Preference and motivation tests for body tactile stimulation in fish

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Gauy, Ana Carolina Dos Santos [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Bolognesi, Marcela Cesar [UNESP], Martins, Guilherme Delgado [UNESP], Gonçalves-De-freitas, Eliane [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani11072042
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/229093
Resumo: We tested whether territorial fish (Nile tilapia) perceive body tactile stimulation as a positive or negative resource. Individual male fish were placed for eight days in an aquarium containing a rectangular PVC frame, which was filled with vertical plastic sticks sided with silicone bristles in the middle of the tank. Fish passing this device received a tactile stimulus. The fish then underwent a preference test by choosing between areas half-with and half-without tactile bristles. Then, fish were submitted to a motivation test where they had to pass an aversive stimulus (bright light) to access the device. Fish were, then, paired to settle social rank, which occurs by way of fights (social stressor), and were assigned again to preference and motivation tests. A group without social stress was used as a control. Contrary to our expectations, fish preferred the area without tactile bristles, although subordinate fish reached tactile stimulation more than the dominant one. Social stress did not affect the preference and motivation, suggesting that fish do not perceive tactile stimulation as a stressor reliever. However, as fish did not avoid the stimulation, reached the device spontaneously, and faced an aversive stimulus to access it, we conclude that tactile stimulation is not a negative condition and, therefore, can be used in further studies regarding fish welfare.
id UNSP_84b7ca0b0e6bf74fca227cf639995e07
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/229093
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Preference and motivation tests for body tactile stimulation in fishAggressive behaviorChoiceMotivationSocial stressWelfareWe tested whether territorial fish (Nile tilapia) perceive body tactile stimulation as a positive or negative resource. Individual male fish were placed for eight days in an aquarium containing a rectangular PVC frame, which was filled with vertical plastic sticks sided with silicone bristles in the middle of the tank. Fish passing this device received a tactile stimulus. The fish then underwent a preference test by choosing between areas half-with and half-without tactile bristles. Then, fish were submitted to a motivation test where they had to pass an aversive stimulus (bright light) to access the device. Fish were, then, paired to settle social rank, which occurs by way of fights (social stressor), and were assigned again to preference and motivation tests. A group without social stress was used as a control. Contrary to our expectations, fish preferred the area without tactile bristles, although subordinate fish reached tactile stimulation more than the dominant one. Social stress did not affect the preference and motivation, suggesting that fish do not perceive tactile stimulation as a stressor reliever. However, as fish did not avoid the stimulation, reached the device spontaneously, and faced an aversive stimulus to access it, we conclude that tactile stimulation is not a negative condition and, therefore, can be used in further studies regarding fish welfare.Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Departamento de Ciências Biológicas Instituto de Biociências Letras e Ciências Exatas Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Rua Cristóvão Colombo 2265CAUNESP—Centro de Aquicultura da UNESPDepartamento de Ciências Biológicas Instituto de Biociências Letras e Ciências Exatas Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Rua Cristóvão Colombo 2265CAUNESP—Centro de Aquicultura da UNESPCNPq: #131338/2017-0CNPq: #154975/2016-8Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Gauy, Ana Carolina Dos Santos [UNESP]Bolognesi, Marcela Cesar [UNESP]Martins, Guilherme Delgado [UNESP]Gonçalves-De-freitas, Eliane [UNESP]2022-04-29T08:30:20Z2022-04-29T08:30:20Z2021-07-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani11072042Animals, v. 11, n. 7, 2021.2076-2615http://hdl.handle.net/11449/22909310.3390/ani110720422-s2.0-85109275988Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengAnimalsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-04-29T08:30:20Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/229093Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T15:53:53.556567Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Preference and motivation tests for body tactile stimulation in fish
title Preference and motivation tests for body tactile stimulation in fish
spellingShingle Preference and motivation tests for body tactile stimulation in fish
Gauy, Ana Carolina Dos Santos [UNESP]
Aggressive behavior
Choice
Motivation
Social stress
Welfare
title_short Preference and motivation tests for body tactile stimulation in fish
title_full Preference and motivation tests for body tactile stimulation in fish
title_fullStr Preference and motivation tests for body tactile stimulation in fish
title_full_unstemmed Preference and motivation tests for body tactile stimulation in fish
title_sort Preference and motivation tests for body tactile stimulation in fish
author Gauy, Ana Carolina Dos Santos [UNESP]
author_facet Gauy, Ana Carolina Dos Santos [UNESP]
Bolognesi, Marcela Cesar [UNESP]
Martins, Guilherme Delgado [UNESP]
Gonçalves-De-freitas, Eliane [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Bolognesi, Marcela Cesar [UNESP]
Martins, Guilherme Delgado [UNESP]
Gonçalves-De-freitas, Eliane [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Gauy, Ana Carolina Dos Santos [UNESP]
Bolognesi, Marcela Cesar [UNESP]
Martins, Guilherme Delgado [UNESP]
Gonçalves-De-freitas, Eliane [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Aggressive behavior
Choice
Motivation
Social stress
Welfare
topic Aggressive behavior
Choice
Motivation
Social stress
Welfare
description We tested whether territorial fish (Nile tilapia) perceive body tactile stimulation as a positive or negative resource. Individual male fish were placed for eight days in an aquarium containing a rectangular PVC frame, which was filled with vertical plastic sticks sided with silicone bristles in the middle of the tank. Fish passing this device received a tactile stimulus. The fish then underwent a preference test by choosing between areas half-with and half-without tactile bristles. Then, fish were submitted to a motivation test where they had to pass an aversive stimulus (bright light) to access the device. Fish were, then, paired to settle social rank, which occurs by way of fights (social stressor), and were assigned again to preference and motivation tests. A group without social stress was used as a control. Contrary to our expectations, fish preferred the area without tactile bristles, although subordinate fish reached tactile stimulation more than the dominant one. Social stress did not affect the preference and motivation, suggesting that fish do not perceive tactile stimulation as a stressor reliever. However, as fish did not avoid the stimulation, reached the device spontaneously, and faced an aversive stimulus to access it, we conclude that tactile stimulation is not a negative condition and, therefore, can be used in further studies regarding fish welfare.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-07-01
2022-04-29T08:30:20Z
2022-04-29T08:30:20Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani11072042
Animals, v. 11, n. 7, 2021.
2076-2615
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/229093
10.3390/ani11072042
2-s2.0-85109275988
url http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani11072042
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/229093
identifier_str_mv Animals, v. 11, n. 7, 2021.
2076-2615
10.3390/ani11072042
2-s2.0-85109275988
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Animals
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808128580465459200