Effect of different feed restriction programs on the performance and reproductive traits of broiler breeders
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps/pez181 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/201188 |
Resumo: | The current experiment evaluated the effect of different feed restriction programs applied during rearing on the performance and reproductive traits of broiler breeder pullets reared on floor pens, isolating the birds' weight effect from the analysis. At 4 wk of age, 1,400 breeder pullets were distributed in a completely randomized design with 4 treatments: daily restriction (DAILY - every day feeding), skip-a-day restriction (SKIP - every other day feeding), 4/3 restriction (4/3-4 days feeding and 3 nonconsecutive fasting days) and 5/2 restriction (5/2-5 days feeding and 2 nonconsecutive fasting days), and 8 replicates. At 11, 18, 25, 32, and 39 wk of age, body weight, feed intake, feed conversion ratio, carcass composition, organs relative weight (liver, fat, oviduct, and ovary stroma), egg production, and egg weight were accessed. At 32 and 39 wk, 12 eggs by experimental unit were collected and incubated to determine hatchability and fertility parameters. Body weight, carcass EE, and FCR were higher for SKIP birds when compared to other feed restriction programs. SKIP birds also showed the lowest number of eggs per bird (NEB) and % of egg production when compared to 4/3 feeding schedule, which provided higher values. Feed conversion ratio per egg mass (FCEM) was also higher in 4/3 schedule in relation to SKIP birds. In regard to incubation parameters, 5/2 treatment showed higher values for hatchability (HAT) and fertility (FERT), similar to results of 4/3 and DAILY treatments, while SKIP birds showed the lowest. In conclusion, 4/3 and 5/2 feeding programs showed best results and should be used by broiler breeder producers to control pullets' body weight. Therefore, the higher number of eggs produced with less feed and statistically not different fertility and hatchability between programs obtained in this study suggest the 4/3 program could be more efficient than 5/2 program. Body weight′|'s effect isolation was important to analyze the effect of feed restriction program per se, and should be applied in future approaches. |
id |
UNSP_878be5e5a6195adde50e9acc728cda3e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/201188 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Effect of different feed restriction programs on the performance and reproductive traits of broiler breedersbroiler breedercarcass compositionegg productionfeed restriction programisolation of body weight effectThe current experiment evaluated the effect of different feed restriction programs applied during rearing on the performance and reproductive traits of broiler breeder pullets reared on floor pens, isolating the birds' weight effect from the analysis. At 4 wk of age, 1,400 breeder pullets were distributed in a completely randomized design with 4 treatments: daily restriction (DAILY - every day feeding), skip-a-day restriction (SKIP - every other day feeding), 4/3 restriction (4/3-4 days feeding and 3 nonconsecutive fasting days) and 5/2 restriction (5/2-5 days feeding and 2 nonconsecutive fasting days), and 8 replicates. At 11, 18, 25, 32, and 39 wk of age, body weight, feed intake, feed conversion ratio, carcass composition, organs relative weight (liver, fat, oviduct, and ovary stroma), egg production, and egg weight were accessed. At 32 and 39 wk, 12 eggs by experimental unit were collected and incubated to determine hatchability and fertility parameters. Body weight, carcass EE, and FCR were higher for SKIP birds when compared to other feed restriction programs. SKIP birds also showed the lowest number of eggs per bird (NEB) and % of egg production when compared to 4/3 feeding schedule, which provided higher values. Feed conversion ratio per egg mass (FCEM) was also higher in 4/3 schedule in relation to SKIP birds. In regard to incubation parameters, 5/2 treatment showed higher values for hatchability (HAT) and fertility (FERT), similar to results of 4/3 and DAILY treatments, while SKIP birds showed the lowest. In conclusion, 4/3 and 5/2 feeding programs showed best results and should be used by broiler breeder producers to control pullets' body weight. Therefore, the higher number of eggs produced with less feed and statistically not different fertility and hatchability between programs obtained in this study suggest the 4/3 program could be more efficient than 5/2 program. Body weight′|'s effect isolation was important to analyze the effect of feed restriction program per se, and should be applied in future approaches.Trouw NutritionSchool of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences São Paulo State University (Unesp)Seara Alimentos LTDAHy-Line Do Brasil LTDASchool of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences São Paulo State University (Unesp)Trouw NutritionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Seara Alimentos LTDAHy-Line Do Brasil LTDACarneiro, P. R.O.Lunedo, R. [UNESP]Fernandez-Alarcon, M. F. [UNESP]Baldissera, G.Freitas, G. G.MacAri, M. [UNESP]2020-12-12T02:26:17Z2020-12-12T02:26:17Z2019-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article4705-4715http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps/pez181Poultry Science, v. 98, n. 10, p. 4705-4715, 2019.1525-31710032-5791http://hdl.handle.net/11449/20118810.3382/ps/pez1812-s2.0-85072509225Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengPoultry Scienceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-06-06T18:42:26Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/201188Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T22:11:43.071703Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Effect of different feed restriction programs on the performance and reproductive traits of broiler breeders |
