Quality of mechanical peanut sowing and digging using autopilot

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Zerbato, Cristiano [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Furlani, Carlos E. A. [UNESP], Oliveira, Mailson F. de [UNESP], Voltarelli, Murilo A., Tavares, Tiago de O. [UNESP], Carneiro, Franciele M. [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v23n8p630-637
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/185901
Resumo: Over the past decade, automatic guidance of agricultural machinery via Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) signals has been increasingly adopted by the farming community. Peanut farmers are adopting such technology in order to improve the parallelism of operations to address difficulties that occur in mechanical digging, where losses are a big problem. This study aimed to evaluate mechanized operations of peanut sowing and digging controlled manually and by autopilot, along with their quality. The treatments consisted of two digging operations, with and without autopilot, and two displacement speeds (4.5 and 6.0 km h(-1)). The experiment was conducted in a medium-textured soil in a completely randomized design arranged in bands, using the analyzed variables as quality indicators. At sowing, parallelism between passes of the tractor-sower set, was evaluated at 120 points of each system (manual and automatic routing). The digging losses were evaluated in the two guidance systems, under two displacement speeds (4.5 to 6.0 km h(-1)) at 15 points per treatment. It was verified that the parallelism between the passes of the tractor-sower set was better when using the autopilot, which improved the operation quality. Displacement speed did not influence the digging loss. There were no differences in the visible digging loss, but higher quality was obtained when the operation was performed using autopilot. Minor invisible and total digging losses were obtained when the digging was performed with automatic routing, and superior quality was found at a speed of 4.5 km h(-1); however, quality was adversely affected under manual operation. Thus, the use of autopilot is effective for improving the accuracy and the quality of the operations.
id UNSP_816bb2341068b9c9843d062c24610866
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/185901
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Quality of mechanical peanut sowing and digging using autopilotArachis hypogaea L.statistical process controlkinematic relative positioningparallelismdigging lossesOver the past decade, automatic guidance of agricultural machinery via Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) signals has been increasingly adopted by the farming community. Peanut farmers are adopting such technology in order to improve the parallelism of operations to address difficulties that occur in mechanical digging, where losses are a big problem. This study aimed to evaluate mechanized operations of peanut sowing and digging controlled manually and by autopilot, along with their quality. The treatments consisted of two digging operations, with and without autopilot, and two displacement speeds (4.5 and 6.0 km h(-1)). The experiment was conducted in a medium-textured soil in a completely randomized design arranged in bands, using the analyzed variables as quality indicators. At sowing, parallelism between passes of the tractor-sower set, was evaluated at 120 points of each system (manual and automatic routing). The digging losses were evaluated in the two guidance systems, under two displacement speeds (4.5 to 6.0 km h(-1)) at 15 points per treatment. It was verified that the parallelism between the passes of the tractor-sower set was better when using the autopilot, which improved the operation quality. Displacement speed did not influence the digging loss. There were no differences in the visible digging loss, but higher quality was obtained when the operation was performed using autopilot. Minor invisible and total digging losses were obtained when the digging was performed with automatic routing, and superior quality was found at a speed of 4.5 km h(-1); however, quality was adversely affected under manual operation. Thus, the use of autopilot is effective for improving the accuracy and the quality of the operations.Univ Estadual Paulista, Fac Ciencias Agr & Vet, Dept Engn Rural, Jaboticabal, SP, BrazilUniv Fed Sao Carlos, Ctr Ciencias Nat, Campus Lagoa Sino, Buri, SP, BrazilUniv Estadual Paulista, Fac Ciencias Agr & Vet, Dept Engn Rural, Jaboticabal, SP, BrazilUniv Federal Campina GrandeUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar)Zerbato, Cristiano [UNESP]Furlani, Carlos E. A. [UNESP]Oliveira, Mailson F. de [UNESP]Voltarelli, Murilo A.Tavares, Tiago de O. [UNESP]Carneiro, Franciele M. [UNESP]2019-10-04T12:39:36Z2019-10-04T12:39:36Z2019-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article630-637application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v23n8p630-637Revista Brasileira De Engenharia Agricola E Ambiental. Campina Grande Pb: Univ Federal Campina Grande, v. 23, n. 8, p. 630-637, 2019.1415-4366http://hdl.handle.net/11449/18590110.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v23n8p630-637S1415-43662019000800630WOS:000475486200012S1415-43662019000800630.pdfWeb of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengRevista Brasileira De Engenharia Agricola E Ambientalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-06-06T15:18:29Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/185901Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T18:05:22.339132Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Quality of mechanical peanut sowing and digging using autopilot
title Quality of mechanical peanut sowing and digging using autopilot
spellingShingle Quality of mechanical peanut sowing and digging using autopilot
Zerbato, Cristiano [UNESP]
Arachis hypogaea L.
