Techno-economic and environmental assessment of bioenergy and livestock integrated systems in Brazil

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Souza, Nariê Rinke Dias de [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Cavalett, Otávio [UNESP], Junqueira, Tassia Lopes [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2022.05.013
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/240164
Resumo: Bioenergy-livestock integrated systems (BLI) are a promising land-based option to meet future agricultural demands, while also alleviating pressure on land use and mitigating greenhouse gas (GHG) emission. However, their techno-economic feasibility and environmental implications are still unclear. This study performs a life cycle assessment and techno-economic assessment of key BLI systems in Brazil from a land management perspective. We considered pasture intensification options and use of biofuels by-products as animal feed supplement to release pasture area for additional crop production. BLI presents higher techno-economic feasibility compared to conventional systems, reducing payback time by almost half, and resulting in a five-fold increased net present value to initial investment ratio. The potential to avoid GHG emissions per hectare (replacing fossil fuels) is about two times higher in BLI than conventional system, mostly due to the possibility of producing more outputs using less area. Sugarcane ethanol produced under BLI scenarios outperformed conventional systems in eight out of nine addressed Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), mainly because of the use of manure on sugarcane fields and use of bagasse as animal feed. Crops production to feed cattle in feedlots can increase acidification and eutrophication impacts, negatively influencing the meat production scores on SDG 2: Zero Hunger, 6: Clean Water and Sanitation, and 14: Life Below Water, for example. Conversely, meat produced in feedlots resulted in lower impacts on air quality and increased GHG mitigation, mostly due to shorter cycle duration, with better scores in SDG 11: Sustainable Cities and Communities and 13: Climate Action. These results might help to guide an enhanced integration of biofuels and livestock sectors in Brazil. BLI systems are expected to contribute to the achievement of climate mitigation targets while also reaching many of the SDGs and remaining techno-economically feasible.
id UNSP_80aec5a7fb811632f1e9c6c58d739559
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/240164
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Techno-economic and environmental assessment of bioenergy and livestock integrated systems in BrazilBiofuelsClimate change mitigationLand use intensificationLife cycle assessmentSustainable Development GoalsBioenergy-livestock integrated systems (BLI) are a promising land-based option to meet future agricultural demands, while also alleviating pressure on land use and mitigating greenhouse gas (GHG) emission. However, their techno-economic feasibility and environmental implications are still unclear. This study performs a life cycle assessment and techno-economic assessment of key BLI systems in Brazil from a land management perspective. We considered pasture intensification options and use of biofuels by-products as animal feed supplement to release pasture area for additional crop production. BLI presents higher techno-economic feasibility compared to conventional systems, reducing payback time by almost half, and resulting in a five-fold increased net present value to initial investment ratio. The potential to avoid GHG emissions per hectare (replacing fossil fuels) is about two times higher in BLI than conventional system, mostly due to the possibility of producing more outputs using less area. Sugarcane ethanol produced under BLI scenarios outperformed conventional systems in eight out of nine addressed Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), mainly because of the use of manure on sugarcane fields and use of bagasse as animal feed. Crops production to feed cattle in feedlots can increase acidification and eutrophication impacts, negatively influencing the meat production scores on SDG 2: Zero Hunger, 6: Clean Water and Sanitation, and 14: Life Below Water, for example. Conversely, meat produced in feedlots resulted in lower impacts on air quality and increased GHG mitigation, mostly due to shorter cycle duration, with better scores in SDG 11: Sustainable Cities and Communities and 13: Climate Action. These results might help to guide an enhanced integration of biofuels and livestock sectors in Brazil. BLI systems are expected to contribute to the achievement of climate mitigation targets while also reaching many of the SDGs and remaining techno-economically feasible.Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)Interinstitutional Graduate Program in Bioenergy (USP/UNICAMP/UNESP) – 330 Cora Coralina Street Cidade Universitária, CEPBrazilian Biorenewables National Laboratory (LNBR) Brazilian Center for Research in Energy and Materials (CNPEM), Sao PauloIndustrial Ecology Programme Department of Energy and Process Engineering Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU)Interinstitutional Graduate Program in Bioenergy (USP/UNICAMP/UNESP) – 330 Cora Coralina Street Cidade Universitária, CEPFAPESP: 2017/11523-5Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Brazilian Center for Research in Energy and Materials (CNPEM)Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU)Souza, Nariê Rinke Dias de [UNESP]Cavalett, Otávio [UNESP]Junqueira, Tassia Lopes [UNESP]2023-03-01T20:04:19Z2023-03-01T20:04:19Z2022-07-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article580-592http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2022.05.013Sustainable Production and Consumption, v. 32, p. 580-592.2352-5509http://hdl.handle.net/11449/24016410.1016/j.spc.2022.05.0132-s2.0-85131090478Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengSustainable Production and Consumptioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-03-01T20:04:19Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/240164Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T14:36:50.161737Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Techno-economic and environmental assessment of bioenergy and livestock integrated systems in Brazil
title Techno-economic and environmental assessment of bioenergy and livestock integrated systems in Brazil
spellingShingle Techno-economic and environmental assessment of bioenergy and livestock integrated systems in Brazil
Souza, Nariê Rinke Dias de [UNESP]
Biofuels
Climate change mitigation
Land use intensification
Life cycle assessment
Sustainable Development Goals
title_short Techno-economic and environmental assessment of bioenergy and livestock integrated systems in Brazil
title_full Techno-economic and environmental assessment of bioenergy and livestock integrated systems in Brazil
title_fullStr Techno-economic and environmental assessment of bioenergy and livestock integrated systems in Brazil
title_full_unstemmed Techno-economic and environmental assessment of bioenergy and livestock integrated systems in Brazil
title_sort Techno-economic and environmental assessment of bioenergy and livestock integrated systems in Brazil
author Souza, Nariê Rinke Dias de [UNESP]
author_facet Souza, Nariê Rinke Dias de [UNESP]
Cavalett, Otávio [UNESP]
Junqueira, Tassia Lopes [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Cavalett, Otávio [UNESP]
Junqueira, Tassia Lopes [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
Brazilian Center for Research in Energy and Materials (CNPEM)
Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Souza, Nariê Rinke Dias de [UNESP]
Cavalett, Otávio [UNESP]
Junqueira, Tassia Lopes [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Biofuels
Climate change mitigation
Land use intensification
Life cycle assessment
Sustainable Development Goals
topic Biofuels
Climate change mitigation
Land use intensification
Life cycle assessment
Sustainable Development Goals
description Bioenergy-livestock integrated systems (BLI) are a promising land-based option to meet future agricultural demands, while also alleviating pressure on land use and mitigating greenhouse gas (GHG) emission. However, their techno-economic feasibility and environmental implications are still unclear. This study performs a life cycle assessment and techno-economic assessment of key BLI systems in Brazil from a land management perspective. We considered pasture intensification options and use of biofuels by-products as animal feed supplement to release pasture area for additional crop production. BLI presents higher techno-economic feasibility compared to conventional systems, reducing payback time by almost half, and resulting in a five-fold increased net present value to initial investment ratio. The potential to avoid GHG emissions per hectare (replacing fossil fuels) is about two times higher in BLI than conventional system, mostly due to the possibility of producing more outputs using less area. Sugarcane ethanol produced under BLI scenarios outperformed conventional systems in eight out of nine addressed Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), mainly because of the use of manure on sugarcane fields and use of bagasse as animal feed. Crops production to feed cattle in feedlots can increase acidification and eutrophication impacts, negatively influencing the meat production scores on SDG 2: Zero Hunger, 6: Clean Water and Sanitation, and 14: Life Below Water, for example. Conversely, meat produced in feedlots resulted in lower impacts on air quality and increased GHG mitigation, mostly due to shorter cycle duration, with better scores in SDG 11: Sustainable Cities and Communities and 13: Climate Action. These results might help to guide an enhanced integration of biofuels and livestock sectors in Brazil. BLI systems are expected to contribute to the achievement of climate mitigation targets while also reaching many of the SDGs and remaining techno-economically feasible.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-07-01
2023-03-01T20:04:19Z
2023-03-01T20:04:19Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2022.05.013
Sustainable Production and Consumption, v. 32, p. 580-592.
2352-5509
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/240164
10.1016/j.spc.2022.05.013
2-s2.0-85131090478
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2022.05.013
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/240164
identifier_str_mv Sustainable Production and Consumption, v. 32, p. 580-592.
2352-5509
10.1016/j.spc.2022.05.013
2-s2.0-85131090478
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Sustainable Production and Consumption
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 580-592
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808128388004577280