Predicting bioaccessibility of contaminants of emerging concern in marine sediments using chemical methods

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: dos Santos, Dayana M. [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Williams, Mike, Kookana, Rai, de Marchi, Mary Rosa R. [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11368-017-1905-z
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/170528
Resumo: Purpose: A comparison was made between three chemical methods to predict bioaccessibility of triclosan (TCS), bisphenol A (BPA), and 17α-ethynylestradiol (EE2) in marine sediments, involving an exchangeable (E) value, butanol extractions, and hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin (β-HPCD) extractions. Materials and methods: A 60-day batch experiment was undertaken where the aqueous phase was analyzed by GC-MS/MS. The bioaccessibility study based on the E value model involved monitoring stable isotopes exchanging with the bioaccessible phase, while this exchangeability was also estimated with sediment extractions with butanol and β-HPCD, respectively. Results and discussion: Based on the E value method, TCS was readily exchangeable for up to 7 days, while after this period become virtually non-exchangeable (not detected in aqueous phase). This trend was also evident for butanol and β-HPCD extractions, suggesting TCS was strongly complexed with the matrix. For BPA and EE2, the fraction considered exchangeable was higher after 14 days and the extraction efficiency was slightly higher for the butanol treatment. Conclusions: Chemical methods to predict bioaccessibility in marine sediments have demonstrated differences between selected contaminants, but agreement between methods. Triclosan shows the highest affinity with tested sediments, some exchangeability in the first days of interaction of E value experiment as well as observed for extraction methods. However, the highest capacity to be extracted from already-sorbed phase was observed for BPA, showed in both extraction methods, and confirming its mobility and bioaccessibility in sediments over the time.
id UNSP_7e41270dc0913845c769c0ac0a8bdc09
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/170528
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Predicting bioaccessibility of contaminants of emerging concern in marine sediments using chemical methodsEmerging contaminantIsotopic exchangeabilitySedimentSorption bioaccessiblePurpose: A comparison was made between three chemical methods to predict bioaccessibility of triclosan (TCS), bisphenol A (BPA), and 17α-ethynylestradiol (EE2) in marine sediments, involving an exchangeable (E) value, butanol extractions, and hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin (β-HPCD) extractions. Materials and methods: A 60-day batch experiment was undertaken where the aqueous phase was analyzed by GC-MS/MS. The bioaccessibility study based on the E value model involved monitoring stable isotopes exchanging with the bioaccessible phase, while this exchangeability was also estimated with sediment extractions with butanol and β-HPCD, respectively. Results and discussion: Based on the E value method, TCS was readily exchangeable for up to 7 days, while after this period become virtually non-exchangeable (not detected in aqueous phase). This trend was also evident for butanol and β-HPCD extractions, suggesting TCS was strongly complexed with the matrix. For BPA and EE2, the fraction considered exchangeable was higher after 14 days and the extraction efficiency was slightly higher for the butanol treatment. Conclusions: Chemical methods to predict bioaccessibility in marine sediments have demonstrated differences between selected contaminants, but agreement between methods. Triclosan shows the highest affinity with tested sediments, some exchangeability in the first days of interaction of E value experiment as well as observed for extraction methods. However, the highest capacity to be extracted from already-sorbed phase was observed for BPA, showed in both extraction methods, and confirming its mobility and bioaccessibility in sediments over the time.Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)Institute of Chemistry Univ. Estadual Paulista - UNESPChemistry Department State University of Londrina - UELCSIRO Land and WaterInstitute of Chemistry Univ. Estadual Paulista - UNESPFAPESP: 12/17898-7FAPESP: 13/09437-2Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)CSIRO Land and Waterdos Santos, Dayana M. [UNESP]Williams, MikeKookana, Raide Marchi, Mary Rosa R. [UNESP]2018-12-11T16:51:12Z2018-12-11T16:51:12Z2018-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article1720-1728application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11368-017-1905-zJournal of Soils and Sediments, v. 18, n. 4, p. 1720-1728, 2018.1614-74801439-0108http://hdl.handle.net/11449/17052810.1007/s11368-017-1905-z2-s2.0-850400047072-s2.0-85040004707.pdfScopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal of Soils and Sediments0,919info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-12-08T06:23:52Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/170528Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T19:48:38.881165Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Predicting bioaccessibility of contaminants of emerging concern in marine sediments using chemical methods
