Environmental impacts of precision feeding programs applied in pig production

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Andretta, I
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Hauschild, L. [UNESP], Kipper, M., Pires, P. G. S., Pomar, C.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1751731117003159
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/160510
Resumo: This study was undertaken to evaluate the effect that switching from conventional to precision feeding systems during the growing-finishing phase would have on the potential environmental impact of Brazilian pig production. Standard life-cycle assessment procedures were used, with a cradle-to-farm gate boundary. The inputs and outputs of each interface of the life cycle (production of feed ingredients, processing in the feed industry, transportation and animal rearing) were organized in a model. Grain production was independently characterized in the Central-West and South regions of Brazil, whereas the pigs were raised in the South region. Three feeding programs were applied for growing-finishing pigs: conventional phase feeding by group (CON); precision daily feeding by group (PFG) (whole herd fed the same daily adjusted diet); and precision daily feeding by individual (PFI) (diets adjusted daily to match individual nutrient requirements). Raising pigs (1 t pig BW at farm gate) in South Brazil under the CON feeding program using grain cultivated in the same region led to emissions of 1840 kg of CO2-eq, 13.1 kg of PO4-eq and 32.2 kg of SO2-eq. Simulations using grain from the Central-West region showed a greater climate change impact. Compared with the previous scenario, a 17% increase in climate change impact was found when simulating with soybeans produced in Central-West Brazil, whereas a 28% increase was observed when simulating with corn and soybeans from Central-West Brazil. Compared with the CON feeding program, the PFG and PFI programs reduced the potential environmental impact. Applying the PFG program mitigated the potential climate change impact and eutrophication by up to 4%, and acidification impact by up to 3% compared with the CON program. Making a further adjustment by feeding pigs according to their individual nutrient requirements mitigated the potential climate change impact by up to 6% and the potential eutrophication and acidification impact by up to 5% compared with the CON program. The greatest environmental gains associated with the adoption of precision feeding were observed when the diet combined soybeans from Central-West Brazil with corn produced in Southern Brazil. The results clearly show that precision feeding is an effective approach for improving the environmental sustainability of Brazilian pig production.
id UNSP_8135a1b875e1c96669e8f9d8edac44f7
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/160510
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Environmental impacts of precision feeding programs applied in pig productionlife-cycle assessmentnutrient requirementsprecision farmingswineThis study was undertaken to evaluate the effect that switching from conventional to precision feeding systems during the growing-finishing phase would have on the potential environmental impact of Brazilian pig production. Standard life-cycle assessment procedures were used, with a cradle-to-farm gate boundary. The inputs and outputs of each interface of the life cycle (production of feed ingredients, processing in the feed industry, transportation and animal rearing) were organized in a model. Grain production was independently characterized in the Central-West and South regions of Brazil, whereas the pigs were raised in the South region. Three feeding programs were applied for growing-finishing pigs: conventional phase feeding by group (CON); precision daily feeding by group (PFG) (whole herd fed the same daily adjusted diet); and precision daily feeding by individual (PFI) (diets adjusted daily to match individual nutrient requirements). Raising pigs (1 t pig BW at farm gate) in South Brazil under the CON feeding program using grain cultivated in the same region led to emissions of 1840 kg of CO2-eq, 13.1 kg of PO4-eq and 32.2 kg of SO2-eq. Simulations using grain from the Central-West region showed a greater climate change impact. Compared with the previous scenario, a 17% increase in climate change impact was found when simulating with soybeans produced in Central-West Brazil, whereas a 28% increase was observed when simulating with corn and soybeans from Central-West Brazil. Compared with the CON feeding program, the PFG and PFI programs reduced the potential environmental impact. Applying the PFG program mitigated the potential climate change impact and eutrophication by up to 4%, and acidification impact by up to 3% compared with the CON program. Making a further adjustment by feeding pigs according to their individual nutrient requirements mitigated the potential climate change impact by up to 6% and the potential eutrophication and acidification impact by up to 5% compared with the CON program. The greatest environmental gains associated with the adoption of precision feeding were observed when the diet combined soybeans from Central-West Brazil with corn produced in Southern Brazil. The results clearly show that precision feeding is an effective approach for improving the environmental sustainability of Brazilian pig production.Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Fac Agron, BR-91540000 Porto Alegre, RS, BrazilUniv Estadual Paulista, Fac Ciencias Agr & Vet, BR-14884900 Jaboticabal, SP, BrazilAgr & Agri Food Canada, Dairy & Swine Res & Dev Ctr, Sherbrooke, PQ J1M 0C8, CanadaUniv Estadual Paulista, Fac Ciencias Agr & Vet, BR-14884900 Jaboticabal, SP, BrazilFAPESP: 12/03781-0Cambridge Univ PressUniv Fed Rio Grande do SulUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Agr & Agri Food CanadaAndretta, IHauschild, L. [UNESP]Kipper, M.Pires, P. G. S.Pomar, C.2018-11-26T16:04:48Z2018-11-26T16:04:48Z2018-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article1990-1998application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1751731117003159Animal. