Biomechanical evaluation of 3-unit fixed partial dentures on monotype and two-piece zirconia dental implants

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: de Matos, Jefferson David Melo [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Lopes, Guilherme da Rocha Scalzer [UNESP], Nakano, Leonardo Jiro Nomura [UNESP], Ramos, Nathália de Carvalho [UNESP], Vasconcelos, John Eversong Lucena de, Bottino, Marco Antonio [UNESP], Tribst, João Paulo Mendes [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2021.1946798
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/233570
Resumo: This study aimed to evaluate the biomechanical behavior, stress distributions and bone microstrain of fixed partial dentures (FPD) with ceramic abutments supported on monotype zirconia implants, titanium implants and two-piece zirconia implants, using finite element analysis. A three-dimensional model of the jaw was simulated containing 1.0 mm thick cortical bone and cancellous bone tissue. A FPD and implant models (4.1 x 10 mm) were modeled containing a cement-retained implant abutment. These models were replicated in three groups with similar geometries: Titanium Implant and Zirconia Abutment (Ti-Zr); Zirconia Implant and Zirconia Abutment (Zr-Zr) and Monotype Zirconia Implant (Zr-S). An axial load of 300 N was applied to the center of the first premolar. The microstrain (με) and the Von-Mises stress (MPa) were assumed as failures criteria. For the three groups, a higher stress concentration was observed in the region of FPD connectors. The Ti-Zr group showed a higher stress concentration in the prosthesis and implant when compared to the other groups. However, the smaller elastic modulus of the titanium implant, in relation to the zirconia, provided a lower stress in the abutment and in the prosthetic screw. The monotype implant system allowed a more homogeneous stress distribution and its strain were predominantly located in the cervical region of the peri-implant bone tissue. Monotype or two-piece zirconia implants can be used for rehabilitation with FPD. However, the absence of separation between implant and abutment in the monotype system avoids the stress concentration in the prosthetic screw and reduced the peri-implant bone strain.
id UNSP_825c37401cf5aaabdf6126396907474d
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/233570
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Biomechanical evaluation of 3-unit fixed partial dentures on monotype and two-piece zirconia dental implantsDental AbutmentsDental ImplantsDental MaterialsFinite element analysisThis study aimed to evaluate the biomechanical behavior, stress distributions and bone microstrain of fixed partial dentures (FPD) with ceramic abutments supported on monotype zirconia implants, titanium implants and two-piece zirconia implants, using finite element analysis. A three-dimensional model of the jaw was simulated containing 1.0 mm thick cortical bone and cancellous bone tissue. A FPD and implant models (4.1 x 10 mm) were modeled containing a cement-retained implant abutment. These models were replicated in three groups with similar geometries: Titanium Implant and Zirconia Abutment (Ti-Zr); Zirconia Implant and Zirconia Abutment (Zr-Zr) and Monotype Zirconia Implant (Zr-S). An axial load of 300 N was applied to the center of the first premolar. The microstrain (με) and the Von-Mises stress (MPa) were assumed as failures criteria. For the three groups, a higher stress concentration was observed in the region of FPD connectors. The Ti-Zr group showed a higher stress concentration in the prosthesis and implant when compared to the other groups. However, the smaller elastic modulus of the titanium implant, in relation to the zirconia, provided a lower stress in the abutment and in the prosthetic screw. The monotype implant system allowed a more homogeneous stress distribution and its strain were predominantly located in the cervical region of the peri-implant bone tissue. Monotype or two-piece zirconia implants can be used for rehabilitation with FPD. However, the absence of separation between implant and abutment in the monotype system avoids the stress concentration in the prosthetic screw and reduced the peri-implant bone strain.Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Institute of Science and Technology São Paulo State University (UNESP)Department of Dentistry Universidade São Francisco (USF)Department of Implantology College of Denstristry CECAPE Juazeiro do NorteDepartment of Dentistry University of Taubaté (UNITAU)Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Institute of Science and Technology São Paulo State University (UNESP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Universidade São Francisco (USF)Juazeiro do NorteUniversity of Taubaté (UNITAU)de Matos, Jefferson David Melo [UNESP]Lopes, Guilherme da Rocha Scalzer [UNESP]Nakano, Leonardo Jiro Nomura [UNESP]Ramos, Nathália de Carvalho [UNESP]Vasconcelos, John Eversong Lucena deBottino, Marco Antonio [UNESP]Tribst, João Paulo Mendes [UNESP]2022-05-01T09:30:47Z2022-05-01T09:30:47Z2022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article239-246http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2021.1946798Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, v. 25, n. 3, p. 239-246, 2022.1476-82591025-5842http://hdl.handle.net/11449/23357010.1080/10255842.2021.19467982-s2.0-85115635500Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengComputer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineeringinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-05-01T09:30:48Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/233570Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T20:49:13.800759Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Biomechanical evaluation of 3-unit fixed partial dentures on monotype and two-piece zirconia dental implants
