A comparative analysis reveals weak relationships between ecological factors and beta diversity of stream insect metacommunities at two spatial levels
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ece3.1439/full http://hdl.handle.net/11449/128751 |
Resumo: | The hypotheses that beta diversity should increase with decreasing latitude and increase with spatial extent of a region have rarely been tested based on a comparative analysis of multiple datasets, and no such study has focused on stream insects. We first assessed how well variability in beta diversity of stream insect metacommunities is predicted by insect group, latitude, spatial extent, altitudinal range, and dataset properties across multiple drainage basins throughout the world. Second, we assessed the relative roles of environmental and spatial factors in driving variation in assemblage composition within each drainage basin. Our analyses were based on a dataset of 95 stream insect metacommunities from 31 drainage basins distributed around the world. We used dissimilarity-based indices to quantify beta diversity for each metacommunity and, subsequently, regressed beta diversity on insect group, latitude, spatial extent, altitudinal range, and dataset properties (e.g., number of sites and percentage of presences). Within each metacommunity, we used a combination of spatial eigenfunction analyses and partial redundancy analysis to partition variation in assemblage structure into environmental, shared, spatial, and unexplained fractions. We found that dataset properties were more important predictors of beta diversity than ecological and geographical factors across multiple drainage basins. In the within-basin analyses, environmental and spatial variables were generally poor predictors of variation in assemblage composition. Our results revealed deviation from general biodiversity patterns because beta diversity did not show the expected decreasing trend with latitude. Our results also call for reconsideration of just how predictable stream assemblages are along ecological gradients, with implications for environmental assessment and conservation decisions. Our findings may also be applicable to other dynamic systems where predictability is low. |
id |
UNSP_85198d68f21f5aac935b5e19dac91a28 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/128751 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
A comparative analysis reveals weak relationships between ecological factors and beta diversity of stream insect metacommunities at two spatial levelsAltitude rangeComparative analysisEnvironmental filteringinsectsLatitudeSpatial extentVariance partitioningThe hypotheses that beta diversity should increase with decreasing latitude and increase with spatial extent of a region have rarely been tested based on a comparative analysis of multiple datasets, and no such study has focused on stream insects. We first assessed how well variability in beta diversity of stream insect metacommunities is predicted by insect group, latitude, spatial extent, altitudinal range, and dataset properties across multiple drainage basins throughout the world. Second, we assessed the relative roles of environmental and spatial factors in driving variation in assemblage composition within each drainage basin. Our analyses were based on a dataset of 95 stream insect metacommunities from 31 drainage basins distributed around the world. We used dissimilarity-based indices to quantify beta diversity for each metacommunity and, subsequently, regressed beta diversity on insect group, latitude, spatial extent, altitudinal range, and dataset properties (e.g., number of sites and percentage of presences). Within each metacommunity, we used a combination of spatial eigenfunction analyses and partial redundancy analysis to partition variation in assemblage structure into environmental, shared, spatial, and unexplained fractions. We found that dataset properties were more important predictors of beta diversity than ecological and geographical factors across multiple drainage basins. In the within-basin analyses, environmental and spatial variables were generally poor predictors of variation in assemblage composition. Our results revealed deviation from general biodiversity patterns because beta diversity did not show the expected decreasing trend with latitude. Our results also call for reconsideration of just how predictable stream assemblages are along ecological gradients, with implications for environmental assessment and conservation decisions. Our findings may also be applicable to other dynamic systems where predictability is low.Academy of FinlandConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)FRGS of Ministry of Higher Education, MalaysiaSpanish Ministry of Science and TechnologyEUCONICETCompanhia Energetica de Minas Gerais (Peixe Vivo Program)PD ANEEL/CEMIGFundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa de Minas GeraisINPACoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)Claude Leon Postdoctoral FellowshipFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)Programa de Apoio a Fixacao de Doutores no Amazonas - FIXAM/AM fellowshipAustralian Research CouncilSwiss National Science FoundationSwiss Federal Office for the Environment from SwitzerlandFinnish Environment Institute, Natural Environment Centre, Biodiversity, Oulu, FinlandDepartamento de Ecologia, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, GO, BrazilDepartment of Aquatic Ecology, Eawag: Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, Dübendorf, SwitzerlandInstitute of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Zürich, SwitzerlandSchool of Biological Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, MalaysiaBiology Department, Faculty of Science, University of Tabuk, Tabuk, Saudi ArabiaDepartment of Aquatic