Carbon dioxide emissions under different soil tillage systems in mechanically harvested sugarcane
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2013 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/1/015014 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/74209 |
Resumo: | Soil tillage and other methods of soil management may influence CO 2 emissions because they accelerate the mineralization of organic carbon in the soil. This study aimed to quantify the CO2 emissions under conventional tillage (CT), minimum tillage (MT) and reduced tillage (RT) during the renovation of sugarcane fields in southern Brazil. The experiment was performed on an Oxisol in the sugarcane-planting area with mechanical harvesting. An undisturbed or no-till (NT) plot was left as a control treatment. The CO2 emissions results indicated a significant interaction (p < 0.001) between tillage method and time after tillage. By quantifying the accumulated emissions over the 44 days after soil tillage, we observed that tillage-induced emissions were higher after the CT system than the RT and MT systems, reaching 350.09 g m-2 of CO2 in CT, and 51.7 and 5.5 g m-2 of CO2 in RT and MT respectively. The amount of C lost in the form of CO2 due to soil tillage practices was significant and comparable to the estimated value of potential annual C accumulation resulting from changes in the harvesting system in Brazil from burning of plant residues to the adoption of green cane harvesting. The CO 2 emissions in the CT system could respond to a loss of 80% of the potential soil C accumulated over one year as result of the adoption of mechanized sugarcane harvesting. Meanwhile, soil tillage during the renewal of the sugar plantation using RT and MT methods would result in low impact, with losses of 12% and 2% of the C that could potentially be accumulated during a one year period. © 2013 IOP Publishing Ltd. |
id |
UNSP_8597b184bb7397af3134f5d20cf230be |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/74209 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Carbon dioxide emissions under different soil tillage systems in mechanically harvested sugarcaneBrazilC footprintCO2emissionsemission after tillageethanolgreenhouse gassoil carbonCarbon dioxide emissionsControl treatmentsConventional tillageHarvesting systemSoil carbonSugar plantationAgricultural machineryAgronomyCarbon dioxideEthanolGlobal warmingGreenhouse gasesHarvestingSoilsSoil pollutionbiomass burningcarbon dioxidecarbon footprintconservation tillagefieldharvestingorganic carbonOxisolplant residueplantationsoil managementsugar canezero tillageSoil tillage and other methods of soil management may influence CO 2 emissions because they accelerate the mineralization of organic carbon in the soil. This study aimed to quantify the CO2 emissions under conventional tillage (CT), minimum tillage (MT) and reduced tillage (RT) during the renovation of sugarcane fields in southern Brazil. The experiment was performed on an Oxisol in the sugarcane-planting area with mechanical harvesting. An undisturbed or no-till (NT) plot was left as a control treatment. The CO2 emissions results indicated a significant interaction (p < 0.001) between tillage method and time after tillage. By quantifying the accumulated emissions over the 44 days after soil tillage, we observed that tillage-induced emissions were higher after the CT system than the RT and MT systems, reaching 350.09 g m-2 of CO2 in CT, and 51.7 and 5.5 g m-2 of CO2 in RT and MT respectively. The amount of C lost in the form of CO2 due to soil tillage practices was significant and comparable to the estimated value of potential annual C accumulation resulting from changes in the harvesting system in Brazil from burning of plant residues to the adoption of green cane harvesting. The CO 2 emissions in the CT system could respond to a loss of 80% of the potential soil C accumulated over one year as result of the adoption of mechanized sugarcane harvesting. Meanwhile, soil tillage during the renewal of the sugar plantation using RT and MT methods would result in low impact, with losses of 12% and 2% of the C that could potentially be accumulated during a one year period. © 2013 IOP Publishing Ltd.ESALQ-USP, 11, Avenida Pádua Dias, Piracicaba, SPCENA-USP, 303, Avenida Centenário, Piracicaba, SPFCAV-UNESP, Via de Acesso Prof. Paulo Donato Castellane s/n, 14884-900, Jaboticabal, SPFCAV-UNESP, Via de Acesso Prof. Paulo Donato Castellane s/n, 14884-900, Jaboticabal, SPUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Silva-Olaya, A. M.Cerri, C. E PLa Scala, N. [UNESP]Dias, C. T SCerri, C. C.2014-05-27T11:27:29Z2014-05-27T11:27:29Z2013-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/1/015014Environmental Research Letters, v. 8, n. 1, 2013.1748-93181748-9326http://hdl.handle.net/11449/7420910.1088/1748-9326/8/1/015014WOS:0003169983000772-s2.0-848761880352-s2.0-84876188035.pdf1449605928537533Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengEnvironmental Research Letters4.5412,436info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-06-06T13:42:01Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/74209Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T14:11:22.017003Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Carbon dioxide emissions under different soil tillage systems in mechanically harvested sugarcane |