title Biomechanical evaluation of 3-unit fixed partial dentures on monotype and two-piece zirconia dental implants
spellingShingle Biomechanical evaluation of 3-unit fixed partial dentures on monotype and two-piece zirconia dental implants
de Matos, Jefferson David Melo [UNESP]
Dental Abutments
Dental Implants
Dental Materials
Finite element analysis
title_short Biomechanical evaluation of 3-unit fixed partial dentures on monotype and two-piece zirconia dental implants
title_full Biomechanical evaluation of 3-unit fixed partial dentures on monotype and two-piece zirconia dental implants
title_fullStr Biomechanical evaluation of 3-unit fixed partial dentures on monotype and two-piece zirconia dental implants
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanical evaluation of 3-unit fixed partial dentures on monotype and two-piece zirconia dental implants
title_sort Biomechanical evaluation of 3-unit fixed partial dentures on monotype and two-piece zirconia dental implants
author de Matos, Jefferson David Melo [UNESP]
author_facet de Matos, Jefferson David Melo [UNESP]
Lopes, Guilherme da Rocha Scalzer [UNESP]
Nakano, Leonardo Jiro Nomura [UNESP]
Ramos, Nathália de Carvalho [UNESP]
Vasconcelos, John Eversong Lucena de
Bottino, Marco Antonio [UNESP]
Tribst, João Paulo Mendes [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Lopes, Guilherme da Rocha Scalzer [UNESP]
Nakano, Leonardo Jiro Nomura [UNESP]
Ramos, Nathália de Carvalho [UNESP]
Vasconcelos, John Eversong Lucena de
Bottino, Marco Antonio [UNESP]
Tribst, João Paulo Mendes [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
Universidade São Francisco (USF)
Juazeiro do Norte
University of Taubaté (UNITAU)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv de Matos, Jefferson David Melo [UNESP]
Lopes, Guilherme da Rocha Scalzer [UNESP]
Nakano, Leonardo Jiro Nomura [UNESP]
Ramos, Nathália de Carvalho [UNESP]
Vasconcelos, John Eversong Lucena de
Bottino, Marco Antonio [UNESP]
Tribst, João Paulo Mendes [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Dental Abutments
Dental Implants
Dental Materials
Finite element analysis
topic Dental Abutments
Dental Implants
Dental Materials
Finite element analysis
description This study aimed to evaluate the biomechanical behavior, stress distributions and bone microstrain of fixed partial dentures (FPD) with ceramic abutments supported on monotype zirconia implants, titanium implants and two-piece zirconia implants, using finite element analysis. A three-dimensional model of the jaw was simulated containing 1.0 mm thick cortical bone and cancellous bone tissue. A FPD and implant models (4.1 x 10 mm) were modeled containing a cement-retained implant abutment. These models were replicated in three groups with similar geometries: Titanium Implant and Zirconia Abutment (Ti-Zr); Zirconia Implant and Zirconia Abutment (Zr-Zr) and Monotype Zirconia Implant (Zr-S). An axial load of 300 N was applied to the center of the first premolar. The microstrain (με) and the Von-Mises stress (MPa) were assumed as failures criteria. For the three groups, a higher stress concentration was observed in the region of FPD connectors. The Ti-Zr group showed a higher stress concentration in the prosthesis and implant when compared to the other groups. However, the smaller elastic modulus of the titanium implant, in relation to the zirconia, provided a lower stress in the abutment and in the prosthetic screw. The monotype implant system allowed a more homogeneous stress distribution and its strain were predominantly located in the cervical region of the peri-implant bone tissue. Monotype or two-piece zirconia implants can be used for rehabilitation with FPD. However, the absence of separation between implant and abutment in the monotype system avoids the stress concentration in the prosthetic screw and reduced the peri-implant bone strain.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-05-01T09:30:47Z
2022-05-01T09:30:47Z
2022-01-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2021.1946798
Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, v. 25, n. 3, p. 239-246, 2022.
1476-8259
1025-5842
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/233570
10.1080/10255842.2021.1946798
2-s2.0-85115635500
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2021.1946798
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/233570
identifier_str_mv Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, v. 25, n. 3, p. 239-246, 2022.
1476-8259
1025-5842
10.1080/10255842.2021.1946798
2-s2.0-85115635500
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 239-246
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808129253507596288