Biomechanical evaluation of 3-unit fixed partial dentures on monotype and two-piece zirconia dental implants
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2021.1946798 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/233570 |
Resumo: | This study aimed to evaluate the biomechanical behavior, stress distributions and bone microstrain of fixed partial dentures (FPD) with ceramic abutments supported on monotype zirconia implants, titanium implants and two-piece zirconia implants, using finite element analysis. A three-dimensional model of the jaw was simulated containing 1.0 mm thick cortical bone and cancellous bone tissue. A FPD and implant models (4.1 x 10 mm) were modeled containing a cement-retained implant abutment. These models were replicated in three groups with similar geometries: Titanium Implant and Zirconia Abutment (Ti-Zr); Zirconia Implant and Zirconia Abutment (Zr-Zr) and Monotype Zirconia Implant (Zr-S). An axial load of 300 N was applied to the center of the first premolar. The microstrain (με) and the Von-Mises stress (MPa) were assumed as failures criteria. For the three groups, a higher stress concentration was observed in the region of FPD connectors. The Ti-Zr group showed a higher stress concentration in the prosthesis and implant when compared to the other groups. However, the smaller elastic modulus of the titanium implant, in relation to the zirconia, provided a lower stress in the abutment and in the prosthetic screw. The monotype implant system allowed a more homogeneous stress distribution and its strain were predominantly located in the cervical region of the peri-implant bone tissue. Monotype or two-piece zirconia implants can be used for rehabilitation with FPD. However, the absence of separation between implant and abutment in the monotype system avoids the stress concentration in the prosthetic screw and reduced the peri-implant bone strain. |
id |
UNSP_825c37401cf5aaabdf6126396907474d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/233570 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Biomechanical evaluation of 3-unit fixed partial dentures on monotype and two-piece zirconia dental implantsDental AbutmentsDental ImplantsDental MaterialsFinite element analysisThis study aimed to evaluate the biomechanical behavior, stress distributions and bone microstrain of fixed partial dentures (FPD) with ceramic abutments supported on monotype zirconia implants, titanium implants and two-piece zirconia implants, using finite element analysis. A three-dimensional model of the jaw was simulated containing 1.0 mm thick cortical bone and cancellous bone tissue. A FPD and implant models (4.1 x 10 mm) were modeled containing a cement-retained implant abutment. These models were replicated in three groups with similar geometries: Titanium Implant and Zirconia Abutment (Ti-Zr); Zirconia Implant and Zirconia Abutment (Zr-Zr) and Monotype Zirconia Implant (Zr-S). An axial load of 300 N was applied to the center of the first premolar. The microstrain (με) and the Von-Mises stress (MPa) were assumed as failures criteria. For the three groups, a higher stress concentration was observed in the region of FPD connectors. The Ti-Zr group showed a higher stress concentration in the prosthesis and implant when compared to the other groups. However, the smaller elastic modulus of the titanium implant, in relation to the zirconia, provided a lower stress in the abutment and in the prosthetic screw. The monotype implant system allowed a more homogeneous stress distribution and its strain were predominantly located in the cervical region of the peri-implant bone tissue. Monotype or two-piece zirconia implants can be used for rehabilitation with FPD. However, the absence of separation between implant and abutment in the monotype system avoids the stress concentration in the prosthetic screw and reduced the peri-implant bone strain.Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Institute of Science and Technology São Paulo State University (UNESP)Department of Dentistry Universidade São Francisco (USF)Department of Implantology College of Denstristry CECAPE Juazeiro do NorteDepartment of Dentistry University of Taubaté (UNITAU)Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Institute of Science and Technology São Paulo State University (UNESP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Universidade São Francisco (USF)Juazeiro do NorteUniversity of Taubaté (UNITAU)de Matos, Jefferson David Melo [UNESP]Lopes, Guilherme da Rocha Scalzer [UNESP]Nakano, Leonardo Jiro Nomura [UNESP]Ramos, Nathália de Carvalho [UNESP]Vasconcelos, John Eversong Lucena deBottino, Marco Antonio [UNESP]Tribst, João Paulo Mendes [UNESP]2022-05-01T09:30:47Z2022-05-01T09:30:47Z2022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article239-246http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2021.1946798Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, v. 25, n. 3, p. 239-246, 2022.1476-82591025-5842http://hdl.handle.net/11449/23357010.1080/10255842.2021.19467982-s2.0-85115635500Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengComputer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineeringinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-05-01T09:30:48Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/233570Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T20:49:13.800759Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Biomechanical evaluation of 3-unit fixed partial dentures on monotype and two-piece zirconia dental implants |
