Performance of low-fat beef burger with added soluble and insoluble dietary fibers
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/fst.09217 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/157551 |
Resumo: | AbstractInulin, fructooligosaccharide, oat fiber and wheat fiber were added at 3 and 6% level in low-fat beef burger and their performances were evaluated. The low-fat beef burgers were submitted to cooking losses, objective color, texture profile, TBARS value, pH, microbiological and sensory evaluations. FR3, FR6, IN3 e IN6 showed no difference from the control to yield. Hardness values increased in OF6, WF3 and WF6 and it was similar to control. WF6 was the lowest score for the overall acceptance. Higher yield and hardness were found with the addition of insoluble fibers at 6% level. The TBARS values were not influenced by the addition of dietary fibers in low-fat beef burger. Inulin at 6% (IN6) level showed the highest score for all the sensory attributes. Adding 6% inulin was shown the best alternative for use in low-fat beef burger. |
id |
UNSP_816983520675da386817b6dfe22b0a48 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/157551 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Performance of low-fat beef burger with added soluble and insoluble dietary fibersdietary fiberacceptabilityfat substituteTPAinulinAbstractInulin, fructooligosaccharide, oat fiber and wheat fiber were added at 3 and 6% level in low-fat beef burger and their performances were evaluated. The low-fat beef burgers were submitted to cooking losses, objective color, texture profile, TBARS value, pH, microbiological and sensory evaluations. FR3, FR6, IN3 e IN6 showed no difference from the control to yield. Hardness values increased in OF6, WF3 and WF6 and it was similar to control. WF6 was the lowest score for the overall acceptance. Higher yield and hardness were found with the addition of insoluble fibers at 6% level. The TBARS values were not influenced by the addition of dietary fibers in low-fat beef burger. Inulin at 6% (IN6) level showed the highest score for all the sensory attributes. Adding 6% inulin was shown the best alternative for use in low-fat beef burger.Universidade Estadual Paulista Departamento de Engenharia e Tecnologia de Alimentos Laboratório de Carnes e Produtos Cárneos,Universidade Estadual Paulista Departamento de Engenharia e Tecnologia de Alimentos Laboratório de Carnes e Produtos Cárneos,Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de AlimentosUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Bis-souza, Camila VespúcioHenck, Jenifer Mayara MonariBarretto, Andrea Carla Da Silva2018-11-12T17:25:52Z2018-11-12T17:25:52Z2018info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/fst.09217Food Science and Technology. Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos, n. ahead, p. -, 2018.0101-2061http://hdl.handle.net/11449/15755110.1590/fst.09217S0101-20612018005012103S0101-20612018005012103.pdfSciELOreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengFood Science and Technology0,467info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-01-03T06:19:28Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/157551Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T21:58:47.497441Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Performance of low-fat beef burger with added soluble and insoluble dietary fibers |
title |
Performance of low-fat beef burger with added soluble and insoluble dietary fibers |
spellingShingle |
Performance of low-fat beef burger with added soluble and insoluble dietary fibers Bis-souza, Camila Vespúcio dietary fiber acceptability fat substitute TPA inulin |
title_short |
Performance of low-fat beef burger with added soluble and insoluble dietary fibers |
title_full |
Performance of low-fat beef burger with added soluble and insoluble dietary fibers |
title_fullStr |
Performance of low-fat beef burger with added soluble and insoluble dietary fibers |
title_full_unstemmed |
Performance of low-fat beef burger with added soluble and insoluble dietary fibers |
title_sort |
Performance of low-fat beef burger with added soluble and insoluble dietary fibers |
author |
Bis-souza, Camila Vespúcio |
author_facet |
Bis-souza, Camila Vespúcio Henck, Jenifer Mayara Monari Barretto, Andrea Carla Da Silva |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Henck, Jenifer Mayara Monari Barretto, Andrea Carla Da Silva |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Bis-souza, Camila Vespúcio Henck, Jenifer Mayara Monari Barretto, Andrea Carla Da Silva |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
dietary fiber acceptability fat substitute TPA inulin |
topic |
dietary fiber acceptability fat substitute TPA inulin |
description |
AbstractInulin, fructooligosaccharide, oat fiber and wheat fiber were added at 3 and 6% level in low-fat beef burger and their performances were evaluated. The low-fat beef burgers were submitted to cooking losses, objective color, texture profile, TBARS value, pH, microbiological and sensory evaluations. FR3, FR6, IN3 e IN6 showed no difference from the control to yield. Hardness values increased in OF6, WF3 and WF6 and it was similar to control. WF6 was the lowest score for the overall acceptance. Higher yield and hardness were found with the addition of insoluble fibers at 6% level. The TBARS values were not influenced by the addition of dietary fibers in low-fat beef burger. Inulin at 6% (IN6) level showed the highest score for all the sensory attributes. Adding 6% inulin was shown the best alternative for use in low-fat beef burger. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-11-12T17:25:52Z 2018-11-12T17:25:52Z 2018 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/fst.09217 Food Science and Technology. Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos, n. ahead, p. -, 2018. 0101-2061 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/157551 10.1590/fst.09217 S0101-20612018005012103 S0101-20612018005012103.pdf |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/fst.09217 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/157551 |
identifier_str_mv |
Food Science and Technology. Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos, n. ahead, p. -, 2018. 0101-2061 10.1590/fst.09217 S0101-20612018005012103 S0101-20612018005012103.pdf |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Food Science and Technology 0,467 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
- application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
SciELO reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808129380871831552 |