Does the applied gauge-wheel loads have influence on seeding depth and soil structure?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Oliveira, L. P.
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Ortiz, B. V., Silva, R. P. [UNESP], Way, T. R., Oliveira, M. F., Pate, G.
Tipo de documento: Artigo de conferência
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.13031/aim.202101211
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/222348
Resumo: The inadequate use of farming machinery could have negative impacts on soil structure and crop growth. During planting, a row-unit downforce system is used to reach and maintain a target seeding depth by applying downward forces to the planter’s gauge-wheels. These forces are transferred to the soil and can increase the soil bulk density resulting in soil compaction. This study aimed to evaluate if gauge-wheel load, created by a hydraulic downforce system, have influence on seeding depth, soil cone index and bulk density using downforce in active (dynamic) and fixed (static) operational modes during cotton sowing. The test was conducted under a no-tillage loamy sand soil. A six row John Deere Max Emerge Plus planter set to 91 cm row spacing was equipped with a hydraulic downforce system. For the static operational mode of the downforce mechanism, five load levels were tested: NDF (Row-unit weight), Low – 535 Newtons (N), Medium 667 N, High – 890 N, and Very High – 1112 N. Four loads were evaluated using the dynamic mode: same low and medium loads as in manual mode, and also 756 N and 867 N, which were considered as High and Very High, respectively. When the static mode was used, the applied load exceeded the target load, especially when 890 and 1112 N were applied. Overall, the applied final load was close to the target and exhibited less variability when the dynamic mode was used compared to the static mode. As the downward forces increased, seeding depth increased with less variability.
id UNSP_842d5d1281b4d8ee582a07ce14ead337
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/222348
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Does the applied gauge-wheel loads have influence on seeding depth and soil structure?CottonDownforcePlantingThe inadequate use of farming machinery could have negative impacts on soil structure and crop growth. During planting, a row-unit downforce system is used to reach and maintain a target seeding depth by applying downward forces to the planter’s gauge-wheels. These forces are transferred to the soil and can increase the soil bulk density resulting in soil compaction. This study aimed to evaluate if gauge-wheel load, created by a hydraulic downforce system, have influence on seeding depth, soil cone index and bulk density using downforce in active (dynamic) and fixed (static) operational modes during cotton sowing. The test was conducted under a no-tillage loamy sand soil. A six row John Deere Max Emerge Plus planter set to 91 cm row spacing was equipped with a hydraulic downforce system. For the static operational mode of the downforce mechanism, five load levels were tested: NDF (Row-unit weight), Low – 535 Newtons (N), Medium 667 N, High – 890 N, and Very High – 1112 N. Four loads were evaluated using the dynamic mode: same low and medium loads as in manual mode, and also 756 N and 867 N, which were considered as High and Very High, respectively. When the static mode was used, the applied load exceeded the target load, especially when 890 and 1112 N were applied. Overall, the applied final load was close to the target and exhibited less variability when the dynamic mode was used compared to the static mode. As the downward forces increased, seeding depth increased with less variability.Crop Soil and Environmental Sciences Department Auburn UniversityAgricultural Engineering and Exact Sciences Department São Paulo State University, SPARS - United States Department of Agriculture, 411 S Donahue DrAlabama Agricultural Research Station Auburn UniversityAgricultural Engineering and Exact Sciences Department São Paulo State University, SPAuburn UniversityUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)ARS - United States Department of AgricultureOliveira, L. P.Ortiz, B. V.Silva, R. P. [UNESP]Way, T. R.Oliveira, M. F.Pate, G.2022-04-28T19:44:10Z2022-04-28T19:44:10Z2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject2676-2681http://dx.doi.org/10.13031/aim.202101211American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers Annual International Meeting, ASABE 2021, v. 4, p. 2676-2681.http://hdl.handle.net/11449/22234810.13031/aim.2021012112-s2.0-85114211971Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengAmerican Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers Annual International Meeting, ASABE 2021info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-04-28T19:44:10Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/222348Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T15:59:51.789299Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Does the applied gauge-wheel loads have influence on seeding depth and soil structure?
title Does the applied gauge-wheel loads have influence on seeding depth and soil structure?
spellingShingle Does the applied gauge-wheel loads have influence on seeding depth and soil structure?
Oliveira, L. P.
Cotton
Downforce
Planting
title_short Does the applied gauge-wheel loads have influence on seeding depth and soil structure?
title_full Does the applied gauge-wheel loads have influence on seeding depth and soil structure?
title_fullStr Does the applied gauge-wheel loads have influence on seeding depth and soil structure?
title_full_unstemmed Does the applied gauge-wheel loads have influence on seeding depth and soil structure?
title_sort Does the applied gauge-wheel loads have influence on seeding depth and soil structure?
author Oliveira, L. P.
author_facet Oliveira, L. P.
Ortiz, B. V.
Silva, R. P. [UNESP]
Way, T. R.
Oliveira, M. F.
Pate, G.
author_role author
author2 Ortiz, B. V.
Silva, R. P. [UNESP]
Way, T. R.
Oliveira, M. F.
Pate, G.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Auburn University
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
ARS - United States Department of Agriculture
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Oliveira, L. P.
Ortiz, B. V.
Silva, R. P. [UNESP]
Way, T. R.
Oliveira, M. F.
Pate, G.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Cotton
Downforce
Planting
topic Cotton
Downforce
Planting
description The inadequate use of farming machinery could have negative impacts on soil structure and crop growth. During planting, a row-unit downforce system is used to reach and maintain a target seeding depth by applying downward forces to the planter’s gauge-wheels. These forces are transferred to the soil and can increase the soil bulk density resulting in soil compaction. This study aimed to evaluate if gauge-wheel load, created by a hydraulic downforce system, have influence on seeding depth, soil cone index and bulk density using downforce in active (dynamic) and fixed (static) operational modes during cotton sowing. The test was conducted under a no-tillage loamy sand soil. A six row John Deere Max Emerge Plus planter set to 91 cm row spacing was equipped with a hydraulic downforce system. For the static operational mode of the downforce mechanism, five load levels were tested: NDF (Row-unit weight), Low – 535 Newtons (N), Medium 667 N, High – 890 N, and Very High – 1112 N. Four loads were evaluated using the dynamic mode: same low and medium loads as in manual mode, and also 756 N and 867 N, which were considered as High and Very High, respectively. When the static mode was used, the applied load exceeded the target load, especially when 890 and 1112 N were applied. Overall, the applied final load was close to the target and exhibited less variability when the dynamic mode was used compared to the static mode. As the downward forces increased, seeding depth increased with less variability.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-01-01
2022-04-28T19:44:10Z
2022-04-28T19:44:10Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
format conferenceObject
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.13031/aim.202101211
American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers Annual International Meeting, ASABE 2021, v. 4, p. 2676-2681.
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/222348
10.13031/aim.202101211
2-s2.0-85114211971
url http://dx.doi.org/10.13031/aim.202101211
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/222348
identifier_str_mv American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers Annual International Meeting, ASABE 2021, v. 4, p. 2676-2681.
10.13031/aim.202101211
2-s2.0-85114211971
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers Annual International Meeting, ASABE 2021
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 2676-2681
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808128590438465536