Structural differences in the secondary phloem suggest higher support and storage potential in stems than roots of Cytharexylum myrianthum Cham. (Verbenaceae)

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Vergílio, Paula Cristina Benetton [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Da Silva, Jane Rodrigues [UNESP], Blagitz, Marcela [UNESP], Longo, Leandro Roberto [UNESP], Marcati, Carmen Regina [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/cjb-2017-0034
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/175146
Resumo: Stems and roots are interconnected by their secondary phloem, a complex tissue that exhibits functional differences related to the anatomical structure of each organ. Here, we compared the structure of secondary phloem in mature stems and roots of Citharexylum myrianthum Cham. (Verbenaceae). We sampled the main stems at a height of 1.3 m and the roots at a depth of 0.5 m. We described both the qualitative and quantitative features of all secondary phloem cell types, and compared the quantitative features using a paired Student’s t test. The same percentage of sieve tubes in the conducting phloem between the organs indicates a similar conducting efficiency between stem and roots, even though sieve tubes have wider diameters in the stems. Overall, stems had a higher portion of nonconducting secondary phloem than the roots, with a higher number of both parenchyma and sclerenchyma bands, likely indicating a higher storage and support potential of the phloem in stems.
id UNSP_86c5674196fa901386acd42a9a4b2c26
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/175146
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Structural differences in the secondary phloem suggest higher support and storage potential in stems than roots of Cytharexylum myrianthum Cham. (Verbenaceae)Conducting phloemDeciduous treeInner barkNonconducting phloemStems and roots are interconnected by their secondary phloem, a complex tissue that exhibits functional differences related to the anatomical structure of each organ. Here, we compared the structure of secondary phloem in mature stems and roots of Citharexylum myrianthum Cham. (Verbenaceae). We sampled the main stems at a height of 1.3 m and the roots at a depth of 0.5 m. We described both the qualitative and quantitative features of all secondary phloem cell types, and compared the quantitative features using a paired Student’s t test. The same percentage of sieve tubes in the conducting phloem between the organs indicates a similar conducting efficiency between stem and roots, even though sieve tubes have wider diameters in the stems. Overall, stems had a higher portion of nonconducting secondary phloem than the roots, with a higher number of both parenchyma and sclerenchyma bands, likely indicating a higher storage and support potential of the phloem in stems.Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do AmazonasConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) Instituto de Biociências de Botucatu, Câmpus de Botucatu, Distrito de Rubião JuniorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) Faculdade de Ciências Agronômicas Laboratório de Anatomia da Madeira, Câmpus de Botucatu, Rua José Barbosa de Barros, 1780Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) Instituto de Biociências de Botucatu, Câmpus de Botucatu, Distrito de Rubião JuniorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) Faculdade de Ciências Agronômicas Laboratório de Anatomia da Madeira, Câmpus de Botucatu, Rua José Barbosa de Barros, 1780Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Amazonas: 04/05913-5CNPq: 503425/2005-2Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Vergílio, Paula Cristina Benetton [UNESP]Da Silva, Jane Rodrigues [UNESP]Blagitz, Marcela [UNESP]Longo, Leandro Roberto [UNESP]Marcati, Carmen Regina [UNESP]2018-12-11T17:14:35Z2018-12-11T17:14:35Z2017-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article953-960http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/cjb-2017-0034Botany, v. 95, n. 9, p. 953-960, 2017.1916-2804http://hdl.handle.net/11449/17514610.1139/cjb-2017-00342-s2.0-85028994070Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengBotany0,611info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-10-23T15:25:28Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/175146Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T13:35:33.004136Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Structural differences in the secondary phloem suggest higher support and storage potential in stems than roots of Cytharexylum myrianthum Cham. (Verbenaceae)
title Structural differences in the secondary phloem suggest higher support and storage potential in stems than roots of Cytharexylum myrianthum Cham. (Verbenaceae)
spellingShingle Structural differences in the secondary phloem suggest higher support and storage potential in stems than roots of Cytharexylum myrianthum Cham. (Verbenaceae)
Vergílio, Paula Cristina Benetton [UNESP]
Conducting phloem
Deciduous tree
Inner bark
Nonconducting phloem
title_short Structural differences in the secondary phloem suggest higher support and storage potential in stems than roots of Cytharexylum myrianthum Cham. (Verbenaceae)
title_full Structural differences in the secondary phloem suggest higher support and storage potential in stems than roots of Cytharexylum myrianthum Cham. (Verbenaceae)
title_fullStr Structural differences in the secondary phloem suggest higher support and storage potential in stems than roots of Cytharexylum myrianthum Cham. (Verbenaceae)
title_full_unstemmed Structural differences in the secondary phloem suggest higher support and storage potential in stems than roots of Cytharexylum myrianthum Cham. (Verbenaceae)
title_sort Structural differences in the secondary phloem suggest higher support and storage potential in stems than roots of Cytharexylum myrianthum Cham. (Verbenaceae)
author Vergílio, Paula Cristina Benetton [UNESP]
author_facet Vergílio, Paula Cristina Benetton [UNESP]
Da Silva, Jane Rodrigues [UNESP]
Blagitz, Marcela [UNESP]
Longo, Leandro Roberto [UNESP]
Marcati, Carmen Regina [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Da Silva, Jane Rodrigues [UNESP]
Blagitz, Marcela [UNESP]
Longo, Leandro Roberto [UNESP]
Marcati, Carmen Regina [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Vergílio, Paula Cristina Benetton [UNESP]
Da Silva, Jane Rodrigues [UNESP]
Blagitz, Marcela [UNESP]
Longo, Leandro Roberto [UNESP]
Marcati, Carmen Regina [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Conducting phloem
Deciduous tree
Inner bark
Nonconducting phloem
topic Conducting phloem
Deciduous tree
Inner bark
Nonconducting phloem
description Stems and roots are interconnected by their secondary phloem, a complex tissue that exhibits functional differences related to the anatomical structure of each organ. Here, we compared the structure of secondary phloem in mature stems and roots of Citharexylum myrianthum Cham. (Verbenaceae). We sampled the main stems at a height of 1.3 m and the roots at a depth of 0.5 m. We described both the qualitative and quantitative features of all secondary phloem cell types, and compared the quantitative features using a paired Student’s t test. The same percentage of sieve tubes in the conducting phloem between the organs indicates a similar conducting efficiency between stem and roots, even though sieve tubes have wider diameters in the stems. Overall, stems had a higher portion of nonconducting secondary phloem than the roots, with a higher number of both parenchyma and sclerenchyma bands, likely indicating a higher storage and support potential of the phloem in stems.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-01-01
2018-12-11T17:14:35Z
2018-12-11T17:14:35Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/cjb-2017-0034
Botany, v. 95, n. 9, p. 953-960, 2017.
1916-2804
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/175146
10.1139/cjb-2017-0034
2-s2.0-85028994070
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/cjb-2017-0034
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/175146
identifier_str_mv Botany, v. 95, n. 9, p. 953-960, 2017.
1916-2804
10.1139/cjb-2017-0034
2-s2.0-85028994070
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Botany
0,611
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 953-960
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808128251348910080