Does the applied gauge-wheel loads have influence on seeding depth and soil structure?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo de conferência |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.13031/aim.202101211 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/222348 |
Resumo: | The inadequate use of farming machinery could have negative impacts on soil structure and crop growth. During planting, a row-unit downforce system is used to reach and maintain a target seeding depth by applying downward forces to the planter’s gauge-wheels. These forces are transferred to the soil and can increase the soil bulk density resulting in soil compaction. This study aimed to evaluate if gauge-wheel load, created by a hydraulic downforce system, have influence on seeding depth, soil cone index and bulk density using downforce in active (dynamic) and fixed (static) operational modes during cotton sowing. The test was conducted under a no-tillage loamy sand soil. A six row John Deere Max Emerge Plus planter set to 91 cm row spacing was equipped with a hydraulic downforce system. For the static operational mode of the downforce mechanism, five load levels were tested: NDF (Row-unit weight), Low – 535 Newtons (N), Medium 667 N, High – 890 N, and Very High – 1112 N. Four loads were evaluated using the dynamic mode: same low and medium loads as in manual mode, and also 756 N and 867 N, which were considered as High and Very High, respectively. When the static mode was used, the applied load exceeded the target load, especially when 890 and 1112 N were applied. Overall, the applied final load was close to the target and exhibited less variability when the dynamic mode was used compared to the static mode. As the downward forces increased, seeding depth increased with less variability. |
id |
UNSP_842d5d1281b4d8ee582a07ce14ead337 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/222348 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Does the applied gauge-wheel loads have influence on seeding depth and soil structure?CottonDownforcePlantingThe inadequate use of farming machinery could have negative impacts on soil structure and crop growth. During planting, a row-unit downforce system is used to reach and maintain a target seeding depth by applying downward forces to the planter’s gauge-wheels. These forces are transferred to the soil and can increase the soil bulk density resulting in soil compaction. This study aimed to evaluate if gauge-wheel load, created by a hydraulic downforce system, have influence on seeding depth, soil cone index and bulk density using downforce in active (dynamic) and fixed (static) operational modes during cotton sowing. The test was conducted under a no-tillage loamy sand soil. A six row John Deere Max Emerge Plus planter set to 91 cm row spacing was equipped with a hydraulic downforce system. For the static operational mode of the downforce mechanism, five load levels were tested: NDF (Row-unit weight), Low – 535 Newtons (N), Medium 667 N, High – 890 N, and Very High – 1112 N. Four loads were evaluated using the dynamic mode: same low and medium loads as in manual mode, and also 756 N and 867 N, which were considered as High and Very High, respectively. When the static mode was used, the applied load exceeded the target load, especially when 890 and 1112 N were applied. Overall, the applied final load was close to the target and exhibited less variability when the dynamic mode was used compared to the static mode. As the downward forces increased, seeding depth increased with less variability.Crop Soil and Environmental Sciences Department Auburn UniversityAgricultural Engineering and Exact Sciences Department São Paulo State University, SPARS - United States Department of Agriculture, 411 S Donahue DrAlabama Agricultural Research Station Auburn UniversityAgricultural Engineering and Exact Sciences Department São Paulo State University, SPAuburn UniversityUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)ARS - United States Department of AgricultureOliveira, L. P.Ortiz, B. V.Silva, R. P. [UNESP]Way, T. R.Oliveira, M. F.Pate, G.2022-04-28T19:44:10Z2022-04-28T19:44:10Z2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject2676-2681http://dx.doi.org/10.13031/aim.202101211American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers Annual International Meeting, ASABE 2021, v. 4, p. 2676-2681.http://hdl.handle.net/11449/22234810.13031/aim.2021012112-s2.0-85114211971Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengAmerican Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers Annual International Meeting, ASABE 2021info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-04-28T19:44:10Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/222348Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T15:59:51.789299Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Does the applied gauge-wheel loads have influence on seeding depth and soil structure? |
title |
Does the applied gauge-wheel loads have influence on seeding depth and soil structure? |
spellingShingle |
Does the applied gauge-wheel loads have influence on seeding depth and soil structure? Oliveira, L. P. Cotton Downforce Planting |
title_short |
Does the applied gauge-wheel loads have influence on seeding depth and soil structure? |
title_full |
Does the applied gauge-wheel loads have influence on seeding depth and soil structure? |
title_fullStr |
Does the applied gauge-wheel loads have influence on seeding depth and soil structure? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Does the applied gauge-wheel loads have influence on seeding depth and soil structure? |
title_sort |
Does the applied gauge-wheel loads have influence on seeding depth and soil structure? |
author |
Oliveira, L. P. |
author_facet |
Oliveira, L. P. Ortiz, B. V. Silva, R. P. [UNESP] Way, T. R. Oliveira, M. F. Pate, G. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ortiz, B. V. Silva, R. P. [UNESP] Way, T. R. Oliveira, M. F. Pate, G. |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Auburn University Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) ARS - United States Department of Agriculture |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Oliveira, L. P. Ortiz, B. V. Silva, R. P. [UNESP] Way, T. R. Oliveira, M. F. Pate, G. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Cotton Downforce Planting |
topic |
Cotton Downforce Planting |
description |
The inadequate use of farming machinery could have negative impacts on soil structure and crop growth. During planting, a row-unit downforce system is used to reach and maintain a target seeding depth by applying downward forces to the planter’s gauge-wheels. These forces are transferred to the soil and can increase the soil bulk density resulting in soil compaction. This study aimed to evaluate if gauge-wheel load, created by a hydraulic downforce system, have influence on seeding depth, soil cone index and bulk density using downforce in active (dynamic) and fixed (static) operational modes during cotton sowing. The test was conducted under a no-tillage loamy sand soil. A six row John Deere Max Emerge Plus planter set to 91 cm row spacing was equipped with a hydraulic downforce system. For the static operational mode of the downforce mechanism, five load levels were tested: NDF (Row-unit weight), Low – 535 Newtons (N), Medium 667 N, High – 890 N, and Very High – 1112 N. Four loads were evaluated using the dynamic mode: same low and medium loads as in manual mode, and also 756 N and 867 N, which were considered as High and Very High, respectively. When the static mode was used, the applied load exceeded the target load, especially when 890 and 1112 N were applied. Overall, the applied final load was close to the target and exhibited less variability when the dynamic mode was used compared to the static mode. As the downward forces increased, seeding depth increased with less variability. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-01-01 2022-04-28T19:44:10Z 2022-04-28T19:44:10Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject |
format |
conferenceObject |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.13031/aim.202101211 American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers Annual International Meeting, ASABE 2021, v. 4, p. 2676-2681. http://hdl.handle.net/11449/222348 10.13031/aim.202101211 2-s2.0-85114211971 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.13031/aim.202101211 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/222348 |
identifier_str_mv |
American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers Annual International Meeting, ASABE 2021, v. 4, p. 2676-2681. 10.13031/aim.202101211 2-s2.0-85114211971 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers Annual International Meeting, ASABE 2021 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
2676-2681 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808128590438465536 |