Effect of different feed restriction programs on the performance and reproductive traits of broiler breeders

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Carneiro, P. R.O.
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Lunedo, R. [UNESP], Fernandez-Alarcon, M. F. [UNESP], Baldissera, G., Freitas, G. G., MacAri, M. [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps/pez181
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/201188
Resumo: The current experiment evaluated the effect of different feed restriction programs applied during rearing on the performance and reproductive traits of broiler breeder pullets reared on floor pens, isolating the birds' weight effect from the analysis. At 4 wk of age, 1,400 breeder pullets were distributed in a completely randomized design with 4 treatments: daily restriction (DAILY - every day feeding), skip-a-day restriction (SKIP - every other day feeding), 4/3 restriction (4/3-4 days feeding and 3 nonconsecutive fasting days) and 5/2 restriction (5/2-5 days feeding and 2 nonconsecutive fasting days), and 8 replicates. At 11, 18, 25, 32, and 39 wk of age, body weight, feed intake, feed conversion ratio, carcass composition, organs relative weight (liver, fat, oviduct, and ovary stroma), egg production, and egg weight were accessed. At 32 and 39 wk, 12 eggs by experimental unit were collected and incubated to determine hatchability and fertility parameters. Body weight, carcass EE, and FCR were higher for SKIP birds when compared to other feed restriction programs. SKIP birds also showed the lowest number of eggs per bird (NEB) and % of egg production when compared to 4/3 feeding schedule, which provided higher values. Feed conversion ratio per egg mass (FCEM) was also higher in 4/3 schedule in relation to SKIP birds. In regard to incubation parameters, 5/2 treatment showed higher values for hatchability (HAT) and fertility (FERT), similar to results of 4/3 and DAILY treatments, while SKIP birds showed the lowest. In conclusion, 4/3 and 5/2 feeding programs showed best results and should be used by broiler breeder producers to control pullets' body weight. Therefore, the higher number of eggs produced with less feed and statistically not different fertility and hatchability between programs obtained in this study suggest the 4/3 program could be more efficient than 5/2 program. Body weight′|'s effect isolation was important to analyze the effect of feed restriction program per se, and should be applied in future approaches.
id UNSP_878be5e5a6195adde50e9acc728cda3e
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/201188
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Effect of different feed restriction programs on the performance and reproductive traits of broiler breedersbroiler breedercarcass compositionegg productionfeed restriction programisolation of body weight effectThe current experiment evaluated the effect of different feed restriction programs applied during rearing on the performance and reproductive traits of broiler breeder pullets reared on floor pens, isolating the birds' weight effect from the analysis. At 4 wk of age, 1,400 breeder pullets were distributed in a completely randomized design with 4 treatments: daily restriction (DAILY - every day feeding), skip-a-day restriction (SKIP - every other day feeding), 4/3 restriction (4/3-4 days feeding and 3 nonconsecutive fasting days) and 5/2 restriction (5/2-5 days feeding and 2 nonconsecutive fasting days), and 8 replicates. At 11, 18, 25, 32, and 39 wk of age, body weight, feed intake, feed conversion ratio, carcass composition, organs relative weight (liver, fat, oviduct, and ovary stroma), egg production, and egg weight were accessed. At 32 and 39 wk, 12 eggs by experimental unit were collected and incubated to determine hatchability and fertility parameters. Body weight, carcass EE, and FCR were higher for SKIP birds when compared to other feed restriction programs. SKIP birds also showed the lowest number of eggs per bird (NEB) and % of egg production when compared to 4/3 feeding schedule, which provided higher values. Feed conversion ratio per egg mass (FCEM) was also higher in 4/3 schedule in relation to SKIP birds. In regard to incubation parameters, 5/2 treatment showed higher values for hatchability (HAT) and fertility (FERT), similar to results of 4/3 and DAILY treatments, while SKIP birds showed the lowest. In conclusion, 4/3 and 5/2 feeding programs showed best results and should be used by broiler breeder producers to control pullets' body weight. Therefore, the higher number of eggs produced with less feed and statistically not different fertility and hatchability between programs obtained in this study suggest the 4/3 program could be more efficient than 5/2 program. Body weight′|'s effect isolation was important to analyze the effect of feed restriction program per se, and should be applied in future approaches.Trouw NutritionSchool of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences São Paulo State University (Unesp)Seara Alimentos LTDAHy-Line Do Brasil LTDASchool of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences São Paulo State University (Unesp)Trouw NutritionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Seara Alimentos LTDAHy-Line Do Brasil LTDACarneiro, P. R.O.Lunedo, R. [UNESP]Fernandez-Alarcon, M. F. [UNESP]Baldissera, G.Freitas, G. G.MacAri, M. [UNESP]2020-12-12T02:26:17Z2020-12-12T02:26:17Z2019-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article4705-4715http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps/pez181Poultry Science, v. 98, n. 10, p. 4705-4715, 2019.1525-31710032-5791http://hdl.handle.net/11449/20118810.3382/ps/pez1812-s2.0-85072509225Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengPoultry Scienceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-06-06T18:42:26Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/201188Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T22:11:43.071703Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Effect of different feed restriction programs on the performance and reproductive traits of broiler breeders
title Effect of different feed restriction programs on the performance and reproductive traits of broiler breeders
spellingShingle Effect of different feed restriction programs on the performance and reproductive traits of broiler breeders
Carneiro, P. R.O.