Sciences and Assessment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, SwedenDepartament d'Ecologia, Grup de Recerca Freshwater Ecology and Management (FEM), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, SpainLIESA-CONICET-Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia SJB, Chubut, ArgentinaDepartamento de Biologia Geral, Instituto de Biologia Geral, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, BrazilDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, CanadaLaboratory of Entomology, School of Biological Sciences, Pontifical Catholic University of Ecuador, Quito, EcuadorIRD, Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, Laboratoire Evolution, Génomes et Spéciation, Gif-sur-Yvette, FranceSchool of Biological Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, ChinaLaboratorio de Ecología Acuática Colegio de Ciencias Biológicas y Ambientales Universidad San Francisco de Quito, Quito, EcuadorDepartment of Bioscience, Aarhus University, Silkeborg, DenmarkInstituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Coordenação de Biodiversidade, Manaus, AM, Brazil 18Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, DenmarkDepartamento de Botânica e Ecologia, Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso, Cuiabá, BrazilDepartamento de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, BrazilSection of Conservation Biology, Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Basel, Basel, SwitzerlandBalaton Limnological Institute, Centre for Ecological Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Tihany, HungaryDepartment of Conservation Ecology and Entomology, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South AfricaInstituto de Biociências, UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista, Rio Claro, São Paulo, BrazilInstitute for Applied Ecology, University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT, AustraliaDepartment of Zoology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.Universidade Estadual Paulista, Instituto de Biociências, Departamento de Ecologia, UNESP - Rio Claro, São Paulo, BrazilSpanish Ministry of Science and Technology: HID98-0323-C05Spanish Ministry of Science and Technology: REN2001-3438-C07EU: 226874CONICET: PIP 5733PD ANEEL/CEMIG: GT-487Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa de Minas Gerais: FAPEMIG PPM-00077/13FAPESP: 2013/50424-1CNPq: 403949/2013-0Australian Research Council: FT110100957Wiley-BlackwellFinnish Environm InstUniversidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)Eawag Swiss Fed Inst Aquat Sci &TechnolUniv ZurichSch Biol SciUniv TabukSwedish Univ Agr SciUniv BarcelonaLIESA CONICET Univ Nacl Patagonia SJBUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)Univ GuelphPontif Cathol Univ EcuadorInst Rech DeveloppementUniv Hong KongLaboratorio Ecologia Acuat Colegio Ciencias BioloAarhus UnivInst Nacl de Pesquisas da AmazoniaUniv CopenhagenUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS)Univ BaselHungarian Acad SciUniv StellenboschUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Univ CanberraUniv OtagoHeino, JaniMelo, Adriano S.Bini, Luis MauricioAltermatt, FlorianAl-Shami, Salman A.Angeler, David G.Bonada, NuriaBrand, CeciliaCallisto, MarcosCottenie, KarlDangles, OlivierDudgeon, DavidEncalada, AndreaGoethe, EmmaGroenroos, MiraHamada, NeusaJacobsen, DeanLandeiro, Victor L.Ligeiro, RaphaelMartins, Renato T.Miserendino, Maria LauraMd Rawi, Che SalmahRodrigues, Marciel E.Roque, Fabio de OliveiraSandin, LeonardSchmera, DenesSgarbi, Luciano F.Simaika, John P.Siqueira, Tadeu [UNESP]Thompson, Ross M.Townsend, Colin R.2015-10-21T13:13:04Z2015-10-21T13:13:04Z2015-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article1235-1248application/pdfhttp://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ece3.1439/fullEcology And Evolution. Hoboken: Wiley-blackwell, v. 5, n. 6, p. 1235-1248, 2015.2045-7758http://hdl.handle.net/11449/12875110.1002/ece3.1439WOS:000351458500010WOS000351458500010.pdfWeb of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengEcology And Evolution2.3401,356info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-11-20T06:16:37Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/128751Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T18:16:05.361706Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
A comparative analysis reveals weak relationships between ecological factors and beta diversity of stream insect metacommunities at two spatial levels |
title |
A comparative analysis reveals weak relationships between ecological factors and beta diversity of stream insect metacommunities at two spatial levels |
spellingShingle |
A comparative analysis reveals weak relationships between ecological factors and beta diversity of stream insect metacommunities at two spatial levels Heino, Jani Altitude range Comparative analysis Environmental filtering insects Latitude Spatial extent Variance partitioning |
title_short |
A comparative analysis reveals weak relationships between ecological factors and beta diversity of stream insect metacommunities at two spatial levels |
title_full |
A comparative analysis reveals weak relationships between ecological factors and beta diversity of stream insect metacommunities at two spatial levels |
title_fullStr |
A comparative analysis reveals weak relationships between ecological factors and beta diversity of stream insect metacommunities at two spatial levels |
title_full_unstemmed |
A comparative analysis reveals weak relationships between ecological factors and beta diversity of stream insect metacommunities at two spatial levels |
title_sort |
A comparative analysis reveals weak relationships between ecological factors and beta diversity of stream insect metacommunities at two spatial levels |
author |
Heino, Jani |