statistical process control
kinematic relative positioning
parallelism
digging losses
title_short Quality of mechanical peanut sowing and digging using autopilot
title_full Quality of mechanical peanut sowing and digging using autopilot
title_fullStr Quality of mechanical peanut sowing and digging using autopilot
title_full_unstemmed Quality of mechanical peanut sowing and digging using autopilot
title_sort Quality of mechanical peanut sowing and digging using autopilot
author Zerbato, Cristiano [UNESP]
author_facet Zerbato, Cristiano [UNESP]
Furlani, Carlos E. A. [UNESP]
Oliveira, Mailson F. de [UNESP]
Voltarelli, Murilo A.
Tavares, Tiago de O. [UNESP]
Carneiro, Franciele M. [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Furlani, Carlos E. A. [UNESP]
Oliveira, Mailson F. de [UNESP]
Voltarelli, Murilo A.
Tavares, Tiago de O. [UNESP]
Carneiro, Franciele M. [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Zerbato, Cristiano [UNESP]
Furlani, Carlos E. A. [UNESP]
Oliveira, Mailson F. de [UNESP]
Voltarelli, Murilo A.
Tavares, Tiago de O. [UNESP]
Carneiro, Franciele M. [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Arachis hypogaea L.
statistical process control
kinematic relative positioning
parallelism
digging losses
topic Arachis hypogaea L.
statistical process control
kinematic relative positioning
parallelism
digging losses
description Over the past decade, automatic guidance of agricultural machinery via Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) signals has been increasingly adopted by the farming community. Peanut farmers are adopting such technology in order to improve the parallelism of operations to address difficulties that occur in mechanical digging, where losses are a big problem. This study aimed to evaluate mechanized operations of peanut sowing and digging controlled manually and by autopilot, along with their quality. The treatments consisted of two digging operations, with and without autopilot, and two displacement speeds (4.5 and 6.0 km h(-1)). The experiment was conducted in a medium-textured soil in a completely randomized design arranged in bands, using the analyzed variables as quality indicators. At sowing, parallelism between passes of the tractor-sower set, was evaluated at 120 points of each system (manual and automatic routing). The digging losses were evaluated in the two guidance systems, under two displacement speeds (4.5 to 6.0 km h(-1)) at 15 points per treatment. It was verified that the parallelism between the passes of the tractor-sower set was better when using the autopilot, which improved the operation quality. Displacement speed did not influence the digging loss. There were no differences in the visible digging loss, but higher quality was obtained when the operation was performed using autopilot. Minor invisible and total digging losses were obtained when the digging was performed with automatic routing, and superior quality was found at a speed of 4.5 km h(-1); however, quality was adversely affected under manual operation. Thus, the use of autopilot is effective for improving the accuracy and the quality of the operations.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-10-04T12:39:36Z
2019-10-04T12:39:36Z
2019-08-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v23n8p630-637
Revista Brasileira De Engenharia Agricola E Ambiental. Campina Grande Pb: Univ Federal Campina Grande, v. 23, n. 8, p. 630-637, 2019.
1415-4366
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/185901
10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v23n8p630-637
S1415-43662019000800630
WOS:000475486200012
S1415-43662019000800630.pdf
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v23n8p630-637
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/185901
identifier_str_mv Revista Brasileira De Engenharia Agricola E Ambiental. Campina Grande Pb: Univ Federal Campina Grande, v. 23, n. 8, p. 630-637, 2019.
1415-4366
10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v23n8p630-637
S1415-43662019000800630
WOS:000475486200012
S1415-43662019000800630.pdf
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira De Engenharia Agricola E Ambiental
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 630-637
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Univ Federal Campina Grande
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Univ Federal Campina Grande
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Web of Science
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808128893224222720