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ Press, v. 12, n. 9, p. 1990-1998, 2018.1751-7311http://hdl.handle.net/11449/16051010.1017/S1751731117003159WOS:000442226000024WOS000442226000024.pdfWeb of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengAnimal0,842info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-10-19T06:07:05Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/160510Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T15:20:53.136432Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Environmental impacts of precision feeding programs applied in pig production
title Environmental impacts of precision feeding programs applied in pig production
spellingShingle Environmental impacts of precision feeding programs applied in pig production
Andretta, I
life-cycle assessment
nutrient requirements
precision farming
swine
title_short Environmental impacts of precision feeding programs applied in pig production
title_full Environmental impacts of precision feeding programs applied in pig production
title_fullStr Environmental impacts of precision feeding programs applied in pig production
title_full_unstemmed Environmental impacts of precision feeding programs applied in pig production
title_sort Environmental impacts of precision feeding programs applied in pig production
author Andretta, I
author_facet Andretta, I
Hauschild, L. [UNESP]
Kipper, M.
Pires, P. G. S.
Pomar, C.
author_role author
author2 Hauschild, L. [UNESP]
Kipper, M.
Pires, P. G. S.
Pomar, C.
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Agr & Agri Food Canada
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Andretta, I
Hauschild, L. [UNESP]
Kipper, M.
Pires, P. G. S.
Pomar, C.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv life-cycle assessment
nutrient requirements
precision farming
swine
topic life-cycle assessment
nutrient requirements
precision farming
swine
description This study was undertaken to evaluate the effect that switching from conventional to precision feeding systems during the growing-finishing phase would have on the potential environmental impact of Brazilian pig production. Standard life-cycle assessment procedures were used, with a cradle-to-farm gate boundary. The inputs and outputs of each interface of the life cycle (production of feed ingredients, processing in the feed industry, transportation and animal rearing) were organized in a model. Grain production was independently characterized in the Central-West and South regions of Brazil, whereas the pigs were raised in the South region. Three feeding programs were applied for growing-finishing pigs: conventional phase feeding by group (CON); precision daily feeding by group (PFG) (whole herd fed the same daily adjusted diet); and precision daily feeding by individual (PFI) (diets adjusted daily to match individual nutrient requirements). Raising pigs (1 t pig BW at farm gate) in South Brazil under the CON feeding program using grain cultivated in the same region led to emissions of 1840 kg of CO2-eq, 13.1 kg of PO4-eq and 32.2 kg of SO2-eq. Simulations using grain from the Central-West region showed a greater climate change impact. Compared with the previous scenario, a 17% increase in climate change impact was found when simulating with soybeans produced in Central-West Brazil, whereas a 28% increase was observed when simulating with corn and soybeans from Central-West Brazil. Compared with the CON feeding program, the PFG and PFI programs reduced the potential environmental impact. Applying the PFG program mitigated the potential climate change impact and eutrophication by up to 4%, and acidification impact by up to 3% compared with the CON program. Making a further adjustment by feeding pigs according to their individual nutrient requirements mitigated the potential climate change impact by up to 6% and the potential eutrophication and acidification impact by up to 5% compared with the CON program. The greatest environmental gains associated with the adoption of precision feeding were observed when the diet combined soybeans from Central-West Brazil with corn produced in Southern Brazil. The results clearly show that precision feeding is an effective approach for improving the environmental sustainability of Brazilian pig production.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-11-26T16:04:48Z
2018-11-26T16:04:48Z
2018-09-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1751731117003159
Animal. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ Press, v. 12, n. 9, p. 1990-1998, 2018.
1751-7311
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/160510
10.1017/S1751731117003159
WOS:000442226000024
WOS000442226000024.pdf
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1751731117003159
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/160510
identifier_str_mv Animal. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ Press, v. 12, n. 9, p. 1990-1998, 2018.
1751-7311
10.1017/S1751731117003159
WOS:000442226000024
WOS000442226000024.pdf
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Animal
0,842
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 1990-1998
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cambridge Univ Press
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cambridge Univ Press
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Web of Science
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808128500395147264