Quality of mechanical peanut sowing and digging using autopilot
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v23n8p630-637 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/185901 |
Resumo: | Over the past decade, automatic guidance of agricultural machinery via Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) signals has been increasingly adopted by the farming community. Peanut farmers are adopting such technology in order to improve the parallelism of operations to address difficulties that occur in mechanical digging, where losses are a big problem. This study aimed to evaluate mechanized operations of peanut sowing and digging controlled manually and by autopilot, along with their quality. The treatments consisted of two digging operations, with and without autopilot, and two displacement speeds (4.5 and 6.0 km h(-1)). The experiment was conducted in a medium-textured soil in a completely randomized design arranged in bands, using the analyzed variables as quality indicators. At sowing, parallelism between passes of the tractor-sower set, was evaluated at 120 points of each system (manual and automatic routing). The digging losses were evaluated in the two guidance systems, under two displacement speeds (4.5 to 6.0 km h(-1)) at 15 points per treatment. It was verified that the parallelism between the passes of the tractor-sower set was better when using the autopilot, which improved the operation quality. Displacement speed did not influence the digging loss. There were no differences in the visible digging loss, but higher quality was obtained when the operation was performed using autopilot. Minor invisible and total digging losses were obtained when the digging was performed with automatic routing, and superior quality was found at a speed of 4.5 km h(-1); however, quality was adversely affected under manual operation. Thus, the use of autopilot is effective for improving the accuracy and the quality of the operations. |
id |
UNSP_816bb2341068b9c9843d062c24610866 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/185901 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Quality of mechanical peanut sowing and digging using autopilotArachis hypogaea L.statistical process controlkinematic relative positioningparallelismdigging lossesOver the past decade, automatic guidance of agricultural machinery via Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) signals has been increasingly adopted by the farming community. Peanut farmers are adopting such technology in order to improve the parallelism of operations to address difficulties that occur in mechanical digging, where losses are a big problem. This study aimed to evaluate mechanized operations of peanut sowing and digging controlled manually and by autopilot, along with their quality. The treatments consisted of two digging operations, with and without autopilot, and two displacement speeds (4.5 and 6.0 km h(-1)). The experiment was conducted in a medium-textured soil in a completely randomized design arranged in bands, using the analyzed variables as quality indicators. At sowing, parallelism between passes of the tractor-sower set, was evaluated at 120 points of each system (manual and automatic routing). The digging losses were evaluated in the two guidance systems, under two displacement speeds (4.5 to 6.0 km h(-1)) at 15 points per treatment. It was verified that the parallelism between the passes of the tractor-sower set was better when using the autopilot, which improved the operation quality. Displacement speed did not influence the digging loss. There were no differences in the visible digging loss, but higher quality was obtained when the operation was performed using autopilot. Minor invisible and total digging losses were obtained when the digging was performed with automatic routing, and superior quality was found at a speed of 4.5 km h(-1); however, quality was adversely affected under manual operation. Thus, the use of autopilot is effective for improving the accuracy and the quality of the operations.Univ Estadual Paulista, Fac Ciencias Agr & Vet, Dept Engn Rural, Jaboticabal, SP, BrazilUniv Fed Sao Carlos, Ctr Ciencias Nat, Campus Lagoa Sino, Buri, SP, BrazilUniv Estadual Paulista, Fac Ciencias Agr & Vet, Dept Engn Rural, Jaboticabal, SP, BrazilUniv Federal Campina GrandeUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar)Zerbato, Cristiano [UNESP]Furlani, Carlos E. A. [UNESP]Oliveira, Mailson F. de [UNESP]Voltarelli, Murilo A.Tavares, Tiago de O. [UNESP]Carneiro, Franciele M. [UNESP]2019-10-04T12:39:36Z2019-10-04T12:39:36Z2019-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article630-637application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v23n8p630-637Revista Brasileira De Engenharia Agricola E Ambiental. Campina Grande Pb: Univ Federal Campina Grande, v. 23, n. 8, p. 630-637, 2019.1415-4366http://hdl.handle.net/11449/18590110.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v23n8p630-637S1415-43662019000800630WOS:000475486200012S1415-43662019000800630.pdfWeb of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengRevista Brasileira De Engenharia Agricola E Ambientalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-06-06T15:18:29Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/185901Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T18:05:22.339132Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Quality of mechanical peanut sowing and digging using autopilot |