title |
Biomechanical evaluation of 3-unit fixed partial dentures on monotype and two-piece zirconia dental implants |
spellingShingle |
Biomechanical evaluation of 3-unit fixed partial dentures on monotype and two-piece zirconia dental implants de Matos, Jefferson David Melo [UNESP] Dental Abutments Dental Implants Dental Materials Finite element analysis |
title_short |
Biomechanical evaluation of 3-unit fixed partial dentures on monotype and two-piece zirconia dental implants |
title_full |
Biomechanical evaluation of 3-unit fixed partial dentures on monotype and two-piece zirconia dental implants |
title_fullStr |
Biomechanical evaluation of 3-unit fixed partial dentures on monotype and two-piece zirconia dental implants |
title_full_unstemmed |
Biomechanical evaluation of 3-unit fixed partial dentures on monotype and two-piece zirconia dental implants |
title_sort |
Biomechanical evaluation of 3-unit fixed partial dentures on monotype and two-piece zirconia dental implants |
author |
de Matos, Jefferson David Melo [UNESP] |
author_facet |
de Matos, Jefferson David Melo [UNESP] Lopes, Guilherme da Rocha Scalzer [UNESP] Nakano, Leonardo Jiro Nomura [UNESP] Ramos, Nathália de Carvalho [UNESP] Vasconcelos, John Eversong Lucena de Bottino, Marco Antonio [UNESP] Tribst, João Paulo Mendes [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Lopes, Guilherme da Rocha Scalzer [UNESP] Nakano, Leonardo Jiro Nomura [UNESP] Ramos, Nathália de Carvalho [UNESP] Vasconcelos, John Eversong Lucena de Bottino, Marco Antonio [UNESP] Tribst, João Paulo Mendes [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) Universidade São Francisco (USF) Juazeiro do Norte University of Taubaté (UNITAU) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
de Matos, Jefferson David Melo [UNESP] Lopes, Guilherme da Rocha Scalzer [UNESP] Nakano, Leonardo Jiro Nomura [UNESP] Ramos, Nathália de Carvalho [UNESP] Vasconcelos, John Eversong Lucena de Bottino, Marco Antonio [UNESP] Tribst, João Paulo Mendes [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Dental Abutments Dental Implants Dental Materials Finite element analysis |
topic |
Dental Abutments Dental Implants Dental Materials Finite element analysis |
description |
This study aimed to evaluate the biomechanical behavior, stress distributions and bone microstrain of fixed partial dentures (FPD) with ceramic abutments supported on monotype zirconia implants, titanium implants and two-piece zirconia implants, using finite element analysis. A three-dimensional model of the jaw was simulated containing 1.0 mm thick cortical bone and cancellous bone tissue. A FPD and implant models (4.1 x 10 mm) were modeled containing a cement-retained implant abutment. These models were replicated in three groups with similar geometries: Titanium Implant and Zirconia Abutment (Ti-Zr); Zirconia Implant and Zirconia Abutment (Zr-Zr) and Monotype Zirconia Implant (Zr-S). An axial load of 300 N was applied to the center of the first premolar. The microstrain (με) and the Von-Mises stress (MPa) were assumed as failures criteria. For the three groups, a higher stress concentration was observed in the region of FPD connectors. The Ti-Zr group showed a higher stress concentration in the prosthesis and implant when compared to the other groups. However, the smaller elastic modulus of the titanium implant, in relation to the zirconia, provided a lower stress in the abutment and in the prosthetic screw. The monotype implant system allowed a more homogeneous stress distribution and its strain were predominantly located in the cervical region of the peri-implant bone tissue. Monotype or two-piece zirconia implants can be used for rehabilitation with FPD. However, the absence of separation between implant and abutment in the monotype system avoids the stress concentration in the prosthetic screw and reduced the peri-implant bone strain. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-05-01T09:30:47Z 2022-05-01T09:30:47Z 2022-01-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2021.1946798 Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, v. 25, n. 3, p. 239-246, 2022. 1476-8259 1025-5842 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/233570 10.1080/10255842.2021.1946798 2-s2.0-85115635500 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2021.1946798 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/233570 |
identifier_str_mv |
Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, v. 25, n. 3, p. 239-246, 2022. 1476-8259 1025-5842 10.1080/10255842.2021.1946798 2-s2.0-85115635500 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
239-246 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808129253507596288 |