Field evaluation of COVID-19 antigen tests versus RNA based detection: Potential lower sensitivity compensated by immediate results, technical simplicity, and low cost

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Matsuda, Elaine Monteiro
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Campos, Ivana Barros de, Oliveira, Isabela Penteriche de [UNESP], Colpas, Daniela Rodrigues, Carmo, Andreia Moreira dos Santos, Brigido, Luis Fernando de Macedo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmv.26985
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/209317
Resumo: One year into the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, diagnostic strategies, although central for contact tracing and other preventive measures, are still limited. To meet the global demand, lower cost and faster antigen tests for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) detection are a convenient alternative to the gold standard reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay. We tested laboratory-based RT-PCR RNA detection and two rapid antigen detection (RAD) tests, based on the immunochromatography test for nucleocapsid protein of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19 Ag ECO Test, ECO Diagnostica, and Panbio COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Abbott). Paired collection and testing were done in a small prospective open study in three clinical services in Sao Paulo, constituted of mostly symptomatic volunteers at collection (97%, 109/112) for a median of 4 days (interquartile range: 3-6), ranging from 1 to 30. Among the 108 paired RT-PCR/RAD tests, results were concordant in 96.4% (101/108). The test's performance was comparable, with an overall sensitivity of 87% and a specificity of 96%. These observations add to other data that suggest that antigen tests may provide reasonable sensitivity and specificity and deserve a role to improve testing strategies, especially in resource-limited settings.
id UNSP_86389afe4c6f10b3f87b00e823e1dc56
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/209317
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Field evaluation of COVID-19 antigen tests versus RNA based detection: Potential lower sensitivity compensated by immediate results, technical simplicity, and low costCOVID&#820819diagnosticgargle lavagenasopharyngeal swabrapid antigen detectionSARS&#8208CoV&#82082One year into the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, diagnostic strategies, although central for contact tracing and other preventive measures, are still limited. To meet the global demand, lower cost and faster antigen tests for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) detection are a convenient alternative to the gold standard reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay. We tested laboratory-based RT-PCR RNA detection and two rapid antigen detection (RAD) tests, based on the immunochromatography test for nucleocapsid protein of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19 Ag ECO Test, ECO Diagnostica, and Panbio COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Abbott). Paired collection and testing were done in a small prospective open study in three clinical services in Sao Paulo, constituted of mostly symptomatic volunteers at collection (97%, 109/112) for a median of 4 days (interquartile range: 3-6), ranging from 1 to 30. Among the 108 paired RT-PCR/RAD tests, results were concordant in 96.4% (101/108). The test's performance was comparable, with an overall sensitivity of 87% and a specificity of 96%. These observations add to other data that suggest that antigen tests may provide reasonable sensitivity and specificity and deserve a role to improve testing strategies, especially in resource-limited settings.Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)Santo Andre Hlth Secretary, Infect Dis Outpatient Clin, Santo Andre, SP, BrazilAdolfo Lutz Inst, Santo Andre Reg Ctr, Santo Andre, SP, BrazilSao Paulo State Univ, Bioproc & Biotecnol Engn, Botucatu, SP, BrazilAdolfo Lutz Inst, Virol Ctr, Ave Dr Arnaldo 355, BR-01246000 Sao Paulo, SP, BrazilSao Paulo State Univ, Bioproc & Biotecnol Engn, Botucatu, SP, BrazilCNPq: 442776/2019-5FAPESP: 2018/14384-9Wiley-BlackwellSanto Andre Hlth SecretaryAdolfo Lutz InstUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Matsuda, Elaine MonteiroCampos, Ivana Barros deOliveira, Isabela Penteriche de [UNESP]Colpas, Daniela RodriguesCarmo, Andreia Moreira dos SantosBrigido, Luis Fernando de Macedo2021-06-25T11:56:07Z2021-06-25T11:56:07Z2021-04-08info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article6http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmv.26985Journal Of Medical Virology. Hoboken: Wiley, 6 p., 2021.0146-6615http://hdl.handle.net/11449/20931710.1002/jmv.26985WOS:000637681200001Web of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal Of Medical Virologyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-10-23T19:28:03Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/209317Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462021-10-23T19:28:03Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Field evaluation of COVID-19 antigen tests versus RNA based detection: Potential lower sensitivity compensated by immediate results, technical simplicity, and low cost