title |
Quality of mechanical peanut sowing and digging using autopilot |
spellingShingle |
Quality of mechanical peanut sowing and digging using autopilot Zerbato, Cristiano [UNESP] Arachis hypogaea L. statistical process control kinematic relative positioning parallelism digging losses |
title_short |
Quality of mechanical peanut sowing and digging using autopilot |
title_full |
Quality of mechanical peanut sowing and digging using autopilot |
title_fullStr |
Quality of mechanical peanut sowing and digging using autopilot |
title_full_unstemmed |
Quality of mechanical peanut sowing and digging using autopilot |
title_sort |
Quality of mechanical peanut sowing and digging using autopilot |
author |
Zerbato, Cristiano [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Zerbato, Cristiano [UNESP] Furlani, Carlos E. A. [UNESP] Oliveira, Mailson F. de [UNESP] Voltarelli, Murilo A. Tavares, Tiago de O. [UNESP] Carneiro, Franciele M. [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Furlani, Carlos E. A. [UNESP] Oliveira, Mailson F. de [UNESP] Voltarelli, Murilo A. Tavares, Tiago de O. [UNESP] Carneiro, Franciele M. [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Zerbato, Cristiano [UNESP] Furlani, Carlos E. A. [UNESP] Oliveira, Mailson F. de [UNESP] Voltarelli, Murilo A. Tavares, Tiago de O. [UNESP] Carneiro, Franciele M. [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Arachis hypogaea L. statistical process control kinematic relative positioning parallelism digging losses |
topic |
Arachis hypogaea L. statistical process control kinematic relative positioning parallelism digging losses |
description |
Over the past decade, automatic guidance of agricultural machinery via Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) signals has been increasingly adopted by the farming community. Peanut farmers are adopting such technology in order to improve the parallelism of operations to address difficulties that occur in mechanical digging, where losses are a big problem. This study aimed to evaluate mechanized operations of peanut sowing and digging controlled manually and by autopilot, along with their quality. The treatments consisted of two digging operations, with and without autopilot, and two displacement speeds (4.5 and 6.0 km h(-1)). The experiment was conducted in a medium-textured soil in a completely randomized design arranged in bands, using the analyzed variables as quality indicators. At sowing, parallelism between passes of the tractor-sower set, was evaluated at 120 points of each system (manual and automatic routing). The digging losses were evaluated in the two guidance systems, under two displacement speeds (4.5 to 6.0 km h(-1)) at 15 points per treatment. It was verified that the parallelism between the passes of the tractor-sower set was better when using the autopilot, which improved the operation quality. Displacement speed did not influence the digging loss. There were no differences in the visible digging loss, but higher quality was obtained when the operation was performed using autopilot. Minor invisible and total digging losses were obtained when the digging was performed with automatic routing, and superior quality was found at a speed of 4.5 km h(-1); however, quality was adversely affected under manual operation. Thus, the use of autopilot is effective for improving the accuracy and the quality of the operations. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-10-04T12:39:36Z 2019-10-04T12:39:36Z 2019-08-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v23n8p630-637 Revista Brasileira De Engenharia Agricola E Ambiental. Campina Grande Pb: Univ Federal Campina Grande, v. 23, n. 8, p. 630-637, 2019. 1415-4366 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/185901 10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v23n8p630-637 S1415-43662019000800630 WOS:000475486200012 S1415-43662019000800630.pdf |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v23n8p630-637 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/185901 |
identifier_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira De Engenharia Agricola E Ambiental. Campina Grande Pb: Univ Federal Campina Grande, v. 23, n. 8, p. 630-637, 2019. 1415-4366 10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v23n8p630-637 S1415-43662019000800630 WOS:000475486200012 S1415-43662019000800630.pdf |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira De Engenharia Agricola E Ambiental |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
630-637 application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Univ Federal Campina Grande |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Univ Federal Campina Grande |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Web of Science reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808128893224222720 |