title |
Carbon dioxide emissions under different soil tillage systems in mechanically harvested sugarcane |
spellingShingle |
Carbon dioxide emissions under different soil tillage systems in mechanically harvested sugarcane Silva-Olaya, A. M. Brazil C footprint CO2emissions emission after tillage ethanol greenhouse gas soil carbon Carbon dioxide emissions Control treatments Conventional tillage Harvesting system Soil carbon Sugar plantation Agricultural machinery Agronomy Carbon dioxide Ethanol Global warming Greenhouse gases Harvesting Soils Soil pollution biomass burning carbon dioxide carbon footprint conservation tillage field harvesting organic carbon Oxisol plant residue plantation soil management sugar cane zero tillage |
title_short |
Carbon dioxide emissions under different soil tillage systems in mechanically harvested sugarcane |
title_full |
Carbon dioxide emissions under different soil tillage systems in mechanically harvested sugarcane |
title_fullStr |
Carbon dioxide emissions under different soil tillage systems in mechanically harvested sugarcane |
title_full_unstemmed |
Carbon dioxide emissions under different soil tillage systems in mechanically harvested sugarcane |
title_sort |
Carbon dioxide emissions under different soil tillage systems in mechanically harvested sugarcane |
author |
Silva-Olaya, A. M. |
author_facet |
Silva-Olaya, A. M. Cerri, C. E P La Scala, N. [UNESP] Dias, C. T S Cerri, C. C. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Cerri, C. E P La Scala, N. [UNESP] Dias, C. T S Cerri, C. C. |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silva-Olaya, A. M. Cerri, C. E P La Scala, N. [UNESP] Dias, C. T S Cerri, C. C. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Brazil C footprint CO2emissions emission after tillage ethanol greenhouse gas soil carbon Carbon dioxide emissions Control treatments Conventional tillage Harvesting system Soil carbon Sugar plantation Agricultural machinery Agronomy Carbon dioxide Ethanol Global warming Greenhouse gases Harvesting Soils Soil pollution biomass burning carbon dioxide carbon footprint conservation tillage field harvesting organic carbon Oxisol plant residue plantation soil management sugar cane zero tillage |
topic |
Brazil C footprint CO2emissions emission after tillage ethanol greenhouse gas soil carbon Carbon dioxide emissions Control treatments Conventional tillage Harvesting system Soil carbon Sugar plantation Agricultural machinery Agronomy Carbon dioxide Ethanol Global warming Greenhouse gases Harvesting Soils Soil pollution biomass burning carbon dioxide carbon footprint conservation tillage field harvesting organic carbon Oxisol plant residue plantation soil management sugar cane zero tillage |
description |
Soil tillage and other methods of soil management may influence CO 2 emissions because they accelerate the mineralization of organic carbon in the soil. This study aimed to quantify the CO2 emissions under conventional tillage (CT), minimum tillage (MT) and reduced tillage (RT) during the renovation of sugarcane fields in southern Brazil. The experiment was performed on an Oxisol in the sugarcane-planting area with mechanical harvesting. An undisturbed or no-till (NT) plot was left as a control treatment. The CO2 emissions results indicated a significant interaction (p < 0.001) between tillage method and time after tillage. By quantifying the accumulated emissions over the 44 days after soil tillage, we observed that tillage-induced emissions were higher after the CT system than the RT and MT systems, reaching 350.09 g m-2 of CO2 in CT, and 51.7 and 5.5 g m-2 of CO2 in RT and MT respectively. The amount of C lost in the form of CO2 due to soil tillage practices was significant and comparable to the estimated value of potential annual C accumulation resulting from changes in the harvesting system in Brazil from burning of plant residues to the adoption of green cane harvesting. The CO 2 emissions in the CT system could respond to a loss of 80% of the potential soil C accumulated over one year as result of the adoption of mechanized sugarcane harvesting. Meanwhile, soil tillage during the renewal of the sugar plantation using RT and MT methods would result in low impact, with losses of 12% and 2% of the C that could potentially be accumulated during a one year period. © 2013 IOP Publishing Ltd. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-01-01 2014-05-27T11:27:29Z 2014-05-27T11:27:29Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/1/015014 Environmental Research Letters, v. 8, n. 1, 2013. 1748-9318 1748-9326 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/74209 10.1088/1748-9326/8/1/015014 WOS:000316998300077 2-s2.0-84876188035 2-s2.0-84876188035.pdf 1449605928537533 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/1/015014 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/74209 |
identifier_str_mv |
Environmental Research Letters, v. 8, n. 1, 2013. 1748-9318 1748-9326 10.1088/1748-9326/8/1/015014 WOS:000316998300077 2-s2.0-84876188035 2-s2.0-84876188035.pdf 1449605928537533 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Environmental Research Letters 4.541 2,436 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808128329880961024 |