title Field evaluation of COVID-19 antigen tests versus RNA based detection: Potential lower sensitivity compensated by immediate results, technical simplicity, and low cost
spellingShingle Field evaluation of COVID-19 antigen tests versus RNA based detection: Potential lower sensitivity compensated by immediate results, technical simplicity, and low cost
Matsuda, Elaine Monteiro
COVID&#8208
19
diagnostic
gargle lavage
nasopharyngeal swab
rapid antigen detection
SARS&#8208
CoV&#8208
2
title_short Field evaluation of COVID-19 antigen tests versus RNA based detection: Potential lower sensitivity compensated by immediate results, technical simplicity, and low cost
title_full Field evaluation of COVID-19 antigen tests versus RNA based detection: Potential lower sensitivity compensated by immediate results, technical simplicity, and low cost
title_fullStr Field evaluation of COVID-19 antigen tests versus RNA based detection: Potential lower sensitivity compensated by immediate results, technical simplicity, and low cost
title_full_unstemmed Field evaluation of COVID-19 antigen tests versus RNA based detection: Potential lower sensitivity compensated by immediate results, technical simplicity, and low cost
title_sort Field evaluation of COVID-19 antigen tests versus RNA based detection: Potential lower sensitivity compensated by immediate results, technical simplicity, and low cost
author Matsuda, Elaine Monteiro
author_facet Matsuda, Elaine Monteiro
Campos, Ivana Barros de
Oliveira, Isabela Penteriche de [UNESP]
Colpas, Daniela Rodrigues
Carmo, Andreia Moreira dos Santos
Brigido, Luis Fernando de Macedo
author_role author
author2 Campos, Ivana Barros de
Oliveira, Isabela Penteriche de [UNESP]
Colpas, Daniela Rodrigues
Carmo, Andreia Moreira dos Santos
Brigido, Luis Fernando de Macedo
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Santo Andre Hlth Secretary
Adolfo Lutz Inst
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Matsuda, Elaine Monteiro
Campos, Ivana Barros de
Oliveira, Isabela Penteriche de [UNESP]
Colpas, Daniela Rodrigues
Carmo, Andreia Moreira dos Santos
Brigido, Luis Fernando de Macedo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv COVID&#8208
19
diagnostic
gargle lavage
nasopharyngeal swab
rapid antigen detection
SARS&#8208
CoV&#8208
2
topic COVID&#8208
19
diagnostic
gargle lavage
nasopharyngeal swab
rapid antigen detection
SARS&#8208
CoV&#8208
2
description One year into the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, diagnostic strategies, although central for contact tracing and other preventive measures, are still limited. To meet the global demand, lower cost and faster antigen tests for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) detection are a convenient alternative to the gold standard reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay. We tested laboratory-based RT-PCR RNA detection and two rapid antigen detection (RAD) tests, based on the immunochromatography test for nucleocapsid protein of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19 Ag ECO Test, ECO Diagnostica, and Panbio COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Abbott). Paired collection and testing were done in a small prospective open study in three clinical services in Sao Paulo, constituted of mostly symptomatic volunteers at collection (97%, 109/112) for a median of 4 days (interquartile range: 3-6), ranging from 1 to 30. Among the 108 paired RT-PCR/RAD tests, results were concordant in 96.4% (101/108). The test's performance was comparable, with an overall sensitivity of 87% and a specificity of 96%. These observations add to other data that suggest that antigen tests may provide reasonable sensitivity and specificity and deserve a role to improve testing strategies, especially in resource-limited settings.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-06-25T11:56:07Z
2021-06-25T11:56:07Z
2021-04-08
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmv.26985
Journal Of Medical Virology. Hoboken: Wiley, 6 p., 2021.
0146-6615
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/209317
10.1002/jmv.26985
WOS:000637681200001
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmv.26985
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/209317
identifier_str_mv Journal Of Medical Virology. Hoboken: Wiley, 6 p., 2021.
0146-6615
10.1002/jmv.26985
WOS:000637681200001
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Journal Of Medical Virology
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 6
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wiley-Blackwell
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wiley-Blackwell
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Web of Science
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1803047376116514816