Castration methods do not affect weight gain and have diverse impacts on the welfare of water buffalo males
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2011 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2011.03.026 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/219689 |
Resumo: | Castration is used to improve the management of water buffalo beef males raised under extensive conditions. However, as buffalo are considered robust animals, their welfare is often neglected, which, among other implications, may compromise their productivity. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of different castration methods on the stress level and weight gain of water buffalo males. Two experiments were performed with three treatments each. In experiment 1, serum cortisol concentrations were used as stress indicators for non-castrated (control group) or castrated males, either surgically or by burdizzo clamp. In experiment 2, blood levels of fibrinogen were used as stress indicators for males in the control group compared to those castrated by either burdizzo clamp or intratesticular injection of calcium chloride (chemical castration). In both experiments, clinical parameters and the mean daily weight gain were measured for all males. Surgical castration and chemical castration caused higher stress than castration with burdizzo, with no differences observed in weight gain among castration methods. In conclusion, for water buffalo males, castration with burdizzo clamp is preferable to surgical and chemical methods because it causes the lowest stress level in the animals. © 2011 Elsevier B.V. |
id |
UNSP_873979331a2c332c480dd8955aad2601 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/219689 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Castration methods do not affect weight gain and have diverse impacts on the welfare of water buffalo malesBubalus bubalisBurdizzoChemical castrationCortisolFibrinogenOrchiectomyCastration is used to improve the management of water buffalo beef males raised under extensive conditions. However, as buffalo are considered robust animals, their welfare is often neglected, which, among other implications, may compromise their productivity. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of different castration methods on the stress level and weight gain of water buffalo males. Two experiments were performed with three treatments each. In experiment 1, serum cortisol concentrations were used as stress indicators for non-castrated (control group) or castrated males, either surgically or by burdizzo clamp. In experiment 2, blood levels of fibrinogen were used as stress indicators for males in the control group compared to those castrated by either burdizzo clamp or intratesticular injection of calcium chloride (chemical castration). In both experiments, clinical parameters and the mean daily weight gain were measured for all males. Surgical castration and chemical castration caused higher stress than castration with burdizzo, with no differences observed in weight gain among castration methods. In conclusion, for water buffalo males, castration with burdizzo clamp is preferable to surgical and chemical methods because it causes the lowest stress level in the animals. © 2011 Elsevier B.V.Agro-veterinary Research Center Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina, Lages, Santa CatarinaVeterinary and Animal Science College Universidade do Estado São Paulo, São PauloVeterinary Faculty Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Capão do Leão, Rio Grande do SulUniversidade do Estado de Santa CatarinaUniversidade do Estado São PauloUniversidade Federal de PelotasMartins, L. T.Gonçalves, M. C.Tavares, K. C.S.Gaudêncio, S.Santos Neto, P. C.Dias, A. L.G.Gava, A.Saito, M. E.Oliveira, C. A.Mezzalira, A.Vieira, A. D.2022-04-28T18:56:55Z2022-04-28T18:56:55Z2011-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article171-176http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2011.03.026Livestock Science, v. 140, n. 1-3, p. 171-176, 2011.1871-1413http://hdl.handle.net/11449/21968910.1016/j.livsci.2011.03.0262-s2.0-79960908566Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengLivestock Scienceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-04-28T18:56:55Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/219689Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462022-04-28T18:56:55Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Castration methods do not affect weight gain and have diverse impacts on the welfare of water buffalo males |
title |
Castration methods do not affect weight gain and have diverse impacts on the welfare of water buffalo males |
spellingShingle |
Castration methods do not affect weight gain and have diverse impacts on the welfare of water buffalo males Martins, L. T. Bubalus bubalis Burdizzo Chemical castration Cortisol Fibrinogen Orchiectomy |
title_short |
Castration methods do not affect weight gain and have diverse impacts on the welfare of water buffalo males |
title_full |
Castration methods do not affect weight gain and have diverse impacts on the welfare of water buffalo males |
title_fullStr |
Castration methods do not affect weight gain and have diverse impacts on the welfare of water buffalo males |
title_full_unstemmed |
Castration methods do not affect weight gain and have diverse impacts on the welfare of water buffalo males |
title_sort |
Castration methods do not affect weight gain and have diverse impacts on the welfare of water buffalo males |
author |
Martins, L. T. |
author_facet |
Martins, L. T. Gonçalves, M. C. Tavares, K. C.S. Gaudêncio, S. Santos Neto, P. C. Dias, A. L.G. Gava, A. Saito, M. E. Oliveira, C. A. Mezzalira, A. Vieira, A. D. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Gonçalves, M. C. Tavares, K. C.S. Gaudêncio, S. Santos Neto, P. C. Dias, A. L.G. Gava, A. Saito, M. E. Oliveira, C. A. Mezzalira, A. Vieira, A. D. |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina Universidade do Estado São Paulo Universidade Federal de Pelotas |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Martins, L. T. Gonçalves, M. C. Tavares, K. C.S. Gaudêncio, S. Santos Neto, P. C. Dias, A. L.G. Gava, A. Saito, M. E. Oliveira, C. A. Mezzalira, A. Vieira, A. D. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Bubalus bubalis Burdizzo Chemical castration Cortisol Fibrinogen Orchiectomy |
topic |
Bubalus bubalis Burdizzo Chemical castration Cortisol Fibrinogen Orchiectomy |
description |
Castration is used to improve the management of water buffalo beef males raised under extensive conditions. However, as buffalo are considered robust animals, their welfare is often neglected, which, among other implications, may compromise their productivity. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of different castration methods on the stress level and weight gain of water buffalo males. Two experiments were performed with three treatments each. In experiment 1, serum cortisol concentrations were used as stress indicators for non-castrated (control group) or castrated males, either surgically or by burdizzo clamp. In experiment 2, blood levels of fibrinogen were used as stress indicators for males in the control group compared to those castrated by either burdizzo clamp or intratesticular injection of calcium chloride (chemical castration). In both experiments, clinical parameters and the mean daily weight gain were measured for all males. Surgical castration and chemical castration caused higher stress than castration with burdizzo, with no differences observed in weight gain among castration methods. In conclusion, for water buffalo males, castration with burdizzo clamp is preferable to surgical and chemical methods because it causes the lowest stress level in the animals. © 2011 Elsevier B.V. |
publishDate |
2011 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2011-09-01 2022-04-28T18:56:55Z 2022-04-28T18:56:55Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2011.03.026 Livestock Science, v. 140, n. 1-3, p. 171-176, 2011. 1871-1413 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/219689 10.1016/j.livsci.2011.03.026 2-s2.0-79960908566 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2011.03.026 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/219689 |
identifier_str_mv |
Livestock Science, v. 140, n. 1-3, p. 171-176, 2011. 1871-1413 10.1016/j.livsci.2011.03.026 2-s2.0-79960908566 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Livestock Science |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
171-176 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositoriounesp@unesp.br |
_version_ |
1826304264685748224 |