UNESP]Lopes, P. C. F. [UNESP]Gering, A. P. [UNESP]Moro, J. [UNESP]Rocha, F. D. L. [UNESP]2019-10-04T12:14:34Z2019-10-04T12:14:34Z2019-05-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article944-952application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4162-10472Arquivo Brasileiro De Medicina Veterinaria E Zootecnia. Minas Gerais: Arquivo Brasileiro Medicina Veterinaria Zootecnia, v. 71, n. 3, p. 944-952, 2019.0102-0935http://hdl.handle.net/11449/18455010.1590/1678-4162-10472S0102-09352019000300944WOS:000473319900029S0102-09352019000300944.pdfWeb of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengArquivo Brasileiro De Medicina Veterinaria E Zootecniainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-11-06T06:09:56Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/184550Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T17:01:36.598374Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Effects of inspired oxygen fractions in rabbits anesthetized with isoflurane or sevoflurane, maintained on spontaneous ventilation |
title |
Effects of inspired oxygen fractions in rabbits anesthetized with isoflurane or sevoflurane, maintained on spontaneous ventilation |
spellingShingle |
Effects of inspired oxygen fractions in rabbits anesthetized with isoflurane or sevoflurane, maintained on spontaneous ventilation Horr, M. [UNESP] rabbit inhalatory anesthesia ventilation |
title_short |
Effects of inspired oxygen fractions in rabbits anesthetized with isoflurane or sevoflurane, maintained on spontaneous ventilation |
title_full |
Effects of inspired oxygen fractions in rabbits anesthetized with isoflurane or sevoflurane, maintained on spontaneous ventilation |
title_fullStr |
Effects of inspired oxygen fractions in rabbits anesthetized with isoflurane or sevoflurane, maintained on spontaneous ventilation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Effects of inspired oxygen fractions in rabbits anesthetized with isoflurane or sevoflurane, maintained on spontaneous ventilation |
title_sort |
Effects of inspired oxygen fractions in rabbits anesthetized with isoflurane or sevoflurane, maintained on spontaneous ventilation |
author |
Horr, M. [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Horr, M. [UNESP] Nunes, N. [UNESP] Biteli, E. G. F. [UNESP] Lopes, P. C. F. [UNESP] Gering, A. P. [UNESP] Moro, J. [UNESP] Rocha, F. D. L. [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Nunes, N. [UNESP] Biteli, E. G. F. [UNESP] Lopes, P. C. F. [UNESP] Gering, A. P. [UNESP] Moro, J. [UNESP] Rocha, F. D. L. [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Horr, M. [UNESP] Nunes, N. [UNESP] Biteli, E. G. F. [UNESP] Lopes, P. C. F. [UNESP] Gering, A. P. [UNESP] Moro, J. [UNESP] Rocha, F. D. L. [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
rabbit inhalatory anesthesia ventilation |
topic |
rabbit inhalatory anesthesia ventilation |
description |
It is important to identify the best inspired fraction of oxygen in a variety of situations, including sevoflurane or isoflurane anesthesia, in spontaneously breathing rabbits. For this, 64 rabbits were assigned to eight groups: GI100 (FiO(2) = 1,0 + isoflurane), GS100 (FiO(2) = 1,0 + sevoflurane), GI80 (FiO(2) = 0,8 + isoflurane), GS80 (FiO(2) = 0,8 + sevoflurane), GI60 (FiO(2) = 0,6 + isoflurane), GS60 (FiO(2) = 0,6 + sevoflurane), GI21 (FiO(2) = 0,21 + isoflurane), GS21 (FiO(2) = 0,21 + sevoflurane). The induction was performed with (2.5MAC) of the anesthetic. The vaporizer was setted at 1.5 MAC and FiO(2) as attributed for each group. After the induction, the concentration was changed to 1 MAC. Measurements of parameters were performed 30 minutes after induction (TO), and then at 15 minute intervals (from T15 to T60). The arterial partial pressures of oxygen (PaO2), alveolar oxygen partial pressure (PAO2) and alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient [P(A-a)O-2] were higher with the use of high FiO(2). The GI80 showed higher levels of PaO2 FiO(2) ratio and respiratory index (RI). In conclusion, the FiO(2) of 0.21 is not indicated, because it causes hypoxemia. The isoflurane determines better ventilation when compared to sevoflurane, but isoflurane associated with 80% of oxygen promotes intrapulmonary shunt increase. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-10-04T12:14:34Z 2019-10-04T12:14:34Z 2019-05-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4162-10472 Arquivo Brasileiro De Medicina Veterinaria E Zootecnia. Minas Gerais: Arquivo Brasileiro Medicina Veterinaria Zootecnia, v. 71, n. 3, p. 944-952, 2019. 0102-0935 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/184550 10.1590/1678-4162-10472 S0102-09352019000300944 WOS:000473319900029 S0102-09352019000300944.pdf |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4162-10472 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/184550 |
identifier_str_mv |
Arquivo Brasileiro De Medicina Veterinaria E Zootecnia. Minas Gerais: Arquivo Brasileiro Medicina Veterinaria Zootecnia, v. 71, n. 3, p. 944-952, 2019. 0102-0935 10.1590/1678-4162-10472 S0102-09352019000300944 WOS:000473319900029 S0102-09352019000300944.pdf |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Arquivo Brasileiro De Medicina Veterinaria E Zootecnia |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
944-952 application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Arquivo Brasileiro Medicina Veterinaria Zootecnia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Arquivo Brasileiro Medicina Veterinaria Zootecnia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Web of Science reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808128740895490048 |