title Predicting bioaccessibility of contaminants of emerging concern in marine sediments using chemical methods
spellingShingle Predicting bioaccessibility of contaminants of emerging concern in marine sediments using chemical methods
dos Santos, Dayana M. [UNESP]
Emerging contaminant
Isotopic exchangeability
Sediment
Sorption bioaccessible
title_short Predicting bioaccessibility of contaminants of emerging concern in marine sediments using chemical methods
title_full Predicting bioaccessibility of contaminants of emerging concern in marine sediments using chemical methods
title_fullStr Predicting bioaccessibility of contaminants of emerging concern in marine sediments using chemical methods
title_full_unstemmed Predicting bioaccessibility of contaminants of emerging concern in marine sediments using chemical methods
title_sort Predicting bioaccessibility of contaminants of emerging concern in marine sediments using chemical methods
author dos Santos, Dayana M. [UNESP]
author_facet dos Santos, Dayana M. [UNESP]
Williams, Mike
Kookana, Rai
de Marchi, Mary Rosa R. [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Williams, Mike
Kookana, Rai
de Marchi, Mary Rosa R. [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
CSIRO Land and Water
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv dos Santos, Dayana M. [UNESP]
Williams, Mike
Kookana, Rai
de Marchi, Mary Rosa R. [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Emerging contaminant
Isotopic exchangeability
Sediment
Sorption bioaccessible
topic Emerging contaminant
Isotopic exchangeability
Sediment
Sorption bioaccessible
description Purpose: A comparison was made between three chemical methods to predict bioaccessibility of triclosan (TCS), bisphenol A (BPA), and 17α-ethynylestradiol (EE2) in marine sediments, involving an exchangeable (E) value, butanol extractions, and hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin (β-HPCD) extractions. Materials and methods: A 60-day batch experiment was undertaken where the aqueous phase was analyzed by GC-MS/MS. The bioaccessibility study based on the E value model involved monitoring stable isotopes exchanging with the bioaccessible phase, while this exchangeability was also estimated with sediment extractions with butanol and β-HPCD, respectively. Results and discussion: Based on the E value method, TCS was readily exchangeable for up to 7 days, while after this period become virtually non-exchangeable (not detected in aqueous phase). This trend was also evident for butanol and β-HPCD extractions, suggesting TCS was strongly complexed with the matrix. For BPA and EE2, the fraction considered exchangeable was higher after 14 days and the extraction efficiency was slightly higher for the butanol treatment. Conclusions: Chemical methods to predict bioaccessibility in marine sediments have demonstrated differences between selected contaminants, but agreement between methods. Triclosan shows the highest affinity with tested sediments, some exchangeability in the first days of interaction of E value experiment as well as observed for extraction methods. However, the highest capacity to be extracted from already-sorbed phase was observed for BPA, showed in both extraction methods, and confirming its mobility and bioaccessibility in sediments over the time.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-12-11T16:51:12Z
2018-12-11T16:51:12Z
2018-04-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11368-017-1905-z
Journal of Soils and Sediments, v. 18, n. 4, p. 1720-1728, 2018.
1614-7480
1439-0108
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/170528
10.1007/s11368-017-1905-z
2-s2.0-85040004707
2-s2.0-85040004707.pdf
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11368-017-1905-z
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/170528
identifier_str_mv Journal of Soils and Sediments, v. 18, n. 4, p. 1720-1728, 2018.
1614-7480
1439-0108
10.1007/s11368-017-1905-z
2-s2.0-85040004707
2-s2.0-85040004707.pdf
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Soils and Sediments
0,919
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 1720-1728
application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808129120162283520