Crossover clinical trial of different methods of removing a denture adhesive and the influence on the oral microbiota

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Nunes, Élen Massaro [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Policastro, Vivian Barnabé [UNESP], Scavassin, Priscila Mattos [UNESP], Leite, Andressa Rosa Perin [UNESP], Mendoza Marin, Danny Omar [UNESP], Giro, Gabriela [UNESP], De Oliveira Júnior, Norberto Martins [UNESP], Compagnoni, Marco Antonio [UNESP], Pero, Ana Carolina [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.08.004
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/172269
Resumo: Statement of problem The difficulty of removing denture adhesive is a common problem reported by users of these products. Purpose The purpose of this clinical study was to investigate the effectiveness of different cleaning protocols for removing a denture adhesive (DA) and the influence on the oral microbiota. Material and methods Twenty participants wearing well-fitting complete dentures were instructed to use a denture adhesive 3 times a day during a 4-week trial, divided into 4 stages: (A) control - 3 daily denture brushings using water at ambient temperature, (B) - 3 daily denture brushings using water at ambient temperature plus coconut soap, (C) - 3 daily denture brushings using water at ambient temperature plus dentifrice; (D) - 3 daily denture brushings using water at ambient temperature combined with immersion in sodium perborate solution for 5 minutes before nocturnal sleep. After each 1-week stage, saliva specimens were collected. A dye was used to display and quantify the remaining DA on the internal surface of the maxillary dentures as a percentage. For microbiological analysis, the saliva was diluted and plated onto Petri dishes containing a nonselective culture medium and Candida spp culture media. After the incubation period, Candida species were identified and the number of colony forming units (CFU/mL) was calculated. Results A significant difference was found among the 4 cleaning methods for the quantification of remaining DA (Friedman, P=.036). Brushing the dentures with coconut soap, dentifrice, or water combined with immersion in sodium perborate solution was more effective in removing DA than brushing with only water. The cleaning methods did not influence the quantification of microorganisms in general or Candida albicans and other Candida species in particular. Conclusions Brushing the dentures with coconut soap, dentifrice, or water combined with immersion in sodium perborate solution was more effective for removing cream-type denture adhesive than brushing with only water.
id UNSP_7e6b0e0975fbe5720eece47ab65cbc19
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/172269
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Crossover clinical trial of different methods of removing a denture adhesive and the influence on the oral microbiotaStatement of problem The difficulty of removing denture adhesive is a common problem reported by users of these products. Purpose The purpose of this clinical study was to investigate the effectiveness of different cleaning protocols for removing a denture adhesive (DA) and the influence on the oral microbiota. Material and methods Twenty participants wearing well-fitting complete dentures were instructed to use a denture adhesive 3 times a day during a 4-week trial, divided into 4 stages: (A) control - 3 daily denture brushings using water at ambient temperature, (B) - 3 daily denture brushings using water at ambient temperature plus coconut soap, (C) - 3 daily denture brushings using water at ambient temperature plus dentifrice; (D) - 3 daily denture brushings using water at ambient temperature combined with immersion in sodium perborate solution for 5 minutes before nocturnal sleep. After each 1-week stage, saliva specimens were collected. A dye was used to display and quantify the remaining DA on the internal surface of the maxillary dentures as a percentage. For microbiological analysis, the saliva was diluted and plated onto Petri dishes containing a nonselective culture medium and Candida spp culture media. After the incubation period, Candida species were identified and the number of colony forming units (CFU/mL) was calculated. Results A significant difference was found among the 4 cleaning methods for the quantification of remaining DA (Friedman, P=.036). Brushing the dentures with coconut soap, dentifrice, or water combined with immersion in sodium perborate solution was more effective in removing DA than brushing with only water. The cleaning methods did not influence the quantification of microorganisms in general or Candida albicans and other Candida species in particular. Conclusions Brushing the dentures with coconut soap, dentifrice, or water combined with immersion in sodium perborate solution was more effective for removing cream-type denture adhesive than brushing with only water.Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Araraquara Dental School Sao Paulo State University (UNESP)Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Araraquara Dental School Sao Paulo State University (UNESP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Nunes, Élen Massaro [UNESP]Policastro, Vivian Barnabé [UNESP]Scavassin, Priscila Mattos [UNESP]Leite, Andressa Rosa Perin [UNESP]Mendoza Marin, Danny Omar [UNESP]Giro, Gabriela [UNESP]De Oliveira Júnior, Norberto Martins [UNESP]Compagnoni, Marco Antonio [UNESP]Pero, Ana Carolina [UNESP]2018-12-11T16:59:27Z2018-12-11T16:59:27Z2016-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article462-466application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.08.004Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, v. 115, n. 4, p. 462-466, 2016.0022-3913http://hdl.handle.net/11449/17226910.1016/j.prosdent.2015.08.0042-s2.0-849492393532-s2.0-84949239353.pdf8921196002764597Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal of Prosthetic Dentistry1,087info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-11-20T06:09:19Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/172269Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T18:10:23.578027Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Crossover clinical trial of different methods of removing a denture adhesive and the influence on the oral microbiota