broiler breeder
carcass composition
egg production
feed restriction program
isolation of body weight effect
title_short Effect of different feed restriction programs on the performance and reproductive traits of broiler breeders
title_full Effect of different feed restriction programs on the performance and reproductive traits of broiler breeders
title_fullStr Effect of different feed restriction programs on the performance and reproductive traits of broiler breeders
title_full_unstemmed Effect of different feed restriction programs on the performance and reproductive traits of broiler breeders
title_sort Effect of different feed restriction programs on the performance and reproductive traits of broiler breeders
author Carneiro, P. R.O.
author_facet Carneiro, P. R.O.
Lunedo, R. [UNESP]
Fernandez-Alarcon, M. F. [UNESP]
Baldissera, G.
Freitas, G. G.
MacAri, M. [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Lunedo, R. [UNESP]
Fernandez-Alarcon, M. F. [UNESP]
Baldissera, G.
Freitas, G. G.
MacAri, M. [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Trouw Nutrition
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Seara Alimentos LTDA
Hy-Line Do Brasil LTDA
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Carneiro, P. R.O.
Lunedo, R. [UNESP]
Fernandez-Alarcon, M. F. [UNESP]
Baldissera, G.
Freitas, G. G.
MacAri, M. [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv broiler breeder
carcass composition
egg production
feed restriction program
isolation of body weight effect
topic broiler breeder
carcass composition
egg production
feed restriction program
isolation of body weight effect
description The current experiment evaluated the effect of different feed restriction programs applied during rearing on the performance and reproductive traits of broiler breeder pullets reared on floor pens, isolating the birds' weight effect from the analysis. At 4 wk of age, 1,400 breeder pullets were distributed in a completely randomized design with 4 treatments: daily restriction (DAILY - every day feeding), skip-a-day restriction (SKIP - every other day feeding), 4/3 restriction (4/3-4 days feeding and 3 nonconsecutive fasting days) and 5/2 restriction (5/2-5 days feeding and 2 nonconsecutive fasting days), and 8 replicates. At 11, 18, 25, 32, and 39 wk of age, body weight, feed intake, feed conversion ratio, carcass composition, organs relative weight (liver, fat, oviduct, and ovary stroma), egg production, and egg weight were accessed. At 32 and 39 wk, 12 eggs by experimental unit were collected and incubated to determine hatchability and fertility parameters. Body weight, carcass EE, and FCR were higher for SKIP birds when compared to other feed restriction programs. SKIP birds also showed the lowest number of eggs per bird (NEB) and % of egg production when compared to 4/3 feeding schedule, which provided higher values. Feed conversion ratio per egg mass (FCEM) was also higher in 4/3 schedule in relation to SKIP birds. In regard to incubation parameters, 5/2 treatment showed higher values for hatchability (HAT) and fertility (FERT), similar to results of 4/3 and DAILY treatments, while SKIP birds showed the lowest. In conclusion, 4/3 and 5/2 feeding programs showed best results and should be used by broiler breeder producers to control pullets' body weight. Therefore, the higher number of eggs produced with less feed and statistically not different fertility and hatchability between programs obtained in this study suggest the 4/3 program could be more efficient than 5/2 program. Body weight′|'s effect isolation was important to analyze the effect of feed restriction program per se, and should be applied in future approaches.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-10-01
2020-12-12T02:26:17Z
2020-12-12T02:26:17Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps/pez181
Poultry Science, v. 98, n. 10, p. 4705-4715, 2019.
1525-3171
0032-5791
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/201188
10.3382/ps/pez181
2-s2.0-85072509225
url http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps/pez181
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/201188
identifier_str_mv Poultry Science, v. 98, n. 10, p. 4705-4715, 2019.
1525-3171
0032-5791
10.3382/ps/pez181
2-s2.0-85072509225
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Poultry Science
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 4705-4715
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808129402924433408