Castration methods do not affect weight gain and have diverse impacts on the welfare of water buffalo males

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Martins, L. T.
Data de Publicação: 2011
Outros Autores: Gonçalves, M. C., Tavares, K. C.S., Gaudêncio, S., Santos Neto, P. C., Dias, A. L.G., Gava, A., Saito, M. E., Oliveira, C. A., Mezzalira, A., Vieira, A. D.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2011.03.026
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/219689
Resumo: Castration is used to improve the management of water buffalo beef males raised under extensive conditions. However, as buffalo are considered robust animals, their welfare is often neglected, which, among other implications, may compromise their productivity. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of different castration methods on the stress level and weight gain of water buffalo males. Two experiments were performed with three treatments each. In experiment 1, serum cortisol concentrations were used as stress indicators for non-castrated (control group) or castrated males, either surgically or by burdizzo clamp. In experiment 2, blood levels of fibrinogen were used as stress indicators for males in the control group compared to those castrated by either burdizzo clamp or intratesticular injection of calcium chloride (chemical castration). In both experiments, clinical parameters and the mean daily weight gain were measured for all males. Surgical castration and chemical castration caused higher stress than castration with burdizzo, with no differences observed in weight gain among castration methods. In conclusion, for water buffalo males, castration with burdizzo clamp is preferable to surgical and chemical methods because it causes the lowest stress level in the animals. © 2011 Elsevier B.V.
id UNSP_873979331a2c332c480dd8955aad2601
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/219689
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Castration methods do not affect weight gain and have diverse impacts on the welfare of water buffalo malesBubalus bubalisBurdizzoChemical castrationCortisolFibrinogenOrchiectomyCastration is used to improve the management of water buffalo beef males raised under extensive conditions. However, as buffalo are considered robust animals, their welfare is often neglected, which, among other implications, may compromise their productivity. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of different castration methods on the stress level and weight gain of water buffalo males. Two experiments were performed with three treatments each. In experiment 1, serum cortisol concentrations were used as stress indicators for non-castrated (control group) or castrated males, either surgically or by burdizzo clamp. In experiment 2, blood levels of fibrinogen were used as stress indicators for males in the control group compared to those castrated by either burdizzo clamp or intratesticular injection of calcium chloride (chemical castration). In both experiments, clinical parameters and the mean daily weight gain were measured for all males. Surgical castration and chemical castration caused higher stress than castration with burdizzo, with no differences observed in weight gain among castration methods. In conclusion, for water buffalo males, castration with burdizzo clamp is preferable to surgical and chemical methods because it causes the lowest stress level in the animals. © 2011 Elsevier B.V.Agro-veterinary Research Center Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina, Lages, Santa CatarinaVeterinary and Animal Science College Universidade do Estado São Paulo, São PauloVeterinary Faculty Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Capão do Leão, Rio Grande do SulUniversidade do Estado de Santa CatarinaUniversidade do Estado São PauloUniversidade Federal de PelotasMartins, L. T.Gonçalves, M. C.Tavares, K. C.S.Gaudêncio, S.Santos Neto, P. C.Dias, A. L.G.Gava, A.Saito, M. E.Oliveira, C. A.Mezzalira, A.Vieira, A. D.2022-04-28T18:56:55Z2022-04-28T18:56:55Z2011-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article171-176http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2011.03.026Livestock Science, v. 140, n. 1-3, p. 171-176, 2011.1871-1413http://hdl.handle.net/11449/21968910.1016/j.livsci.2011.03.0262-s2.0-79960908566Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengLivestock Scienceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-04-28T18:56:55Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/219689Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462022-04-28T18:56:55Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Castration methods do not affect weight gain and have diverse impacts on the welfare of water buffalo males
title Castration methods do not affect weight gain and have diverse impacts on the welfare of water buffalo males
spellingShingle Castration methods do not affect weight gain and have diverse impacts on the welfare of water buffalo males
Martins, L. T.
Bubalus bubalis
Burdizzo
Chemical castration
Cortisol
Fibrinogen
Orchiectomy
title_short Castration methods do not affect weight gain and have diverse impacts on the welfare of water buffalo males
title_full Castration methods do not affect weight gain and have diverse impacts on the welfare of water buffalo males
title_fullStr Castration methods do not affect weight gain and have diverse impacts on the welfare of water buffalo males
title_full_unstemmed Castration methods do not affect weight gain and have diverse impacts on the welfare of water buffalo males
title_sort Castration methods do not affect weight gain and have diverse impacts on the welfare of water buffalo males
author Martins, L. T.
author_facet Martins, L. T.
Gonçalves, M. C.
Tavares, K. C.S.
Gaudêncio, S.
Santos Neto, P. C.
Dias, A. L.G.
Gava, A.
Saito, M. E.
Oliveira, C. A.
Mezzalira, A.
Vieira, A. D.
author_role author
author2 Gonçalves, M. C.
Tavares, K. C.S.
Gaudêncio, S.
Santos Neto, P. C.
Dias, A. L.G.
Gava, A.
Saito, M. E.
Oliveira, C. A.
Mezzalira, A.
Vieira, A. D.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina
Universidade do Estado São Paulo
Universidade Federal de Pelotas
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Martins, L. T.
Gonçalves, M. C.
Tavares, K. C.S.
Gaudêncio, S.
Santos Neto, P. C.
Dias, A. L.G.
Gava, A.
Saito, M. E.
Oliveira, C. A.
Mezzalira, A.
Vieira, A. D.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Bubalus bubalis
Burdizzo
Chemical castration
Cortisol
Fibrinogen
Orchiectomy
topic Bubalus bubalis
Burdizzo
Chemical castration
Cortisol
Fibrinogen
Orchiectomy
description Castration is used to improve the management of water buffalo beef males raised under extensive conditions. However, as buffalo are considered robust animals, their welfare is often neglected, which, among other implications, may compromise their productivity. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of different castration methods on the stress level and weight gain of water buffalo males. Two experiments were performed with three treatments each. In experiment 1, serum cortisol concentrations were used as stress indicators for non-castrated (control group) or castrated males, either surgically or by burdizzo clamp. In experiment 2, blood levels of fibrinogen were used as stress indicators for males in the control group compared to those castrated by either burdizzo clamp or intratesticular injection of calcium chloride (chemical castration). In both experiments, clinical parameters and the mean daily weight gain were measured for all males. Surgical castration and chemical castration caused higher stress than castration with burdizzo, with no differences observed in weight gain among castration methods. In conclusion, for water buffalo males, castration with burdizzo clamp is preferable to surgical and chemical methods because it causes the lowest stress level in the animals. © 2011 Elsevier B.V.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-09-01
2022-04-28T18:56:55Z
2022-04-28T18:56:55Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2011.03.026
Livestock Science, v. 140, n. 1-3, p. 171-176, 2011.
1871-1413
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/219689
10.1016/j.livsci.2011.03.026
2-s2.0-79960908566
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2011.03.026
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/219689
identifier_str_mv Livestock Science, v. 140, n. 1-3, p. 171-176, 2011.
1871-1413
10.1016/j.livsci.2011.03.026
2-s2.0-79960908566
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Livestock Science
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 171-176
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositoriounesp@unesp.br
_version_ 1826304264685748224