title |
Effect of different feed restriction programs on the performance and reproductive traits of broiler breeders |
spellingShingle |
Effect of different feed restriction programs on the performance and reproductive traits of broiler breeders Carneiro, P. R.O. broiler breeder carcass composition egg production feed restriction program isolation of body weight effect |
title_short |
Effect of different feed restriction programs on the performance and reproductive traits of broiler breeders |
title_full |
Effect of different feed restriction programs on the performance and reproductive traits of broiler breeders |
title_fullStr |
Effect of different feed restriction programs on the performance and reproductive traits of broiler breeders |
title_full_unstemmed |
Effect of different feed restriction programs on the performance and reproductive traits of broiler breeders |
title_sort |
Effect of different feed restriction programs on the performance and reproductive traits of broiler breeders |
author |
Carneiro, P. R.O. |
author_facet |
Carneiro, P. R.O. Lunedo, R. [UNESP] Fernandez-Alarcon, M. F. [UNESP] Baldissera, G. Freitas, G. G. MacAri, M. [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Lunedo, R. [UNESP] Fernandez-Alarcon, M. F. [UNESP] Baldissera, G. Freitas, G. G. MacAri, M. [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Trouw Nutrition Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) Seara Alimentos LTDA Hy-Line Do Brasil LTDA |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Carneiro, P. R.O. Lunedo, R. [UNESP] Fernandez-Alarcon, M. F. [UNESP] Baldissera, G. Freitas, G. G. MacAri, M. [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
broiler breeder carcass composition egg production feed restriction program isolation of body weight effect |
topic |
broiler breeder carcass composition egg production feed restriction program isolation of body weight effect |
description |
The current experiment evaluated the effect of different feed restriction programs applied during rearing on the performance and reproductive traits of broiler breeder pullets reared on floor pens, isolating the birds' weight effect from the analysis. At 4 wk of age, 1,400 breeder pullets were distributed in a completely randomized design with 4 treatments: daily restriction (DAILY - every day feeding), skip-a-day restriction (SKIP - every other day feeding), 4/3 restriction (4/3-4 days feeding and 3 nonconsecutive fasting days) and 5/2 restriction (5/2-5 days feeding and 2 nonconsecutive fasting days), and 8 replicates. At 11, 18, 25, 32, and 39 wk of age, body weight, feed intake, feed conversion ratio, carcass composition, organs relative weight (liver, fat, oviduct, and ovary stroma), egg production, and egg weight were accessed. At 32 and 39 wk, 12 eggs by experimental unit were collected and incubated to determine hatchability and fertility parameters. Body weight, carcass EE, and FCR were higher for SKIP birds when compared to other feed restriction programs. SKIP birds also showed the lowest number of eggs per bird (NEB) and % of egg production when compared to 4/3 feeding schedule, which provided higher values. Feed conversion ratio per egg mass (FCEM) was also higher in 4/3 schedule in relation to SKIP birds. In regard to incubation parameters, 5/2 treatment showed higher values for hatchability (HAT) and fertility (FERT), similar to results of 4/3 and DAILY treatments, while SKIP birds showed the lowest. In conclusion, 4/3 and 5/2 feeding programs showed best results and should be used by broiler breeder producers to control pullets' body weight. Therefore, the higher number of eggs produced with less feed and statistically not different fertility and hatchability between programs obtained in this study suggest the 4/3 program could be more efficient than 5/2 program. Body weight′|'s effect isolation was important to analyze the effect of feed restriction program per se, and should be applied in future approaches. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-10-01 2020-12-12T02:26:17Z 2020-12-12T02:26:17Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps/pez181 Poultry Science, v. 98, n. 10, p. 4705-4715, 2019. 1525-3171 0032-5791 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/201188 10.3382/ps/pez181 2-s2.0-85072509225 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps/pez181 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/201188 |
identifier_str_mv |
Poultry Science, v. 98, n. 10, p. 4705-4715, 2019. 1525-3171 0032-5791 10.3382/ps/pez181 2-s2.0-85072509225 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Poultry Science |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
4705-4715 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808129402924433408 |