author_facet |
Heino, Jani Melo, Adriano S. Bini, Luis Mauricio Altermatt, Florian Al-Shami, Salman A. Angeler, David G. Bonada, Nuria Brand, Cecilia Callisto, Marcos Cottenie, Karl Dangles, Olivier Dudgeon, David Encalada, Andrea Goethe, Emma Groenroos, Mira Hamada, Neusa Jacobsen, Dean Landeiro, Victor L. Ligeiro, Raphael Martins, Renato T. Miserendino, Maria Laura Md Rawi, Che Salmah Rodrigues, Marciel E. Roque, Fabio de Oliveira Sandin, Leonard Schmera, Denes Sgarbi, Luciano F. Simaika, John P. Siqueira, Tadeu [UNESP] Thompson, Ross M. Townsend, Colin R. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Melo, Adriano S. Bini, Luis Mauricio Altermatt, Florian Al-Shami, Salman A. Angeler, David G. Bonada, Nuria Brand, Cecilia Callisto, Marcos Cottenie, Karl Dangles, Olivier Dudgeon, David Encalada, Andrea Goethe, Emma Groenroos, Mira Hamada, Neusa Jacobsen, Dean Landeiro, Victor L. Ligeiro, Raphael Martins, Renato T. Miserendino, Maria Laura Md Rawi, Che Salmah Rodrigues, Marciel E. Roque, Fabio de Oliveira Sandin, Leonard Schmera, Denes Sgarbi, Luciano F. Simaika, John P. Siqueira, Tadeu [UNESP] Thompson, Ross M. Townsend, Colin R. |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Finnish Environm Inst Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG) Eawag Swiss Fed Inst Aquat Sci &Technol Univ Zurich Sch Biol Sci Univ Tabuk Swedish Univ Agr Sci Univ Barcelona LIESA CONICET Univ Nacl Patagonia SJB Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) Univ Guelph Pontif Cathol Univ Ecuador Inst Rech Developpement Univ Hong Kong Laboratorio Ecologia Acuat Colegio Ciencias Biolo Aarhus Univ Inst Nacl de Pesquisas da Amazonia Univ Copenhagen Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS) Univ Basel Hungarian Acad Sci Univ Stellenbosch Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) Univ Canberra Univ Otago |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Heino, Jani Melo, Adriano S. Bini, Luis Mauricio Altermatt, Florian Al-Shami, Salman A. Angeler, David G. Bonada, Nuria Brand, Cecilia Callisto, Marcos Cottenie, Karl Dangles, Olivier Dudgeon, David Encalada, Andrea Goethe, Emma Groenroos, Mira Hamada, Neusa Jacobsen, Dean Landeiro, Victor L. Ligeiro, Raphael Martins, Renato T. Miserendino, Maria Laura Md Rawi, Che Salmah Rodrigues, Marciel E. Roque, Fabio de Oliveira Sandin, Leonard Schmera, Denes Sgarbi, Luciano F. Simaika, John P. Siqueira, Tadeu [UNESP] Thompson, Ross M. Townsend, Colin R. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Altitude range Comparative analysis Environmental filtering insects Latitude Spatial extent Variance partitioning |
topic |
Altitude range Comparative analysis Environmental filtering insects Latitude Spatial extent Variance partitioning |
description |
The hypotheses that beta diversity should increase with decreasing latitude and increase with spatial extent of a region have rarely been tested based on a comparative analysis of multiple datasets, and no such study has focused on stream insects. We first assessed how well variability in beta diversity of stream insect metacommunities is predicted by insect group, latitude, spatial extent, altitudinal range, and dataset properties across multiple drainage basins throughout the world. Second, we assessed the relative roles of environmental and spatial factors in driving variation in assemblage composition within each drainage basin. Our analyses were based on a dataset of 95 stream insect metacommunities from 31 drainage basins distributed around the world. We used dissimilarity-based indices to quantify beta diversity for each metacommunity and, subsequently, regressed beta diversity on insect group, latitude, spatial extent, altitudinal range, and dataset properties (e.g., number of sites and percentage of presences). Within each metacommunity, we used a combination of spatial eigenfunction analyses and partial redundancy analysis to partition variation in assemblage structure into environmental, shared, spatial, and unexplained fractions. We found that dataset properties were more important predictors of beta diversity than ecological and geographical factors across multiple drainage basins. In the within-basin analyses, environmental and spatial variables were generally poor predictors of variation in assemblage composition. Our results revealed deviation from general biodiversity patterns because beta diversity did not show the expected decreasing trend with latitude. Our results also call for reconsideration of just how predictable stream assemblages are along ecological gradients, with implications for environmental assessment and conservation decisions. Our findings may also be applicable to other dynamic systems where predictability is low. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-10-21T13:13:04Z 2015-10-21T13:13:04Z 2015-03-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ece3.1439/full Ecology And Evolution. Hoboken: Wiley-blackwell, v. 5, n. 6, p. 1235-1248, 2015. 2045-7758 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/128751 10.1002/ece3.1439 WOS:000351458500010 WOS000351458500010.pdf |
url |
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ece3.1439/full http://hdl.handle.net/11449/128751 |
identifier_str_mv |
Ecology And Evolution. Hoboken: Wiley-blackwell, v. 5, n. 6, p. 1235-1248, 2015. 2045-7758 10.1002/ece3.1439 WOS:000351458500010 WOS000351458500010.pdf |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Ecology And Evolution 2.340 1,356 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
1235-1248 application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Wiley-Blackwell |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Wiley-Blackwell |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Web of Science reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808128914360369152 |