title Crossover clinical trial of different methods of removing a denture adhesive and the influence on the oral microbiota
spellingShingle Crossover clinical trial of different methods of removing a denture adhesive and the influence on the oral microbiota
Nunes, Élen Massaro [UNESP]
title_short Crossover clinical trial of different methods of removing a denture adhesive and the influence on the oral microbiota
title_full Crossover clinical trial of different methods of removing a denture adhesive and the influence on the oral microbiota
title_fullStr Crossover clinical trial of different methods of removing a denture adhesive and the influence on the oral microbiota
title_full_unstemmed Crossover clinical trial of different methods of removing a denture adhesive and the influence on the oral microbiota
title_sort Crossover clinical trial of different methods of removing a denture adhesive and the influence on the oral microbiota
author Nunes, Élen Massaro [UNESP]
author_facet Nunes, Élen Massaro [UNESP]
Policastro, Vivian Barnabé [UNESP]
Scavassin, Priscila Mattos [UNESP]
Leite, Andressa Rosa Perin [UNESP]
Mendoza Marin, Danny Omar [UNESP]
Giro, Gabriela [UNESP]
De Oliveira Júnior, Norberto Martins [UNESP]
Compagnoni, Marco Antonio [UNESP]
Pero, Ana Carolina [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Policastro, Vivian Barnabé [UNESP]
Scavassin, Priscila Mattos [UNESP]
Leite, Andressa Rosa Perin [UNESP]
Mendoza Marin, Danny Omar [UNESP]
Giro, Gabriela [UNESP]
De Oliveira Júnior, Norberto Martins [UNESP]
Compagnoni, Marco Antonio [UNESP]
Pero, Ana Carolina [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Nunes, Élen Massaro [UNESP]
Policastro, Vivian Barnabé [UNESP]
Scavassin, Priscila Mattos [UNESP]
Leite, Andressa Rosa Perin [UNESP]
Mendoza Marin, Danny Omar [UNESP]
Giro, Gabriela [UNESP]
De Oliveira Júnior, Norberto Martins [UNESP]
Compagnoni, Marco Antonio [UNESP]
Pero, Ana Carolina [UNESP]
description Statement of problem The difficulty of removing denture adhesive is a common problem reported by users of these products. Purpose The purpose of this clinical study was to investigate the effectiveness of different cleaning protocols for removing a denture adhesive (DA) and the influence on the oral microbiota. Material and methods Twenty participants wearing well-fitting complete dentures were instructed to use a denture adhesive 3 times a day during a 4-week trial, divided into 4 stages: (A) control - 3 daily denture brushings using water at ambient temperature, (B) - 3 daily denture brushings using water at ambient temperature plus coconut soap, (C) - 3 daily denture brushings using water at ambient temperature plus dentifrice; (D) - 3 daily denture brushings using water at ambient temperature combined with immersion in sodium perborate solution for 5 minutes before nocturnal sleep. After each 1-week stage, saliva specimens were collected. A dye was used to display and quantify the remaining DA on the internal surface of the maxillary dentures as a percentage. For microbiological analysis, the saliva was diluted and plated onto Petri dishes containing a nonselective culture medium and Candida spp culture media. After the incubation period, Candida species were identified and the number of colony forming units (CFU/mL) was calculated. Results A significant difference was found among the 4 cleaning methods for the quantification of remaining DA (Friedman, P=.036). Brushing the dentures with coconut soap, dentifrice, or water combined with immersion in sodium perborate solution was more effective in removing DA than brushing with only water. The cleaning methods did not influence the quantification of microorganisms in general or Candida albicans and other Candida species in particular. Conclusions Brushing the dentures with coconut soap, dentifrice, or water combined with immersion in sodium perborate solution was more effective for removing cream-type denture adhesive than brushing with only water.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-04-01
2018-12-11T16:59:27Z
2018-12-11T16:59:27Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.08.004
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, v. 115, n. 4, p. 462-466, 2016.
0022-3913
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/172269
10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.08.004
2-s2.0-84949239353
2-s2.0-84949239353.pdf
8921196002764597
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.08.004
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/172269
identifier_str_mv Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, v. 115, n. 4, p. 462-466, 2016.
0022-3913
10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.08.004
2-s2.0-84949239353
2-s2.0-84949239353.pdf
8921196002764597
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
1,087
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 462-466
application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808128905099345920